Slashdot Mirror


Georgia Gives Personal Data of 6 Million Voters To Georgia GunOwner Magazine (ajc.com)

McGruber writes: A class action lawsuit alleges that Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp's office released the personal identifying information of Georgia voters to twelve organizations, "including statewide political parties, news media organizations and Georgia GunOwner Magazine".

According to Kemp, his office shares "voter registration data every month with news media and political parties that have requested it as required by Georgia law. Due to a clerical error where information was put in the wrong file, 12 recipients received a disc that contained personal identifying information that should not have been included."

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution independently confirmed the inclusion of the personal data in the October file. The AJC did so by accessing the October data disc, looking up information for an AJC staffer and confirming his Social Security number and driver's license information was included. The AJC has returned its copy of the disc to the state.

110 comments

  1. Why single out a magazine? by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There were 12 organizations which received the info, which included some mistakenly provided personal info.

    Singling out one organization in the headline seems to make this story a politically driven one.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a Georgian who owns guns, I have never even heard of this magazine nor seen it in any of the several gun stores/ranges I have gone to over the years. And looking at their website, it looks like something a high school student would throw together for a web publishing class. I agree, it does seem odd that it would specifically mention the magazine in the title, but the article itself only names the magazine, with the other groups being vaguely defined as "statewide political parties" and "news media organizations".

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Dicedot lives on clickbait.

    3. Re:Why single out a magazine? by dywolf · · Score: 1, Informative

      which of the 12 should have been listed to make it apolitical?
      the story is already politically driven due to the involvement of the incompetent and openly partisan (and racist) office of Brian Kemp.

      this is an office that fails at security, and actively discourages minority voters. they had already previously been hacked multiple times, the most recent of which after the office claimed to have fixed its security faults by implementing encryption and security staff, a claim proven to be false. this is the office that has sued to stop voter registration drives in minority majority areas of the state, and been caught slow-walking the registrations of minority voters.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    4. Re:Why single out a magazine? by dwillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about not name any. They chose to list gunowner magazine to draw the ire of those opposed to anything related to gun rights. Heck they even noted that the reporting news agency received a copy of the data, why not list themselves? Or better yet just state the information was incorrectly released to multiple news agencies.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone, including the fine, fine journalists at /. who wrote that headline, who would get exorcised over the fact that the information was released to a gun mag, but not get equally exorcised over the fact that it was released to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, or vice versa, is a partisan hack. To paraphrase Ron White, "It's not THAT information about GA voters was released to GA-based organizations. It's WHAT information about GA voters was released to GA-based organizations."

    6. Re:Why single out a magazine? by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "which of the 12 should have been listed to make it apolitical?"

      None of them. All had a right to the data (minus what was erroneously included by the state). Why not a simple "Private data mistakenly handed out by the State of Georgia" headline, focusing blame where it falls? Or mention "12 organizations." If one organization must be chosen, then the Atlanta Journal-Constitution would be a logical choice - the article implies that it was they who noticed the breach.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:Why single out a magazine? by bluelip · · Score: 1

      I have no points, but cheers to you msauve for pointing out the the bias here on Slashdot and the media. One would be forgiven for thinking Zuckerberg is on /.'s parent's board.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    8. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because "Guns" + "Privacy" = clicks.

      GUNS!

      PRIVACY!

      GUNS!!!!!!!!!!!

      (This post is now the most-read post ever on Slashdot.)

    9. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so now mentioning the incompetence and known bias of brian kemp's office is flamebait.

    10. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Um, no it doesn't. Hypocrisy would be not complaining about this breach while complaining about unneeded gun registration efforts. There is no evidence about the gun owner's feelings about this particular breach.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    11. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      (This post is now the most-read post ever on Slashdot.)

      You are right, I just couldn't help but read it.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:Why single out a magazine? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      It the the example of the set that most demonstrates that the set both should not have received the data *and* that the set would not have been requesting the data.

      If one of the political parties were used as an example, people might have the impression that the groups were asking for data that they should not have received and their request was erroneously approved.

      If "News Publishing Co." was used an example, people might have the impression that news organization were allowed to have this information.

      Georgia GunOwner Magazine is an organization that would not care to have this information, would never have asked for this information, and probably wondered why they were sent this information. This highlights that data is being sent out unsolicited, which is a different sort of error.

    13. Re:Why single out a magazine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, /. is so left leaning now this is only news because some eeeevil gun magazine got the information. Guns are eeeevil, don't you know this? Just the other day, I saw a gun get up all by itself and kill someone, and get away with it! I was so terrified!

      Guns must be banned, like in UK where it's much better to be killed by a knife or hammer. Don't worry, the UK wants to ban pointed kitchen knives also. Reason? "No one needs a pointed kitchen knife." Sounds familiar, where have I heard a "reason" like that before?

      Oh well, it's ok because we have a "Bill of Rights" in the US, not a "Bill of Needs". Right? I mean, it says "shall not be infringed". Surely everyone should be able to comprehend that right? What do you say diane frankenfienbitchenstien? What's that? "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in."

