HTTP/2.0 Opens Every New Connection It Makes With the Word 'PRISM' (jgc.org)

HTTP/2.0 support. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:33 · Score: 5, Funny

HTTP/2.0 also supports the Bitcoin protocol which allows underpaid female STEM workers to drive 3D printed Uber cars or get a job (powered by DICE) delivering Arduinos via drones to Elon Musks new IoT manufacturing Chinese death factory.

Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by Lumpy · 2015-11-30 13:48 · Score: 0

No tacos? FAIL!

--
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by mystik · 2015-11-30 17:06 · Score: 1

Linux crypto hackers open-sourced the BSD Microsoft monopoly.

--
Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by thegarbz · 2015-11-30 20:45 · Score: 1

Wow I got Bingo on the first post.
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 03:16 · Score: 0

Check it again today now that it's Tuesday. That's Taco Tuesday.
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by flink · 2015-12-01 04:17 · Score: 1

You should at least cite your sources :P
Re: HTTP/2.0 support. by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 04:34 · Score: 1

SystemD started on Windows, it is just a svchost backport.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 04:36 · Score: 1

Second post, the first post is someone posting AC claiming to be APK and insulting him pretty profoundly.
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Always read at -1, it is the most interesting side of Slashdot.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by thegarbz · 2015-12-01 06:22 · Score: 1

Always read at -1, it is the most interesting side of Slashdot.
Now there's good advice. Right up there with you don't need condoms. Sex is far more interesting without protection :-)
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 07:35 · Score: 1

Hey, if I didn't read at -1, I never would have seen the treasure that is an APK post.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Re:HTTP/2.0 support. by Avarist · 2015-12-01 07:39 · Score: 1

You forgot the rasperry pi hacker competition.

--
In Capitalist US, the commerce controls the Government.

no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by raymorris · 2015-11-30 13:48 · Score: 1

If you remove the line feeds, you get PRI*HTTP/2.0SM.

Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by dcollins117 · 2015-11-30 14:12 · Score: 5, Insightful

So someone added cruft to a communications protocol just to make a political statement? Seems to me that is a very poor reason to make a technical decision. It's not needed, it should be removed.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:29 · Score: 1

There needed to be a magic sting to help reject non-http2 at http2 endpoints. It isn't cruft. And it is sent exactly once on a new connection.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:37 · Score: 0

TFA says it used to be "FOO", then was changed to "PRI". Not sure where the "SM" after the line separators fits in exactly though.
Re: no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:05 · Score: 0

Yeah, also using the letters PRI * SM is in poor taste
They should have uses NSA * FU
Re: no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:12 · Score: 0

It's better than the original choice, "SPECTRE"
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by BitterOak · 2015-11-30 15:40 · Score: 2

Isn't that what the characters "HTTP/2.0" do? How does that not identify it as http2?

--
If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:52 · Score: 0

It used to be FOO BA and was changed to PRI SM so the tweak makes a statement without adding any overhead.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by tepples · 2015-11-30 16:40 · Score: 1

The use of a new request method (PRI) makes HTTP/1.x servers more likely to (correctly) reject the connection attempt so that the client can cleanly fall back to 1.1.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by dcollins117 · 2015-11-30 19:14 · Score: 1

The use of a new request method (PRI) makes HTTP/1.x servers more likely to (correctly) reject the connection attempt so that the client can cleanly fall back to 1.1.
That is not how computers work. They match bits, that's it. To anthropomorphize them because that's the way your brain works is a serious error.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Jesus_666 · 2015-11-30 19:24 · Score: 3, Insightful

// HTTP 1.1 is essentially 1.0 so any future version of HTTP will work with our code. var weSupportThis = new Regex("^HTTP/\d+\.\d+").IsMatch(header);

There are many coders out there and many broken ways of detecting protocols. Only changing the version number might run into trouble if one side of the conversation assumes that everything starting with "HTTP" is going to be pretty much equivalent to HTTP/1.0. So at least the "PRI" part makes sense.

--
USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 19:35 · Score: 1

And that habit will continue since it works.
As a result we end up with protocols with more overhead than necessary.
Wouldn't it be better that those who use broken code suffer instead of everyone else?
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 19:36 · Score: 1

> [...] poor reason to make a technical decision.
Sigh. Yet another "technical ideologist". Thing is, most of those have no clue about technology itself, but tout an ideal in which each and every decision is taken on "technical grounds". Which end up, for the above reason, by being just disguised gut feelings.
Know what? To do a good job, you should start by differentiating between your gut feelings and technical things (*both* are necessary and useful, but by all means, know which is which). If you can't muster that, you should steer clear of science and engineering.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by dcollins117 · 2015-11-30 19:38 · Score: 1, Funny

Thank you , Jesus. I see the light. It's way off in the distance, because I am surrounded by imbeciles, by I can see the light. One day, I believe, people will be smart. That's all I can hope for.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 20:02 · Score: 1

It used to be FOO BA\r actually, wouldn't want that shitty pun to go unnoticed;
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 20:08 · Score: 0

Stop arguing with your own mentall illness.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 22:18 · Score: 0

Wouldn't it be better that those who use broken code suffer instead of everyone else?
It would, on the other hand it might set the world on fire. You have no idea how much hilariously broken code is out there, even Microsoft skipped on Windows 9 to avoid checks against Windows 9(5) and Windows 9(8(SE)), some IBM software blew up when the SUN JVM was replaced by the ORACLE JVM, year 2000 issues were a thing, etc. . There are just too many people who could not code themselves out of a wet paper bag.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by AmiMoJo · 2015-11-30 22:46 · Score: 1

It was originally going to be START, but they found that people were using the START method for various things so changed it to something that hopefully would be less common. At first it was FOOBA, but after Snowden it was changed to PRISM in protest.

--
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2015-12-01 00:33 · Score: 1

> [...] poor reason to make a technical decision.
Sigh. Yet another "technical ideologist". Thing is, most of those have no clue about technology itself, but tout an ideal in which each and every decision is taken on "technical grounds". Which end up, for the above reason, by being just disguised gut feelings.
Know what? To do a good job, you should start by differentiating between your gut feelings and technical things (*both* are necessary and useful, but by all means, know which is which). If you can't muster that, you should steer clear of science and engineering.
Thank you!

