Slashdot Mirror


UK Mobile Operator Could Block Ads At Network Level (telegraph.co.uk)

Mickeycaskill writes: UK network operator EE says it is investigating the possibility of blocking adverts at a network level, allowing customers to limit the types and frequency of adverts they see in browsers and applications. The move is likely to concern digital publishers, many of whom rely on advertising revenue to fund their content. Ad blockers have become more popular in recent times, with many users employing them to save battery life, consume less data and protect against malvertising attacks. EE CEO Olaf Swantee said, "We think it’s important that, over time, customers start to be offered more choice and control over the level and intensity of ads on mobile. For EE, this is not about ad blocking, but about starting an important debate around customer choice, controls and the level of ads customers receive. This is an important debate that needs to happen soon."

109 comments

  1. Websites will block EE ip ranges by bazmail · · Score: 1

    Its not going to work, and besides he only said that to kickstart a conversation in the UK about annoying ads.

    1. Re:Websites will block EE ip ranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not going to happen. All UK mobile operators and then ISPs will follow suit (as the customers begin the like the idea).

      Since none of these companies make money out of it, can use it for future industry leverage and force a legal finding exercise in this space.

    2. Re:Websites will block EE ip ranges by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      French provider Free has been blocking ads for years. First as an ISP, then also for mobile customers.

      This started during the Free-Google war which settled in the meantime, but the ad blocking is still in effect. But that won't make all companies do the same.

      In fact, only Free can do that since they do not rely on any collaboration or contracts with ad providers. All the others are stuck because they are either part of a big advertisement group or have heavy bilateral contracts with ad agencies.

    3. Re:Websites will block EE ip ranges by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. Many of these web sites are operated by people who don't control the advertisements themselves. They outsource the ad job to a third party then wait for revenue to trickle in. They may not even have the skills to do the blocking if their tech skill level is just enough to customize wordpress.

    4. Re:Websites will block EE ip ranges by davester666 · · Score: 1

      No, this is about getting a cut of the action. These are MY customers. If you want your ads to show up on MY customers devices, you will have to pay me $x/impression.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:Websites will block EE ip ranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, websites will not. Now that Net Neutrality is officially dead, all ISPs will do this.

      "You want to advertise to my customers? Pony up my cut of the revenue, or I block your ad serving domains."

      Publicly, ISPs will sell this as removing ads for their valued customers. The hoi polloi will take the bait; Hook, line, and sinker. This is why Google fought for net neutrality. It's not because they were protecting fairness and level playing fields. Google's only concern is defending their primary source of revenue.

  2. All newspapers will have SSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:All newspapers will have SSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they ISP will just proxy the HTTPS site via HTTP. If the user tries to connect securely, the connection can be blocked and the user will assume the site doesn't support it.

    2. Re:All newspapers will have SSL by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's how they wanna go about it. security is part of their reasoning.
      They're gonna block ip addresses at 'network level'. it's not going to be matching the host name against 'googleanalytics.com', they're going after 173.194.112.XXX

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  3. EE redirects instead to a competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tit for tat is a game for two that is often circular and usually broken with discussion. ;)

  4. EE will use the integrated face system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The integrated face system blocks adverts and will also block anything that EE dosen't approve of.

  5. No different than piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DMCA will shut that UK operator down faster than you can say rumpledforeskin.

  6. Re: For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope your software ability doesn't match your spelling and grammar ability.

    If you pay me to try it, I may. In the meantime, I'll simply do what other users should do. Search Google for "ad block host files" and read the directions. Genius not required. Spelling and grammar are required.

    Sincerely,
    The Grammar Nazi

  7. Re: For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spamming? How cool of you!

    I suggest people interested search Google for FREE solutions. Simply search, "ad block hosts files" read the simple directions and BAM your done. No executables, no untrusted software, no convincing from Anonymous Cowards.

  8. Elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah the ads were irritating and got worse and worse over the years, but it was the malware that made me finally install blocking software. Malware is the reason I won't run a browser without ad-blocking software these days, and recommend it to all my friends.

    1. Re: Elephant in the room by popo · · Score: 1

      Which is why the *real* elephant in the room is *browser security* and the fact that javascript *still* isn't effectively sandboxed in 2015.