      Flame on!

    14. Re:Why single out a magazine? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      <sarcasm>

      Politically-driven story? On Slashdot? That never happens.

      </sarcasm>

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  2. As a georgian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for leading the way, fellow luddites

  3. Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by hattig · · Score: 1

    Clearly a massive breach of personal data. All to get a few dollars by selling it.

    Luckily restricted to 12 organisations, but who can guarantee that they will not abuse it or a member of staff hasn't leaked it?

    The state should be providing free identity theft insurance to every citizen as a result.

    Also, why the hell is a gun magazine buying these details (even the more restricted version), and why are they even allowed to?

    1. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why the hell is a gun magazine buying these details?

      They should be fired.

    2. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why the hell is a gun magazine buying these details (even the more restricted version), and why are they even allowed to?

      Because it's fucking well America ... where if a corporation can't buy it, it must be communism.

      I'm sure some libertarian idiot pushed to make this happen so the free speech of those entities can be protected and enabled by reaching out to people, while allowing them to maximize profits.

      Have you not noticed how the deck is stacked against you as a citizen and skewed towards favoring corporations?

      Blame people like Roman Mir who will tell you the state should be in the business of making sure corporations have all they need to succeed, and how regulations are evil.

    3. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the rant. Now for reality...

      Voter records have ALWAYS been publically available. The cost was probably just paying someone in govt the time it takes to gather it and burn it to a disk. Many people have used these records to show dead people voting (Social Security also keeps a list of dead people), or other voter irregularities.

      The difference here is they released SSNs of the voters, along with other "private" information.

      But thanks for the rant on how evil capitalism is when this is a 100% screw up of the government. That's like blaming a mugging victim for daring to carry something valuable to be robbed and saying the only solution is to give the muggers more power to ensure people don't dare carry valuables anymore. You would think anti-freedom people like this would be ridiculed instead of listened to.

    4. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by msauve · · Score: 1

      "The state should be providing free identity theft insurance to every citizen as a result."

      ...said by someone who doesn't understand that taking taxpayer money and then handing it back to them doesn't make something "free."

      The citizens wouldn't gain anything by doing so, but companies which provide ID theft insurance sure would. Do you work for one?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...said by someone who doesn't understand that taking taxpayer money and then handing it back to them doesn't make something "free."

      Equivocation fallacy. "Free" in this case means "free at the point of service". The cost is obviously spread over all economic actors. It's like you deliberately twisted OP's words so you wouldn't sound so crazy back on your soapbox.

      The citizens wouldn't gain anything by doing so, but companies which provide ID theft insurance sure would. Do you work for one?

      If only the government could somehow provide insurance rather than going through a third partty, i.e. by promising to pay out for actual costs incurred, if any... although in corporate America, the involvement of a useless, leeching middleman in everything is sometimes prerequisite to getting anything done, isn't it?

    6. Re:Clearly a massive breach of personal data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny that you put it that way when it's the government that's the leeching middleman.

  4. Learning time for Editors by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, so, is Slashdot a tech-news page or just trying to be Gawker?

    The story here is that personally-identifying information was sent to 12 organizations. One of those organizations was a gun magazine (because they were one of the 12 that requested the info).

    Editor 101 quiz, which of these headlines is more informative, and which is just polemic clickbait:
    "Georgia Gives Personal Data of 6 Million Voters To Georgia GunOwner Magazine"
    or
    "Georgia Gives Personal Data of 6 Million Voters To 12 Organizations"
    ?

    If we're going to go the polemic route, why not just go all the way? The Governor of GA is a Republican, you could instead re-title this:
    "Republican Governor's office hands citizen data to Gun Magazine"?

    --
    -Styopa
  5. Oh no, they sent it to a gun magazine! by MikeRT · · Score: 2

    Those dastardly (probably all white!!!!11!) editors and writers might use the information to... send poor black voters information about how they can exercise their right to keep and bear arms and information on why they might want to do it.

  6. For who's eyes only? by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    The rather more interesting part of the story might be exactly who would have been authorized to receive a disk full of citizens' personal information.

    The disks very existence seems suspect, let alone that it is routinely distributed.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:For who's eyes only? by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      In pretty much every state, the voter roll is a matter of public record. Lots of good reasons for it to be, otherwise there's no way for the public to check whether a few thousand extra folks have been added to subtracted here and there.

    2. Re:For who's eyes only? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "The rather more interesting part of the story might be exactly who would have been authorized to receive a disk full of citizens' personal information."

      Anyone. Elector rolls are public record. Specific to this case, GA law 21-2-225, which states: "... the list of electors maintained by the Secretary of State pursuant to this article shall be available for public inspection ..."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:For who's eyes only? by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      ...a massive data breach by Secretary of State Brian Kemp involving the Social Security numbers and other private information of more than six million voters statewide.

      If the State is in the business of releasing names with SS#s and home addresses, there's not much point in getting alarmed when the next Home Depot/Target/CVS/IRS data breach occurs...

