Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Swarm Robotics Breakthrough Brings Pheromone Communication To AI (thestack.com)

Posted by timothy on from the bioimitation dept.

An anonymous reader writes: Computer scientists at the University of Lincoln have invented a reliable, low-cost system which replicates in robots the pheromone-based communication behind insect swarms. Using off-the-shelf equipment including an LCD screen and a USB camera, the team has proposed what they call COS-phi, or Communication System via Pheromone. The artificial pheromone trails are traced visually onto the screen. As soon as a bot picks up on the path, it is forced to follow the leader.

5 of 31 comments (clear)

  1. Forced to follow... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Forced to follow..."

    So it's like the behavior of Millennials when a new iPhone comes out?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Forced to follow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not exactly. There are some differences between these robots and Millennials.

      Unlike Millennials, these robots don't force "tolerance" by any means necessary, including intolerance that far exceeds anything the allegedly "intolerant" person may have engaged in. (See the case of Brendan Eich.)

      Likewise, unlike Millennials, these robots aren't totally into the complete and ruthless censorship of anything deemed to be "politically incorrect".

      And again, unlike Millennials, these robots don't claim to support a million different social causes, none of which they really care about, just to make it look like they do care.

      In summary, these robots tend to be better, more well-rounded, reasonable people than Millennials are.

  2. This is a breakthrough? by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    Interesting to see what people consider a robots breakthrough these days.

    It seems little more than the old follow the white line 'robots' (that have existed for for at least 50+ years, and primary school kids build with a couple of photodiodes, motors, etc) a monitor for them to run on (and not even a very large one), and a simple feedback camera to 'draw' from one of the robots.
    They could do pretty much the same thing by tying a pen to the first damn 'bot' and putting them on a normal floor.

    This has exactly ZERO do to with pheromones, swarms, or I would suggest breakthroughs.

    I would expect something like this from a high school science project, not a damn PhD.

    Hell, whats wrong with some actual chemical sensors, and droplet sprayers on the robots? would be more interesting and allow for different
    mixing, trail lifespan testing, etc.
    Or they could have used a virtual trail system using radio location and swam communication, but that may have involved actual development.

    I am not sure which is sadder, this 'research', that a university actually allowed it, or that slashdot reported on it.

    1. Re:This is a breakthrough? by JMZero · · Score: 2

      Yeah... I really don't understand a lot of robotics research. They seem to be forever chasing these awkward "proof-of-concept" implementations of concepts that are completely uninteresting. This is a perfect example: obviously you could make some robots that could do this, but it's really unclear what you'd learn by doing so, and the result is useless.

      I mean, if they actually wanted this behavior for some purpose, and this was a reasonable way to approach that practical purpose? Sure, do it. Of course. If there was some question whether this was possible (which obviously there wasn't, at least not serious), then sure, prove it's possible. If there was some question we'd be answering (about biology, maybe?) or some challenge that would be interesting to overcome, then, uh, maybe. But it seems much more likely that such questions could be answered easier by a simulation.

      As it stands, it seems like we've got a HUGE surplus of research on, to pick a random example, how to have robots all go somewhere without bumping into each other - most of it saddled with arbitrary restrictions that are also completely uninteresting. Can the swarming robots co-ordinate without any predetermined communication protocol? Yes, obviously, and we can prove that in simulation. But that's not good enough for some reason, have to actually build some crappy robots to mong into each other while we re-solve a bunch of boring practical problems with batteries and light sensors.

      If you just want to have a challenge, or get some practice building robots that have to deal with the real world, why not build them to at least attempt something interesting or useful, or at least entertaining?

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    2. Re:This is a breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This has a lot to do with pheremone trails, like ants use. But since we can't replicate the chemical nature of pheremnes yet, they are sing photons. If you watched the video you could see that the trail fades with time as would pheremones and it can be followed the wrong way. They also showed following the stronger trail if it crossed itself. These are all behaviors that we had no way of duplicating until someone realized that a light trail could provide a useful analog that could be modulated (color, patterns, etc) to provide different "pheremonal" instructions. So yes, this research is far more than find and follow the white line, and it has quite a lot to do with pheremones.