      That alone would be a a shockingly big deal, but making it even bigger is the fact that the world's largest ad supported company also manufactures the world's most popular web browser -- oh, and bundles Flash.

      Still though-- NoScript works. Don't kill off your favorite website just because out browsers are broken.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    2. Re: Elephant in the room by tepples · · Score: 1

      Still though-- NoScript works.

      If a web application has a good reason to require JavaScript to function, what should it do to gain the trust of a NoScript user?

    3. Re: Elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offer source so people can run it locally. I am never going to block localhost.

    4. Re: Elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a web application has a good reason to require JavaScript to function, what should it do to gain the trust of a NoScript user?

      Heh. Picture trust for these devs as being akin to consideration for gun-owners seeking to regain the trust of a public that hates guns --especially when the local shootings increase daily. It will be easy to see how getting noscript is mostly a one-way trip.

      The "allow x subdomain temporarily" option is great for tentative exploration probing a new site built to hide content behind JS and css layers.

  9. Bad idea! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    First they blocked ads, but I don't see ads

    Then they blocked porn, but I don't watch porn... (Liar!)

    Then they blocked politicians... well, that's okay (No it's not!)

    Then they blocked Slashdot... Okay that's going too far, everybody, out!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Bad idea! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In theory a provider is like a cloud computer system that offers direct network access as the main product.
      Why not use the "offered more choice" to upsell or differentiate with new services?
      A provider might come with a few settings for email accounts, SPAM filter setting, their own adsl settings (1, 2+, a low latency profile), free or upgraded web site setup. Blocking as an on/off option?
      The user is still a customer with some real network options :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Bad idea! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Blocking will not remain optional for very long. The old slippery slope applies here.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Bad idea! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Once NGO's, local and other governments work out thats its looking deep into the flow of data... why not block or scan for other data too? Images (hash list), movies, files names, file types.. it will get interesting fast.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Badly behaved adverts are the problem by agoodm · · Score: 1

    I believe the problem on mobile devices is not per say well behaved adverts, but instead its adverts that cause the page to morph or change some seconds after it is rendered. My local newspapers website is virtually unusable on my android tablet device. The page loads, you start reading, or decide what to click on next and suddenly the content moves down the page so that an advert can appear...

    1. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It gets better. Adverts use in 30-50% of current bandwidth. By blocking add on the network the mobile company saves precious bandwidth instead of using data caps.

      Datacaps will kill internet advertisers.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Threni · · Score: 1

      Adverts use half the bandwidth? Which arse did you pull that statistic out of?

    3. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right here on slashdot 6 months ago dipshit.

    4. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you ignore the high bandwidth stuff like downloads and streaming, large content images, etc.... MORE than half (i'd guess over 75%, easy) the bytes of the typical web page on the typical site with ads is pure garbage.. ads and tracking shit..

    5. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Likely the same arse that thought it was a great idea to auto run fucking video advertisements with no sound controls, this on a page with no other video and just a few images ie so about 99% of bandwidth in that case being advertisement that could not be shut off without leaving the page or running an ad blocker and reloading the page or permanently blocking that particular advertising agency and reloading the page.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the figure seems too low to me.

    7. Re:Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "per se" not "per say" - I figured you might wish to actually know this. This is my effort to make you aware without being a dick at the same time.

    8. Re: Badly behaved adverts are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wouldn't using up customer bandwidth be a feature to the ISPs instead of a bug?

  11. Sooooo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess EE customers don't use Yahoo! email....

  12. Take your grubby hands off my data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, absolutely no! You will not squeeze yourself into that position where you can demand money from publishers to let their stuff through. I hate ads, but I'll be damned if I let ISPs be the gatekeeper to the data I can or can't get. You're not supposed to look at the data anyway, so how do you even know what to block? Right, you are looking, aren't you?

  13. AND it's a dessert topping! (tm NBC) by swschrad · · Score: 0

    also heals acne and toenail fungus. ask your doctor if cellphones are right for you.

    if it was all typed in caps, it would be just another late-night TV ad for 1-800-YOU-FOOL type merchandise.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:AND it's a dessert topping! (tm NBC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the best you've got APK should thank you for helping him.