      It would be reassuring to know that identity theft is not a foregone conclusion.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:For who's eyes only? by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      Yes, definitely, including the other information (SS#, DL#, etc.) was a massive screwup, but that wasn't supposed to happen. From the article, sounds like someone, in effect, forgot to delete some columns from Excel.

    5. Re:For who's eyes only? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Yes, definitely, including the other information (SS#, DL#, etc.) was a massive screwup, but that wasn't supposed to happen. From the article, sounds like someone, in effect, forgot to delete some columns from Excel.

      Sorry to drag this article slightly on topic for Slashdot, but this might be the main technical problem with this situation. How do you accidentally include information that shouldn't be there in a report? Why isn't generating the data disk completely automated so that there's no way for a person to screw up and include personal information?

    6. Re:For who's eyes only? by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Because the government doesn't want to or have the money to spend on such a system. Or they just don't want one.

    7. Re:For who's eyes only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government probably spent a billion dollars on this system, but it doesn't work and isn't intended to be rolled out until 2156.

  7. WTF? by gstoddart · · Score: 0

    According to Kemp, his office shares "voter registration data every month with news media and political parties that have requested it as required by Georgia law.

    Wait, what?

    It is required by law that the state sell voter information to corporations? What the hell for?

    This sounds like an incredibly stupid law which has either been recklessly put in to raise money, or stupidly put in to advance corporate interests.

    Having government be required to sell this to corporations smacks of the results of terrible policy. The government should not be in the business of selling information about voters to anybody.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:WTF? by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      The voter roll is a matter of public record in pretty much every state, and for very good reason - if it's not public, there's no way for the public to cross check to make sure that someone in government hasn't been adding people who don't exist. Like a lot of public data, it's available to anyone who wants it, so long as they cover the cost of providing the data. Sounds like these 12 organizations have, in effect, a subscription.

    2. Re:WTF? by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Our own Inland Revenue "lost in the post" a CD with 12 million or so UK residents' details including payment info some time ago, and it is accepted that the info should never even have been collated for this purpose.

      I have removed my details from the public version of the voter rolls here to reduce marketing crap, etc.

      Routinely selling voter details to random orgs seems generally a bad idea if voters cannot opt out.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    3. Re:WTF? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It is required by law that the state sell voter information to corporations? What the hell for?

      Well, I can see why a third-party should and would get that data. Or someone who wants to run in a primary without the backing of the party. And the line between what parties should and should not get that data probably shouldn't rely on a political appointee deciding if your part is "real".

      Now, if there's a better way to handle it, I'm all for that. But fact of the matter is that it seems like most other voting issues , e.g. idiots' votes count equally to Einstein's - any other method is rife for abuse and worse.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  8. Upset about Georgia Gun Owner Magazine... by cirby · · Score: 1

    ...but not about giving your personal information to political parties?

    Then you're, well, a little naive. Maybe not a little.

    Which is more likely to abuse the information - a small magazine devoted to individual rights, or the two major political parties?

    Which of them have the resources to actually abuse that information on a grand scale, including lots of manpower and skilled database programmers on staff?

    Of course, the Dems and the GOP probably have most of that data already, but let's not help them fill in the gaps so easily, okay?

    1. Re:Upset about Georgia Gun Owner Magazine... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 0

      Which is more likely to abuse the information - a small magazine devoted to individual rights, or the two major political parties?

      The tiny gun magazine, of course. The political parties and newspapers actually have reputations to lose.

      Besides, have you ever heard how gun nuts talk?

    2. Re:Upset about Georgia Gun Owner Magazine... by cirby · · Score: 1

      Which is more likely to abuse the information - a small magazine devoted to individual rights, or the two major political parties?

      The tiny gun magazine, of course. The political parties and newspapers actually have reputations to lose.

      When did that start? Not in the last couple of decades, anyway.

      Besides, have you ever heard how gun nuts talk?

      Yeah, all that "we have actual civil rights, and the Constitution codifies them" jazz.

      What lunatics.

    3. Re:Upset about Georgia Gun Owner Magazine... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Which is more likely to abuse the information - a small magazine devoted to individual rights, or the two major political parties?

      The Libertarian Party, which refused to return or destroy the disk. Or maybe one of the other random third parties.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  9. its not odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you want clicks and ad revenue, you relate what you are talking about with something very controversial and that has passions running very high on either end of the debat - blind rage, actually.

    Guns have become one of those issues. Add in guns owners paranoia that their guns are honing to be confiscated by the government, we have here an attempt to garner quite a bit of outrage from the anti-government gun owner crowd.

    It's a cheap trick but the public gets suckered every time.

    1. Re: its not odd by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing new. TV has been doing this for decades. 'This substance WILL kill you. And it's in YOUR home right now. Information you need to save your life and the lives of your family... After this commercial break.'