--
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by DarkOx · 2015-12-01 00:34 · Score: 1

No computers do what they are programmed to do. I would count on the fact there are a lot of 'simplified' HTTP clients and servers out there that look for the string 'HTTP' and not much more. After all if you were implementing something that just needed to exchange a little information over the course of a handful of strait forward GETs or something and wanted to make it HTTP like enough to traverse firewalls be proxied if needed etc, a cut down HTTP implementation is/was a good way to go.
When it comes to something like that you don't care if its HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 the differences in the protocol won't impact your use case at all. Given how long HTTP/1.1 has been the standard a lot of stuff probably just assumes that.
Personally HTTP/2.0 being so radically different and binary to boot is probably a mistake. HTTP is Hyper TEXT transfer protocol, it makes sense that it is text. Future development of HTTP should have been more negotiable human readable text protocols not binary. Which is not to say the modern Internet application could not benefit from a binary protocol there are advantages. I just wish we could have called it WATP web application transport protocol, or something so it was clearly something radically different that won't work with existing proxies etc.

--
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 00:47 · Score: 0

"by I can see the light"
looks like you can't see the grammar checker button though
Re: no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 01:40 · Score: 0

Note that the above code won't work, since the protocol, is the last thing on the line. The request line has the protocol, the resource uri, and the protocol.
H/2 uses a PRI method, no URL and the new protocol. Old code is likely to break.
Also, no real web server will have shitty code like that. That looks like garbage CGI scripts written to avoid using a spec-compliant server.
So basically, we are looking at a whole bunch of embedded devices now being unable to handle h/2. Hooray for ignores standards.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by LiENUS · 2015-12-01 03:14 · Score: 1

HTTP is Hyper TEXT transfer protocol, it makes sense that it is text.
Yes its for transmitting hypertext, ie text documents that contains links to other text documents. IE exactly what HTTP/2.0 is doing. Hypertext refers to the content not the protocol.
Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM by fisted · 2015-12-01 03:53 · Score: 1

TFcommit says it used to be STA RT, not FOO BA

--
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!

it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:50 · Score: 1

for this to get "noticed"?

so much for open standards and open source software... 'its safe. you can look at the code yourself"... it took two and a half fucking years for someone to do just that.. and just to find an easter egg, not an embedded and obscured vulnerability.

Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by viperidaenz · 2015-11-30 14:03 · Score: 5, Insightful

took 2 1/2 years for someone to care
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Atmchicago · 2015-11-30 14:19 · Score: 2

How long would it take for someone to spot something similar in a closed project? Forever?

--
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by KGIII · 2015-11-30 15:00 · Score: 0

Just 'cause it's open doesn't mean someone's gonna notice. For example, look at this text that I'm typing now (and still typing) and see if you can spot the hidden message. It's open, can you find it? Can't make the association? No? Well, here's some more words to make it finish - consider this random text.

--
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by vel-ex-tech · 2015-11-30 15:04 · Score: 1

Do you have a working Geiger counter?
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by harperska · 2015-11-30 16:13 · Score: 2

Forever? Quite probably. Considering the developer who last touched any given source file in a large closed project has probably long since been laid off years before the poor contractor at some Bangalore outsourcing firm tasked with fixing a bug in the aforementioned source file was ever hired.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by KGIII · 2015-11-30 16:26 · Score: 1

Nah, I'm not that smart. It's also not nearly so insightful. Well, maybe, but then I'd have to give you a hint. It is a topical message and there is, indeed, a very open message in there and it's not even remotely hidden if you know what to look for. Given Slashdot user's typical traits, I'd think it'd be obvious but only in hindsight.
Should I remember (or get a notification on here) then I'll share the "hidden" message or at least some hint. *nods*

--
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 16:42 · Score: 1

Your mother's legs are always open and every man can find that.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by BradleyUffner · 2015-11-30 18:10 · Score: 1

How long would it take for someone to spot something similar in a closed project? Forever?
Considering that this is a communication protocol spec, there is no way something similar could be "closed" in a way that would obscure it.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by BronsCon · 2015-11-30 19:39 · Score: 1

Mine is in the shop.

--
APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by thegarbz · 2015-11-30 20:46 · Score: 4, Insightful

No. It took this long for someone to post it to Slashdot.
People still don't care.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 21:21 · Score: 0

for this to get "noticed"?
so much for open standards and open source software... 'its safe. you can look at the code yourself"... it took two and a half fucking years for someone to do just that.. and just to find an easter egg, not an embedded and obscured vulnerability.
Of course *you* could always have taken a look at the code if you'd wanted to.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Sique · 2015-11-30 21:23 · Score: 1

Considering that there are enough proprietary communication protocols around, whose specs are never disclosed at all, or where you have to pay money and sign a non disclosure agreement prior to getting a look at them, there are enough ways for them to be closed.

--
.sig: Sique *sigh*
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by jellomizer · 2015-11-30 22:44 · Score: 1

That is probably more like it. The real down side I see it being connected to such a thing is if some techy guy who isn't awair of the protocol standard port sniffs the code and he thinks that he is being targeted by the NSA.

--
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 23:53 · Score: 0

Well, what were you doing during that 2.5 years?
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 00:07 · Score: 0

Don't get your knickers in a twist.
This is used to differentiate a PRIOR knowledge connection from a non-prior knowledge connection. PRI makes sense in that context. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Stewie241 · 2015-12-01 01:19 · Score: 1

Except that there are things like Wireshark and other tools that let you sniff packets and see what is inside them. If it's widely used enough somebody is going to have tried.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by tsqr · 2015-12-01 01:41 · Score: 1

The hidden message? It's right there - between "spot " and ". It's"
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by swillden · 2015-12-01 02:57 · Score: 1

for this to get "noticed"?
so much for open standards and open source software... 'its safe. you can look at the code yourself"... it took two and a half fucking years for someone to do just that.. and just to find an easter egg, not an embedded and obscured vulnerability.
No, it didn't take 2.5 years to get noticed. Look at the comments on the final commit, it was noticed and commented on by another team member the same day it went in. https://github.com/http2/http2...
The public didn't notice, but I'm sure many people involved in the project did... the commit wasn't in any way obscured. It just wasn't interesting enough for anyone else to notice.

--
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:41 · Score: 0

With enough eyes on the code, all features are shallow, too.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 05:38 · Score: 0

The more I think of it, the more hilarious it gets.
Re:it took 2 1/2 years... by allo · 2015-12-05 23:04 · Score: 1

when it's so obvious, the NSA must be really stupid.

Those Responsible Should Be HANGED! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:53 · Score: 0

Until their heads fall off!

Sucks to see the Republucans... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:54 · Score: 0

destroy security like this.

Re: Sucks to see the Republucans... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:56 · Score: 0

They hate us and want us to die. To die.
Re: Sucks to see the Republucans... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:57 · Score: 0

They are truly the party of death.
Re: Sucks to see the Republucans... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:00 · Score: 0

You should never vote for someone that wants you to die.
Re: Sucks to see the Republucans... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:01 · Score: 0

They are too stupid to understand why security is important.
Re:Sucks to see the Republucans... by ganjadude · 2015-11-30 15:54 · Score: 1

its the same person posting like 8 times, he does this in everythread these days. i guess he likes talking to himself

--
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same

Wait a sec by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 13:55 · Score: 0

How do we know this isn't just how PRISM does it's thing?

