Slashdot Mirror


NASA Prepares To Launch an Orion and 3 Cubesats To Deep Space: 3 Years To Go (examiner.com)

MarkWhittington writes: As NASA has noted, the space agency and its contractors are working diligently on the first launch of the heavy-lift Space Launch System. The launch, officially called EM-1, or Exploration Mission 1, will loft an unpiloted version of the Orion spacecraft around the moon. NASASpaceFlight.com also noted that a number of secondary payloads, known as CubeSats, will be along for the ride as well. NASA considered EM-1, scheduled for 2018, a crucial step in its Journey to Mars which will, it is hoped, reach its ultimate destination sometime in the 2030s.

8 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. I kept reading that as "3 years ago" by Rei · · Score: 2

    I couldn't stop thinking, "NASA invented time travel - I knew it! Insane theories one, regular theories a billion!"

    --
    I hate to bring up our imminent arrest during your crazy time, but we gotta move.
  2. I thought the secondary payload by tlambert · · Score: 2

    I thought the secondary payload was called "astronauts".

    1. Re:I thought the secondary payload by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We can't even send a monkey anymore, because that would offend PETA. This country lost its collective balls in the 1960s. We can't cope with any risk or danger anymore. This is why we'll never walk on the moon again. This is also why the terrorists are running our lives these days.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:I thought the secondary payload by murdocj · · Score: 2

      Really? So we have a choice between trying to keep a human alive for months so they can spend a few weeks on Mars, with all the cost and supply that entails... or we can operate rovers pretty much indefinitely. Which one makes more sense? Which one gets more done? For the cost of ONE manned mission to Mars, we can have a hundred rovers checking the planet out for years.

    3. Re:I thought the secondary payload by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Factually as related to the crewed space program I don't think your conclusion holds up.
      After the Apollo 1 fatal accident in January 1967, the first crewed flight of Apollo was delayed from its scheduled February 1967 to October 1968, a delay of 20 months.
      After the Challenger fatal accident in January 1986, the next STS launch was delayed until September 1988, a delay of 32 months.
      After the Columbia fatal accident in January 2003, the next STS launch was delayed until July 2005, a delay of 30 months.

      The difference between a 20 month program delay after a fatal accident and a 30 month delay doesn't seem to qualify as "lost its collective balls".

      And as for the manned space program in the 1960's, Alan Shepard aboard Mercury-Redstone 3 would have beaten Yuri Gagarin and been the first human into space if the previous Mercury-Redstone 2 had not exhibited some anomalies (which the chimpanzee aboard survived fine) and influenced NASA to add another test flight before launching Shepard. So NASA was not quite as "ballsy" back then as the legends have it.

    4. Re:I thought the secondary payload by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      For the price of one manned mission we will see tens of thousands of more engineers and scientists inspired to go into STEM.

      I know 2 people who are going back to college for mechanical engineering so that they can "work at SpaceX someday". And that's suborbital. Anecdote yes, but listen to all of the Anecdotes of people inspired by Apollo.

    5. Re:I thought the secondary payload by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, in 1975 we abandoned our existing orbital (and deep space) capability and put all our leftover Apollo/Saturn vehicles in museums. Then we had a six year gap in crewed space capability until STS-1 in 1981. Now, the first crewed missions for the Boeing Atlas/CST-100 vehicle and the SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon vehicle are both scheduled for 2017, again giving a six year gap in US crewed orbital capability (SLS/Orion is a deep space capability to follow a few years later). But, I don't recall the enormous wailing and hand wringing about the USA losing its abilities in space back during the gap in the 70's like there is today.

    6. Re:I thought the secondary payload by jimtheowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jules Vernes for one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But yes, there were people interested in science before; ever since we raised our eyes to the sky wondering about the stars and imagined what it would be like if we could fly like birds.