  14. Ummmm.. no by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't like ads, but I don't want ISPs to be allowed to monitor or alter content mid-stream. I appreciate the intention, but that's a door we've already been clear we don't want opened.

    What I would like, however, is an ad-blocking router.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Ummmm.. no by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      An edit to the /etc/hosts file would be a much cheaper fix for you. Works on all major OS, including Android. An of course, works regardless of where you connect.

      You'd have to update it from time to time, however once every two/three years is more than enough in my experience. Or you could be fancy, and do a cron-job.

    2. Re:Ummmm.. no by jacobbrett · · Score: 1

      If you have an OpenWRT-compatible router and are comfortable administrating it you could install this adblocking script, which automatically updates its own block list from a variety of sources. I've personally been using this set-up for about a month and its been working well.

    3. Re:Ummmm.. no by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  15. If you could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could get rid of auto-playing ads, that'd be great.

  16. Re:For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats) by tepples · · Score: 2

    You make a big deal that browser-level blocking extensions are "usermode slower & increases messagepassing". But if a browser extension blocks a request, the CPU doesn't need to make a context switch to kernel mode in the first place. And good luck with your hosts files once ad networks start randomizing their servers' hostnames for every hit using wildcard CNAME records. Finally, and most relevantly to the article, good luck changing the hosts file on mobile devices without root privileges.

  17. Starting An Important Debate by sexconker · · Score: 0

    this is not about ad blocking, but about starting an important debate

    No, it's about ad blocking. No one ever wants to "start a debate" or "have a conversation" or "open a dialog".
    Everyone saying those things simply wants to do their thing and ram it down your throat while getting tards to parrot their talking points in the guise of "debate", "conversation", or "dialog".

    I'm 100% against ads and 100% for blocking them. I'm just sick of asshats using the phony debate/dialog/conversation bullshit to pretend they haven't already taken a hardline stance on a subject.

  18. Advertising is SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Treat ads like spam and block it any way possible.

    Now were talking!

    Bring back the internet of open and free for the community. If you are a for-profit thinking you can make a quick buck you don't belong here.

  19. Why not ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... capture all the ads and offer a 'sponsors' button/tab with the requested page? That way, people who want to see the ads can elect to view them as a list. Or reload the page with ads included. Whatever works best.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. How to make publishers willing to offer source? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If a web application has a good reason to require JavaScript to function, what should it do to gain the trust of a NoScript user?

    Offer source so people can run it locally.

    What use is a local app that is unable to access the resources it requires due to the Same Origin Policy? Some of the resources are dynamically generated by the web app's server. Even ability to download static resources locally as well would fail because Chrome considers each file in the file: scheme to be a separate origin.

    If you instead refer to storing all resources on a computer owned by the user, there are two things likely to happen. The first is unwillingness to share source code: "You can use the app on the public server without charge, or you can license a copy to run on your own private server for $9,999." The second is network effects. Consider a web application that allows users of a particular server to interact, but user accounts on your private server cannot interact with users on the public servers. So good luck getting the majority of users to use your private server instead of the public ones.

    If you want more concrete examples, consider whether the publisher would be wiling to offer the source code for Google Maps or H&R Block At Home or Netflix or an HTML5 multiplayer game with greater-than-hobbyist production values. Or what would be the business model for funding the continued development of such an application as free software?

  21. Having to write a half dozen native apps by tepples · · Score: 1

    As more Internet users adopt NoScript, does this mean people are going to have to stop writing web apps and instead write six different native apps, one each for Windows desktop, Windows UWP, OS X, iOS, X11/Linux, and Android?

  22. Re:For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats) by EETech1 · · Score: 1

    I've tried it, and my core 2 duo never finished without crashing.

    So much duplication that it never completed? Just ground it to a halt (not out of ram) even after several tries.

    I wish you'd just post the output weekly somewhere as APK master host file so I could just copy it in to place on all my devices.

  23. Re:Routers get "nuked" a lot... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your spam and fuck off, apk.

  24. I'll let others speak for me on that account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, what's that you said Coren22, by AC?

    * :)

    (Hahahahahaha - fool!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You will ALWAYS be my fool now - accept it!

    ... apk

  25. I'll let others speak for me on that account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:31AM (#50947415)

    Now, what's that you said Coren22 by AC?

