Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Are Developing Cure for Human Pain (neurosciencenews.com)

transporter_ii writes: Scientists from University College London seem to have come up with a two-pronged treatment regimen they believe would help patients suffering from chronic pain. And in a strange irony, they did it by making it possible for mice – and one human – to feel pain when they previously couldn't. From the story: "To examine if opioids were important for painlessness, the researchers gave naloxone, an opioid blocker, to mice lacking Nav1.7 and found that they became able to feel pain. They then gave naloxone to a 39-year-old woman with the rare mutation and she felt pain for the first time in her life. 'After a decade of rather disappointing drug trials, we now have confirmation that Nav1.7 really is a key element in human pain,' says senior author Professor John Wood (UCL Medicine). 'The secret ingredient turned out to be good old-fashioned opioid peptides, and we have now filed a patent for combining low dose opioids with Nav1.7 blockers. This should replicate the painlessness experienced by people with rare mutations, and we have already successfully tested this approach in unmodified mice.'"

32 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Ouch by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scientists from University College London seem to have come up with a two-pronged treatment regiment

    Two-pronged? Sounds painful. Couldn't they have made it one-pronged, or, like, two-nubbed or something?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  2. Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
    I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.
    If this just DELAYS that final dosing, it would add weeks or months of enjoyable life to those who are dying of such agony.
    Patented? GOOD! Maybe this time the patent rights will be granted to competing entities, allowing for some competition.
    Since these are British researchers, we can so hope, they aren't quite as corrupted as our government funded research.

    1. Re:Too late for some. by PvtVoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
      I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.

      I'm sorry you had to go through this, truly. It sounds like she needed to be given opiates much sooner than she was. There is no reason at all for anybody to go through that kind of suffering, except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice before they start suffering like this.

      Anybody with aging parents or an ill family member needs to educate themselves about hospice, and advocate fiercely for their loved ones.

    2. Re:Too late for some. by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
      I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.

      I'm sorry you had to go through this, truly. It sounds like she needed to be given opiates much sooner than she was. There is no reason at all for anybody to go through that kind of suffering, except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice before they start suffering like this.

      Anybody with aging parents or an ill family member needs to educate themselves about hospice, and advocate fiercely for their loved ones.

      I had a relative watch a friend die. They increased the drugs to the "maximum legal limit" and even tilted the bed to make it harder to breath so that the friend would die quicker. They then had to sit there and watch and keep hoping that each breath was their last. How is this and doing things like removing the feeding tube and letting someone starve to death "standard procedure"? It's cruel and unusual punishment. Even our criminals are treated better.

    3. Re:Too late for some. by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >no reason at all ... except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice

      It's not just that, it's a perverse Calvinistic view of chronic pain in general that one should just 'deal with it.'

      Never mind the fact that such pain has other clinical effects, like elevated blood pressure, depression, etc.

      The hostility that too many doctors have to analgesics is maddening. Over the past couple of years, it's gotten worse. Considering what's been going on with the latest moral panic over opioids/opiates and shenanigans like what's gone on over at the CDC about this, people are suffering and dying (sometimes because of suicide) needlessly.

      When the CDC gets piled on by a bunch of other agencies (FDA, HHS, etc.,) for fucking this up, something is rotten in Denmark.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Too late for some. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      It's because we don't have people becoming doctors to help people. they are there to be wealthy.

      Remember the old small town doctor that drive a rusted out chevy and helped poor people for free and even make house calls? Yeah those don't exist anymore. My doc was that kind and he recently died.

      He told me that the government would put him in jail for giving free care or making house calls. I guess charging less than the mandated minimum is a felony in the United States.

      Honest doctors help those in need. Dishonest ones drive a porsche and gold of fridays.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Too late for some. by fafalone · · Score: 2

      Imagine seeing someone die of cancer, and their wife flushing any pain medication he got because "junkies will break in to steal it!". I lost my uncle to cancer, and my aunt to 'can't be the same room as such a despicable person'.

