Slashdot Mirror
Andrew Tanenbaum Announces MINIXcon (minix3.org)
LichtSpektren writes: Andrew Tanenbaum, author of MINIX, writes: 'MINIX has been around now for about 30 years so it is (finally) time for the MINIXers to have a conference to get together, just as Linuxers and BSDers have been doing for a long time. The idea is to exchange ideas and experiences among MINIX 3 developers and users as well as discussing possible paths forward now that the ERC funding is over. Future developments will now be done like in any other volunteer-based open-source project. Increasing community involvement is a key issue here. Attend or give a presentation.' The con will be held on 1 February 2016 at the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
"The idea is to exchange ideas and experiences among MINIX 3 developers and users..."
I wish all seven of them have a good time exchanging ideas and experiences.
Perhaps they could use email.
You know.
Like through a linux server.
Because.
That's how it works.
"If the OSI developers are emailing each other, it's over TCP/IP" -- Steven Belovin, before you were born
"If the Minix developers[sic] are emailing each other, it's on Linux systems" -- me
Ehud
I hope that Minix 3 gets more interest. When I have time I really want to see if I can use it for NAS.
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
Would it really have been so hard to link to the announcement in the summary:
http://www.minix3.org/conferen...
MINIX is obsolete.
Even if assuming that's the case: okay, so what? Things that are considered 'obsolete' are used in many places, every day, doing their thing. Often better than if done by a modern 'equivalent'.
From what I've read, MINIX has some unique features that mainstream OS'es don't have. For that reason alone there's a place for it. And it's useful as a way to learn the inner workings of an OS. Not as big and complex as an OS that supports everything under the sun.
Still not good enough hey? How about as a research vehicle? To try some new concepts that haven't been tried elsewhere. Do things that have been done elsewhere just a little different, and see how that works. Or just for the fun of it.
Especially us /. users should applaud and appreciate projects like this. There used to be a time when it seemed as if every company were working on some OS or programming language of their own. When hobbyists where beating bare metal of their PC's in assembly, even up to a GUI or 3D games. These days... not so much. Most software news these days is new releases of existing software. New versions of existing operating systems. Some new way to make existing software X work with existing software Y. Projects like MINIX that are still developed (even if slowly) are few and far between.
Last but not least: if you're not interested: fine, that's OKAY. But no reason to mock an interesting project simply because it's not your cup of tea.
The children on this thread are hilarious. So what if people want to get together and talk about a project that interests them but may not interest you. Why do you care? Keep using Linux if thats what you prefer but at least grow up enough to not be but-hurt when other people enjoy working with something else.
Yes, I say he "lost" in the court of public opinion, because the rough gist of his initial argument was that Linux was going nowhere due to its Kernel design, and Linux and Minix had very different trajectories than this argument would have predicted. How much of that was due to kernel design is debatable, but the argument that Linux was "obsolete" 23 years ago certainly looks silly now.
If one digs into the details of the debate, not only were a lot of Tannebaum's detailed points quite correct, but Linus wasn't even arguing against them at the time. He was just arguing that for what he was trying to accomplish, Linux's design was better. So you could say they were both right on the details, but it isn't the details that made the argument famous.
never heard of it. I'm gnu to this stuff.