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    2. Re:its not odd by KGIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      This one CHEAP TRICK that will sucker the public into reading this headline and clicking through!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re: its not odd by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      For those of you who are wondering about the substance, it's dihydrogen monoxide.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    4. Re: its not odd by neoritter · · Score: 0

      Unrelated to the article but tangentially related here. I just heard on the radio this morning an ad for a report from my local news station about the dangers of hoverboards. Apparently a) we do have them? b) it's news that they're any more dangerous than real skateboards.

    5. Re:its not odd by bradrum · · Score: 1

      The NYPost even brags about their ability to do just that.

        "A good headline kicks you in the eyeballs." NYPost ad

    6. Re: its not odd by Letophoro · · Score: 1

      If your local radio is like my local news, then they are actually referring to those hands-free Segway-like boards. Having tried one, I can say that they aren't really any more dangerous than regular skateboards.

    7. Re: its not odd by neoritter · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I just realized this. I didn't know they were called "hoverboards." Now I feel like I should sue for false advertising...

    8. Re: its not odd by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      For those of you who are wondering about the substance, it's dihydrogen monoxide.

      That shit is dangerous! Every serial killer used it just before killing their victims! Every drowning victim had it in their lungs!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re:its not odd by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      reading the summary is a task for most on /. , no chance of them following a link

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  10. Georgia Releases Personal Data of 6 Million Voters by mbone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fixed your headline for you.

    I am certainly not a gun-nut, but it seems that the magazine in the headline has no more blame in this matter than the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

  11. This wouldn't have happened if they used APPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern app appers know that only apps can app apps. If the LUDDITES in Georgia used apps instead of LUDDITE discs, the data would still be secure!

    Apps!

  12. samzenpus by JBMcB · · Score: 0

    Is someone other than samzenpus allowed to post headlines? The entire front page are all his posts.

    Need a little more basic diversity here, meaning more than one person.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re: samzenpus by msauve · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Careful what you ask for, you might get timothy.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  13. To everyone whining about the title... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the list of organizations who got the info:

    Georgia Democratic Party
    Georgia Republican Party
    Georgia Libertarian Party
    Independence Party of Georgia
    Southern Party of Georgia
    Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Macon Telegraph
    Savannah Morning News
    Georgia GunOwner Magazine
    Georgia Pundit
    News Publishing Co.
    RedState

    Who is the biggest risk? Who has the least to lose and the most ideological fervor? Who is most likely simply to get hacked?

    Actually, it isn't the gun nut magazine, it's the Southern Party of Georgia.

    That would make an even better headline: Georgia Gives Personal Data of 6 Million Voters To Racist Lost Cause Political Party You've Never Heard Of

    1. Re:To everyone whining about the title... by mbone · · Score: 1

      What about the "Independence Party of Georgia"? As far as I can tell, this list is the only evidence of their existence (unless the State of Georgia is sending personal information to a political party in the Republic of Georgia, which would be an interesting development).

    2. Re:To everyone whining about the title... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Who is the biggest risk? Who has the least to lose and the most ideological fervor? Who is most likely simply to get hacked?

      Well, the Libertarian Party says that they are not going to return/destroy the data, so...

      Okay, that they're considering returning or destroying it, maybe.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:To everyone whining about the title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the political parties save for two in the USA are lost causes. It's their damned first-past-the-post electoral system. They should move to some real proportional representation like the rest of us. Sainte-Laguë preferably.

      (We have eight parties in the parliament. It's more than the two the Americans have. Somehow the Brits manage to have four. I wonder what's up with that.)

  14. 60%?!! I live in Georgia, this rubs be very raw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me see if I get this straight: 60% of the people who live in Georgia had their identity information given to 12 organizations that have forwarded it to who-else-knows? I live in Georgia. If this is true, I'm incredibly pissed. I don't care that this article singled out a single magazine, as so many other have posted. That doesn't matter. What does matter is that 60% of the people living in an ENTIRE STATE have just had their identities compromised. If I'm misunderstanding, someone please point out my flawgic (flawed logic--a word coined by my amazing girlfriend). I'll be signing what Class Action Lawsuit that comes around. As of this moment, presuming that that article is properly fact checked, this situation is a complete screw up that the state needs to address.

    1. Re:60%?!! I live in Georgia, this rubs be very raw by joshuao3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I posted that while not logged in. I've reposted it while logged in.

      --
      Monitor bandwidth usage on IIS6 in real-time: http://www.waetech.com/services/iisbm/
  15. No fowl in that case by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > "including statewide political parties, news media organizations and Georgia GunOwner Magazine".

    To be honest, Georgia GunOwner Magazine thought it was just their subscriber list.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  16. 60%?!! I live in Georgia, this rubs me very raw by joshuao3 · · Score: 1

    Let me see if I get this straight: 60% of the people who live in Georgia had their identity information given to 12 organizations that have forwarded it to who-else-knows? I live in Georgia. If this is true, I'm incredibly pissed. I don't care that this article singled out a single magazine, as so many other have posted. That doesn't matter. What does matter is that 60% of the people living in an ENTIRE STATE have just had their identities compromised. If I'm misunderstanding, someone please point out my flawgic (flawed logic--a word coined by my amazing girlfriend). I'll be signing what Class Action Lawsuit that comes around. As of this moment, presuming that that article is properly fact checked, this situation is a complete screw up that the state needs to address.