    6. Re:Too late for some. by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The legal limit is "dont kill the patient". Unfortunately the realities of terminal illness is that people can be in such harrowing agony the only rational thing to do is to help the patient pass away so doctors will often quietly administer a dose that will probably kill the patient reasoning that its the only dose that will contain the suffering and if the patient dies, well such is terminal illness.

      This puts doctors in a horrible situation legally. We accept without question that it is humane to euthenise pets whos suffering is more than they can deal with. Yet we cant allow our own species to take a dignified exit when they, and the doctor, agree that hope is lost.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    7. Re:Too late for some. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Someone on opiates for long term build up a tolerance that diminishes the effect, but the tolerance also increases the LD50. This is why so many people OD. They take half the dose of the addict that's showing them how, and that's quite lethal. Or, the long-term addict who was locked up in prison or rehab gets clean enough that their old maintenance dose is quite lethal. This is also why the concept of a maximum legal dose would be silly, as it would vary from person to person.

      A good suicide method would be to give a reasonable dose, then let the patient self-administer in 1mg doses. Someone tolerant enough of it to keep dosing themselves deserves the right to keep administering, if they so choose.

    8. Re:Too late for some. by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      Even our criminals are treated better.

      It's such a rare and insightful perspective. Criminals can be executed instead of suffering their guilt while incarcerated for their entire life. Meanwhile whole families are sentenced to watching a loved one suffer, be humiliated and eventually die in the most horrible ways when they have already chosen to die. It's a fucked up society that will take a life but will allow someone who is perfectly innocent to suffer for a long time before an inevitable, un-revocable, death penalty.

      People who haven't suffered adversity probably don't understand.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:Too late for some. by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A good suicide method would be to give a reasonable dose, then let the patient self-administer in 1mg doses. Someone tolerant enough of it to keep dosing themselves deserves the right to keep administering, if they so choose.

      That might work for someone who has a fully functional brain and is capable of movement but many times for the terminally ill at the very end, that's not the case. They might be brain dead, paralysed, non-responsive, mentally incompetent or one or more other reasons that they can't self-administer. Most people who would be aware enough and physically able enough to self-administer wouldn't actually want to commit suicide. I think the more common case are the people who can't self-administer or even express their wishes who are left to suffer.

    10. Re:Too late for some. by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      The legal limit is "dont kill the patient".

      Maybe in the US. At least here in Germany it is legal to administer doses of morphine or other pain killers that might kill the patient as a side-effect, if these high doses are required to control the pain. However, doctors from hospices usually dispute the view that a proper dosing of morphine will hasten death. If you would administer the doses used in hospices to someone unused to opioids, they would kill, but we are talking about people that have usually received high doses of opioids for long time.
      The real issue is often that doctors are afraid of killing the patient by raising the dose and people being in pain because of that, even through raising the dose would not really kill the patient.

      --
      Jan
  3. Re:Cure for symptoms by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, you want to have the pain until you have pinpointed the problem. Then you can turn off the alarm.

    So yes, people need to be very careful about using a "cure" for pain. People who don't feel pain can end up with much more serious damage to themselves from otherwise mundane causes than people who do feel pain.

    Ever burn yourself on a stove and yank your hand back? Someone who doesn't feel pain would probably not notice until they figured out that the burning smell was their own charred flesh.

  4. The world is crying out for better pain killers by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's why this story is so cool.

    There's a good reason why doctors are hostile to analgesics. They can cause damage that lasts far longer than the acute pain, and can cause effects in the long term that are worse than the chronic pain, in many cases.

    For many cases of chronic pain, the relatively harmless stuff like NSAIDs, aspirin, and acetaminophen don't really work well enough, and in high doses all of these are toxic. So out come the opiates, however, opiates quickly induce tolerance so larger and larger doses are required. And the tolerance becomes addiction, and the brain starts getting re-wired. Not to mention the side effects of opiates, which aren't all that nice either.

    It can take *years* for a brain re-wired by long term use of opiates can return to "sort of" normal, if ever. And the return to normal has nasty psychological effects, such as depression, OCD-like symptoms, suicidal tendencies, and an inability to be happy or experience joy.

