Slashdot Mirror


AMA Calls For Ban On Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs (ap.org)

HughPickens.com writes: The Associated Press reports that the American Medical Association has called for a ban on direct-to-consumer ads for prescription drugs and implantable medical devices, saying they contribute to rising costs and patients' demands for inappropriate treatment. According to data cited in an AMA news release, ad dollars spent by drugmakers have risen to $4.5 billion in the last two years, a 30 percent increase. Physicians cited concerns that a growing proliferation of ads is driving demand for expensive treatments despite the clinical effectiveness of less costly alternatives. "Today's vote in support of an advertising ban reflects concerns among physicians about the negative impact of commercially-driven promotions, and the role that marketing costs play in fueling escalating drug prices," said the AMA's Patrice A. Harris. "Direct-to-consumer advertising also inflates demand for new and more expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate."

The AMA also calls for convening a physician task force and launching an advocacy campaign to promote prescription drug affordability by demanding choice and competition in the pharmaceutical industry, and greater transparency in prescription drug prices and costs. Last month, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a report saying that a high cost of prescription drugs remains the public's top health care priority. In the past few years, prices on generic and brand-name prescription drugs have steadily risen and experienced a 4.7 percent spike in 2015, according to the Altarum Institute Center for Sustainable Health Spending.

4 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. stupid by AntEater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "ask your doctor is "X" is right for you"

    If my doctor doesn't already know whether X is right for me, then I need to get a new doctor. I've always thought that this was incredibly irresponsible to be promoting the idea that the average slob off the street should suggest treatments when you need about 10 years of post-secondary education just to be able to deliver such treatment.

    "end users, ask your sysadmin if systemd is right for you."

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
  2. Re:Marketing costs? Do me a favor by toebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're neglecting compliance. Having worked at a pharma company I saw first hand huge amounts of resources dedicated to running around meeting the whim of every country's various regulatory agencies. Overhead is one of, if not the largest, cost involved.

  3. Re:Do you want to pay for advertising? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2) Furthermore this sort of advertising creates all sorts of bad incentives for patients to ask about medicines that may not be appropriate for their condition. Most people without medical training demonstrably do not understand what these drugs do nor do they understand the side effects.

    I'm betting most doctors don't either these days, and I'm also fairly sure the only source of this is the marketing material provided by the company -- and I refuse to believe that is accurate or doesn't downplay the issues.

    Doctors can't see the real data on these things, and pharma companies routinely try to pitch it for "off-label" applications they haven't been approved for.

    So, you have marketing to the consumers, marketing provided directly to the doctors in the form of samples of glossy material ... and nobody really has a clue about the effectiveness or real incidence of side effects.

    In a lot of cases, modern medicine as it relates to big pharma is a dog and pony show driven by salesmen and people in marketing.

    The more we remove the pharmaceutical companies from driving decisions around healthcare and determining which products to use the better ... because having the conversation be dictated by multi-billion dollar corporations trying to maximize profits is a terrible idea.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  4. Re:Ban the side effects by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What medicine really needs is competition, and that is something the AMA, despite that lip service in this announcement, has always resisted. Instead of banning advertising, give patients the right to get their prescriptions filled on the world market, just as we do when we buy electronics from Amazon.

    In 2011 the FDA fined Google half a billion dollars for the crime of letting Canadian pharmacies advertise to Americans. Make the FDA give every stolen dime back to Google, and then slash its budget so it can't pursue any more anti-competitive operations like this. Make the FDA stick to its primary mission of organizing new drug tests, and nothing else.