So who did it? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · 2015-11-30 14:03 · Score: 5, Interesting

It should be possible to find out who did the code chage, who approved the change and who merged it.

One of our coders used a limerick, yes it was the man from Nantucket, as a static string. He used it to test some of the string utility functions he was developing. Forgot to remove it. Eventually a nosy customer found it by running strings on our executable and made a stink about it. (Never explained why they were poking around our executable with strings) It is out of our builds now, but if you do a blame on stingutils.cpp you can still see it and see how long it stayed in production.

--
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact

Re:So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:12 · Score: 0

A friend of mine who worked for PDI (creators of Antz, Shrek, etc, later bought by Dreamworks) said one of his coworkers grepped their source code for "fuck" and there were so many comments using it, he turned it into a poem...
Re:So who did it? by dcollins117 · 2015-11-30 14:18 · Score: 1

It should be possible to find out who did the code chage, who approved the change and who merged it.
There is a link to the commit in TFS. It is worth looking at if only to see the first (and at this time, only) comment to the commit.
Re:So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:24 · Score: 0

> you can still see it and see how long it stayed in production.
So long you could fuck it?
Re: So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:56 · Score: 0

I remember that!
Re:So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 16:35 · Score: 0

Does it sound a lot like Baldrick's poem about war?
Re:So who did it? by epyT-R · 2015-11-30 18:39 · Score: 1

(Never explained why they were poking around our executable with strings)
It's on his computer. That gives him the right.
Re:So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 19:58 · Score: 1

(Never explained why they were poking around our executable with strings)
It's on his computer. That gives him the right.
A person with code in his possession does not automatically give him the right to do whatever he wants with it, anymore than having windows on his computer allows him allows him to disasseble it and reuse it's code, or having a video on his computer gives him the right to edit and republish it.
That said, there is nothing to stop him from doing whatever he wants with what he has in his possession. Whatever he chooses to do, he may not have the right to do so, and there may be repercussions.
Re:So who did it? by dotancohen · 2015-11-30 20:11 · Score: 1

A friend of mine who worked for PDI (creators of Antz, Shrek, etc, later bought by Dreamworks) said one of his coworkers grepped their source code for "fuck" and there were so many comments using it, he turned it into a poem...
Go grep around the Linux source code. It would make a sailer blush.

--
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
Re: So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 20:17 · Score: 0

Careful, the way you worded that comment it sounds like they use Team Foundation Server as their source control.
Re:So who did it? by stoborrobots · 2015-11-30 21:08 · Score: 1

Agreed - they have the right.
However, the question was "why were they doing it?", not "were they doing something wrong?"

--
"Go to CNN [for a] spell-checked, fact-checked summary" -- CmdrTaco
Re:So who did it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 21:18 · Score: 1

Disassembling Windows is perfectly legal (at least in my country) and I consider it ludicrous to think otherwise. Code is text. If it's in front of me, I can read it.
Re:So who did it? by Dog-Cow · 2015-11-30 22:06 · Score: 2

The GP never implied the customer didn't have the right.
Re:So who did it? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · 2015-12-02 07:33 · Score: 1

Well, you remember the limerick well, sadly the mods don't seem to.

--
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Re:So who did it? by allo · 2015-12-06 03:35 · Score: 1

It does. But it does not give you the right to redistribute the result (as long as its not fair use) and no right to demand change from the vendor.

Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:14 · Score: 0, Funny

The culprit of this change was Martin Thomson, a programmer from London. Typical cisgender white male with microaggressive behavior. This is why I don't use HTTP2/0.

Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:44 · Score: 0

wtf is cisgender?
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 17:19 · Score: 0

> The culprit of this change was Martin Thomson, a programmer from London.
> Typical cisgender white male with microaggressive behavior.
You mad bro?
Re:Martin Thomson by dave420 · 2015-11-30 20:17 · Score: 1

Please be quiet - adults are trying to talk.
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 22:11 · Score: 0

Because screaming "die cis scum" is a adult thing to say...
CIS is a term use by abnormal peoples to describe normal peoples. They use this term as a attempt to enforce being 'comfortable in skin' as a heinous act. CIS is the 'NAZI' or 'RACIST' of Identity Politics. In other words, they try to redefine what is normal.
Also you are an idiot for buying that bullshit. These peoples need physiological therapy not confirmation that it's everyone else that is born wrong.
Re:Martin Thomson by gweihir · 2015-11-30 23:03 · Score: 1

Slander term used by people that think normal is somehow icky. (The variety of fuckups in the human race is both endless and astonishing....)

--
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 02:08 · Score: 0

Do self mutilation and pretend to be someone else is normal? They have the right to do that to themselves (provided that they are over 18 years of in the case of mutilation), but that is certainly not the norm in any society. This is not normal, it is abnormal by definition. Inventing insults like CIS to humiliate and ostracising everyone else is not a solution. They need to except they are abnormal and live with it, or change their way.
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 02:17 · Score: 0

Thats rich coming from a guy with 420 in his name. Just sayin...
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 02:32 · Score: 0

Racism, sexism, slavery and every other type of crappy attitude and behaviour have been implemented and approved by "normal" people.
Yeah, normal is icky. Deal with it.
Re:Martin Thomson by gweihir · 2015-12-01 05:44 · Score: 1

I already did by identifying you as a "fuckup". Which you clearly are.

--
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Re:Martin Thomson by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 06:18 · Score: 0

A microagressive term for heterosexual.
Re:Martin Thomson by ganjadude · 2015-12-01 07:33 · Score: 1

not sure how this is troll when it is scientifically correct. this is not a knock at anyone, simply the scientific truth

--
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
Re:Martin Thomson by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2015-12-01 11:15 · Score: 0

Trans is Latin for "other side of; beyond"; cis is "this side of; within". E.g. cislunar.
"Cisgender" is a neologism, but I see nothing wrong with that, given that "transgender" has only been around since the 1980s.
And what's with the veiled hate/disgust thing? Remind me never to invite you to a showing of The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

--
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Re:Martin Thomson by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2015-12-02 19:31 · Score: 1

Wow, a -1, Informative. First time for everything, heh.

--
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.

Taco left four years ago by tepples · 2015-11-30 14:19 · Score: 1

There haven't been tacos on Slashdot since Mr. Malda left four years ago.

Re:Taco left four years ago by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:36 · Score: 0, Informative

It's all still his fault, the navel-gazing, iPod down-playing douchebag.

PHK not an architect for HTTP2 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:27 · Score: 0

PHK was NOT one of the architects.
Furthermore, he argued continuously and strenuously against encryption.