    It's much more than "moral panic" over opiates. The drugs are frankly dangerous, and even with the very best management practices, they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

    I'd only want to be on large amounts of opiates if I were terminally ill.

    1. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by fafalone · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a good reason why doctors are hostile to analgesics.

      They're scared of the DEA if they prescribe opiates in a way that offends the local field office.

      So out come the opiates, however, opiates quickly induce tolerance so larger and larger doses are required.

      So? Medical literature shows no additional side effects from even extreme doses (some non-terminal chronic pain sufferers even take 800+mg/day of oxycodone without issue)

      And the tolerance becomes addiction, and the brain starts getting re-wired.

      Despite the anecdotes, there's no medical evidence this happens anything more than a tiny minority of the time in patients who aren't already drug abusers. Dependence is not the same as addiction.

      Not to mention the side effects of opiates, which aren't all that nice either.

      Constipation, tiny bit of immune suppression rarely clinically significant, and...? Do you mean the effect of non-prescribed opiates due to prohibition rather than the substances themselves? People with tolerance to opiates aren't impaired and nodding out if they're being properly managed.

      It can take *years* for a brain re-wired by long term use of opiates can return to "sort of" normal, if ever.

      Among addicts with the medically distinct condition of addiction. As mentioned, a very small minority of those treated with opioids. And the statement should be more like a 1-3 months to 'sort of' normal, and 'if ever' for 'totally normal'.

      It's much more than "moral panic" over opiates. The drugs are frankly dangerous, and even with the very best management practices, they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

      It actually is moral panic. Medically speaking, opiates are far safer than the vast majority of prescription drugs. You sound like all your knowledge of opioid treatment comes exclusively from anti-drug propaganda sources. It sure as hell didn't come from the medical community.

      I'd only want to be on large amounts of opiates if I were terminally ill.

      Well you're into that whole drug war propaganda thing where you believe everyone prescribed some Vicodin for a toothache is shooting up heroin with dirty needles while homeless in an alley a few months later. So if you want to suffer, go for it. But respect the rights of others to not want to suffer because of opioid hysteria like you're spreading. And even if you want to go on believing that hysteria, I hope we can at least agree that the DEA shouldn't be setting treatment guidelines like it is now, and it should be left up to the patient and their doctor. (if you're getting massively overprescribed by a pill mill, it's a situation you've gone out of your way to get to)

    2. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your choice was confinement to bed or opiates, I'll bet you would sooner of later risk the opiates if that was an option. Pain can get severe enough to blot out thought even in the absence of a terminal condition. The answer used to be risk the opiates and give them years of more of less normalcy. The answer now seems to be let 'em scream.

    3. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > the relatively harmless stuff like NSAIDs

      Speaking as a victim of this meme, I have to say that this is one of the most dangerous memes out there.

      Ibuprofen, and such, kill your kidneys. I should know, my cardiologist tore me a new asshole when I told him how much OTC ibuprofen I was taking for my arm pain. I am sure that part of the kidney damage I have is because of that.

      4mg of hydromorphone would have been /much/ safer. And no, I wouldn't have gotten addicted, because I'm not the type of person who does so, because I've seen other people with addiction problems and I've learned the easy way by watching them learn the hard way.

      It's too bad I had to learn about NSAIDs the hard way myself.

      >they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

      Chronic pain sufferers aren't looking to get high. They just want to get out of the fetal position and get out of bed.

      My wife has one of those rare doctors who is actually knowledgeable about chronic pain. She is terrified of what will happen to her when he retires - she travels an hour across the state because in 7 years, she's yet to find a doctor locally who takes chronic pain seriously. And this moral panic is terrifying her even more, on top of that.

      If she is cut off from her legal and safe meds, which she has been responsively using for decades now, she will either kill herself (the plan is a helium 'exit bag' - we have soberly discussed this at length, and I am not OK with it.) /or/ she will turn to street heroin, truly a sub-optimal solution. This moral panic is killing people and making heroin addicts out of chronic pain sufferers because they turn to heroin when cold-turkeyed and locked out by ignorant-as-fuck doctors from legal and safe opiates and get thrown into the world of "I don't know how much this dose is because I got it from Shady-Joe."

