Slashdot Mirror


Remix Mini Review: a $70 Android Desktop PC (liliputing.com)

walterbyrd writes: Earlier this year, Jide released a 2-in-1 tablet called the Remix Ultra, which shipped with a custom version of Android called Remix OS. The software features a taskbar, a desktop, support for keyboard shortcuts, and support for running many apps either in full-screen mode or in smaller windows. The Remix Ultra tablet comes with a keyboard cover and touchpad, allowing you to use it like a laptop — and it worked... kind of. But the Remix Ultra is also kind of expensive. Now Jide is offering something much more affordable: the Jide Remix Mini is basically a small, low-power desktop computer that ships with Remix OS. After running a successful Kickstarter campaign to raise money (and awareness) this fall, Jide is now shipping the Remix Mini to customers.

82 comments

  1. Jide Remix by mjc_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got one of these from the Kickstarter campaign. It works reasonably well. I haven't tried to do much with it, but as a tiny desktop computer it's OK.

    I had initial problems getting the display to work, because my monitor (a Benq GW1255) only accepted 1080p on its HDMI interface and the Remix output 720p. I first connected the Remix to a monitor that could handle 720p and changed the Remix's display settings, but I finally ended up getting a HDMI to VGA connector (from Amazon by CableMaster, about $10) and it now works fine.

    I use the Remix just for playing around. It prints fine with a Brother driver over my wifi to a 2360DW.

    I use my Apple keyboard (wired) with its attached trackball via USB, and they both work without any problems.

    So far, I like it.

    (Wow - I sure haven't posted in a loooooong time - look at my sig)

    --
    This is the Constitution.This is the Constitution under the Bush administration. Any questions?
    1. Re:Jide Remix by mlts · · Score: 1

      To me, it looks like a good candidate for a thin client for VDI work. For example, in finance or a part of a company where data is highly sensitive, using these coupled with RDP, Citrix, or a VNC protocol that had encryption, would make for a relatively inexpensive, but usable machine. Plus, if one got stolen or broken, $70 isn't too bad.

      Of course, this isn't for everyone, as we already went through the pre-cloud Javastation song and dance... but for areas where thin clients and VDI would be useful and are needed for a security aspect, I can see buying a bunch of these, especially if they could be configured with a custom image (so apps like RDP or Citrix Receiver would be installed and ready to go.)

    2. Re: Jide Remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it different from other (cheaper) mini pcs?

    3. Re: Jide Remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also why android for general purpose desktop?

      This is masochism!

    4. Re: Jide Remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you post a link to an example? Otherwise it is a bit hard to say.

    5. Re:Jide Remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if all you want is citrix, then why not just buy a wyse box?

    6. Re: Jide Remix by luvirini · · Score: 1

      >Also why android for general purpose desktop?
      >This is masochism!

      The problem is alternatives are:
      Windows->spies on you and stops you from doing things.
      Linux->the new spiffy unusable UIs are standard so you need to hunt for a usable one.
      Apple->a LOT more expensive and the increasing lock in makes actually using them as computers harder and harder every year.
      All the less popular systems->many of them are fine as long as you do not have any problems, but then finding a solution is close to impossible as no-one else uses them.

      Android is bad too.. but I do not see it as any more or less masochism than any other current system.

      There seems to be a race on the mainstream to make systems as unusable as possible and it is hard to say who is winning the race...

    7. Re: Jide Remix by RDW · · Score: 3

      Linux->the new spiffy unusable UIs are standard so you need to hunt for a usable one.

      To be fair, if it takes more than 5 minutes to find a distribution like Ubuntu MATE, Mint MATE or Mint Cinnamon, or the packages for Xfce, LXDE or MATE in other distributions, then you're doing it wrong.

    8. Re: Jide Remix by Desler · · Score: 2

      What does Windows stop you from doing?

