Slashdot Mirror


Boot Camps Introducing More Women To Tech (dice.com)

Nerval's Lobster writes: A new study from Course Report suggests that boot camps are introducing more women to the tech-employment pipeline. Data for the study came from 769 graduates from 43 qualifying coding schools (a.k.a. boot camps). Some 66 percent of those graduates reported landing a full-time job that hinged on skills learned at the boot camp. Although the typical "bootcamper" is 31 years old, with 7.6 years of work experience, relatively few had a job as a programmer before participating in a boot camp. Perhaps the most interesting data-point from Course Report, though, is that 36 percent of "bootcampers" are women, compared to 14.1 percent coming into the tech industry via undergraduate programs. Bringing more women and underrepresented groups into the tech industry is a stated goal of many companies. Over the past few years, these companies' diversity reports have bemoaned how engineering and leadership teams skew overwhelmingly white and male. Proposed strategies for the issue include adjusting how companies recruit new workers; boot camps could also quickly deepen the pool of potential employees with the right skills.

2 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Prepare for Slashdot's mostly white Mens Rights/Libertarian audience to start whining about getting non-whites/females interested in tech fields that needs more workers.

    I think what a lot of people on her miss is that there's a cultural aspect as to why some women aren't inherently interested in pursuing IT. If we stop forcing young people to play with barbies and dolls and try to get everyone interested in science, tech, space, and other things males are mostly associated with, we can make some progress in this area. Not sure if "boot camps" are a good idea though.

  2. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It takes a special kind of person to see celebrating greater diversity as celebrating the decline of another group.

    I don't understand it myself. What's wrong with increasing diversity? Is it that you feel threatened because you think you can't compete in the job market? Are you afraid of interacting women and minorities?

    A person who disagrees with the diversity rhetoric is not necessarily doing so because they feel threatened. In my case, for example, I see two main reasons to oppose it:

    (1) Many of the claims made by the supporters of diversity are irrational claims. See, for example, http://www.ams.org/notices/201409/rnoti-p1024.pdf. An individual who values logic and rational thought should be expected to oppose such claims.

    (2) The benefits of diversity are not really apparent to me, but I am increasingly pressured to help to increase diversity. In that sense, discussion of diversity is an annoyance that takes time away from other endeavors. In particular, many individuals read Slashdot as a form of entertainment. The discussion of diversity diminishes that entertainment.

    You strongly imply that white males are being attacked or otherwise oppressed and that some unnamed other takes pleasure in causing that harm.

    Do you remember that "pac-man" pie chart of religious affiliation in the US? The one where the largest piece is saying "help, we're being oppressed!"? Your comment reminds me of that.

    It's really easy to be a Christian in the US. You're in the majority...

    You seem to be jumping to unwarranted conclusions here. (See point 1, above.) The people who are opposed to the diversity rhetoric are not necessarily white male Christians.

    Though, as many atheists know, there are also social consequences for those on the outside. The larger group benefits from something called "privilege".

    I couched that in religious terms for your benefit. It's easy to see that Christians in the US are not, in fact, being oppressed and that they enjoy numerous social benefits. It's also easy to see why atheists often need to hide their beliefs to avoid discrimination or other harmful conflict.

    I, in fact, happen to be atheist. I have always been very open about my beliefs, even though I spent most of my life living in a conservative religious community. Although I did receive some harassment for my beliefs, you greatly exaggerate it. For example, I never needed to "hide [my] beliefs to avoid discrimination or other harmful conflict" while I was growing up.