      This moral panic is a pogrom against the ill. It needs to fucking stop right now.

      And yes, there are moneyed interests behind this moral panic. You can google this stuff yourself.

      Kurt Cobain is dead largely because of chronic pain and the cascade of effects it has. Chronic pain is not to be fucked with.

      In his journals, Kurt often mentioned that he was suffering from chronic stomach pain. He went to several doctors but they were unable to determine the cause. His condition worsened as time progressed which prompted Cobain to shoot up more and more heroin to alleviate the pain. In his suicide note, Kurt references his stomach problems:

      "Thank you all from the pit of my burning, nauseous stomach for your letters and concern during the past years."

      https://www.upvenue.com/articl...

      This war on drugs has been a fucking disaster.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by swb · · Score: 2

      I had a serious accident that cost me half of my left ring finger and required fusing the distal joint on my middle finger. I was prescribed 40 mg oxycodone per day but after about two weeks it was just too much -- I was listless and in a fog, so I just dialed back the dosage to the point where the pain was manageable and I was much less foggy. I ended up on a daily dose of about 5 mg for three months and when they were gone, I never felt the need to take more.

      I don't know how typical my experience is, but I honestly expected that when the meds ran out I would feel some kind of withdrawal symptoms and/or some compulsion to keep taking them, but I mostly just forgot about them. My best guess is that the half life of oxycodone is short enough and the once a day dosage I was taking was low enough that I probably couldn't have developed an additction because I wasn't taking enough or with enough frequency to develop a physical addiction.

      I think I've also read that the psychoactive tolerance to opiates builds much faster than the angelsic response -- escalating dosages is a problem because people get less high and believe the pain relief is less, too, so they take higher dosages because they don't believe they're getting the right response. In fact, the analgesic response is still good, they just don't think so because they've gotten tolerant to the psychoactive response.

      I would think that the "opate problem" would be a lot less if we'd develop sound strategies on how to take them and educate patients versus just sending them away with pills. Personally I think that given how many people take opiates, the problems are way smaller than the hype would suggest (and more than a few people have a stake in the hype).

    5. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I am an opiate addict though I no longer use IV (very often) and am on Suboxone. I did first take opiates for the pain, they handed 'em out like candy back then. However, that's not why I stuck with it. I used them because I like the warm embrace. I like being able to sleep. I like not really caring a whole lot. The world is full of stupid people who say stupid things and I find it easier to deal with them when I'm high. Dealing with them was a requirement.

      I was a functional addict for years. I still am, really. Though I don't need to function as much. I shot up for years and years.

      I guess my point is that it's nice that it solves the pain problem but some of us used it for greater therapies than pain and just plain recreation. I know it bothers many people to let others do what they want but, even as an addict that's no longer using illegal drugs, I'm still a huge fan of legalization. Bad behavior is already criminalized and prohibition has caused more harm than good. (I believe we're in agreement there.)

      So, there's more than one use for opiates. It's not just about physical pain. Sometimes, it's just nice to be wrapped in a warm fuzzy blanket and not give a shit that the person you're talking to is borderline retarded and somehow managed to be either elected or appointed. (I did a lot of work for the government.)

      Oddly, most people think that posts must all be arguments. I'll add that this is not really an attempt to do so but rather to shed light on some additional usage patterns. I'm still on a monster dose of 32mg of Suboxone with an extra 16 available as needed. I was fond of extracting Fentanyl from the mylar patches and shooting that. To put that in perspective, Fentanyl is about the most potent thing meant to go into a human and is about 80 times more powerful than pure heroin/diacetylmorphine.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  5. Re:Cure for symptoms by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pain is a warning that something is wrong and is harming you. You don't want the warning to go away... you want the problem that's causing the warning to be solved.