    --
    Monitor bandwidth usage on IIS6 in real-time: http://www.waetech.com/services/iisbm/
  17. How many voters does Georgia have? by Letophoro · · Score: 1

    According to the US Census bureau, (table 4a) there are only 4.3 million registered voters of the 7.3 million voting age population.

    Where did the other 1.7 million voters come from? Or am I reading the census data wrong?

    1. Re:How many voters does Georgia have? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Where did the other 1.7 million voters come from?

      My guess would be 1.7 million former voters who died/moved/something were included in the list.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  18. Exponentially increasing incompetence by Gim+Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

    The level of incompetence in the State of Georgia government has been increasing at an exponential rate for well over a decade now. As a life long Georgia Resident and former employee of this State it is not news to anyone living here. The guiding principle of governance by the last two administrations (and to some extent the one before) has been to outsource anything and everything to the bidder that make the largest campaign contribution. Low bid, high bid, competence -- none of those matter.

    The higher paying State Jobs that are supposed to be overseeing this outsource mania have been filled by politically correct incompetents that have no idea of what they are supposed to be doing --and it is getting worse. I was fortunate to escape when I did.

    To clarify one point in the article and the comments. The voter data that is mandated to be public record by law is limited to the voter's name and possibly address. The screw up in this is that they included such things as the full social security number, driver's license number, and other sensitive personal information. The Secretary of State (Bryan Kemp) maintained that since there was no security breach, this didn't have to be reported as such under law. I guess that gives is a good clue as to his mental state.

  19. Re:Georgia Releases Personal Data of 6 Million Vot by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2
    Or, "Readily Available SSN Remains The Magic Password For Identity Thieves".

    It shouldn't be a big deal if social security numbers are released - the fault lies with a system that makes them so powerful.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  20. It's OK by PPH · · Score: 1

    The discs were just used as pistol targets.

    I mean, what do you expect us to do now that our hoard of AOL discs is running low?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Most of the CD's have been returned. by clovis · · Score: 2

    Most of the CD's have been returned. For some reason the Libertarian party is being a jerk about it and is dawdling.
    What I can't find out is which of the others still have their copy, or worse yet, are making copies.

    1. Re:Most of the CD's have been returned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's their right to keep the disc if they want to (Fourth Amendment).
      And it's their right to publish it far and wide if they want to (First Amendment).
      Hopefully someone does publish it, that'll make people think twice about collecting anything about people in the first place.
      Fucking govt power freaks.

  22. Taxpayers are screwed, so make them pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The state should be providing free identity theft insurance to every citizen as a result." ...said by someone who doesn't understand that taking taxpayer money and then handing it back to them doesn't make something "free."

    The citizens wouldn't gain anything by doing so, but companies which provide ID theft insurance sure would. Do you work for one?

    Actually, it would be better to give taxpayers the option of identity theft service or the money that the state would otherwise pay a third party provider for identity theft service. Because as it is the suggestion is not about giving people some free service or giving them money back, but rather screwing up and then making them pay for identity theft insurance that they probably don't need and don't want. The only people that benefit in that case would be whatever company is paid to provide the identity theft service/insurance.

  23. Single out one party by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

    Well, the magazine is singled out because unlike everyone else on the list (major newspapers, political parties and RedState) it's a minor organization. If the NSA had a major leak where they sent secret data to CIA analysts, the White House and the Russian Embassy, I would expect most news stories to focus on the Russian connection.

    But one group should be singled out. The Libertarian Party. The other groups have promised to keep the data safe and return it. The Libertarian Party is fucking around with the idea of maybe returning/destroying the data. I get that we don't pretend the breech didn't happen, but FFS, now the Libertarian Party is putting the info in danger as well.

    Full list of the 12:

    • Georgia Democratic Party
    • Georgia Republican Party
    • Georgia Libertarian Party
    • Independence Party of Georgia
    • Southern Party of Georgia
    • Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    • Macon Telegraph
    • Savannah Morning News
    • Georgia GunOwner Magazine
    • Georgia Pundit
    • News Publishing Co.
    • RedState
    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  24. Voter Registration should be secret by andymadigan · · Score: 0

    Voter registration info should be secret, not distributed at a whim. I'm sick of getting spam, junk mail, and robocalls from people who have gotten my info off the registration rolls.

    --
    The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
  25. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "defame me saying things he knows aren't true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Hypocrite You're projecting & your signatures do the rest.

    "the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    I show /.'ers say differently by quoted testimonials - Show us you've done better: YOU can't!

    "maybe someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Quotes of you = true - & You can't keep your word + projecting what YOU do (AD/DNS lie).

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    I protect users speeding them up, helping reliability, & security + anonymity online w/ more ability & efficiency than ANY 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.