This was a result of a dinner at the HTTP2 meeting.. it was discussed over melting cheese and much frustration.

Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 14:43 · Score: 0

You need something constant in the feed, like the word "PRISM" to brute force the key.

Re: Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:01 · Score: 0

No, enigma code breakers looked for predictable encrypted words
The http hello happens in plaintext BEFORE encryption ... has no bearing on the ciphertext
Re:Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by KGIII · 2015-11-30 15:04 · Score: 1

If that's true then, AFAIK, headers have always had some form of constant and, if not, there's consistent content in the individual packets that identify things like what stream they belong to.

--
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Re:Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by gumbi+west · 2015-11-30 15:52 · Score: 1

Right, but not all headers can be encrypted. e.g. your letter still needs an unencrypted address or it can't be delivered.
Re:Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:56 · Score: 0

No. Just, no. That's not how it works at all. You're wrong on multiple levels. Fire up google and look up how headers and handshakes work.
Re:Isn't it how Enigma was broken? by KGIII · 2015-11-30 22:28 · Score: 1

That's kind of what I was thinking - I wasn't sure that their comment was even salient but I'm not a crypto-geek and I knew that headers have pretty much always contained repeatable data and that it's not made a difference (AFAIK) so far. I probably should have phrased it better. I do know, by grace of having to learn a bunch, some basic networking but not a lot of crypto - enough to implement it if needed. I understand things like SYN and ACK, UDP, etc... I did not have the budget to hire a network admin (lots of years ago) and spent lots of time learning about it. I think the important thing I learned was to drop Cisco and go Juniper. *nods* But, I digress.

--
"So long and thanks for all the fish."

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:04 · Score: 1

Is this was slashdot has come to?

HTTP/2 not HTTP/2.0 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:42 · Score: 0

Small nit: It's HTTP/2 not HTTP/2.0

2.5 years... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:48 · Score: 1

and suddenly now we give a fuck?

Wasting time on "cute" things? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 15:52 · Score: 0

Every time I see things like this I feel like people are wasting time on some "cute" thing instead of working to make the protocol better.

Re:Wasting time on "cute" things? by GrandCow · 2015-11-30 17:53 · Score: 1

Yes... all 30 seconds or so were wasted.

--
"Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson

Poor word choice by sootman · 2015-11-30 16:12 · Score: 1

"Each new connection forged by the HTTP/2.0 protocol..."

So is that...
* forge (verb) 2. To form or create with concerted effort.
or
* forge (verb) 4. To create a forgery of; to make a counterfeit item of; to copy or imitate unlawfully.
?

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/forge

--
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.

Re:Poor word choice by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 20:33 · Score: 0

> forge (verb) 2. To form or create with concerted effort.
When it comes to metallurgy, let's not forget the honourable mention from Kremlin's PR department:
"... An unbreakable union of free republics, the great Russia has WELDED forever to stand! ..."

uaggressions by tepples · 2015-11-30 16:42 · Score: 1, Troll

microaggressive behavior

What, as in it'd take a million of them to cause even one real problem?

Re:uaggressions by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 07:54 · Score: 0

Actually I think the math works out like this:
1 micro aggression X 1 mega ego = 1 ado about nothing

No, they did not. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 16:56 · Score: 1

They needed a magic value to recognize HTTP/2.0 servers that would reliably fail on existing ones. As magic values are arbitrary, this one was good enough (i.e. actually fails on almost all servers), they simply picked something and moved on.

This is NOT something extra or unnecessary added to HTTP/2.0, it's just something arbitrary that they happened to pick as a "magic" value, not unlike those commonly found in most file formats.

Re:No, they did not. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 02:21 · Score: 0

As magic values are arbitrary, this one was good enough (i.e. actually fails on almost all servers), they simply picked something and moved on.
Inaccurate. They did originally just pick something and move on "FOOBA\r", but then went back and changed it after the fact to make some pointless statement.

Pointless by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 17:00 · Score: 0

Idiots. Add a cheesy string to prove a political point. Meanwhile back at the ranch - software and systems across the Internet are being owned and customer data is being stolen.

Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 17:28 · Score: 0

That's all I really had to say. Can we get standards developed without easter eggs, or is that not web-scale?

Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 20:16 · Score: 0

What crawled up your ass and died?
Re:Unprofessional by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 05:01 · Score: 1

A CIA Bug.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-11-30 17:33 · Score: 0

Troll infestation by idiots like Coren22? Yes. I think it's great when apk smokes trolls like him by the dozens of alternate id sock puppets they use as Coren22 does with his proxies...

Re:Hello by dave420 · 2015-11-30 20:25 · Score: 0

APK, you are not going to win any friends by assuming we are all too stupid to realise that it's not you posting these ridiculous sycophantic messages. We know it's you. You know it's you. Stop lying for once in your life. Be an adult.

Re:Hello by _merlin · 2015-11-30 21:24 · Score: 0

You know the duplicate AC posts makes it really obvious that's you, APK. Why don't you just give up? Even the trolls are mocking you now.

Summary should be clearer by dabadab · 2015-11-30 23:01 · Score: 1

Does this apply only to forged connections or also to legit ones?

--
Real life is overrated.

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 00:42 · Score: 0

Yes, seems like the comments posted to any Slashdot story break down like this:

* 1/4 APK spamming his hosts file garbage

* 1/4 APK pretending to be someone else, supporting APK

* 1/4 APK spewing psychobabble about his "enemies."

* 1/4 actual comments from real people.

It's a shame.

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 01:21 · Score: 0

You are a cow. MOOOOOOO!

The bitchslapping of Dave420 #1/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 01:26 · Score: 0

"Everyone who does use HOSTS files (myself included) doesn't use your software" - by dave420 (699308) on Thursday November 05, 2015 @07:30AM (#50869743)

Some /.'ers made you "eat your words": They use my hosts file engine saying it's good vs. your bullshit:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

(LMAO... you FAIL as usual, again, vs. me!)

* What's that you said I have quoted from you above Dave420?

APK

P.S.=> Thanks for making me look good: You always say something I can put away with undeniable facts that prove you wrong... lol!

... apk

The bitchslapping of Dave420 #2/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 01:31 · Score: 0

"You have no supporters with accounts" - by dave420 (699308) on Monday November 23, 2015 @11:17AM (#50985793)

See subject & a quote of your words you must eat vs. me again:

Tepples does http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

aaaaaaargh! does http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

Trax3001BBS does http://news.slashdot.org/comme...