    9. Re: Jide Remix by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Or just apt-get lubuntu-desktop.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    10. Re: Jide Remix by fsagx · · Score: 1

      In their modified version of android, the apps run in windows to make it a desktop experience. I have one of the 2GB models, and have found that it is pretty solid for web, email and xbmc. If someone is deep into the android ecosystem already, with a phone and maybe a tablet, and If you don't need Adobe CS or MS Office, then I suppose it makes sense.

    11. Re: Jide Remix by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Android is fine if you want to look at cat videos or play Angry Birds. But for a general purpose desktop? Nope! The real alternative to Android is iOS. Windows, Linux, and MacOS are entirely different.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    12. Re:Jide Remix by OakDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (Wow - I sure haven't posted in a loooooong time - look at my sig)

      $sig =~ s/Bush/current/; and you're set for life.

    13. Re:Jide Remix by kriston · · Score: 1

      It's limited to 720p? That's so disappointing. Can it be modified to output 1080p or 1080i?

      --

      Kriston

    14. Re:Jide Remix by kriston · · Score: 1

      Oh, silly me, I didn't fully understand it was the monitor's problem for not allowing you to use it at 720p long enough to change it to 1080p.

      Sorry about that.

      --

      Kriston

  2. Another STB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This looks a lot like android set-top box. While they can perform some functions of a PC, they are still far. In that regard this modified android is a step in right direction, although it seems there are still things to be desired.

    1. Re:Another STB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an android set top box. They two big differences is that its $70 instead of typically $100 and it has been modified so that Android apps can run in resizable windows. Its actually really cool.

      I did not have any 720p / 1080p issues out of the box as others have indicated. It just worked.

  3. cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been looking for a cheap low power fanless server that I could host a web server I could ssh into for my family. Think along the lines of managing chores, etc. Is this something that's fit for that task or are there better options (such as something even cheaper)?

    1. Re: cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raspberry pi

    2. Re:cheap fanless server by Blaskowicz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you get linux drivers for it?, I mean without 3D acceleration (OpenGL) and without wifi but with wired ethernet still it would be fine ; but if you get a blank screen it's not nice and what such a device maybe lacks is a RS232 port that gives a serial console. I may be unfair here : Mali GPU do get some support but what about the specific SoC?

      If you intend to get a GNU userland running under Android thus negating most driver concerns, then why not, but the underlying Android OS will probably not get timely security updates.

      For all the petty dislikes I may have against the Raspberry Pis, they do get huge community support so you can run straight GNU/Linux or even BSD or other.
      ODROID have some favorable reputation. Banana Pi?
      Some PC hardware is not far at all in price (486 + BIOS or Atom + UEFI).
      Some complete 20 euro solution without special tricks would be great if we just want it to respond to pings, ssh and serve static or better html. I guess we'll get there eventually.
      Android computers are a bit like CP/M of old : they run the same software but CP/M machines needed their own custom BIOS (and warts of the time such as a hundred different floppy formats). End result you get a CP/M version tailored to your hardware and floppy. With MS-DOS machines except early ones the BIOS were compatible (and we ended up with 360KB floppy, 1.2MB, 720kB etc.) so you ran unmodified OS on unmodified machines of any vendor. I think we may get there : we'll have ARM + UEFI little boxes like we have x86 + UEFI ones. (and even MIPS + UEFI, etc.)

      We do have it easy even in the current situation because a lot of things are extremely standardized : USB, eMMC, SD, ethernet, Wifi, HDMI, VGA, PCIe. File systems too. It's beautiful that things can be used without special consideration.

    3. Re: cheap fanless server by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      How much CPU do you need? You can spend about $16 total on an older PogoPlug and little USB flash drive, put Arch on it, and run a tiny server. Works fine for a DNS backup or low-bandwidth Tor relay and will hardly dent your power bill.

      http://amzn.to/1NdkLhF

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:cheap fanless server by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I was going to say rpi too.

      The petty dislikes (I like you're phrasing) are mostly that there are cheaper, faster and smaller boards available.

      For that kind of task anything would, but the rpi is in absolute terms cheap enough and fast enough. Its well supported, so saving 5 to 10 bucks comes at the cost of increased hassle. The myriads of distributions for the pi make development as fast and easy as a standard desktop or sever. Possibly more so as the disk is in practice easier to swap than most bigger systems.