    * :)

    (Hahahahahaha - fool!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You will ALWAYS be my fool now - accept it!

    ... apk

  26. I'll let others speak for me on that account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:31AM (#50947415)

    Now what's that you said Coren22 by AC?

    * :)

    (Hahahahahaha - fool!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You will ALWAYS be my fool now - accept it!

    ... apk

  27. They are slower/inefficient, just fact... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject (they're in slower less cpu serviced usermode + redundant & inefficient vs.hosts in kernelmode): Your fundamentals = FAULTY from the get-go tepples.

    APK

    P.S.=> My post such as this one have all the backup for that statement that I need http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... - sorry tepples - I like you, but it's just facts (inviolate, concrete, verifiable, & UNDENIABLE facts w/ backing from reputable enough sources in that link above)... apk

  28. Coren22's "APKolypse"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code and said it looked all good to them" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

    My code went thru verification by Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes' hpHosts

    hpHosts Site Admin Mr. Steven Burn quoted:

    "I've been asked to further clarify so for the record yes I've seen the code, and yes, it is safe."

    FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

    (On my latest 9.0++ code engine above & from past versions -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    A competent coder & BEST security researcher I know of FROM THE BEST ANTIMALWARE THERE IS http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    NOT a secretary!

    I don't give away work to be stolen OR misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    ---

    "won't demonstrate security of his product be exposing the source" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

    Bullshit: 62 reputable sources + /. users say different:

    Safe by 57 antivirus programs in 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan (installer too)-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    APK

    P.S.=> Eat your words, scumbag:

    Tell us about AD + DNS too while you're @ it & how you said I said not to run DNS when I use it myself & said to NOT use external to network DNS with AD http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    OR

    About how my program NEEDS admin privelege to update too (& it doesn't http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    LOL... fool - 'eat your words' on ALL those accounts chump!

    ... apk

  29. Questions/help/troubleshooting... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many rows was dataset? I deduplicate nearly 4++ million here daily (takes ~ 33 minutes on a Core I7 4790k, & ~ 55 minutes on a Core I7 920 @ stock mhz on both).

    Filtering takes longer & isn't recommended over iirc, 500k rows on intake (bust it up into smaller ones to work on @ first for filtering & merge in newly sorted/deduped/filtered data afterward doing ONLY a dedup on it).

    * Typically when you "haul in" the 1st initial dataset that the program imports it shouldn't be more than 250k or so lines TOPS from the 10 base security community hosts file data providers the program draws its data from.

    (There's a "hidden debug tool" in its upper left hand-side CONTROL box menu item entitled "APKDebugErrorLogDump" - use it & IF it has ANY messages? Post them in reply)

    APK

    P.S.=> For troubleshooting:

    Firewall rule: Let it thru your firewall inbound @ least IF you have an issue (has network code in it is why to obtain data via downloads & that *may* be your problem).

    You may have the issue MS introduced in "Windows Defender" in VISTA where you have to make a rule in it to ALLOW hosts alteration - ANOTHER KNOWN ISSUE MS introduced regarding hosts most everyone KNOWS about too

    OR

    You didn't set your local dnscache clientside slower usermode service off as the program & it's installation directions recommend is all!

    NOW, *if* that all doesn't work & the program just "hangs"?

    It means 1 of the sites is UNDER ATTACK (THIS IS NOTED IN ITS CONFIG TAB where you pick sites to download custom hosts file data from) & the socket's timing out.

    See "Config" tab, & check each site (it allows this) by trying to go to it & if it's down in your browser it'll tell you so... apk

  30. Free (in France) already offers that option by illogict · · Score: 1

    Free, a network operator in France, already offers the option to block ads on both their fixed (DSL and FTTH) and mobile networks. It was first implemented and enabled by default) three years ago when they were “fighting” with Google about who should pay for interco upgrades.
    It is now default-disabled and opt-in as they managed to reach an agreement with them.

  31. For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    ---

    FREE, not 'souled-out' to advertisers + adds speed, security & reliability. Does FAR more w/ FAR less more efficiently vs. redundant browser addons & locally installed DNS servers @ home + fixes DNS' many security issues & it stops a LOT of tracking @ webpage + DNS levels combined too from 1 file you NATIVELY have - firewalls do the rest (on lesser used IP address based tracking vs. host-domain name type).

