Somebody Tried To Convince a Raspberry Pi Exec To Install Malware On Its Devices (softpedia.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Liz Upton, Director of Communications for the Raspberry Pi Foundation, has just published an email where someone was asking how much would it cost them for the Foundation to install malware on its devices in the form of a .EXE file. The email sender was asking for a PPI [price per install] quote.
Hey, free money. Not like the PI has any permanent storage so they'd just have to stick the file on some chip somewhere, where it can't really be accessed. Not that an .exe would even be executable.
Better yet - ship every Raspberry PI with an SD card labelled "Malware - Please execute immediately."
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
So after reading the email, I would have to say this headline is sensationalist, and overall bad reporting. So much so that im actually making this post, which i have never done on /.
Nowhere are they asking them to install malware, or install it without the consumers consent. Essentially what they are asking is that their application be packaged with with the pi, and the user be asked to install the software. Basically the same thing most "freeware" on the internet does. He you want our app? What about this one and this one and this one to.
Ive dealt with representatives from foreign companies before, and their command of the English language is about as excellent as google translate will allow. You have to use your brain a little when reading them, but its usually fairly easy to understand and don't leap to conclusions to create headlines like this.
Is it? Newer Linux distros typically come with systemd, which many users consider to be malware because it's unwanted and can have a very negative impact. So it's not like Linux is any better in reality, I'm sad to say.
I hate SystemD because it is unnecessarily complex, becomes a single point of failure for many subsystems, logs to a binary file by default (dafuq?), and is contrary to the *nix mantra of one tool, one purpose. It is essentially a solution looking for a problem.
However, to be fair, I still have yet to see it be the cause of a boot failure.
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
All of the major Linux distros use systemd. The only ones that don't are niche distros (which include Slackware and Gentoo). The only way to truly escape systemd while sticking with open source software is to go *BSD.
It's just a generic form-letter email that would have been sent to an auto-generated list of any number of systems integrators and anyone else that might possibly respond. That's how the bloatware that gets included in Windows PCs ends up on there, it could be describing SymantecNortonLenovoToshibaHuluNetflixCyberlinkDellSkype7ZipAccuweatherRealTek SuperEssentialClickOnMe.
In any case there's already a malware-installer "EXE file that installs a desktop shortcut, that when clicked redirects users to a specific website" for the Raspberry Pi.
Is it? Newer Linux distros typically come with systemd, which many users consider to be malware because it's unwanted and can have a very negative impact. So it's not like Linux is any better in reality, I'm sad to say.
Holy shit, why can't people shut up about systemd? You people seem to bring it up at EVERY single opportunity, even if it's REMOTELY related.
Since you brought it up....
Complaints about systemd are like complaints about the TSA -- richly deserved, but kind of pointless, because that shit is just not going away (until it gets superceded by something even worse).