      I use it for miscellaneous server systems like running octopi, and it works great. I could do it cheaper, but they're are ready rolled images and of course if it breaks, I can get a replacement same day if I need.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re: cheap fanless server by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have used most of the Pogoplugs and I would unreservedly suggest a Raspberry Pi over any but the Series 4 Pogoplug, which is $20. It is the only one with SATA and USB3, but also, it is the only one which has been stable for me. Even the other versions of the same hardware were more problematic, which is weird because some of them were virtually identical. Now I regularly have very long uptimes without problems of any sort. It's been 48 days since my last reboot for updates...

      Raspberry Pi has vastly better hardware stats, but it has no decent storage interfaces; the best thing it has is poorly-implemented USB2. That's the best argument for the pogoplug, but it's also only an argument for one specific model. Luckily, last I checked that model was $20, as stated above, and that's a shipped price for a cased device with a power supply and ethernet cable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Managing chores through a self-hosted website? Sounds very efficient.

      Chore #1: Figure out why website isn't working

    7. Re:cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like you're phrasing

      Well it's certainly better than yours, nigger.

    8. Re:cheap fanless server by doconnor · · Score: 1

      You likely could use your existing Wi-fi router. Just install OpenWrt on it.

    9. Re:cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kangaroo PC is a fanless Windows computer for $100, go for that.

    10. Re:cheap fanless server by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I used my old eeePC netbook. Works fantastic after putting an SSD in it and hanging a large external drive off it.

      10w all day long after turning off Bluetooth and WiFi.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    11. Re:cheap fanless server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parents must be very proud.

    12. Re:cheap fanless server by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      You can snap up an Orange Pi for $15! It's both faster and cheaper than the Raspberry Pi 2. http://www.aliexpress.com/item...

  4. Too expensive. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 4, Informative

    I saw Android 2-in-1s going for 80 last week. And Win10 2-in-1s starting at $100. And those include display/keyboard/trackpad so they're ready to go out of the box. They're not amazingly powerful but neither is this thing. Why would I pay $70 for something in the same class that lacks input devices, a display, and a battery? $25 tops.

    1. Re:Too expensive. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I never understood this market. Is it for people who are pretending to have processing power and storage of 10 years ago? In a desktop machine which is less portable than some current laptops?

      "...when I fired up the WordPress app for Android, I realized that its simple editing tools were a little too simple for writing a long article.

      "Firefox.... After rebooting the Remix Mini and trying again, there was less lag, but it was still a little too annoying to spend any serious amount of time writing that way."

      "So I tried using the WordPress editor in Google Chrome. The lag was gone, but I got fed up with text selection and other quirks and eventually propped up a laptop next to the Remix Mini so I could write on one computer while referring to the other for test results."

      I wouldn't inflict this on anyone. I've given away computers more useful than this.

    2. Re:Too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you aren't running Windows that is more than enough for browsing, email, and text editing. Works quite well as a pc connected to your TV.

    3. Re:Too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you link me to some of those win10 2 in 1s?

    4. Re:Too expensive. by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      $25 tops? You'd pay more than that for a Raspberry Pi and it doesn't even have a damn enclosure.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    5. Re:Too expensive. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Walmart cyberwhatever sale. Still available as I'm typing.

  5. why not Pi ? by DanDD · · Score: 2

    I get that people that live on their phones may be fond of their apps and the app store(s) and the environment they are used to, but please consider:

    The Raspberry Pi 2 (under $40), running Raspbian, is a very usable Debian Linux based desktop environment, unencumbered by the limitations of Android.

    'sudo apt-cache search ' will yield all sorts of interesting things worth investigating, and maybe even a few worth 'sudo apt-get install '

    Android for anything other than a phone is rather pointless.

