Slashdot Mirror
DHS Offering Free Vulnerability Scans, Penetration Tests (krebsonsecurity.com)
tsu doh nimh writes: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been quietly launching stealthy cyber attacks against a range of private U.S. companies -- mostly banks and energy firms. These digital intrusion attempts, commissioned in advance by the private sector targets themselves, are part of a little-known program at DHS designed to help 'critical infrastructure' companies shore up their computer and network defenses against real-world adversaries. And it's all free of charge (well, on the U.S. taxpayer's dime). Brian Krebs examines some of the pros and cons, and the story has some interesting feedback from some banks and others who have apparently taken DHS up on its offer.
Most people don't enjoy the TSA scans and penetration tests, but I guess different strokes for different folks.
The newest scam call: (cue heavy Russian accent)"Hello, my name is Steven. I am calling from the Department of your Homeland Security and am definitely not former KGB agent. For limited time only we are offering free computer vulnerability scans and identity theft testing. Please give us your computer login credentials and bank information that we may begin our testing."(end heavy Russian accent)
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
>> The problem is that it measures only a very limited subset of of the vulnerability space but comes with a gold plated get out of jail free card: ‘The US government came and checked us.’
This.
>> They say they are doing it only for organizations that cannot afford commercial assessments, but they often go to organizations that have deep enough pockets.
Simple solution: put in a regulation that says if you get breached, you agree to take down your online services for two weeks to get your house in order. Something like that would free up money for preventative solutions in a hurry. Furthermore, we KNOW the inspected organizations have some security personnel (which aren't cheap) because the permission form asks for specific contacts who might be smart enough to interpret any results.
Another example of corporate welfare... pen-testing costs time and money, why should I as a taxpayer be out this money?
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
How about publishing a set of standards and tests that critical infrastructure companies must utilize?
love is just extroverted narcissism
One of the problems that the US-CERT/ICS-CERT/etc folks at DHS had (aside from the fact that they were/are forced to be part of DHS) was that while they could tell various Federal agencies that their systems had more holes than swiss cheese, what they didn't have was the authority to tell other federal agencies that they had to fix it, or else. I believe there's been a push to try and fix that problem, though I'm not aware of how far it's come, and it certainly wasn't in time for OPM.
I used to work there, in fact (at least until I found something in the private sector that was better for my sanity/soul/salary*). While I'm not familiar with anything to do with OPM in specific, that sort of scenario popped up all the time. It works much the same in the private sector, in that you can be the best pentester in the world, but if the customer you ran it for doesn't intend to spend the money fixing the holes you pointed out, or drags their feet in doing so, they're still going to get owned despite your best efforts.
As to whether DHS is competent - I knew a lot of really good people (and some less so) when I was there. I know many that went on to work at better jobs doing more interesting things in the private sector, for better pay, so the best of the best aren't going to stick around, but that doesn't mean there aren't competent people there. ICS-CERT (the group focused on critical infrastructure/control systems/etc) in particular always seemed pretty competent to me, and are probably about as different from the usual impression of DHS as you'd expect. To give an example, they showed up at Defcon this past year with an awesome hands-on setup, including an entire mock plant setup with all the controllers that people were free to plug in to and go nuts. (Granted, they never mentioned the fact that they were DHS, but then, would you?)
So certainly I wouldn't expect DHS to be outdoing the best of the best when it comes to penetration testing, but for that municipal water plant in West Nowhere, Texas, that doesn't have the money to hire the best, it's a much better solution than just not doing anything.