Slashdot Mirror


Chrome 47 Released (blogspot.ca)

LichtSpektren writes: Google Chrome version 47 is now available for download. This release features 41 security fixes, very tiny UI changes (except for the built-in PDF viewer, which was redone entirely), and the removal of the desktop notification center. The iOS version has added new keyboard shortcuts and support for 3D touch.

61 comments

  1. Chrome uses the integrated face system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrome uses the integrated face system to browse the web.

  2. Slow news day? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> yet another new "whole number" version of Chrome

    Also, the sun rose again today.

    1. Re:Slow news day? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yep, how is this a landmark? Tell us when Chrome 50 arrives. Incidentally, what version of Chromium is now current? I currently use Version 46.0.2490.80 (64-bit) on PC-BSD

    2. Re:Slow news day? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Well on Fedora 23 I have had Chrome "Version 47.0.2526.73 (64-bit)" for a day although that was when I did an update.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      47.broken.NTLM.sadface

      Auto update bites us on the ass this day.

    4. Re:Slow news day? by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      Does "someone else has installed Linux" headlines grab you more?

  3. Sweet! Can't wait for Firefox 57! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These features sound totally sweet! As a Firefox user, I can look forward to the exact same changes coming my way around Firefox 57, or maybe Firefox 58, if redoing the built-in PDF viewer takes more effort than they expected.

  4. It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally... WTF took so long? Jeezze.
    I've been blocked from doing unimportant things
    because this release was held up in Beta for so long.

    Good Job, nontheless. I still use IE6...

    CAP === 'denature'

  5. And it has a bug .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Chrome is going through a proxy that uses NTLM auth, the users keep on getting prompted for credentials; Google is already aware of it, https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=544255

  6. PDF viewer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (except for the built-in PDF viewer, which was redone entirely)

    Hm, that seems entirely unsourced given the provided links. Actually they both report 4 bugfixes to PDFium (the open source rendering engine - psst, everyone out there wrongfully using GhostScript dependencies) but there is no mention of a redesign.

  7. Good riddance... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

    I don't think I saw anyone who liked the notification center.

    It only took 300+ pages of negative comments and a couple years for Google to realize this was a feature that literally nobody wanted.

    And one that was turned off, by as many people as possible, as soon as they could.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:Good riddance... by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      I think it's a good idea, just as a notification system is in Android and iOS.. Except it should be using the OS's native system, not a secondary one. The problem is.. they haven't done this.. they just removed it completely. Didn't the whole "websites can trigger desktop notifications" thing only come out about a year ago?.. have the abandoned that by doing this?

  8. Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This new version of Chrome should be yet another reason for Mozilla to collectively shit its pants in fear.

    Chrome consistently gets better with each release. So even if there isn't a new release of Firefox, Firefox has still gotten relatively worse compared to Chrome just by the fact that Firefox hasn't improved. It surely doesn't help that each release of Firefox has typically been seen as worse than the one before it, causing more problems and inconvenience for its ever-dwindling user base.

    Just look at the recent browser usage stats. Firefox is only around 7% to 8% of the browser market now, across desktop and mobile platforms, and all versions. The desktop version of Chrome 46 alone has about 3.5 times the number of users than Firefox has. Chrome for Android has roughly 2.5 times as many users as all versions. Even Opera Mini almost has more users than Firefox has in total!

    There should be nothing but panic at Mozilla right now when looking at those numbers. Then there should be even more panic when they realize that Firefox is the only product of theirs that sees much use. They're apparently looking to kill of Thunderbird, based on another recent Slashdot submission. Then their other projects, like Persona, Rust, Firefox OS, Servo, and Bugzilla don't have many users.

    In my opinion, Mozilla's influence is dwindling as more and more users leave Firefox for greener pastures. At some point Mozilla will become completely irrelevant. None of the other browser vendors will give a damn what they think or want when they've only got 1% or maybe 2% of the market. When we see how quickly Firefox's share of the market has been dropping lately, the 2% mark will likely be hit sooner than a lot of people expected.