    --
    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
    1. Re: why not Pi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess the most obvious answer to this is "familiarity". Most people who chose the remix probably have some kind of experience with Android through their own phones. But not everyone is interested to learn Linux nor to setup the pi (which doesn't even come with a case similar to the remix) just to get a simple computer going. I bought one mainly for my 7 year old son to do basic research on the internet and watch YouTube clips and get his feet wet on basic computer usage. It works great for that purpose.

    2. Re: why not Pi ? by weigee · · Score: 1

      I guess the most obvious answer to this is "familiarity". Most people who chose the remix probably have some kind of experience with Android through their own phones. But not everyone is interested to learn Linux nor to setup the pi (which doesn't even come with a case similar to the remix) just to get a simple computer going. I bought one mainly for my 7 year old son to do basic research on the internet and watch YouTube clips and get his feet wet on basic computer usage. It works great for that purpose.

    3. Re:why not Pi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi 2 (under $40), running Raspbian, is a very usable Debian Linux based desktop environment, unencumbered by the limitations of Android

      Right, but this $70 thing has more RAM, 16GB storage, a slightly higher spec CPU, an Ethernet port which presumably isn't sharing the USB bus like it does in the Pi, built-in WiFi and Bluetooth, and a nice case to keep it all in.

      As much as I love my Pi2, I think it is arguable that it is a "very usable" desktop. Web browsing is a pain in the arse because Epiphany is just so damn slow, and the other browsers I've tried aren't much better. My Pi2 is a great machine for learning Python and building robots, but I'd not want to use it as an every-day, get-stuff-done machine. Whether or not the Remix is any better I don't know, but if being a desktop-replacement is its sole purpose you'd like to hope so.

    4. Re:why not Pi ? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      A set-top box for grandma where she can use the same OS on her TV that she already has on her phone?

      The walled garden of Google Play sounds simpler than explaining the intricacies of dpkg to a non-nerd.

    5. Re:why not Pi ? by hughbar · · Score: 2

      Yes, that both the blessing and the curse at the same time. I have an Android TV stick that I can SSH into from my phone, but I hate all the 'Androidiness' + unknown bits that 'may' steal date. Currently I have a PI attached to my TV, web server, xrdp available in the house and that's fine. However I would like to see a pre-packaged, easy to use Linux stick or mini-PC.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    6. Re:why not Pi ? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I believe most distributions come with a decent GUI that overlays over APT, I'm not sure the Play Store actually adds that much value in practice.

      (Perhaps it should become standard though that ".deb" files downloaded independently aren't installable unless you check a box in a GUI somewhere, in a similar fashion to Android's treatment of .apks)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re: why not Pi ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with posting A/C and then logging in to post is the first post might get modded up insightful/informative but the second post surely will be modded redundant.

  6. What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the point of all these Kickstarter Android toys? Maybe I shouldn't even call them toys, as they're barely capable of doing anything short of being a word processor.

    The Ouya was a flop, this is just the Ouya again minus the controller. Why do people keep funding these things that nobody has any practical use for? If you're not sticking this thing in your kitchen to read recipes, I think this is yet another product looking for a market that doesn't exist.

    Look, I know everyone wants to whine and bitch about AppleTV being a whole lot of powerful stuff and nothing in the Android camp is even remotely close to it, but please Android fans, stop trying to use Android as a sad excuse to say "it runs Android" because that's not a selling point. "Runs all Android games that would normally require a 800$ Samsung Galaxy S6" would WoW me. Barely being able to open the web browser like the Raspberry Pi isn't progress. At least the Pi's can be used in robotics.

    Geezus that Remix OS is a huge Windows 10 knock off. I wouldn't be surprised if the Chinese try to present it as such.

  7. Android? Forget it! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, but Android is totally unusable as a desktop operating system. (And I'm not saying that it's particularly usable on phones either.)

    But how about installing some good GNU/Linux on it? Does it run?

