Slashdot Mirror
Bitcoin Inventor Satoshi Nakamoto Nominated For Nobel Prize
HughPickens.com writes: Nobel Prizes are given for making important — preferably fundamental — breakthroughs in the realm of ideas. That's just what Satoshi Nakamoto has done, according to Bhagwan Chowdhry, a professor of finance at UCLA. Chowdhry has nominated Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, for a Nobel prize in economics. The Prize Committee for the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, popularly known as the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, has invited Chowdhry to nominate someone for the 2016 Prize. He started thinking about whose ideas are likely to have a disruptive influence in the twenty first century: "The invention of bitcoin — a digital currency — is nothing short of revolutionary," says Chowdhry. "It offers many advantages over both physical and paper currencies. It is secure, relying on almost unbreakable cryptographic code, can be divided into millions of smaller sub-units, and can be transferred securely and nearly instantaneously from one person to any other person in the world with access to internet bypassing governments, central banks and financial intermediaries." Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin Protocol has also spawned exciting innovations in the FinTech space by showing how financial contracts — not just currencies — can be digitized, securely verified and stored, and transferred instantaneously from one party to another.
There's only one problem. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Suppose the Nobel Committee is convinced that Satoshi Nakamoto deserves the Prize. Now the problem it will face is how to contact him to announce that he has won the Prize. According to Chowdhry, Nakamoto can be informed by contacting him online just the same way people have communicated with him in the past. He has anonymously communicated with the computer science and cryptography community. If he accepts the award, he can verifiably communicate his acceptance. Finally, there is the issue of the Prize money. Nakamoto is already in possession of several hundred million U.S. dollars worth of bitcoins so the additional prize money may not mean much to him. "Only if he wants, the committee could also transfer the prize money to my bitcoin address, 165sAHBpLHujHbHx2zSjC898oXEz25Awtj," concludes Chowdhry. "Mr Nakamoto and I will settle later."
There's only one problem. Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Suppose the Nobel Committee is convinced that Satoshi Nakamoto deserves the Prize. Now the problem it will face is how to contact him to announce that he has won the Prize. According to Chowdhry, Nakamoto can be informed by contacting him online just the same way people have communicated with him in the past. He has anonymously communicated with the computer science and cryptography community. If he accepts the award, he can verifiably communicate his acceptance. Finally, there is the issue of the Prize money. Nakamoto is already in possession of several hundred million U.S. dollars worth of bitcoins so the additional prize money may not mean much to him. "Only if he wants, the committee could also transfer the prize money to my bitcoin address, 165sAHBpLHujHbHx2zSjC898oXEz25Awtj," concludes Chowdhry. "Mr Nakamoto and I will settle later."
Actually he already communicated with me anonymously that he wants them to transfer the money to ME, personally, and I will deliver it to him. Cash only.
There is no Nobel Prize for economics; it is a pretend prize that tries to piggy-back on the Nobel name to push an agenda (of course, some of the real Nobel prizes have been politicized as well).
You know nothing.
He created a decentralized trust chain, one that could be used in applications we cannot today even imagine. Let's say there's a country with no proper land registry... How do you transfer, demarcate or make original claims for a piece of land?
If there's enough mobile phones, computers, participating in a specific swarm due to self-interest (protecting land) then some random can't come and claim rights to the land with forged documents. It would only be valid if both sides agreed to the transaction and signed it cryptographically.
This also extends to bank-to-bank trust, and various others. Paedo-phobia and drug druggies are just where it found a proving ground.
popularly known as the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences
Economists like to call it that. But Alfred Nobel had more sense than to give a prize for hand waving.
And as we all know, traditional currency has never been used for criminal activity whatsoever.
You have made a currency for an underworld of drug & arms dealers, paedophile porn sites and murder for hire. Oh yes, a few people use it for normal transactions too, and it ruins the environment as you have to run computers for a long time to create it.
That's a pretty lame way to frame it. You forgot to mention that it rots your teeth and destroys family values.
American paper money is also the currency of underworld drugs and arms, pedophiles, and murder for hire.
Bitcoin is also the currency of freedom from oppression, freedom from centralized regulation based on political agendas, and massive surveilance.
The American dollar... not so much.
Did you think that the credit cards refusing to allow payments to WikiLeaks was a good thing?
Googling "BitCoin freedom" turns up just shy of a million links.
At least 2000 girls in Afghanistan are being paid in bitcoin for their blog writing and social media skills.
Bitcoin Will Thrust the World Towards Freedom
Inventor of dynamite never intended it to be used to kill people...
How peculiarly relevant that the inventor of dynamite was Alfred Nobel, the founder of the Nobel prize
Right. People with that kind of criminal record usually don't get a Nobel Prize for economics. They get the one for peace.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
You just described the US dollar fiat currency!
Do you think traditional transactions gets processed for free, or do they also need to be processed?
In 2004, I nominated my left testicle, which has caused a great deal of jealousy in my pants. A controversy that continues to this day.
You are welcome on my lawn.
But at a very high cost. The only way to create bitcoins is to waste energy. Worse, the amount of energy that must be wasted to create new bitcoins increases over time.
It doesn't necessarily increase over time, it may also decrease.
Bitcoin mining is a competition : the more they are, the harder it is, the less they are, the easier it is. Because of this, the worst case scenario, energy wise, is that the reward for mining is equal to the energy cost. It means that the energy cost for a new bitcoin will follow its valuation, until all possible bitcoins are mined. It won't be a major problem unless there is a major surge in bitcoin value well before we reach this maximum.
And if it is, there is always the solution of lowering the reward, no need for a next-gen digital currency. Transaction fees can be dealt with the same way.
Exactly. There are a huge number of people who are allowed to nominate, including anyone who is a professor of economics.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Bitcoin is also the only way to pay for many things without the banks getting a piece of it. Bought something on ebay? Paypal gets 3-4%. Paying with a different currency than the merchant? Make that 7%
nventor of dynamite never intended it to be used to kill people
Not true at all. Nobel was one of the biggest armament manufacturers and merchants of the nineteenth century. As he got older he felt guilty about all the people who were being killed as a result of his inventions and business so he turned to philanthropy.
Feynman said getting the prize was the worst thing that ever happened to him.
Yep and that philanthropy survives today as the Nobel prize, the money for the prizes comes from his estate, it's held in perpetuity in a trust fund, profits from the fund are given away as prizes.
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
What makes you think your digital trust chain will be in any way enforcable in a nation that has collapsed so far that it doesn't even have a "proper land registry"?
In that situation, a gun would be far more useful than some bits on a computer somewhere. And that's only if someone else doesn't have bigger and/or more guns.
BTW, Nakamoto didn't invent the idea of decentralised trust chains. He borrowed the idea from existing public key encryption.
Exactly. There are a huge number of people who are allowed to nominate, including anyone who is a professor of economics.
Only if a permanent professor in one of the five Nordic countries. Those who can nominate are:
Bhagwan Chowdhry, who nominated the Bitcoin inventor came in under rule 6, and was invited to supply a nomination, and whoever in the Academy invited him is likely rather embarrassed now.
He's probably an anarchist and thinks you can have a society without government.
Support my political activism on Patreon.