Slashdot Mirror


Persistent Storm Detected On Low-Mass Star (latimes.com)

The L.A. Times reports that researchers using the Kepler and Spitzer space telescopes have discovered an astronomical first: a low-mass star with a huge, persistent, swirling surface feature akin to the long-lived storm on Jupiter. The star, W1906+40 , is cool enough ("a mere 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit or so") to allow cloud formation. A slice: This star was first spotted by NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (or WISE) in 2011; study leader John Gizis of the University of Delaware, Newark and colleagues then looked through NASA's Kepler data to further examine the star. (It just so happened that Kepler was pointing in the right direction to spot the L-dwarf.) ... "The long life of the cloud is in contrast with weather changes seen in cooler brown dwarfs on the timescale of hours and days," they wrote. In fact, the researchers believe the storm has been going strong for at least two years — a stability they seemed to find slightly baffling. "Evidently the W1906+40 spot is very long-lived compared to the 'weather' features in cooler L and T dwarfs," they wrote. "Why would the clouds in W1906+40 be stable?"

19 of 39 comments (clear)

  1. familiar by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Seems to me I've seen this before....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:familiar by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Even post Dice slashdot isn't immune to dupes I guess:

      http://science.slashdot.org/st...

    2. Re:familiar by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      A dupe or a derp?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:familiar by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      What post Dice /.? The site is owned by DHI Group. Their logo is the same as the Dice logo of old. So, no change in owner, just an owner name change.

  2. Climate Change by x0ra · · Score: 1

    We must right now have a conference to agree to limit the effect of human impact on interstellar climate change, our future depends on it ~

    1. Re:Climate Change by chipschap · · Score: 1

      And it will create jobs, too.

    2. Re:Climate Change by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Democrats. All your base are belong to the Government.... The more things change, the more they stay the same.

  3. Re: This is Republican-style... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    No one is going hungry because of the space program. 0.5% of federal budget. We spend over twice that on the Homeland Security gestapo which thus far has netted zero benefit

  4. Wish we could image it. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    Sure, there's some long-baseline interferometry happening on Earth's surface, but I'd love to see imagers with a baseline spanning an AU or so.

  5. Re:Pictures? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    we're talking about maybe five pixels on a CCD array, so here's your picture +

  6. Re: This is Republican-style... by ian_billyboy_morris · · Score: 1

    ISS? Why that's just one letter away from ISIS. NASA are funding the terrorists! We should cut all their funding and giv it to Donald Trump, derp derp!

  7. 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Who still measures things like this in Fahrenheit ? Come on - admit that you are in the 21st century - that should have been (about) 1925 Celsius or 2200 Kelvin

    1. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by geantvert · · Score: 1

      They still use Fahrenheit in the world of Oz

    2. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      I might use Fahrenheit to describe how warm my living room is, but for a star, a scientific measurement, -- Centigrade or Kelvin has been the unit for many years.

    3. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      It's a virtual world so it doesn't count.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      This isn't a scientific journal, this is a science article for the popular press. So they use units that the average reader of an American magazine will be most familiar with.

      In other words, chill....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:3,500 degrees Fahrenheit by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but then again, I doubt many readers are actually familiar with the difference between 2000 degrees and 3500 degrees in either unit system. Chemists and metallurgists could nail it down pretty well -- hot enough to melt anything except carbon, but not to boil most of the interesting stuff beyond lead or zinc -- but, again, it would be lost on most readers.

  8. Re:Pictures? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    It's not possible to take pictures, but variations in emission can be analyzed and matched to known objects like Jupiter to allow for most likely explanation.

    It's not a perfect solution, but the best we have today.

    Now back to the drawingboard to try to figure out how to make a probe that can have warp drive capability.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  9. Re: This is Republican-style... by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    My understanding is they intend to "meat" with him in less than one seventh of a fortnight.

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".