    "I should change my signature again to rile him up more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    Childish sigs = all you've got!

    "I refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    &

    "You claim I have never proved you wrong...a flat out lie." - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    &

    "I proved you wrong on numerous occasions" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    Where & on what tech? "Cat got your tongue"??

    "written in shitty Delphi, "How to secure Windows" docs I could have written in my sleep when I was 20" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2016

    You're 30++ & haven't done either!

    Show you've done MORE vs.a small partial list of mine & better, + earlier:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    THEN talk vs. TALKING OUT YOUR ASS!

    CIS Tool took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which you doubted & my layered security guides got me paid http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... MILLIONS use.

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "I never admit you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    You PROVED I am... apk

  26. Now think of Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Takes 1 person to get hired at Microsoft and sell you out. Seeing that they already intentionally set their OS's as spyware... shouldn't be long huh?

    intentionally.

    intentionally.

    intentionally.

    intentionally.

    intentionally.

  27. Worse news: Not 12 disks, but more by clovis · · Score: 1

    News gets worse.

    Here's is someone who got the disk, copied it, and is not mentioned in the list of twelve.
    But the state knew about them. How many were actually sent out?

    http://www.peachpundit.com/201...

    It is possible that the list of twelve released has typos in it and that only twelve disks went out.
    I doubt that "Georgia GunOwners magazine"asked for or got the list, but rather the PAC "Georgia Gunowners" which has a web site "georgiagunowners.org"
    Likewise, the disk sent to actually sent to Peach Pundit was perhaps listed as "Georgia Pundit"

    They did find someone in IT to fire:
    http://www.ajc.com/news/news/s...

    1. Re:Worse news: Not 12 disks, but more by clovis · · Score: 1

      Followup news articles later showed that the one listed is "Georgia Pundit" is actually "Peach Pundit", so it's just 12 after all.

  28. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

    Where'd I say it? Show us. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there on OpenDNS free (I use it) + AD in my security guide.

    + how to migrate hosts across a LAN (admin/scripts not GPO)-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ... apk

    ---

    I'm RIGHT on admin priv + hosts (WFP/SFP)!

    "figured out why privilege escalation's a bad thing?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

    How else can I programmatically update hosts itself?

    ---

    "it requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

    Hypocrite later admits it!

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware DEMANDS it or it can't do a job fully like many security tools!

    ---

    "Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Mine doesn't to get new data to update hosts vs. threats. Only hosts itself updates need it vs. WFP/SFP. Users set it too. It's not programmatic impersonation.

    ---

    "90's tech to fight modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Ozymandias/Watchmen per a namesake:

    "I resolved to apply antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & began my path to conquest - Conquest not of men but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivir), Nuclear Power (addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers"

    It works Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) too-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts' Admin hosts+recommends APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #2/5... apk

  29. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #2/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

    Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ---

    You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

    Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

    * YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

  30. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #3/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Neither does my program. AV does to remove threats - Adblock addons = Vastly INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I proved & no one proved me wrong to date!

    ---

    "your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    No, hosts do due to WFP/SFP - Intake update of new hosts data doesn't!

    ---

    "won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen by others so it's misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    ---

    "What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't keep a server. Security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it using process monitor + wireshark to prove it (don't need code)!

    ---

    "the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I place hardcoded fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - you'd spot it easily & bulk of hosts is sorted blocked known bad threats.

    ---

    "What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Hasn't happened!

    ---

    "They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    It works there!

    Telemetry tracking's killing 10 by itself: Win10 = Win8 = flops - who're you fooling other than yourself?

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #4/5... apk

  31. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #4/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 'eats his words' vs. me 2x yet again:

    "introduces risk you are relying on a 3rd party to update a hosts file potentially opening you up to MITM attacks" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    How can my program do it?

    Only things it puts in as non-blocking IP addy to hostnames is ones users give it as their favs to speed up @ the TOP of hosts REVERSE DNS VERIFIED!

    (For more speed, & reliability + security - in RAM as 1st resolver queried = faster & more secure vs. remote DNS w/ all its security issues in Kaminsky flaw, DNSChanger malware IP stack settings, routers bushwhacked in DNS settings, rogue DNS, Open DNS servers abused by malware. It aids in reliability vs. redirects).

    YOU'D SPOT IT INSTANTLY AS THEY ARE @ TOP OF CUSTOM HOSTS & can easily edit anything you want out of it!

    (Rest = known bad sites from 10 reputable security community sites for blocking - the MAJORITY of what's in my hosts files!)

    ---

    "maybe one day you can get a score 5 comment" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    See subject & ~ 12 +5 upmods making you "eat your words" vs. me (1st one: You tried using what I post there against me to FAIL):

    +5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly" (11):

    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://science.slashdot.org/co...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    "You believe you are getting the better of me" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    YOU GOT THE BEST OF YOURSELF in tech fails & lies about me. Your immature signatures about me SCREAM you're butthurt - You did it to yourself.