KGIII does http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

* So do all these /.'ers:

"No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015

"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015

"APK isn't wrong" - by cfalcon (779563) on Sunday October 04, 2015

"In a footnote, I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable." - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015

APK

P.S.=> What's that you said Dave420? Outnumbered by 12++:1 for starters?? LMAO... apk

Re:The bitchslapping of Dave420 #2/2... apk by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 04:19 · Score: 1

Are you sure Tepples supports you?
For those of us who are logged in, here is what your link points to:

APK agrees that hosts files are only one component in a layered security strategy [slashdot.org]. Eight years ago, he wrote a detailed article about the other layers [neowin.net].
--
Hosts file disadvantages: No wildcards, no NXDOMAIN, slow linear search, no per-user, no whole-LAN protection
I don't see him agreeing with you anywhere. He in fact strictly disagrees with you in part of that message. You really should use your account, it will change your world to see all those signatures you hate so much.

No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free.
Arg (don't feel like counting the a's, sorry) doesn't actually say he uses your software, just that he uses hosts files.
And that KGIII post you link to has nothing to do with hosts files, he is saying that you likely aren't the GNAA troll, what does that have to do with your software?
Perhaps if you are trying to post links to people supporting you, you should actually post links to people supporting you?

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Re:The bitchslapping of Dave420 #2/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:30 · Score: 0

Coren22 we can read. People are quoted verbatim supporting apk. Can't you read?
Re:The bitchslapping of Dave420 #2/2... apk by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 04:45 · Score: 1

If you could read, you wouldn't still be arguing. It has been proven out that you cannot read repeatedly, including right here, as you didn't read any of the posts you linked to.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 01:34 · Score: 0

Gotta be Coren22. He had his ass handed to him again by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

Your allergy to anthropomorphism by tepples · 2015-12-01 03:52 · Score: 1

To anthropomorphize them because that's the way your brain works is a serious error.

It's called "colloquial language", and it appears to have got the point across to most other readers. But if you insist on discussing the process more formally in terms of "matching bits":

The PRI request method matches none of the methods in a pre-HTTP/2.0 server's list of acceptable methods. This causes the server to write a response that does not match the HTTP/2.0 upgrade pattern, even if the server's matching of the protocol version bits is incorrect. When the response fails to match at the client, the client switches to HTTP/1.1.

Re:Hello by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 04:20 · Score: 1

You are funny, you wish you could even get things right once, but yet still fail utterly to prove your way out of a paper bag.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Coren22 supports himself into the shitter lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:32 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

Coren22 is this you quoted? Yes by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:35 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

Re:Coren22 is this you quoted? Yes by barbariccow · 2015-12-01 09:59 · Score: 1

This is garbage. Literally this entire thread is APK spewing foam and cohen22 shooting him with a nerf gun.

Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:37 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

Re:Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:58 · Score: 0

Funny, you used to around claiming that Zontar was a sockpuppet of BarbaraHudson, and Zontar's got a lower UID than Dog-Cow. Dig that crazy APK math. LOL.
Even funnier that you claimed you DESTROYED Zontar but very quickly shut the fuck up after he dug up your home address from one of the many places you'd posted it and mailed you a postcard. You got pwned by IRL "The Mindless". LOL.
Oh, and you keep linking to that TweakForums thread... the only one you ever started or posted to there, and all the posts except maybe 4 were from you, and at least one of them was you pretending to be an old friend of yours so you could "prove" you had friends. LOL. Where you went around and copied stuff from all those other sites. How many was it? 27? Yeah, you even bragged about it, dumbass. And your "home page" was just a user page on another crappy forum site. I'd forgot all about that. LOL.
And you're too fucking stupid to realize that you're just a cheap source of lulz, which just makes it even better.
See? We can do the "oh I'm so anonymous no I'm not" thing, too, shit-for-brains. LOL. ...napk (or maybe not--but you'll NEVER know, will you?)

Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:50 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

Re:Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 06:01 · Score: 0

LOL! President Obama got APK here ==> https://slashdot.org/comments....
Proof apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine is MALWARE LOL
CA
PestPatrol
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")
LOL ROFL APK!!
APK CAN'T SPELL SIMPLE WORDS LIKE SCHROCK
Thor Schrock SLAMMED APK here! http://www.thorschrock.com/200... [thorschrock.com]
As usual, APK 0, President Obama 1!
P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!
P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!
-- napk
Re:Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2015-12-01 10:34 · Score: 1

Absolutely not me.
Almost wish it was, though.

--
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Re:Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-02 07:01 · Score: 0

NAPK here. The "lameness filter" is now preventing me from posting more. Have they recognized APK's pattern? I'm hoping so. I guess we'll see if he starts posting in a more normal style, or stops altogether...
Re:Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2015-12-02 10:28 · Score: 1

Darn, I was just starting to enjoy your work, seemed to shaping up nicely.

--
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Re:Read Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-03 02:47 · Score: 0

Thanks. Alas, the Lameness filter appears to be beatable, so APK will still post, but hey... I notice he's posting less, so it's obviously hitting him too. Good job Slashdot!

Coren22 insults himself profoundly by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 04:54 · Score: 0

See subject: In his impersonation "APKolypse" - Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk... believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet) thoughts of your signature

... apk

Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 07:33 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

*SNAP* goes Coren22's leg... apk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 07:43 · Score: 0

See subject: The 1 leg he had to stand on -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

* LIMITED DOLT...

APK

P.S.=> That assburgers damaged goods brain of yours showed its true colors - you can only handle 1 variable @ a time in any equation... & you failed badly! apk

Re:*SNAP* goes Coren22's leg... apk by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 08:37 · Score: 1

It would be hilarious if you actually got something right for once, but sadly no, I will now proceed to tear your argument apart.

"except on the hard coded favorites, and even then if they make calls to non hard coded sites, they will take forever" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday December 01, 2015 @10:02AM (#51033517)
See subject: 1st of all you stupid fuck, ads I block alone buys that speed back on the RARE sub 4% times I need DNS - get it? Good!
You CANNOT compare hosts to local DNS with the same records. Yet you continue to try. The ads you block are also on the DNS side, so how can you count the time you save there? If the DNS has the exact same records as your hosts file, every site will load faster. You don't make up the time with the ads you aren't loading, as they also are not loaded with the DNS example. How can you live with such a low IQ?

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

The treasures that broke you in 1/2 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 08:01 · Score: 0

Like this post that snapped you in 1/2 Coren22 http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? How about the 1 before it too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ?? What about your classic list of FAILS too Coren22 http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ???

* :)

(You're just TOO STUPID to live... lol, no joke!)

