Slashdot Mirror


Vandals Deface Facebook's Hamburg Offices (google.com)

Reuters reports that 15 to 20 vandals dressed in black this weekend defaced Facebook's Hamburg offices, spray-painting "Facebook dislike" on a wall, and causing some minor property damage. From the story: "A Facebook spokesman said nobody was injured in the incident. He said he could not immediately comment on the possible motive for the act of vandalism. The European head of Facebook is under investigation in Germany over the social network's alleged failure to remove racist hate speech. The investigation was announced last month as German politicians and celebrities voiced concern about the rise of anti-foreigner comments in German on Facebook and other social media as the country struggles to cope with a refugee influx. (The Guardian has a nearly identical story, but a better photo.)

3 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Well that's good to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A Facebook spokesman said nobody was injured in the incident.

    Any sane person sees where this kind of comment comes from. It's a unilateral attempt to escalate the severity of what actually happened. All they did was break some windows and throw some paint, let's not make this a case of "domestic terrorism" etc.

  2. Freedom of Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >politicians and celebrities voiced concern about the rise of anti-foreigner comments in German on Facebook
    And why can't people voice their concerns over their governments giving away their tax money to middle class "refugees"?

    1. Re:Freedom of Speech by bentcd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And why can't people voice their concerns over their governments giving away their tax money to middle class "refugees"?

      This is Europe, and Europe doesn't have the sort of unrestricted free speech that the US does. All European "free speech" laws that I've seen (which is far from all of them, I will admit) are along the lines of "speech is free so long as it's not objectionable". And I'm guessing the speech in question has been found objectionable by the people who decide such things.

      Now, it's not sufficiently bad here that govt can get away with saying something like "we object to you criticizing us go to jail", but, if it can be rephrased as "hate speech go to jail" or "supporting terrorists go to jail" (or in Germany, "go to jail you nazi") then you're screwed.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health