Slashdot Mirror


Contractors or Not, Seattle Uber Drivers Might Get Collective Bargaining

The Seattle Times reports on a development in Seattle that might have implications for other cities with contentious relationships with transportation coordinating services like Uber. Seattle councilman Mike O'Brien has proposed a system under which drivers for Lyft, Uber, and similar companies would be represented in collective bargaining agreements with the companies they do work for. The proposal would require taxi companies, for-hire vehicle companies and app-based ride-dispatch companies, including Uber and Lyft, to negotiate agreements with drivers on issues such as payment and working conditions. The approach would be novel because of the drivers’ employment status. The National Labor Relations Act gives employees, but not independent contractors, the right to bargain as a union. ... Under O’Brien’s plan, a nonprofit organization would need to show support from a majority of a company’s drivers to be designated by the city as their bargaining representative. The organization would use a list of drivers provided by the company.

4 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry uber drivers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sucks to have your pay docked by a shadow government that does nothing for you, but that's the way it's going to have to be in some retrograde cities.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  2. Pro or Anti union by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether you are pro or anti union, you shouldn't deny workers the right to organize.
    Being able to stand together as a counter-balance to the power of the company is kind of important, whether they choose to take advantage of that right or not.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. Re:Yep, Unions do nothing by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's a list of some of the things we can thank unions for:

            Weekends
            All Breaks at Work, including your Lunch Breaks
            Paid Vacation
            FMLA
            Sick Leave
            Social Security
            Minimum Wage
            Civil Rights Act/Title VII (Prohibits Employer Discrimination)
            8-Hour Work Day
            Overtime Pay
            Child Labor Laws
            Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA)
            40 Hour Work Week
            Worker's Compensation (Worker's Comp)
            Unemployment Insurance
            Pensions
            Workplace Safety Standards and Regulations
            Employer Health Care Insurance
            Collective Bargaining Rights for Employees
            Wrongful Termination Laws
            Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
            Whistleblower Protection Laws
            Employee Polygraph Protect Act (Prohibits Employer from using a lie detector test on an employee)
            Veteran's Employment and Training Services (VETS)
            Compensation increases and Evaluations (Raises)
            Sexual Harassment Laws
            Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
            Holiday Pay
            Employer Dental, Life, and Vision Insurance
            Privacy Rights
            Pregnancy and Parental Leave
            Military Leave
            The Right to Strike
            Public Education for Children
            Equal Pay Acts of 1963 & 2011 (Requires employers pay men and women equally for the same amount of work)
            Laws Ending Sweatshops in the United States

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  4. Re:Fun uber fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The very point in capitalism is to make bank without labour, whereas the very principle of socialism is that you can only earn while labouring. Laziness is a capitalist virtue, as long as it is smart laziness.

    This is lost on some of the college-capitalist blowhards who go around calling socialists lazy. Socialism is unpopular precisely because more intelligent people aren't able to use their brains to reduce the amount of labour they are required to do to survive, so instead go for cronyism.

    (This isn't speaking in defence of or opposition to either. I'm a mixed market pragmatist.)