    1. Re:Android? Forget it! by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good thing that the Jide isn't running plain Android, but a desktop-oriented fork called Remix OS. The review itself does not find severe issues with using the OS or the apps in desktop mode. Maybe you should, you know, read the review?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    2. Re:Android? Forget it! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're missing the point, which is that an "Android Desktop PC" does not have the kind of applications you'd want to have on a desktop PC. This "Remix OS", a slightly modified version of Android, just runs Android apps developed for phones and tablets. To quote the review: "Remix OS does a pretty good job of making some Android apps feel like they were designed for desktop use, but there’s only so much the OS can do if apps don’t play along."

    3. Re:Android? Forget it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are missing the point.

      If you want a low power PC with a Linux distro, there are many available. This is something different. Complaining that it is not what was before misses the point.

      Remember the tablets? Who would want a computer without a keyboard or mouse? That was my original take on it. Apparently there was enough of a market to keep tablets around.

    4. Re:Android? Forget it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not even that, it's a just barely relevant "Android Phone on your TV without Phone Capabilities"

    5. Re:Android? Forget it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, they found text inpout to be frustratingly slow and text selection to be a PITA. Ended up writing the review on a laptop when they wanted to use Remix OS.

    6. Re:Android? Forget it! by phorm · · Score: 2

      It may not have the applications that *YOU* would want on a desktop PC. To be fair, it doesn't catch all the ones I'd want either, but for many of my family members it could do all they need, specifically:
      * Email
      * Browser
      * Netflix
      * Skype
      * Media Player(s)

      Personally what I'd like to see is something that works better for non-touch non-keyboard devices. Android TV boxes are awesome, but I've not seen any that do particularly well with the basic remotes (I don't necessarily blame Android for this, a lot of it is app design, i.e. Netflix is pretty horrible with just a standard up/down/left/right OK remote).

    7. Re:Android? Forget it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But don't they put some decent linux on it? I really don't think that Android can outperform a real linux distro, and that would give your family members all of the above and a lot of additional desktop applications. Putting Android clones on a desktop machine makes no sense.

  8. Android on desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have nothing against Android on a smartphone or even a tablet. But not on a desktop or notebook. I would say even IOS would face similar problems on a desktop. Both OS have mobile roots and are not so inclined to work well with a mouse and keyboard. Nor does Apps work well in a desktop environment. I think they use Android only because its freely available.

    1. Re:Android on desktop? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      As a long time owner of an iPad with keyboard case (pre dating the original Surface), I'd say iOS plays quite nicely with a keyboard. You're probably right about a mouse, though, and there are definitely other aspects of the touch UIs that would make them less than ideal.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Android on desktop? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Also, on my desktop I want a real filesystem and multiple windows. IOS has neither, and I don't think regular Android does either.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Android on desktop? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3

      Exactly. Android and iOS are significantly handicapped because they are designed to work on a phone with almost no resources available. iOS bascially tries to not have a file system at all. Android is missing critical things like the ability to mount a network share. Sure you can access them through apps, but I'd rather just have any application be able to read files from the network transparently.

      This is the reason that even for tablets I think that iOS and Android are useless. Sure they may work most of the time, but when I need to do something more advanced, they fall flat. Simple features are missing that would be present in any modern desktop OS.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  9. Cutting-edge OS software by Laguerre · · Score: 1

    The software features a taskbar, a desktop, support for keyboard shortcuts, and support for running many apps either in full-screen mode or in smaller windows.

    I think many of these features have been pretty common for quite a while now...

  10. If you want an inadequately powered desktop... by sparky81 · · Score: 2

    ...a raspberry pi is half the cost of this,

  11. Code signing vs. hobbyist hardware by tepples · · Score: 1

    Development of peripheral hardware by hobbyists, for one. Windows already requires all kernel-mode drivers to be digitally signed with a certificate issued by a CA that Microsoft trusts. And in the run up to the release of Windows 10, Microsoft has announced that Windows will soon require drivers to be signed with an EV certificate, which only an established company can obtain. No, "Test Mode" doesn't help a hobbyist who intends to actually sell the hardware to other hobbyists at low volume.