    That's not really what chronic pain is, though. Yes, pain is a warning, and an important one for most situations. When the system designed to regulate and deliver pain is broken, though, you get chronic pain. You feel pain regardless of whether or not there's actual harm being done. It's like trying to live in a house where the fire alarm is always going off.

    My wife has PMPS. When her surgery was performed, a number of nerve endings deep in her chest cavity were damaged; they can't grow back, and they're constantly firing alarms at every slightest thing. For her, riding in a car hurts when the car goes over a small bump in the road. Coughing or sneezing hurts like hell. Getting hugged to hard or run into too quickly by our 6-year-old daughter hurts. Don't even think of trying to pick that kid up, either, because that'll hurt, too. My wife's low-impact elliptical workouts are an exercise in constant nerve pain, but she does them anyway to keep up her health. Pulling on a locked door handle expecting it to be open hurts. Trying to grab a pan off the top shelf hurts. Lying on her back hurts. Rolling over in bed hurts. She's lucky to get four hours of sleep on a typical day, thanks to a vicious combination of anti-cancer meds and pain. Countless little, insignificant, pedestrian things that most people wouldn't even bat an eyelid at are constant and grinding sources of pain for her.

    She knows what the problem is; she's got busted nerves in her chest. You can't really fix busted nerves. Yes, there are risks to not feeling pain, but holy hell we'd take them in a heartbeat just to be able to shut this goddamned internal fire alarm off, even for a day.

    There are millions of people dealing with the same kind of thing: constant, chronic pain. This would very literally change their lives.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  6. Re:Cure for symptoms by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    I suffer from chronic pain. I use painkillers to dull it, but it never goes away. Sometimes it is useful, telling me that something I'd wrong, but most of the time it's just meaningless suffering without end.

    What I need is something to turn off the meaningless chronic part, but leave the acute pain there so I realise when I am damaged or unwell.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  7. Re:Junkies by fafalone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heroin peddlers, illegal and legal alike, will shut this research down.

    Actual heroin dealers are probably thrilled... less access to pills = more demand for powder, as our brilliant drug warriors recently proved by sending tens of thousands of people away from doctors and pharmacists and into the arms of heroin dealers. But better 1000 people suffer in agony than 1 person take his pills to feel good, amirite? The DEA controls how your pain is treated now, not your doctor. And their philosophy? "Not dying soon? Not screaming loud enough to give me a headache? No pain relief for you!"
    As for the legal guys... pretty sure this will be something they can charge out the ass for that you'll have to take at least daily.

  8. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is, pain is remarkably important to humans. It tells us we are too close to the fire, or our finger is broken, or someone has just plunged a knife in our back.

    Sure, there are some people who are constantly in pain that this could held with, and you want some pain relief while you are healing, but even when healing, you don't want the possibility of pain gone [ie, broken arm, you get up to go to the washroom and stub your foot, breaking your toe, you want to find out right then it's broken, not later when doctor tells you to just live with it like that.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  9. hypnosis for pain and more by swell · · Score: 2

    My introduction to hypnosis was having three teeth pulled after a five minute session. No drugs. One tooth had three roots wrapped around bone. For a week I spit out bits of broken bone, but no pain, no bleeding at any time.

    A skilled hypnotist can remove chronic pain in a single session. Even better, he/she can teach how you can do it yourself, if necessary for the rest of your life. Most people do well with hypnosis.

    There seems to be a lot of superstition and mystery concerning hypnosis among the ignorant, especially in the medical profession. It can't do all miracles but it does some very well. If you haven't looked closely in to it you are doing yourself and your loved ones a disservice. You'll never know the myriad ways it can benefit you.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  10. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by fredgiblet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes...and? They're not proposing permanent treatments I don't think, just providing relief for people with unendingly painful conditions. And even if they are there's people who would certainly want to give up pain. I know someone who's largely non-functional because of chronic pain due to nerve damage. Her quality of life is terrible because of that, I'm sure it's worth the risk to her to be able to actually use both of her arms.