    ---

    It obtains data vs. threats & for adbanner blocking from 10 reputable sites in the security community!

    ---

    It SPEEDS YOU UP 2 ways (adblocking + locally cached in RAM favorites placed @ TOP of hosts for fastest resolution speed vs. remote DNS (aids reliability)) vs. other "so-called security 'solutions'" SLOWING YOU!

    ---

    It does all that via something you natively have vs. "bolting on browser addons 'MOAR'" that's usermode slower & increases messagepassing, cpu + ram overheads!

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    So is its installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    * "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend".

    APK

    P.S.=> By "yours truly" - "The Lord of Hosts" so-to-speak:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" from https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... & THAT WORD = hosts!

    (Accept NO substitutes!)

    ...apk

  32. For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    ---

    FREE, not 'souled-out' to advertisers + adds speed, security & reliability. Does FAR more w/ FAR less more efficiently vs. redundant browser addons & locally installed DNS servers @ home + fixes DNS' many security issues & it stops a LOT of tracking @ webpage + DNS levels combined too from 1 file you NATIVELY have - firewalls do the rest (on lesser used IP address based tracking vs. host-domain name type).

    ---

    It obtains data vs. threats & for adbanner blocking from 10 reputable sites in the security community!

    ---

    It SPEEDS YOU UP 2 ways (adblocking + locally cached in RAM favorites placed @ TOP of hosts for fastest resolution speed vs. remote DNS (aids reliability)) vs. other "so-called security 'solutions'" SLOWING YOU!

    ---

    It does all that via something you natively have vs. "bolting on browser addons 'MOAR'" that's usermode slower & increases messagepassing, cpu + ram overheads!

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    So is its installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    * "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend".

    APK

    P.S.=> By "yours truly" - "The Lord of Hosts" so-to-speak:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" from https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... & THAT WORD = hosts!

    (Accept NO substitutes!)

    ...apk

  33. Routers get "NuKeD" a lot... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... You may, on the note of the subject, wish to take a peek @ that instead (for now @ least)...

    * :)

    APK

    P.S.=> Accept no substitutes... apk

  34. Re:I'll let others speak for me on that account by dave420 · · Score: 1

    One extension being sub-par does not make them all sub-par. That is terrible logic.

    Using ADB to update your HOSTS files is ridiculous, and HOSTS protection is far from perfect. A wildcard advertising domain can not be blocked by a HOSTS file unless the HOSTS file is megabytes large just for the single wildcard domain. If you don't understand why, you really need (more) help.

  35. How many people actually root? by tepples · · Score: 1

    As chihowa points out, you need root on your phone to use a hosts file. What percentage of Android users have root on their phones? As I understand it, the farthest a "typical" Android user will go is turn on the "Unknown sources" to install an APK file. But because of Android's security model, an APK file can't affect DNS resolution, despite the name, unless it's a full-on VPN client.

  36. Net Neutrality? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Could this possibly go against net neutrality rules? Though I do totally agree with blocking them on Mobile -- especially video-based ads (I'm looking at you YouTube)

  37. Re:For the BEST adblocker (& more vs. threats) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how can your host file tool be installed on a smart phone? And how can your tool be a faster solution than a complete advertisement block on ISP level, long before it reaches your network adapter?

  38. Others used it & it works for them... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & these testimonials to that effect from your /. peers:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    APK

    P.S.=> I'm willing to try help you if a problem indeed exists - reply here to THIS post, or to my other one -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... & most importantly I suppose, & I didn't ask these questions THERE, was:

    1.) What version of Windows do you use?
    2.) Did the data finish intake??
    3.) Were you actually in process doing sort/deduplicate???
    4.) Did you get to the point it asked you to Convert/Filter????

    ... apk

  39. I have no idea... why? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Personally, I think smartphones are toys - that's right: Why?

    Well - Afaik @ least, & yes I code JAVA so I could code for them (as well as Delphi which ports to ANDROID too)??

    You need a PC to develop for them...

    I.E./E.G.-> You really can't do development on a smartphone directly (again, afaik @ least) & I wouldn't want to with such a puny keypad & screen either!