    1. Re:Code signing vs. hobbyist hardware by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Development of peripheral hardware by hobbyists, for one. Windows already requires all kernel-mode drivers to be digitally signed with a certificate issued by a CA that Microsoft trusts. And in the run up to the release of Windows 10, Microsoft has announced that Windows will soon require drivers to be signed with an EV certificate, which only an established company can obtain. No, "Test Mode" doesn't help a hobbyist who intends to actually sell the hardware to other hobbyists at low volume.

      Reboot into recovery mode, Troubleshoot, Advanced Options, hit F7 or 7 (disable driver verification).

      Worked on 64 bit Windows 8 and Windows 10 - I had to install ADB drivers for some dev hardware I was using, and those were not signed. Heck, I didn't use our internal drivers, I used the "universal ADB installer" package that installs drivers for all Android devices. (I did this because I couldn't get our internal drivers to install - windows refused saying no drivers were found). The universal drivers told me I had to enter the recovery mode menu to disable driver verification.

      Sure when I installed it a big scary popup saying there was no validation information was present.

      But no, I didn't get any "Test mode' notice or anything on the system afterwards - it looked pretty much the same to me.

  12. All maximized all the time by tepples · · Score: 1

    In Android, can you have a browser in one half of the screen and e-mail in the other half so you can see the page you're referring to while you write an e-mail about it? Or since when has Android solved the problem of, say, the the full-screen calculator app?

    1. Re:All maximized all the time by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The Remix OS apparently does actually run most apps in windows (with the option to full screen an app if wanted.) According to the review most apps work OK with this, some are a little glitchy (like having widgets out of reach), and one - ironically Hangouts (an IM app - exactly the kind of thing you want to have in a small window) - didn't work at all.

      To be honest, I think the maximize/windowed part of the system is the issue I'm least concerned about. I'm more bothered about how horrendous typical desktop features like cut-and-paste seem to be when translated to mobile and then back again via Android.

      Also why the f--- are they closing Windows 10? The utter lack of imagination the F/OSS community can have on occasion is staggering.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  13. Full screen calculator by tepples · · Score: 0

    A set-top box for grandma where she can use the same OS on her TV that she already has on her phone?

    Answer this question from grandma: "Why does the calculator app take up the whole screen? I want to see the figures that I'm adding up." It's different with a phone, where the full-screen window management policy actually works well for what a 5" screen is capable of.

    1. Re:Full screen calculator by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Even a cursory glance over the article (I know, I know) would answer your question for you. Hint: you are making a false assumption.

  14. Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V on a Bluetooth keyboard by tepples · · Score: 1

    ironically Hangouts (an IM app - exactly the kind of thing you want to have in a small window) - didn't work at all.

    That's because Google was for a long time adamant about running everything maximized. At one time, the Android CDD specified that the screen size that the OS presents to an app wasn't ever allowed to change after installation. This means all resizing to a window had to be zoom-based which isn't very good for text readability. Google even threatened to stop tolerating installation of Google Play Services and Store on CyanogenMod if the latter were to implement the Cornerstone window manager. (I can dig up citations if you want.)

    I'm more bothered about how horrendous typical desktop features like cut-and-paste seem to be when translated to mobile and then back again via Android.

    Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V on a Bluetooth keyboard work well in Android on my Nexus 7 (2012) tablet. The most painful part of copying text around is selecting it with a finger, but a mouse solves that.

    Also why the f--- are they closing Windows 10? The utter lack of imagination the F/OSS community can have on occasion is staggering.

    By "closing" do you mean "cloning"? If so, how else would a non-full-screen version of the Android app launcher look?

    1. Re:Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V on a Bluetooth keyboard by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      (I can dig up citations if you want.

      Sure, I'm not asking because I disbelieve you (this is something people have been peeved at Google for a while over) but because it'd be interesting to know more.

      Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V on a Bluetooth keyboard work well in Android on my Nexus 7 (2012) tablet. The most painful part of copying text around is selecting it with a finger, but a mouse solves that.

      Unfortunately it's the selection I'm talking about. The review says for some apps you have to do exactly the same thing with the mouse that you'd have to do with a touchscreen, ie long touch and then adjust the little circle things on either side of the selection. Urgh.

