Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Persistent Storm Detected On Low-Mass Star (latimes.com)

Posted by timothy on from the on-blitzen-and-kepler-and-spitzer-and-rudolph dept.

The L.A. Times reports that researchers using the Kepler and Spitzer space telescopes have discovered an astronomical first: a low-mass star with a huge, persistent, swirling surface feature akin to the long-lived storm on Jupiter. The star, W1906+40 , is cool enough ("a mere 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit or so") to allow cloud formation. A slice: This star was first spotted by NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (or WISE) in 2011; study leader John Gizis of the University of Delaware, Newark and colleagues then looked through NASA's Kepler data to further examine the star. (It just so happened that Kepler was pointing in the right direction to spot the L-dwarf.) ... "The long life of the cloud is in contrast with weather changes seen in cooler brown dwarfs on the timescale of hours and days," they wrote. In fact, the researchers believe the storm has been going strong for at least two years — a stability they seemed to find slightly baffling. "Evidently the W1906+40 spot is very long-lived compared to the 'weather' features in cooler L and T dwarfs," they wrote. "Why would the clouds in W1906+40 be stable?"

39 comments

  1. familiar by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Seems to me I've seen this before....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:familiar by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Even post Dice slashdot isn't immune to dupes I guess:

      http://science.slashdot.org/st...

    2. Re:familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a story last week about a planet that was "nearly a star" that had a storm like Jupiter. I think. You're right, this is rather confusing.

    3. Re:familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea - it's called Jupiter. ;)

      But yes, this is a dupe.

    4. Re:familiar by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      A dupe or a derp?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:familiar by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      What post Dice /.? The site is owned by DHI Group. Their logo is the same as the Dice logo of old. So, no change in owner, just an owner name change.

  2. Repeat posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here, just another Slashdot re-post of a story from Friday.

  3. This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    corporate welfare of the worst type. It does nothing to help the children.

    1. Re: This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest hope in life is that one day all of those Republicans have to go hungry so they understand why normal people understand that space is a waste of money. They take money from us at gun point to give to NASA.

    2. Re: This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. This is just a scam to funnel money to corporations like the space shuttle and ISS.

    3. Re: This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know if this money is thrown away for something that does no immediate good that it can't be used for good.

    4. Re: This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just how they be.

    5. Re:This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these days I want to meet one of these Republicans and punch them right in the kisser!

    6. Re: This is Republican-style... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      No one is going hungry because of the space program. 0.5% of federal budget. We spend over twice that on the Homeland Security gestapo which thus far has netted zero benefit

    7. Re: This is Republican-style... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      my hope is that the republican establishment leaders meat with donald trump at trump tower and the BS grows so massive that it collapses in on itself and forms a new star.

    8. Re:This is Republican-style... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps the children of scientists, engineers, admins, and support staff at the institutes involved, and the companies they buy things from.

    9. Re: This is Republican-style... by ian_billyboy_morris · · Score: 1

      ISS? Why that's just one letter away from ISIS. NASA are funding the terrorists! We should cut all their funding and giv it to Donald Trump, derp derp!

    10. Re: This is Republican-style... by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      My understanding is they intend to "meat" with him in less than one seventh of a fortnight.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  4. I don't want to say it was aliens . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it was aliens!

    1. Re: I don't want to say it was aliens . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has to be. Who still use Farenheits ?

  5. Climate Change by x0ra · · Score: 1

    We must right now have a conference to agree to limit the effect of human impact on interstellar climate change, our future depends on it ~

    1. Re:Climate Change by chipschap · · Score: 1

      And it will create jobs, too.

    2. Re:Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans: All your base are belong to corporations

    3. Re:Climate Change by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Democrats. All your base are belong to the Government.... The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    4. Re:Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have Democrats and Republicans confused. An easy mistake to make.

  6. Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always stories about these exoplanets and exostars but rarely any pictures. Didn't see a link in the story to pictures, either. Where are they, NASA?

    1. Re:Pictures? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      we're talking about maybe five pixels on a CCD array, so here's your picture +

    2. Re:Pictures? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      It's not possible to take pictures, but variations in emission can be analyzed and matched to known objects like Jupiter to allow for most likely explanation.

      It's not a perfect solution, but the best we have today.

      Now back to the drawingboard to try to figure out how to make a probe that can have warp drive capability.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  7. Wish we could image it. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    Sure, there's some long-baseline interferometry happening on Earth's surface, but I'd love to see imagers with a baseline spanning an AU or so.

  8. Why would it be stable ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geometry ? Or gravity. That's pretty much it.

  9. I thought for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lindsay Lohan got drunk and puked in public again, but they mean an actual star..

  10. 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Who still measures things like this in Fahrenheit ? Come on - admit that you are in the 21st century - that should have been (about) 1925 Celsius or 2200 Kelvin

    1. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by geantvert · · Score: 1

      They still use Fahrenheit in the world of Oz

    2. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      I might use Fahrenheit to describe how warm my living room is, but for a star, a scientific measurement, -- Centigrade or Kelvin has been the unit for many years.

    3. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      It's a virtual world so it doesn't count.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Oz moved to the metric system decades ago.

      (you know Oz is a nickname for Australia, right?)

    5. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      This isn't a scientific journal, this is a science article for the popular press. So they use units that the average reader of an American magazine will be most familiar with.

      In other words, chill....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but then again, I doubt many readers are actually familiar with the difference between 2000 degrees and 3500 degrees in either unit system. Chemists and metallurgists could nail it down pretty well -- hot enough to melt anything except carbon, but not to boil most of the interesting stuff beyond lead or zinc -- but, again, it would be lost on most readers.

    7. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Oz moved to the metric system decades ago.

      (you know Oz is a nickname for Australia, right?)

      Or was it New Zealand?
      One of them is sheep-fuckers and the other has online hoon reporting.
      I can never keep those two straight.