    (Thus - I'm not really interested in them to be bluntly honest about it, so to answer your question? See my subject...)

    HOWEVER:

    I do know how EASY it is to move a hosts file over to a smartphone using ADB... piece of cake. They work there, but using TOO BIG of one can be problematic (if you're on a 'lower-end' model with little RAM/storage that's free...) & hosts work there (they're really just a Linux variant in ANDROID's case w/ a BSD derived IP stack that has hosts (except for KitKat ANDROID, where GOOGLE literally stripped hosts afaik).

    APK

    P.S.=> I'm more interested in PC's & Servers by far (kind of like how Linus Torvalds isn't interested in doing web page work & has publicly stated it)... apk

  40. ADB works to do it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's not ridiculous when it works Dave420. Hosts do more than ANY 1 browser addon by far & for less for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity too!

    APK

    P.S.=> Those are the facts Dave420... apk

  41. The bitchslapping of Dave420 #1/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everyone who does use HOSTS files (myself included) doesn't use your software" - by dave420 (699308) on Thursday November 05, 2015 @07:30AM (#50869743)

    Some /.'ers made you "eat your words": They use my hosts file engine saying it's good vs. your bullshit:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    (LMAO... you FAIL as usual, again, vs. me!)

    * What's that you said I have quoted from you above Dave420?

    APK

    P.S.=> Thanks for making me look good: You always say something I can put away with undeniable facts that prove you wrong... lol!

    ... apk

  42. The bitchslapping of Dave420 #2/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You have no supporters with accounts" - by dave420 (699308) on Monday November 23, 2015 @11:17AM (#50985793)

    See subject & a quote of your words you must eat vs. me again:

    Tepples does http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    aaaaaaargh! does http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    Trax3001BBS does http://news.slashdot.org/comme...

    KGIII does http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    * So do all these /.'ers:

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015

    "Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015

    "APK isn't wrong" - by cfalcon (779563) on Sunday October 04, 2015

    "In a footnote, I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable." - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015

    APK

    P.S.=> What's that you said Dave420? Outnumbered by 12++:1 for starters?? LMAO... apk

  43. I'll let others speak for me on that account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted" - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)

    See subject, that quote from chihowa & "EAT YOUR WORDS" chump... lol!

    * :)

    (Hosts results from my program run on any normal BSD derived IP stack bearing device is how - & using ADB (Android Debugging Bridge) one can use the PULL command to draw said resulting hosts file over to it... easily!)

    APK

    P.S.=> That's NOT a smiley face from me above - it's a SMIRK @ U - why? You SHOULD have known the above is why... apk

  44. Coren22's spelling during his "APKolypse"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & this link in that regards http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (R O T F L M A O) during Coren22's "APKolypse" http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...

    * :)

    (Chump trolls must be outta modpoints - but go on - keep blowing them... lol, I'LL RUN YOU DRY weak bitches!)

    APK

    P.S.=> That's just "what I do/how I roll" & RIGHT OVER YOU TROLLS with ease... apk

  45. AIDE is an app for apping apps by tepples · · Score: 1

    You need a PC to develop for them...

    AIDE allows development of Android applications directly on an Android tablet with a USB, Bluetooth, or clip-on keyboard. After the discontinuation of netbooks, some people recommended pressing such a tablet into service as a substitute for a laptop.

  46. Tepples, it'll work vs. CNAME wildcards &... a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "good luck with your hosts files once ad networks start randomizing their servers' hostnames for every hit using wildcard CNAME records" - by tepples (727027) on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @06:06PM (#50998073)

    See subject & until then, that's "phantasyland" theoreticals anyhow! Seems "desperate" when my naysayers always say "if THIS happens", well... when the sky falls, then chickenlittle should worry - but not until then!

    Plus?

    There's ALWAYS malware + botnet C&C servers hosts will block also!

    IIRC, on your CNAME use note:

    That's SORT OF what ClarityRay can do as well - randomize the adserver names (besides detect & block adblock users) - well, no biggie - my sources in the security community get those new adserver names as the pop up easily too. That's my point there.