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #5/5... apk

  32. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "defame me saying things he knows aren't true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Hypocrite You're projecting & your signatures do the rest.

    "the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    I show /.'ers say differently by quoted testimonials - Show us you've done better: YOU can't!

    "maybe someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Quotes of you = true - & You can't keep your word + projecting what YOU do (AD/DNS lie).

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    I protect users speeding them up, helping reliability, & security + anonymity online w/ more ability & efficiency than ANY 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.

    "I should change my signature again to rile him up more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    Childish sigs = all you've got!

    "I refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    &

    "You claim I have never proved you wrong...a flat out lie." - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    &

    "I proved you wrong on numerous occasions" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    Where & on what tech? "Cat got your tongue"??

    "written in shitty Delphi, "How to secure Windows" docs I could have written in my sleep when I was 20" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2016

    You're 30++ & haven't done either!

    Show you've done MORE vs.a small partial list of mine & better, + earlier:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    THEN talk vs. TALKING OUT YOUR ASS!

    CIS Tool took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which you doubted & my layered security guides got me paid http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... MILLIONS use.

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "I never admit you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    You PROVED I am... apk

  33. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

    Where'd I say it? Show us. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there on OpenDNS free (I use it) + AD in my security guide.

    + how to migrate hosts across a LAN (admin/scripts not GPO)-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ... apk

    ---

    I'm RIGHT on admin priv + hosts (WFP/SFP)!

    "figured out why privilege escalation's a bad thing?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

    How else can I programmatically update hosts itself?

    ---

    "it requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

    Hypocrite later admits it!

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware DEMANDS it or it can't do a job fully like many security tools!

    ---

    "Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Mine doesn't to get new data to update hosts vs. threats. Only hosts itself updates need it vs. WFP/SFP. Users set it too. It's not programmatic impersonation.

    ---

    "90's tech to fight modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Ozymandias/Watchmen per a namesake:

    "I resolved to apply antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & began my path to conquest - Conquest not of men but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivir), Nuclear Power (addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers"

    It works Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) too-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts' Admin hosts+recommends APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #2/5... apk

  34. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #2/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

    Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ---

    You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

    Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

    * YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

  35. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #3/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Neither does my program. AV does to remove threats - Adblock addons = Vastly INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I proved & no one proved me wrong to date!

    ---

    "your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    No, hosts do due to WFP/SFP - Intake update of new hosts data doesn't!

    ---

    "won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen by others so it's misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    ---

    "What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't keep a server. Security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it using process monitor + wireshark to prove it (don't need code)!

    ---

    "the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I place hardcoded fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - you'd spot it easily & bulk of hosts is sorted blocked known bad threats.

    ---

    "What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Hasn't happened!

    ---

    "They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    It works there!

    Telemetry tracking's killing 10 by itself: Win10 = Win8 = flops - who're you fooling other than yourself?

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #4/5... apk

  36. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #4/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 'eats his words' vs. me 2x yet again:

    "introduces risk you are relying on a 3rd party to update a hosts file potentially opening you up to MITM attacks" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    How can my program do it?

    Only things it puts in as non-blocking IP addy to hostnames is ones users give it as their favs to speed up @ the TOP of hosts REVERSE DNS VERIFIED!

    (For more speed, & reliability + security - in RAM as 1st resolver queried = faster & more secure vs. remote DNS w/ all its security issues in Kaminsky flaw, DNSChanger malware IP stack settings, routers bushwhacked in DNS settings, rogue DNS, Open DNS servers abused by malware. It aids in reliability vs. redirects).

    YOU'D SPOT IT INSTANTLY AS THEY ARE @ TOP OF CUSTOM HOSTS & can easily edit anything you want out of it!

    (Rest = known bad sites from 10 reputable security community sites for blocking - the MAJORITY of what's in my hosts files!)

    ---

    "maybe one day you can get a score 5 comment" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    See subject & ~ 12 +5 upmods making you "eat your words" vs. me (1st one: You tried using what I post there against me to FAIL):

    +5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly" (11):

    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://science.slashdot.org/co...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    "You believe you are getting the better of me" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    YOU GOT THE BEST OF YOURSELF in tech fails & lies about me. Your immature signatures about me SCREAM you're butthurt - You did it to yourself.

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #5/5... apk

  37. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "defame me saying things he knows aren't true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Hypocrite You're projecting & your signatures do the rest.

    "the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    I show /.'ers say differently by quoted testimonials - Show us you've done better: YOU can't!

    "maybe someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Quotes of you = true - & You can't keep your word + projecting what YOU do (AD/DNS lie).

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    I protect users speeding them up, helping reliability, & security + anonymity online w/ more ability & efficiency than ANY 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.

    "I should change my signature again to rile him up more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    Childish sigs = all you've got!

    "I refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    &

    "You claim I have never proved you wrong...a flat out lie." - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    &

    "I proved you wrong on numerous occasions" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    Where & on what tech? "Cat got your tongue"??