    I think that Mozilla is reaching a fork in the road. One path leads directly to irrelevance. The other path leads to glory, but it involves going in a very different direction. This means the end to Firefox OS, Rust, Servo, and other failed projects. This means restoring Firefox's UI to what it once was. This means removing Pocket, Hello, and the ads from Firefox. This means listening to Firefox's users, rather than ignoring them, or worse, doing exactly what the users said they don't want to happen. I, for one, sure hope that Mozilla does not choose the current path that leads straight to irrelevance!

    1. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically Netscape all over again and they survived that in a way.

    2. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if firefox has two users, one will be me. I'm not a product, I value my privacy.

    3. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if you want to be a fanboy who pretends Chrome only gets better and Firefox only gets worse, be our guest. But the reality is clearly far from your ridiculous arguments. Chrome is treading water at best, and Firefox has nearly caught up to it in the interim (even Edge is fast nipping at its heels these days).

      Firefox's biggest problem now is fast becoming the entitled sub-group of their users and nay-sayers, who ignore anything positive while loudly decrying anything they can construe as negative. It's become so ridiculous I now suspect it's a conscious astroturfing campaign. I mean, if you apply their same standards to Chrome and Google, they look even worse. But people don't.

    4. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also because there are a lot of idiots who are championing a browser by a fucking ad broker which sells your privacy.

    5. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also because there are a lot of idiots who are championing a browser by a fucking ad broker which sells your privacy.

      Chrome: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default.
      Firefox: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default. Also has built-in ads that read your browsing history.

      Both are pretty bad here, but ironically, it's the "not-for-profit" browser that's more invasive of your privacy than the ad broker's browser.

    6. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Firefox's telemetry is even more invasive than Chrome's.

    7. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pale Moon does not have telemetry at all, and Do-Not-Track is useless.

    8. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon because mod points. Does Chrome ask you on startup what you would like to send to Google, as Firefox does for Mozilla Foundation?

    9. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's still crap compared to Firefox.

    10. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. It's not even on for non-development versions of the browser.

    11. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Firefox: has telemetry on, Do-Not-Track off, etc. by default. Also has built-in ads that read your browsing history.

      You're confused about telemetry:
      https://wiki.mozilla.org/Telem...

      Also, the Do-Not-Track flag is an utter failure. No ad network listens to the DNT flag. If you don't want to be tracked, you need proactive browser support. Something like:
      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/...

      And, for what it's worth, the in-browser advertising project ("tiles") in Firefox is being shut down, per a company-wide announcement sent out earlier today. Look for a public announcement soon.

    12. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, it's time for the two minutes Mozilla hate again?

    13. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox is way behind other browsers and Mozilla gave up on trying to tack on multi-process tabs and sandboxing. They could only get multi-process working with XUL with hacks that kill performance and will only be maintained for a transitional period. I think that if Mozilla listened to the users they would be irrelevant anyway.

    14. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      This new version of Chrome should be yet another reason for Mozilla to collectively shit its pants in fear.

      Good. I hope they become irrelevant, simply due to what their attitude towards Opera users was ten years ago - and especially the attitude of Asa Dotzler, one of the most horrible trolls ever to have existed on the internet.

      Soon enough, Mozilla will drop to Opera's market share. I'm going to laugh, oh how I'm going to laugh!

      And then I'm going to start hoping that Opera falls from 2% to 0%, because they had an incredible browser and fucked it up exactly like Firefox did, by chromifying it entirely and alienating their decade-long users. Did they gain market share by making a Chrome clone? Nope. Quite the opposite.

    15. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you spend your daze hoping for negative things to happen, for people to suffer, and things to be destroyed because they have displeased you. Wow. YOU must be a real laugh-riot at parties. Oh wait...