APK

P.S.=> Your assburgers mentally damaged goods brain showed it itself bigtime in the 1st two... how so? You failed to account for adblocking (another speed gainer hosts yield above & beyond hardcoded favorites which you concede cached in RAM are faster than remote DNS lookups) which makes up for even the SUB 4% times I have to look to DNS - rare in & of itself, but it offsets that (since pages are only literally 1/2 their size MINUS ads bloating them) - this proves your LIMITED ASSBURGERS BRAIN can only handle 1 variable @ a time, lol - no wonder you're not capable of coding... apk

Re:The treasures that broke you in 1/2 by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 08:07 · Score: 1

Wow, you really are special.
When you try to compare hosts to remote DNS, you are missing the point. You should be comparing hosts to local DNS, and DNS is faster on every count.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

ROLF "ne-er do well" apk can't take it - napk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 08:23 · Score: 0

LOL! President Obama got APK here [slashdot.org] ==> https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]

Proof apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine is MALWARE LOL

CA [ca.com]
PestPatrol [pestpatrol.com]
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More [spynomore.com] ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")

LOL ROFL APK!!

APK CAN'T SPELL SIMPLE WORDS LIKE SCHROCK

Thor Schrock SLAMMED APK here! http://www.thorschrock.com/200...

List of reasons

1. Can't spam properly
2. Not as good looking as Roger Moore. Old Roger Moore. LOL
3. Can't make the KESSELL RUN In under one parsec.
4. Smells of cheese
5. Hitler.

As usual, APK 0, NAPK 1 million!

P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!

P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!

-- napk

I am special: You're ESPECIALLY stupid! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 08:33 · Score: 0

See subject & your MASSIVE FAIL due to your limited assburgers brain http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

I am special - you? You're ESPECIALLY STUPID - lol, see above!

Plus - I've told you before why I don't use local DNS here (wasteful of power + system resources, too complex/many moving parts with room for breakdown AND EXPLOIT due to many security issues in DNS, & more than I need @ home - I use REMOTE DNS & with good solid reasons why IN COMBINATION WITH HOSTS (they compliment one another perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )).

* You FAIL boy... as always vs. me!

APK

P.S.=> I suppose it's NOT your fault: Again, your LIMITED mentally damaged goods assburgers brain is only capable of holding 1 variable @ a time when MANY are in play here, lol... apk

Re:I am special: You're ESPECIALLY stupid! by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 08:49 · Score: 1

Compared to your horribly inefficient Hosts file, even remote DNS comes out so far ahead it isn't even funny. But keep trying to claim your hosts file outperforms local DNS, when it flatly does not.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

No "moving the goalposts" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 09:08 · Score: 0

Single machine here only & how I use remote filtering DNS compliments hosts & hosts it, perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

* :)

Of course, there's ALSO the MASSIVE FUCKUP of yours here too, lol -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... that even IF I miss a lookup (sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)? Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.

(Purely, I suspect, due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time (like adblocking WITH hardcoded favorites acting in combination, & ONLY SUB 4% of the TIME for me stupid!))

APK

P.S.=> LOL, it's hilarious - see subject: Is that what you "ASSBURGERS RETARDS" do when cornered? Yes, obviously... apk

Re:No "moving the goalposts" Coren22 by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 09:13 · Score: 1

So, how is it a fuckup that you decide to ignore the ad blocking the local DNS server is doing in your figuring? I see a fuckup, but not on my side.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Bwahahaha bullshit... apk by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 09:16 · Score: 0

See subject & Coren22's MASSIVE FUCKUP here, lol -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... that even IF I miss a lookup (sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)? Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.

(Purely, I suspect, due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time (like adblocking WITH hardcoded favorites acting in combination, & ONLY SUB 4% of the TIME for me stupid!))

Single machine here only & how I use remote filtering DNS compliments hosts & hosts it, perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

* How many people do I have to post that told you otherwise?

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

APK

P.S.=> LOL, it's hilarious - see subject: Is that what you "ASSBURGERS RETARDS" do when cornered? Yes, obviously... apk

Learn to READ: DNS = security issues AND? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 09:27 · Score: 0

See subject: DNS is wasteful of power (especially if setup as separate system) & resources + is complexity & room for breakdown AND EXPLOIT (security issues galore in DNS, I list SOME ONLY in a link below) - I only have a SINGLE SYSTEM here @ home, no need for more (& certainly NO NEED for a locally setup DNS):

See subject & Coren22's MASSIVE FUCKUP here, lol -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... that even IF I miss a lookup (sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)? Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.

(Purely, I suspect, due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time (like adblocking WITH hardcoded favorites acting in combination, & ONLY SUB 4% of the TIME for me stupid!))

Single machine here only & how I use remote filtering DNS compliments hosts & hosts it, perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

APK

P.S.=> YOU have been COMPLETELY DOMINATED by me, lol... I own you! apk

Re:Learn to READ: DNS = security issues AND? by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 09:32 · Score: 1

No it isn't.
DNS running locally is kept up to date in patches, it is not a security issue. DNS uses less resources and speeds your browsing, leading to more power savings. Why would you setup a separate system? https://www.isc.org/downloads/ The need for the locally setup DNS is the exact same need as the need for your terrible hosts file, so that argument is silly. Keep reaching and moving the goal posts.

due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time
Stay classy.

(sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)? Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.
You mean the same ad blocking you gain with a local dns setup with the same entries? Or did your ability to hold onto only one variable catch you again?

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

ROFL! Coren22 and NAPK school APK! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 09:37 · Score: 0

See subject and APK's MASSIVE FAIL here ROFL => http://slashdot.org/comments.p... APK thinks local DNS cannot run on a single system despite most Linux systems running that way. LOL. APK should look up DNSMASQ on GOOGLE to see how he FAILS! LOL!

APK totally busted

ROFL when APK is totally schooled by NAPK and President Obama. LOL! President Obama got APK here [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] ==> https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org]

Proof apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine is MALWARE LOL

CA [ca.com] [ca.com]
PestPatrol [pestpatrol.com] [pestpatrol.com]
SpywareDB [spywaredb.com] ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware [freedom.net]
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR" [spycheck.es]
Spyware No-More [spynomore.com] [spynomore.com] ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")

LOL ROFL APK!!

APK CAN'T SPELL SIMPLE WORDS LIKE SCHROCK

Thor Schrock SLAMMED APK here! http://www.thorschrock.com/200... [thorschrock.com]

List of reasons

1. Can't spam properly
2. Not as good looking as Roger Moore. Old Roger Moore. LOL
3. Can't make the KESSELL RUN In under one parsec.
4. Smells of cheese
5. Hitler.

As usual, APK 0, NAPK 1 million!

P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!

P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!

-- napk

Coren22's "engineering" = Bolt on 'MoAr', lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 09:42 · Score: 0

See subject: Ever heard the saying "less is more = good engineering"? I use what I already natively have in Windows desktop editions (what most folks use) & I don't "ADD ON MORE" in complexity, room for breakdown + exploit!

DNS is wasteful of power (especially if setup as separate system) & resources!

DNS is ADDING complexity & room for breakdown AND EXPLOIT (security issues galore in DNS, I list SOME ONLY in a link below)!

