Slashdot Mirror


Man Arrested For Hacking 130 Celebrities (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A man was arrested after trying to sell Hollywood movie scripts and social security numbers to an undercover DHS agent. The hacker known online as Jeff Moxey managed to hack the computers of 130 celebrities, from where he stole, besides scripts, nude pics and sexually-explicit videos. "The scope of the crime here is potentially quite large," Assistant U.S. Attorney Kristy Greenberg said, adding that the investigation began a few weeks ago.

16 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Security has not kept pace with technology by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do celebrities, who literally have a portion of their trade tied-up in appearance and being desired, record sexual materials to devices that they don't fully understand the workings of? While it's not right for individuals to breach their accounts to copy their pictures, it is a known behavior that some people will do, and as it's a known danger it's the individual's responsibility to take steps to prevent this. If the technology of using Internet-connected devices and Internet services isn't understood, then the only solution is to avoid using Internet-connected devices. Use friggin' offline digital cameras if you want your naughty pictures, or go even more old-school and use an instant film camera.

    There have been examples when "share my day" services for social media sites have shared naked pictures, publicly, automatically, as a matter of course. The settings of the phone's application were to share a sample of pictures automatically. That's STUPID.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by coolmoe2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well im sure the value of lets say Danny Trejo nudes is questionable at best

    2. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by siphonophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a failure of industry, not a failure of individuals. Do we require drivers to be mechanics? Fliers to be aeronautical engineers?

      Starting from zero, it is astoundingly complicated to maintain personal information security--we don't see it like fish don't see water. Industry's response can't be to limit the market for connected devices to themselves.

      --
      Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
      -Scott Adams
    3. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by pr0fessor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know it could replace the rickroll...

    4. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      No, but we require drivers to know how to operate their vehicle safely so they are no threat to themselves or others.

      Since you can't kill someone with a computer by being a complete idiot, any moron is allowed to use one and hook it to the internet.

      If you want to find a analogy, try one where someone using the item in question doesn't require to be LICENSED to use it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Crack, Hookers and Alcohol.
      Three major reasons for recording explicit scenes on their devices.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    6. Re:Security has not kept pace with technology by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      These pseudo celebrities are nothing but fabrications of PR=B$ studios, with a manage public personality used to sell products that in reality has very little to do with their true narcissistic self serving nature. Which when exposed, disrupts their ability to believably lie about the products they are meant to sell and thus ending their career of self serving deceit, so says family man comedian Bill Cosby, hey, hey, hey, want some candy :|. So exposing pseudo celebrity lies is a crime because it impacts advertising revenues, although in reality it is of benefit to society because it exposes the rampant deceit, immorality and down right disgusting nature of that industry.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Great headline there by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right outta Hitchcock

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. The fappening part two by coolmoe2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will be on indefinite hold while the owner starts a kickstart campaign for upstart cash and bail.

  4. Re:Just... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, pics or it didn't happen.

  5. Where he went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where he went wrong was he got greedy.

    If he had just dumped them online, instead of trying to make a profit, then he likely wouldn't have been caught.

    Now he's in jail, and the data is gone. Thanks a lot, asshole.

  6. DHS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why the hell would DHS being involved? This seems more like an FBI thing. I don't exactly understand how this is a homeland security issue.

    1. Re:DHS? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Why the hell would DHS being involved? This seems more like an FBI thing. I don't exactly understand how this is a homeland security issue.

      Good thing the perp wasn't Muslim. DHS allowed the San Bernadino attack to happen, yet they're all over this. Listen to the interview of Philip Haney (near the bottom of the page in two parts).

      http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...

      Very telling as to where US government priorities are.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  7. Re:Punishment to fit the crime by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    $50 says he gets at least twice the sentence he had gotten for hacking into medical data of a million people.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. FBI was all over Target, perpetrators in prison by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Just ignore those two million target customers

    Ignore it, rather than thoroughly investigating and catching the perpetrators like they did? I don't know about the outcome in every single case, but I have researched and written about Target and TJ Maxx. Those feds did their job. Several federal agencies and some state are very active in investigating the types of cases you mentioned. Also, I've spoken to the FBI team primarily interested in what seem to be small-time attacks, who track patterns of malware on consumer desktops etc. If you let them know about attacks you have experienced you may not personally hear back a out the prosecution, but they do include your report in their investigation of trends.

  9. Re:I just bought an Apple Watch for my girlfriend by alantus · · Score: 2

    The gift that says "I love you".

    I was initially looking at Fitbits and Android based devices, but these are ugly and not special. They just mean nothing.

    For this Christmas, I recommend "Apple Watch", if you care about someone special.

    Good idea! That way she gets to see your message every day when she charges it. Or even more often, if she actually uses it.

    Until the new version comes out in a few months, and you'll bend over and fork $500 more to buy it, and hers ends up in a landfill in a third world country.