      You're never invited to parties. You're never invited to anything, being a social outcast that has now become a caricature of Butters / Capt. Chaos. Scarry, forgot about that.

    16. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      So why not juice move to Chrome or Edge or Opera or whatever you like.. Why the allegiance to FF?

    17. Re:Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --It's arguably too late for Firefox. If you like what FF *used* to be, switch over to Palemoon. Pre-Australis interface, continued support for Plugins, even has a 64-bit Linux version. Never looked back after switching.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  9. Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thanks. I suspect some Chrome users will be interested, so this is News for Nerds and Stuff that Matters.

    But I bailed on Chrome a couple years ago - installing and switching to Firefox on my account/machine at the consulting customer that used Chrome for their standard browser.

    The precipitating incident: A typo had brought up a NSFW page, URL autocompletion kept suggesting it whenever its (common) first letter was typed, and both the documented and undocumented methods for removing such "helpful hints" weren't working in that version of Chrome.

    But even before that they had broken several things I used in a "we know what you need better than you" interface change that couldn't be configured-away.

    I'll stick to open stuff, even if it means I don't get the proprietary blazingly-fast rendering engine. Even when Netscape breaks things (like "delay image loading") I (or helpful netizens) have always been able to find a way to get it back, and in principle I could hack the code if it was REALLY important.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  10. No desqtop notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    righton, they were annoying

  11. Ad blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrome is so desperately slow on my iPad compared to Safari with adblocking. Won't get me to use it again until I can control the deluge of shitty ads (and their related malware content) like I can with Safari.

    1. Re:Ad blocking by ledow · · Score: 1

      That's because Chrome on iPad isn't Chrome.

      It's an old WebView.

      Apple don't allow browsers to use their own rendering engines on iPad.

      And there's a choice of old, unaccelerated WebView or new fancy QKView (or something like that), both of which use Safari-components to do the rendering.

      Chrome on iPad is just Safari in a different skin.
      Opera on iPad is just a remote VNC into a real computer running Opera.

  12. Re:Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go to Settings. Turn off "Use a prediction service to help complete searches". Or/also press the "Clear browsing data" button and clear browsing history and cookies (or delete the offending entries by hand by going to the "History" tab"). Firefox does the exact same thing, btw.

    RE: "I'll stick to open stuff" -- Chrome is almost entirely FLOSS. The only difference from the BSD-licensed Chromium browser is that Chrome adds in the auto-updater, Flash, and Widevine.

  13. So *Firefox is dying? by tepples · · Score: 1

    There should be nothing but panic at Mozilla right now when looking at those numbers.

    But what does Netcraft say about the numbers? I know it offers an anti-phishing extension for Firefox, but has it released any news stories about Firefox's decline?

    1. Re:So *Firefox is dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Netcraft confirms it? (or in this case "Does Netcraft confirm it?"). Is this 2002?

  14. I stopped using Chrome because of system services. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    In general, Google is now badly managed, in my opinion.

    People are beginning to dislike the increasing levels of control in the Chrome browser and in the Android operating system.

    I stopped using Chrome because of the system services it installs.

  15. Everything sux. by garyoa1 · · Score: 2

    They all have flaws. Use one for this, another for that. One has neat add ons, the other has crap. 9 jillion browsers out there and none of them do a decent job.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    1. Re:Everything sux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a time, Maxthon was my idea browser. Then I switch to Linux which wasn't supported. I just checked its wiki page and it seems Linux is now supported, but they added a bunch of cloud stuff. Maybe I'll give it a try again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxthon

  16. The real question is: by stry_cat · · Score: 1

    Have the made it possible to disable the new profile management that they forced on everyone in 44?
    I switched to FF after that and haven't looked back.

    1. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have the made it possible to disable the new profile management that they forced on everyone in 44?
      I switched to FF after that and haven't looked back.