Again - I only have a SINGLE SYSTEM here @ home, no need for more (& certainly NO NEED for a locally setup DNS)!

See subject & Coren22's MASSIVE FUCKUP here, lol -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

That even IF I miss a lookup (sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)?

Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.

(Purely, I suspect, due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time (like adblocking WITH hardcoded favorites acting in combination, & ONLY SUB 4% of the TIME for me stupid!))

Single machine here only & how I use remote filtering DNS compliments hosts & hosts it, perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

APK

P.S.=> YOU have been COMPLETELY DOMINATED by me, lol... I own you! apk

Re:Coren22's "engineering" = Bolt on 'MoAr', lol by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 09:50 · Score: 1

Less is more, I totally agree! This is why I suggest running BIND with the entries, as it is more efficient on power, and faster in processing. It uses way less power and time, and speeds up your browsing many fold over your 2 million plus record hosts file!

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Windows desktop editions = most used by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 10:03 · Score: 0

See subject: They don't have DNS server natively! Coren22's "efficient engineering" (lol, not) = "Bolt on 'MoAr'"... lmao!

So, per the saying "less is more = good engineering"?

I use what I already natively have in Windows desktop editions (what most folks use) in hosts, firewalls, + patching (even MS Security Essentials) & I don't "ADD ON MORE" in complexity, room for breakdown + exploit (like you're suggesting to do!).

DNS is wasteful of power (especially if setup as separate system) & resources!

DNS is ADDING complexity & room for breakdown AND EXPLOIT (security issues galore in DNS, I list SOME ONLY in a link below)!

Again - I only have a SINGLE SYSTEM here @ home, no need for more (& certainly NO NEED for a locally setup DNS)!

See subject & Coren22's MASSIVE FUCKUP here, lol -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

That even IF I miss a lookup (sub 4% of the time ONLY for me due to hardcoded favorites in hosts @ the TOP of it cached in RAM locally)?

Adblocking gains me back lookup speeds if a total miss & I have to hit DNS remotely.

(Purely, I suspect, due to your LIMITED MENTALLY DAMAGED GOOD ASSBURGERS BRAIN being only able to hold 1 of MANY variable factors in play @ a time (like adblocking WITH hardcoded favorites acting in combination, & ONLY SUB 4% of the TIME for me stupid!))

Single machine here only & how I use remote filtering DNS compliments hosts & hosts it, perfectly -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

APK

P.S.=> YOU have been COMPLETELY DOMINATED by me, lol... I own you! apk

Re:Windows desktop editions = most used by Coren22 · 2015-12-01 10:10 · Score: 1

You know what they call people like you? Zealots. You can't see that you have already lost your argument, so you keep making the same points over and over, despite them already being proved wrong. Keep up the crusade!
BIND can run on any computer, including desktops. It therefore uses less power/resources than your hosts file, as your name resolution is sped up many fold, so you don't wait on your queries as long. It also can be setup to block the very same records, so it is still faster than your ad blocking, as it is doing that as well. So, when you have an actual argument against BIND, let me know, until then, you have lost, go home and cry into your pillow.

--
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 10:32 · Score: 0

Classic APK--accuse your latest crush of all the shit you like to pull.

Look, Alex, it's okay, there's really no shame in being gay. It's obvious that you are. This why you got so rattled by Sphincter and The Gay Lord on Ars, and why you're so obsessed with Barbara Hudson. You'd be lots happier if you just admitted it to yourself instead of wasting your life in mindless self-denial.

No escaping you're "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 10:35 · Score: 0

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

* You can call me "zealot" ALL DAY, doesn't change a thing - see subject!

(Bottom-line is, YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk

Coren22's impersonation "APKolypse" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:06 · Score: 0

Coren22 IMPERSONATES RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COMMUNITY http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

---

"privilege escalation's a bad thing" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

How else programmatically update it?

"requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

Hypocrite later admits it - hosts do vs. WFP/SFP not my ware. Users set it not programmatic impersonation. Security wares need it.

---

"secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code & said it looked all good" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes

"yes I've seen the code & yes it is safe." FROM http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...

---

"we should avoid your crap it looks like malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

60++ reputable sources say different:

64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Installer-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

---

"MiTM... his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

Hardcoded favs users provide = REVERSE DNS verified & my ware filters 5,500++ false positives - security site hosts data = false positives filtered.

---

"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

Show us where I say it? Not illogic logic but where I say it. I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there.

APK

P.S.=>

"modding you down for trolling in your signature" - by Dog-Cow (21281) on Wednesday November 25, 2015

Dog-Cow's (old acc't. no new sockpuppet from you) thoughts of your signatures about me

... apk

Real "reputable source" there (not, criminals) by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:11 · Score: 0

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:13 · Score: 0

Awwww, poo' lil' trolls get run dry of downmod points by apk's unlimited posting abilities again? Answer = yes.

Coren22 tells of Bolt on 'MoAr' engineering by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:18 · Score: 0

Too bad Coren22 believes in "bolting on 'MoAr'" efficient (lol, not) so-called "engineering" & I don't -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

* :)

(He's too dumb to live... especially the mistake he made on dns lookups I only perform MAYBE sub 4% of the time but IF I have to & the contents NOT in my hosts file? AdBlocking gains me back the speed of remote DNS lookup lag but making the SIZE OF PAGES I LOAD literally around 1/2 the 'normal' adbloated & script loaded bs size!)

APK

P.S.=> Guys like Coren22? A mere user with a better password menial?? They're helpless minus guys like me, coders, who make the TOOLS "his kind" (low menials) merely use... apk

Coren22: Tell us of "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 11:40 · Score: 0

YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

(LMAO - I own you... YOU, have been DOMINATED!)

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk
Reply to This

Coren22: Tell us of "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:17 · Score: 0

YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

(LMAO - I own you... YOU, have been DOMINATED!)

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk

Real "reputable" source there (not, criminals) by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:21 · Score: 0

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

HOWEVER: Before they did? They lowered the 'threat' level on that old simple app of mine to ZERO (no threat, as I passed all 21 of their removal questions with flying colors on it to be cleared as safe... lol!)

THOR SCHMUCK? LOL @ HIM - he had to eat my dust like the fat chump he is.

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

Coren22: Tell us of "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:24 · Score: 0

YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

(LMAO - I own you... YOU, have been DOMINATED!)

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk

Coren22: Tell us of "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:27 · Score: 0

YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

(LMAO - I own you... YOU, have been DOMINATED!)

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk

Coren22: Tell us of "Bolting on 'MoAr'", lol by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:42 · Score: 0

YOU BLEW IT BADLY HERE especially -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

See subject & my last post you replied to Coren22: BIND doesn't come w/ Windows, the most used OS there is by the most folks on the desktop!

