Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Ubuntu 16.04 Will Not Send Local Searches Over the Web By Default

Posted by timothy on from the better-path-to-wisdom dept.

jones_supa writes: Canonical introduced Amazon Product Results as part of Ubuntu 12.10, which meant that local searches performed by a user in Dash were also sent online. This made many Ubuntu users spill their coffee and got criticism from EFF and FSF as well. The so called "Shopping Lens" had to be manually disabled if that kind of search behavior was not desired. Finally after years, Canonical is reacting to the negative feedback and respecting users' privacy, so that Ubuntu 16.04 (the next Long Term Support release) won't send local searches over the web by default. The Amazon search feature is still available for those who explicitly want to use it.

10 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Really Canonical? by scunc · · Score: 5, Funny

    What happened? Is it not cool now that Windows is doing it too?

    1. Re:Really Canonical? by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most likely they're not making as much money as they thought and so they're turning it off.

  2. I can't be true by ISoldat53 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Canonical reacted to user feedback? That must be a first.

    1. Re: I can't be true by Burz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Get over it. systemd won and syslog and stderr lost.

      Actually, this can't be emphasized enough. Systemd is one of the few architectural initiatives emanating from Red Hat's ken that actually improves the operation of desktop systems. There was SO much broken power management in Linux before Upstart and then systemd came along it was like a never-ending joke (which users felt was being played on _them_). As a proponent of desktop PCs (not just Linux-based) I see improvements from systemd all over the system.

      In many ways, Canonical is trying to pull the Linux desktop in the direction of OS X. That is not a bad thing as long as they understand that both Apple and MS have a lot of unexpressed rules about how to build and promote a consumer platform -- I think Canonical gets it and the rest absolutely do not. Their early move to ensure variations with alternate default DEs used different names was more important that many here probably realize. Their attention to hardware testing and certification was another thing they got (mostly) right. Assembling an SDK to attract new app developers was also a first-class move.

      Canonical's big mistake? Exactly what the OP refers to: Over-commercializing to the point where privacy seems compromised. I'm glad they finally recognized this error. Where they could improve is to remove the *dependence* on local search... OS X never removed the old means of finding apps, which is an important avenue for users to visually discover what is available on a system. Ubuntu needs a hierarchical launch menu back, but the reason they're floundering here is probably because they never duplicated OS X's system of app bundles -- would be awesome if they did.

  3. Follow the money by fishwallop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The likeliest explanation is that Amazon is no longer paying Canonical enough money for this to be default behavior.

  4. hadn't thought it through in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously Canonical, didn't you have a meeting on this with the classic PRO vs CON list? Was it inconceivable that some would not like being tracked, even anonymously(if true) and a large portion of that population would be the geeks who you NEED? People, like geeks, who know what GNU/Linux is, why it is used and spread that far and wide and were using Ubuntu and promoting it if not developing for it. Pissing those people off and causing them to move to Debian for example was not a good idea.

    Good to see 16.04 LTS will disable this next year but you really screwed the pooch as they say on this one.

  5. Re:Is Ubuntu still a thing? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Debian and Ubuntu are what, half of desktop Linux use?

    Ubuntu has many editions that differ by the desktop they run, out of the box. Thus no need to set up a theme, configuration etc.

    - Unity
    - KDE
    - Xfce
    - LXDE
    - Gnome 3
    - Mate

    Then there's Mint :
    - Mint Cinnamon
    - Mint Mate
    - Mint Xfce
    - Mint KDE

    Then there's lesser known stuff out there.

    I don't understand. It's like saying you don't like anchovies, so you won't eat pizza, while staring at a list of 10 anchovy-less pizzas.

  6. They just moved the functionality by PvtVoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's been integrated into systemd.

  7. This is a stretch but... by ytene · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... when Mark Shuttleworth formed Canonical, one of the strongest claims they made was that ubuntu would always be free. I *do* appreciate that Canonical's activation of the spyware feature was publicised and only relevent to users of the Dash in the Unity desktop, and also aware that it's a bit of a leap of faith to suggest that 12.10 and onwards were anything other than free, but the fact remained that Canonical started to take kickbacks from Amazon - payment - for data generated by ubuntu users. In other words, ubuntu users were doing stuff that resulted in Canonical getting paid. This doesn't - quite - meet up to "free"... Like the parent post to which you responded, my reaction to the announcement was to continue to run on 12.04 LTS for a bit longer than expected, then make the switch to Mint, initially [and currently] on the ubuntu-derived Mint edition, but with testing currently underway to complete a migration to LMDE 2.0. But from my perspective the key point was that my decision was to literally and completely walk away from ubuntu/Canonical. I didn't agree with the ethics of their decision and the *only* mechanism I had to voice my opinion was to drop their product like a hot potato, which I did. I had been a user of ubuntu since 5.04, Hoary Hedgehog. I got to ubuntu via Mandrake/Mandriva, which in turn I got to after getting annoyed with Red Hat. Once bitten, twice shy. Perhaps the unique perspective here is that users of Linux are, by definition, very much aware of the impacts of acts like this from Canonical. I dare say that there are many GNU/Linux users out there today [well, I'm one] who once used Windows but got so disenfranchised at the machinations and underhand practices of Microsoft that they decided to walk. In any scenario where it becomes clear that a party is acting in an underhand or dishonourable way, the single, simplest response we have in our power is to stop using any product by such an un-trusted source. ~10 years ago I gave up on Microsoft because they were blatantly not trustworthy. 4 years ago I gave up on Canonical/ubuntu for the same reason. I can't say for certain whether Mint will continue to be honourable, but if they slip, I'll move on. Eventually [I hope] enough of us will do that such that companies realise that they "can't get away with it" and will treat their users with respect. Today companies are so big that no amount of end-user action, short of "walk", will bring about a change. Even a non-profit has to be relevant.

    1. Re:This is a stretch but... by umafuckit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't get me wrong, I can see why people (especially here) don't like the data selling. I certainly uninstalled all the lens stuff even though I don't use Unity. However, I also see that there are salaries that need paying and this is one way of doing it. With a lot of web-based services, such as Facebook, if you want to opt out of the data collection you must also opt out of the service. With Ubuntu you can choose to keep the service but ditch the data collection. Seems pretty benign to me compared to all the other BS that's going on.

      --
      soylentnews.org