Slashdot Mirror


Eric Schmidt Proposes 'Hate Spell-Checker' For Radical and Terrorist Content (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader writes: In an opinion piece for the New York Times, Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt has proposed the creation of 'tools' to stop or limit the spread of messages and content intended to recruit terrorists. Schmidt says: "We should build tools to help de-escalate tensions on social media — sort of like spell-checkers, but for hate and harassment. We should target social accounts for terrorist groups like the Islamic State, and remove videos before they spread, or help those countering terrorist messages to find their voice."

Schmidt does not enlarge on whether he is talking about AI-driven systems capable of understanding thought well enough to make value judgments on it, or of the problems involved in auto-censoring speech in order to promote his vision of a new rapport between cultures on the internet.

5 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Google just wants to target terrorists with ads by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Need help planning your next Jihad? Call 1-800-4JIHADS"

    "Looking for devout women who will treat you like a caliph? Visit maskedhotties.com"

    "Have you or a loved one contracted lung disease while training in the desert to be an ISIS warrior? Go to mesothelioma-kills-killers.com for information on receiving remuneration for your illness.

  2. Re:The ministery of truth by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 5, Funny

    It can't possibly work. If I'm not allowed to call someone a 'bastard', I'll write, "You, sir, are the result of an illicit conjugation," a game of wack-a-mole if ever there was one.

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  3. Re:The ministery of truth by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll certainly bring the class back into insults.

  4. Re:Go fuck yourself by istartedi · · Score: 1, Funny

    OMG! It's already happening. He meant to say "fuck yourself with a 10-foot rusty pipe wrapped in barbed wire and smeared with Habanero peppers", but it was auto-corrected. Authorization: section 5, quoting for demonstration purposes. Signed, Director section 5, unit 3, December 8, 2015.

    p.s., I'm not sure how long that last hack will actually work. Grabbed the test sections and units off 4chan this morning.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  5. I [CENSORED] [CENSORED] This! by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I [CENSORED] [CENSORED] when they [CENSORED] censor my [CENSORED] [CENSORED] speech aimed at [CENSORED]!

    Signed,

    [CENSORED] Engineer

    This message was screened for hurtful language for your well being. Have a nice day!

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!