      By "closing" do you mean "cloning"? If so, how else would a non-full-screen version of the Android app launcher look?

      Yes, cloning.

      You need to look at the screenshots in the review, because I suspect you think I meant "Cloning Windows" or "Cloning a generic desktop OS". I really meant cloning Windows 10 . It looks identical, with the exception of the Start button which is their logo rather than Windows. Same buttons. Same notification system. etc.

      I'd imagine if Google ever does a similar OS (which they might, there have been rumors about Android for ChromeBooks for a long time), they'll use the ChromeOS UI as their guide to how a desktop should look like, not Windows 10.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. What changed Google's mind about resizing apps? by tepples · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    One of the most important differences between Remix OS and stock Android is that you don’t need to run all of your apps in full-screen windows. There are Windows-like minimize, resize, and close buttons in the upper right corner of app windows, and if you tap the minimize button in many apps, they’ll automatically shrink to phone-sized windows.

    I also see Gapps in the screenshots, meaning either Google somehow approved this or this product is infringing copyright in the Gapps. I'll assume good faith and assume the former. What got Google to change its mind and allow resizing apps after installation, which was previously forbidden?

  16. GPL Violation? by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was going to load up RemixOS on a VM to try it out, looked at the website found this:

    Disclaimer: Remix OS is only licensed to authorized business partners and pre-loaded on specific product models of those partners;it's not intended for personal use.

    I know they have their part of the software that doesn't have to be GPL, but the rest has to be released. Scrutinize....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:GPL Violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only have to release the source to those the software is distributed to. By not distributing it to you, they are under no obligation to release the source to you. I think if you purchased a computer with Remix OS on it, then you'd have rights to the source per the GPL.

  17. "Devices MUST NOT change screen size" by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Android Compatibility Definition (CDD) as of about a year ago stated: "Devices MUST NOT change their reported screen size at any time." Dianne Hackborn of Google explained how Cornerstone broke the CDD.

    1. Re:"Devices MUST NOT change screen size" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks! You've got to wonder if this is myopia on Google's part. Even ignoring concepts like windows, there are legitimate reasons why a device might report a display size change, for example if it's plugged into a larger touchscreen (I know there's at least one phone out there that has a "tablet" that it slots into.)

      It's all the more peculiar given Android's default behavior with screen orientation changes is to restart the part of the app dealing with the screen (which annoys many developers no end because most initially write an app structured so the whole thing restarts because it all handles the screen.) Given a complete reset of the UI, why the hell would it matter that the screen size has changed?

      Plus... not liking the idea that devices can only list official screen sizes to apps.

      This is also the kind of decision that ties the hands of OS developers in the future. If apps can rely upon the screen size always being the same, then isn't there a risk they'll do so?

      Maybe the supposed merger of ChromeOS and Android will lead them to... well, if not change their mind, then come up with a workaround.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:"Devices MUST NOT change screen size" by tepples · · Score: 1

      Given a complete reset of the UI, why the hell would it matter that the screen size has changed?

      Because the total area hasn't changed. Apps include different activity layout resources for different screen sizes.

      This is also the kind of decision that ties the hands of OS developers in the future.

      The expectation of a constant screen size was set forth in the days of 3 and 4 inch screens. Google's Android division had already tied its hands years before the iPad was announced. As Ms. Hackborn mentioned, apps have to explicitly declare support for resizability in the manifest, and I was under the impression that the way of doing so differed from one device maker's set of Android customizations to another. Samsung has its own extension, for example. I don't know whether any such extension has since become standard in Android.

  18. Beijing is the new Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very cool little device, and it's great to see that people are waking up to the fact that Beijing, and the whole south-east of China really, is the new place to be if you're in electronics or IT, and that people who once left for the U.S are making their way back there.

  19. Good, But.... by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    I got one from the kickstarter, and I like it alot, it works well, doesnt take up much space and seems stable and fast enough for most light work.

    I just can't seem to find a use for it around my house. It may very well end up in my sister's stocking as a Christmas present.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?