    "written in shitty Delphi, "How to secure Windows" docs I could have written in my sleep when I was 20" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2016

    You're 30++ & haven't done either!

    Show you've done MORE vs.a small partial list of mine & better, + earlier:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    THEN talk vs. TALKING OUT YOUR ASS!

    CIS Tool took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which you doubted & my layered security guides got me paid http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... MILLIONS use.

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "I never admit you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    You PROVED I am... apk

  38. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

    Where'd I say it? Show us. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there on OpenDNS free (I use it) + AD in my security guide.

    + how to migrate hosts across a LAN (admin/scripts not GPO)-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ... apk

    ---

    I'm RIGHT on admin priv + hosts (WFP/SFP)!

    "figured out why privilege escalation's a bad thing?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

    How else can I programmatically update hosts itself?

    ---

    "it requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

    Hypocrite later admits it!

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware DEMANDS it or it can't do a job fully like many security tools!

    ---

    "Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Mine doesn't to get new data to update hosts vs. threats. Only hosts itself updates need it vs. WFP/SFP. Users set it too. It's not programmatic impersonation.

    ---

    "90's tech to fight modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Ozymandias/Watchmen per a namesake:

    "I resolved to apply antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & began my path to conquest - Conquest not of men but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivir), Nuclear Power (addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers"

    It works Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) too-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts' Admin hosts+recommends APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #2/5... apk

  39. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #2/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

    Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ---

    You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

    Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

    * YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

  40. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #3/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Neither does my program. AV does to remove threats - Adblock addons = Vastly INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I proved & no one proved me wrong to date!

    ---

    "your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    No, hosts do due to WFP/SFP - Intake update of new hosts data doesn't!

    ---

    "won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen by others so it's misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    ---

    "What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't keep a server. Security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it using process monitor + wireshark to prove it (don't need code)!

    ---

    "the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I place hardcoded fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - you'd spot it easily & bulk of hosts is sorted blocked known bad threats.

    ---

    "What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Hasn't happened!

    ---

    "They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    It works there!

    Telemetry tracking's killing 10 by itself: Win10 = Win8 = flops - who're you fooling other than yourself?

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #4/5... apk

  41. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #4/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 'eats his words' vs. me 2x yet again:

    "introduces risk you are relying on a 3rd party to update a hosts file potentially opening you up to MITM attacks" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    How can my program do it?

    Only things it puts in as non-blocking IP addy to hostnames is ones users give it as their favs to speed up @ the TOP of hosts REVERSE DNS VERIFIED!

    (For more speed, & reliability + security - in RAM as 1st resolver queried = faster & more secure vs. remote DNS w/ all its security issues in Kaminsky flaw, DNSChanger malware IP stack settings, routers bushwhacked in DNS settings, rogue DNS, Open DNS servers abused by malware. It aids in reliability vs. redirects).

    YOU'D SPOT IT INSTANTLY AS THEY ARE @ TOP OF CUSTOM HOSTS & can easily edit anything you want out of it!

    (Rest = known bad sites from 10 reputable security community sites for blocking - the MAJORITY of what's in my hosts files!)

    ---

    "maybe one day you can get a score 5 comment" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    See subject & ~ 12 +5 upmods making you "eat your words" vs. me (1st one: You tried using what I post there against me to FAIL):

    +5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly" (11):

    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://science.slashdot.org/co...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    "You believe you are getting the better of me" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    YOU GOT THE BEST OF YOURSELF in tech fails & lies about me. Your immature signatures about me SCREAM you're butthurt - You did it to yourself.

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #5/5... apk

  42. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "defame me saying things he knows aren't true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Hypocrite You're projecting & your signatures do the rest.

    "the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    I show /.'ers say differently by quoted testimonials - Show us you've done better: YOU can't!

    "maybe someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    Quotes of you = true - & You can't keep your word + projecting what YOU do (AD/DNS lie).

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    I protect users speeding them up, helping reliability, & security + anonymity online w/ more ability & efficiency than ANY 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.

    "I should change my signature again to rile him up more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015

    Childish sigs = all you've got!

    "I refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015

    &

    "You claim I have never proved you wrong...a flat out lie." - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    &

    "I proved you wrong on numerous occasions" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2015

    Where & on what tech? "Cat got your tongue"??

    "written in shitty Delphi, "How to secure Windows" docs I could have written in my sleep when I was 20" - by Coren22 on Monday November 16, 2016

    You're 30++ & haven't done either!

    Show you've done MORE vs.a small partial list of mine & better, + earlier:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    THEN talk vs. TALKING OUT YOUR ASS!

    CIS Tool took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... which you doubted & my layered security guides got me paid http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn... MILLIONS use.

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "I never admit you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    You PROVED I am... apk

  43. Re: Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, because he posted twenty times he almost got me to try APK hosts... Maybe if he had gone to 21?

  44. Re:Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/5... apk by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    How else can I programmatically update hosts itself?

    You can use gksu/do or zenity or even resort to sticky bit. or just use ~/hosts.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)