    ---

    " Finally, and most relevantly to the article, good luck changing the hosts file on mobile devices without root privileges." - by tepples (727027) on Tuesday November 24, 2015 @06:06PM (#50998073)

    It's doable - plenty of folks do it or have phones that way already...

    APK

    P.S.=> There ya go... & besides - I told you already what my thoughts are on smartphones (they're toys)... apk

  47. Thanks 4 updated info. & some 4u too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: & I left another message for you to consider here too http://mobile.slashdot.org/com...

    APK

    P.S.=> Your thoughts, as always, are appreciated - oh, additionally (where are my manners? lol) - sorry for the late reply (had to make lunch & get "vino" for guests coming over for Thanksgiving)... apk

    1. Re:Thanks 4 updated info. & some 4u too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many guests in your head might be part of the problem.

  48. THIS IS IP INFRINGEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject CUZ COHEN22 works for UK mobile operator??????? and he STOLE my hosts file magic I INVENTED using the host file and this doin same technique

    EAT ur werdz UK.....apk...apk

    P.S. => I don't know why this then WORK on non-microsoft OPERATING systems cuz they rnt important

    P.P.S. => cohen22 even admits EAT MY MOM that hosts file need admin privileges to edit, and this does not even require admin??? PROBABLY SUPER HAX

    .....apk

    P.MY.SELF. => On further review THEY are probably usin MY host file tool on their MICROSOFT WINDOWS routers which run the internet

    ....apk

  49. Even if the sky is falling down by tepples · · Score: 1

    well... when the sky falls, then chickenlittle should worry

    In this model, I've spotted the pieces of camouflage that the aliens are assembling.

    my sources in the security community get those new adserver names as the pop up easily too.

    Not if they're like a328bc97.someadnetwork.example. Even eight hex digits would require four billion lines in a hosts file.

  50. Band width theif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am browsing some page. On that page an AD is playing some video content. My wife calls me to go to the store for whatever. I go and come back a few hours later, then I am engaged in eating what I bought. Eventually I get around to shutting my computer off, but while it was on YOUR AD was sucking MY bandwidth away on something I didn't even see. This is YOUR fault not mine, YOUR AD stole MY bandwidth, with absolutely NO benefit to me. One wonders why I am against ANY video advertisement. BAND WIDTH THIEF!!!!

  51. Phantasyland "theoreticals" != reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Plus, there's always botnets & malicious sites to block too that hosts do GREAT on also!

    APK

    P.S.=> You guys can reach for "theoreticals" ALL DAY LONG, doesn't matter - I could say "but if a virus like in Terminator II pops up then no security is possible" so please, give me a break, lol... reality isn't phantasy & so far, you're fantasizing my man! apk

    1. Re:Phantasyland "theoreticals" != reality by tepples · · Score: 1

      In other words, you won't be satisfied until you see a proof of concept. I'll put that on my list.

  52. Reality's reality: Not theoretical phantasyland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all - hosts work vs. ads & malware/botnets, spam, trackers, etc. - et al & that's-that - it's reality, not fantasy theoreticals.

    * I get a lot of that from troll 'naysayers' (anyone can do that, like I said - "What if there was a nanomachine based virus like in Terminator 2? There is no security then!" well, that hasn't happened yet either, so... there you are, by analogy)... I didn't expect it from you though.

    APK

    P.S.=> When you come RIGHT down to it tepples, that's what matters & the fact of the matter is I'm correct... apk

  53. Projecting your issues onto me? LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject - says it all - & if that's "the best ya got" ac troll weasels? You've got squat (& you KNOW it).

    APK

    P.S.=> It must really SUCK to be a worthless "ne'er-do-well" no balls scumbag like you... apk

  54. ADB is how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: ADB = Android Debugging Bridge software that works on PCs & using its PULL command is how.

    APK

    P.S.=> And there ya go... apk

  55. You wish you were me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Your weak attempt @ "impersonating" me proves my subject-line for me - but you do a poor job of it!

    APK

    P.S.=> This is the type of crap that truly lets me know I am doing well - when the troll naysayers have nothing but loony garbage to spew all over this site's pages no doubt out of frustration @ being unable to prove me validly technically wrong, AND from the fact they're jealous lazy "ne'er-do-wells" that are undereducated unskilled morons in computing... apk