Slashdot Mirror
Parts of the SpaceX Falcon-9 Rocket Found Off the Isles of Scilly (bbc.com)
New submitter AppleHoshi writes: The BBC is reporting that a large chunk of the SpaceX Falcon-9 rocket, which exploded shortly after take-off from Cape Canaveral earlier this year, has been found 4,000 miles away, in the sea off the Isles of Scilly. The recovered section is approximately 10m (32ft) by 4m (13ft). It was discovered by a local coastguard patrol, though they didn't recognize it until they scraped off a layer of goose barnacles.
To lose part of your rocket.
http://www.spacex.com/sites/al...
I don't know if it's clear what launch it's from. Several have gone into the ocean, both from attempts at landing on the barge, and ditching in the ocean.
This is the top of the first stage. There may be an empty helium tank inside this acting as flotation. The helium tanks are really robust, and have separately survived even really fast impacts.
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.c...
Ok? What is there to discuss? Rocket explodes, pieces fall into ocean. Pieces later float up somewhere. News for nerds?
The part found is not from the recent explosion, it's from the CRS-4 resupply mission to the International Space Station that launched on 21st September 2014. See the Reddit thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/space... The part is the interstage separator, a carbon fibre component that sits between the first and second stages. It stays attached to the first stage after the second stage detaches - in the case of CRS-4 it re-entered the atmosphere under controlled flight, and was videoed by NASA to gain information on supersonic retropropulsion: https://www.reddit.com/r/space...
This seems to be a part of CRS-4 according to reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/3ugqa1/the_rocket_part_found_in_scilly_uk_is_from_crs4/
Wikipedia to the rescue:
In the days before it was realised that birds migrate, it was thought that barnacle geese, Branta leucopsis, developed from this crustacean, since they were never seen to nest in temperate Europe,[2] hence the English names "goose barnacle", "barnacle goose" and the scientific name Lepas anserifera (Latin anser = "goose"). The confusion was prompted by the similarities in colour and shape. Because they were often found on driftwood, it was assumed that the barnacles were attached to branches before they fell in the water. The Welsh monk, Giraldus Cambrensis, made this claim in his Topographia Hiberniae.[3]
Since barnacle geese were thought to be "neither flesh, nor born of flesh", they were allowed to be eaten on days when eating meat was forbidden by Christianity,[2] though it was not universally accepted. The Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II examined barnacles and noted no evidence of any bird-like embryo in them, and the secretary of Leo of Rozmital wrote a very skeptical account of his reaction to being served the goose at a fast-day dinner in 1456.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Can it be a part of an earlier f9 first stage? To me the amount of barnicles looks like it was in the water for at least a year.
Link to something other than Reddit if you want any credibility. Not saying you're wrong, but a Reddit threat is not and never will be a source.
but a Reddit threat is not and never will be a source.
Neither is Slashdot, so who cares? OP gave you the primary information, if you need more confirmation in order to decide if this is "good" or "bad" or something else, you can do it yourself.
And if your research is for a more important purpose than personal satisfaction, you really should be ashamed of asking someone else to do your job.
All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
Yes, burden of proof should always be on the one HEARING the claim.
The proof is in the positioning of the logo: http://i.imgur.com/15qShQd.jpg
The BBC is wrong here, CRS-7 had grid fins which should have been visible on the found part.
A hilarious booper in the original BBC article (since updated) was the statement (repeated in two different places in the text) that the Falcon-9 mission was "...sending a cargo ship to the International Space Station". Poor little Falcon; no wonder it burst a seam.
Found by HMCG is wrong. Fishermen found it, coastguard towed it in.
Regards Eion MacDonald