  11. Re:Cure for symptoms by RandomFactor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    http://sorrentotherapeutics.co...

    resinoferatoxin is considered ~1000x 'hotter' than pure capsaicin and is being developed for permanent pain relief uses in cases such as end-stage cancer.

    It operates by causing the pain receptors to fire continuously until they die and you don't want to be awake for that, so sedation is required. Since it is targeted in nature, it may be applicable in the GP's wife's case where the issue is with specific nerves.

    [The] higher potency combined with the specific targeting of TRPV-1 allows for selective destruction of the pain-triggering nerves, potentially producing a long lasting and permanent reduction in pain after a single injection.

    I stumbled across it a while back for unrelated reasons (I enjoy eating quite spicy foods and they love comparing it with peppers) it is being developed to provide relief for chronic pain.

    Obviously any interested should check with their doctor, or the company developing this for options. I have no idea if it will work in any given situation or not, or when it might be available, and am not a doctor..

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  12. Flawed understanding... by bcware · · Score: 2

    I believe this "cure" for pain will fail, though it may be a more effective treatment than traditional opiates if it has fewer side effects. Why will it fail? Pain consists of TWO key elements. Element 1 is the physical stimulus or nerve conduction (this is actually the least important). Element 2 is the brain's emotional response to the stimuli it received. The brain is capable is experiencing pain even when no stimulus is received from a peripheral site. Phantom limb pain in amputees definitively proves this. The brain has a "map" of the body and is capable of experiencing pain even when a body part no longer exists. Therefore, anything that blocks nerve conduction (like a sodium channel blocker) will not stop pain in all patients. I'm not trying to say this new drug target will be useless; it might be fantastic, but it will not "cure" pain by any stretch of the imagination. I'm interested to see what kind of side effects are experienced when nav1.7 is blocked in HEALTHY patients.

  13. It's not that the doctors are hostile. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The hostility that too many doctors have to analgesics is maddening.

    It's not that the doctors are hostile to giving adequate doses of painkillers.

    It's that the DEA examines how often and how much they prescribe, and if it is too high (by their far too low scales) they come down on the doctors with penalties that are often career-ending. This puts doctors treating chronic-pain cases, or painful diseases, at substantial risk. So they underprescribe painkillers in order to avoid discovering the current administrative threshold by exceeding it.

    This is particularly appalling now that it has been discovered that adequate opioid painkiller dosage in the first weeks following a traumatic injury apparently prevents post traumatic stress disorder. Perhaps the high and rising incidence of this debilitating condition in the past decades was entirely the result of the drug war.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  14. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by invictusvoyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem is, pain is remarkably important to humans. It tells us we are too close to the fire, or our finger is broken, or someone has just plunged a knife in our back.

    or that we are using Microsoft products or that we are trying to have a conversation with Lennart Poettering

  15. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by doccus · · Score: 2

    Yes...and? They're not proposing permanent treatments I don't think, just providing relief for people with unendingly painful conditions. And even if they are there's people who would certainly want to give up pain. I know someone who's largely non-functional because of chronic pain due to nerve damage. Her quality of life is terrible because of that, I'm sure it's worth the risk to her to be able to actually use both of her arms.

    Just noticed your comment.. Indeed, nerve damage is the worst because they are the source of the pain signals. For instance I have 1 to 2 cm deep dermal ulcers that don't heal, but the nerve fibers do grow outside of the injury.. exposed to the air or dressing. It's like 100 abscess teeth! It soo sux. And I sure do feel for that friend of yours and will pray for her, if it helps...

  16. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by fredgiblet · · Score: 2

    The best part about nerve damage is that it's not even really relevant. Pain is supposed to tell you about something broken in your body, but nerve damage means you have pain just because!

  17. Re:Junkies by Some_Llama · · Score: 3, Informative

    DEA has been cracking down on doctors prescribing drugs for the past 5 years, making it harder to get any kind of pain relief drug from your doctor, in both quantity and quality so that you end up suffering so your doctor doesn't go to jail.

    I know this from personal experience but here is a simple google search that took 5 seconds.

    https://www.google.com/#q=dea+...