Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Legal Fight With Samsung Revealed a Gold Mine of Top-Secret Information (bgr.com)

An anonymous reader writes with this story about how the Apple vs. Samsung battle brought to light the inner workings of Apple product development. BGR reports: "Following a contentious patent battle that raged on for nearly five years, Samsung last week finally agreed to pay Apple $548 million in damages for infringing upon a number of iPhone and iPad patents. While Samsung may still be holding out hope that it may someday recover those millions, it seems that we can finally start closing the book on the most widely publicized patent dispute in recent memory, one which saw Apple and Samsung battle it out in courtrooms across all corners of the globe.

One of the more interesting aspects of Apple's legal battle with Samsung is that it gave us an unprecedented look behind the veil of secrecy that typically shrouds all aspects of Apple's product development and day-to-day operations. Over the course of discovery, innumerable court filings, and a fascinating trial, the inner workings of Apple were brought to the forefront for the fist time in history. From photographs of iPhone prototypes to how Apple conducts market research, Apple's legal battles with Samsung provided tech enthusiasts with a treasure trove of previously top-secret information.

With Samsung now agreeing to pony up for damages, we thought it'd be a good time to take a step back, reminisce, and take a look at some of the more interesting nuggets of information the hard-fought patent dispute brought to light."

1 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Whoa, that iPad prototype by gstoddart · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah, but here's where patents screw up everything: Once you have your patent rubber stamped by the idiots at the patent office whose sole job is to ensure the check cleared, it's a valid patent.

    The patent system is so horribly that once the design patent was awarded, things like facts and reality became irrelevant -- because design patents are just as broken as patents on inventions; first guy to get it accepted wins.

    What people miss here is that this is a situation created ENTIRELY by the way the patent system works, and how it's not designed to weigh to merit of anything, just the paperwork and collecting the fees.

    Patents are now just tools for big business to keep small business out of the game, and to be used as ammunition to try to keep the other big businesses from competing.

    As they exist now, patents are preventing innovation and invention, in favor of letting asshole lawyers wring out licensing fees and stop competition.

    Who did what in what order is meaningless until someone revokes a patent.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.