(LMAO - I own you... YOU, have been DOMINATED!)

APK

P.S.=> You're efficiency is poor - Less IS truly MORE in using what you already have (hosts + firewalls) as I do, & to do more with less... apk

LOL: "Zontar the 'postcard killer'" by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 12:47 · Score: 0

OOoooooo (SO scary, lol - not): Zontar the 'postcard killer', lol - who's the cheap source of lulz here? He & you are.

He's not very good @ that - I am still here alive & kicking, after all, lol!

* Unlike you & yours? I don't NEED to pretend to have friends - I actually have them (good ones)... & I certainly don't pretend to be decent enough @ the art & science of computing... I am.

(You know, once in a while? I have had friends of mine track me down online IF they say, lost my email & what-not... one was around this past Thanksgiving in fact - hell of a mechanical engineer in fact! He's posted here and iirc, possibly there also... in response to myself OR just to say "hey" etc. - et al!)

APK

P.S.=> Punks & "ne'er-do-well" hot-air windbag do nothings in the art & science of computing... apk

LOL APK thinks BIND can't run on Windows by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-01 16:19 · Score: 0

APK so-called DNS expert doesn't know that BIND can run on Windows ROFL! BIND can run anywhere. And BIND isn't even the best solution, DNSMASQ will even read his own HOSTS files yet Mr HOSTS EXPERT (ROFL) doesn't know that! Coren22 SMACKED HIM DOWN here ===> https://slashdot.org/comments.... and NAPK KICKED HIS ASS here ===> https://slashdot.org/comments....

ROFL so-called HOSTS-guy doesn't know how to efficiently use DNS!

APK FAILS AGAIN!

See subject and APK's MASSIVE FAIL here ROFL => http://slashdot.org/comments.p... [slashdot.org] APK thinks local DNS cannot run on a single system despite most Linux systems running that way. LOL. APK should look up DNSMASQ on GOOGLE to see how he FAILS! LOL!

APK totally busted

ROFL when APK is totally schooled by NAPK and President Obama. LOL! President Obama got APK here==> https://slashdot.org/comments....

Proof apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine is MALWARE LOL

CA [ca.com] [ca.com] [ca.com]
PestPatrol
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")

LOL ROFL APK!!

APK CAN'T SPELL SIMPLE WORDS LIKE SCHROCK

Thor Schrock SLAMMED APK here! http://www.thorschrock.com/200... [thorschrock.com] [thorschrock.com]

List of reasons

1. Can't spam properly
2. Not as good looking as Roger Moore. Old Roger Moore. LOL
3. Can't make the KESSELL RUN In under one parsec.
4. Smells of cheese
5. Hitler.

As usual, APK 0, NAPK 1 million!

P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!

P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!

-- napk

Where did I say BIND doesn't run on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-02 04:44 · Score: 0

See subject: Show us me saying that - you can't, I never did. I said it doesn't come with Windows on the CD/DVD install media.

As far as the rest of your b.s.? Here's the truth:

Real "reputable" source there (not, criminals)

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

HOWEVER: Before they did? They lowered the 'threat' level on that old simple app of mine to ZERO (no threat, as I passed all 21 of their removal questions with flying colors on it to be cleared as safe... lol!)

THOR SCHMUCK? LOL @ HIM - he had to eat my dust like the fat chump he is.

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

LOL Thor "KABLAMMOS" APK right off the Internet! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-02 07:10 · Score: 0

See subject here THOR SCHROCK makes mincemeat out of APK! ==> http://www.thorschrock.com/200...

LOL my friend! BIND doesn't have to be on a CD/DVD to be free and run on Windows! It's not as if APKTools comes with Windows too! (Plus BIND is open source so you could even make it part of APKTools if you knew what you were doing!)

clone54231, tomhudson, gmhowell, squiggleslash, and now Coren22 DESTROYS APK on Slashdot!

APK so-called DNS expert doesn't know that BIND can run on Windows ROFL! BIND can run anywhere. And BIND isn't even the best solution, DNSMASQ will even read his own HOSTS files yet Mr HOSTS EXPERT (ROFL) doesn't know that! Coren22 smacked him down here ==> https://slashdot.org/comments.... and NAPK kicked his ass here => https://slashdot.org/comments....

ROFL so-called HOSTS-guy doesn't know how to efficiently use DNS!

APK FAILS AGAIN!

See subject and APK's MASSIVE FAIL here ROFL => http://slashdot.org/comments.p... APK thinks local DNS cannot run on a single system despite most Linux systems running that way. LOL. APK should look up DNSMASQ on GOOGLE to see how he FAILS! LOL!

APK totally busted

ROFL when APK is totally schooled by NAPK and President Obama. LOL! President Obama got APK ==> https://slashdot.org/comments....

As usual, APK 0, NAPK 1 million!

P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!

P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!

P.P.P.S. => No, seriously, guess who. Say my name.

P.P.P.P.S. => I said, say my name.

P.P.P.P.P.S => I'm the one who killed APK! Now say my name

P.P.P.P.P.P.S. => You're damned right I'm NAPK!

-- napk

Not just CA, THOR KABLAMOOS APK! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-12-02 10:14 · Score: 0

See subject here THOR SCHROCK makes mincemeat out of the "maestro" (LOL) APK! ==> http://www.thorschrock.com/200...

APK totally busted

ROFL when APK is totally schooled by NAPK and President Obama. LOL! President Obama got APK ==> https://slashdot.org/comments....

Proof apkapp2backgrounddaemonprocessengine is MALWARE LOL

CA
PestPatrol
SpywareDB ("Dangerous!")
Freedom Anti-Spyware
Spycheck (Spanish-language) - "Recomendacion: DESACTIVAR Y ELIMINAR"
Spyware No-More ("Threat risk: High risk", "Advice: Remove This is a very high risk threat and should be removed immediately as to prevent harm to your computer and / or to protect your privacy")

List of reasons

1. Can't spam properly
2. Not as good looking as Roger Moore. Old Roger Moore. LOL
3. Can't make the KESSELL RUN In under one parsec.
4. Smells of cheese
5. Hitler.

As usual, APK 0, NAPK 1 million!

P.S. => I use Kowalski-be-gone! LOL!

P.P.S. => ROFL! Guess who!

P.P.P,S. => No, seriously, guess who. Say my name.

P.P.P.P.S. => I said, say my name.

P.P.P.P.P.S => I'm the man who killed APK! Now say my name

P.P.P.P.P.P.S. => You're goddamned right I'm NAPK!

....napk

Slashdot Mirror

HTTP/2.0 Opens Every New Connection It Makes With the Word 'PRISM' (jgc.org)

200 comments