      No. Quite the opposite. Until now there was a hack to disable it, but that hack no longer works. They've also changed the bookmark folder color from tan to charcoal gray. Not only do I now have that stupid profile thing at the top, they've made it look as though I've got bugs crawling on my bookmarks bar. Way to go, Chrome! Been nice knowing you!

    2. Re:The real question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Update to my earlier comment: The charcoal gray folders may be a Linux thing. I saw Chrome on Windows this morning, and the folders were still tan colored.

  17. Re:I stopped using Chrome because of system servic by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    What are these system services you speak of?

  18. Re:Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you read the comment you're replying to?
    "both the documented and undocumented methods for removing such "helpful hints" weren't working in that version of Chrome."
    Emphasis mine.

    Knowing how to fix the problem and actually being able to fix the problem are separate things.

  19. Chrome 47 is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just upgraded based on this article and now chrome doesn't load any pages. Tried this on multiple machines.

  20. Chrome new version issues by SourabhAnand · · Score: 1

    So here come's another shit from google chrome, to be frank how many chrome updates will comes all will be shit as always, as it get crash, even alot issues are ahead with chrome browser like the videos on YouTube lags alot

    1. Re:Chrome new version issues by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you say "shit" one more time it will help promote your "shit" videos that promote "shit" what you can do on youtube videos.

  21. Almost stable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrome 47 is one of the more stable of chromium isotopes, but still fairly radioactive with a half-life of about 500 ms. Almost there. (Chromium 50 is the lowest mass "stable" isotope, half-life estimated at 1.8E17 years).

  22. NTLM is broken, use Chromium 49 or keep Chrome 46 by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    So the NTLM bug was fixed, but somehow made it into the release. It is fixed in the chromium releases. I'm using 49 at the moment perfectly.
    Users could not authenticate to the squid proxies, and couldnt get out, and our entire shipping department couldnt reach fedex.

    Bug @ https://code.google.com/p/chro...

    We had to push out a group policy for google chrome to turn off updates, but a few users already got smacked with it. We use google gmail/office enterprise, so this hit us pretty hard. Having employees use IE11 for now. Bug says a update might be pushed out tomorrow.

  23. Re: Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox should never have included ads in the first place. Even if they are removed, the damage has still been done, and it cannot be repaired.

  24. Re: Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. This is exactly why, when we put people in jails, they're always kept there until the end of their natural lives. We just don't have any concept of redemption. Making things right? Ah, fuck it. That's for chumps. Once you make one mistake, you may as well start killing and eating babies.

    Oh, wait. No, that's not right, because we're not psychopaths. Well, I can't speak for you, but as a *society*, we're not comprised *solely* of psychopaths.

  25. Re:Not interested. Bailed on chrome years ago. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    installing and switching to Firefox

    I think we have drugs that can treat that now.

  26. Re: Another reason for Mozilla to shit their pants by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Given the way the US treats ex-felons, it's arguable that letting them out is a worse punishment.

  27. Oh Joy. by JustBoo · · Score: 1

    Oh joy, version 47, (more like 4.7). I can't wait for the end of next year when it is up to 247. That will be awesome. Google has certainly taught us all in high-tech that the bigger your number the better you are than your competition. THAT is what matters my friend, just ask any Googler.

    1. Re:Oh Joy. by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter to you or anyone else where the decimal point is? It's a version number, not a mathematical scale.

    2. Re:Oh Joy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it matter to you that it matters to him? Hypocrite much? You mad because the object of your obsession was criticized for having nothing more than a marketing scheme as a 'versioning' system from an Advertising company?

      Google worshipers are so thin skinned because there is a lot to be thin-skinned about.

  28. PDF viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PDF viewer is now *much* faster at rendering and has rotate buttons. A considerable improvement in this area.

  29. Chrome 47 on linux breaks Amazon Prime video by sclark46 · · Score: 1

    I loaded the update on my Ubuntu laptop and Amazon Prime video quit working. I had to scour the net to find the previous version. Once it was loaded watching video worked again.