Slashdot Mirror


Somebody Tried To Convince a Raspberry Pi Exec To Install Malware On Its Devices (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Liz Upton, Director of Communications for the Raspberry Pi Foundation, has just published an email where someone was asking how much would it cost them for the Foundation to install malware on its devices in the form of a .EXE file. The email sender was asking for a PPI [price per install] quote.

10 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Do it. by Jethro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, free money. Not like the PI has any permanent storage so they'd just have to stick the file on some chip somewhere, where it can't really be accessed. Not that an .exe would even be executable.

    Better yet - ship every Raspberry PI with an SD card labelled "Malware - Please execute immediately."

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re: Do it. by Jethro · · Score: 3, Funny

      I figure Raspberry charges them $20 per unit and gives us a free nice SD card. Now do you guys want to please stop ruining this with facts???

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  2. Sensationalist Headline, bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So after reading the email, I would have to say this headline is sensationalist, and overall bad reporting. So much so that im actually making this post, which i have never done on /.

    Nowhere are they asking them to install malware, or install it without the consumers consent. Essentially what they are asking is that their application be packaged with with the pi, and the user be asked to install the software. Basically the same thing most "freeware" on the internet does. He you want our app? What about this one and this one and this one to.

    Ive dealt with representatives from foreign companies before, and their command of the English language is about as excellent as google translate will allow. You have to use your brain a little when reading them, but its usually fairly easy to understand and don't leap to conclusions to create headlines like this.

    1. Re:Sensationalist Headline, bad reporting by Xenna · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that Liz Upton, the addressee, used the phrase malware herself. That's where the sensationalism started. Just blindly converting it into a Slashdot headline, that's the bad reporting part.

      Whatever happened to common sense...?

    2. Re:Sensationalist Headline, bad reporting by Vokkyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Though this may be me projecting my own prejudices with bundled software, nearly a decade of working in tech support has loosened my definition of malware to include basically any software put on the user's computer without the user's informed consent. Many bundled packages and suites behave in the exact same manner as actual malware and are just as difficult to remove, if not more so in some situations as anti-malware/AV software will not see this software as "malicious" and will not remove it automatically. Given that one of the foci of RaspberryPi's is to provide a cheap computer option for whatever needs, it simply would provide a misleading option to users like the bundled junk that often comes on cheap Windows based laptops.

      I am not purporting that this is what was meant by Ms. Upton, but it's not hard to see how she and basically most people could see the proposed software as "malware" to be bundled.

  3. Sure by kimvette · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure - install it on a Linux system and include in the documentation:

    "Hey! We helped subsidize the cost of your device by including malware on it. If you really, really want to run it, you can install wine but without installing that framework or some sort of Windows emulator it will not run so we felt it is a safe choice to include on the system. It is located in /tmp and will be cleaned up by a cron job after a week, and it isn't marked as executable so even if it were a Linux executable it would not run without your adjusting permissions anyhow, but we urge you out of principle to do an 'rm /tmp/scumbag-sucker-malware.exe' at your first opportunity."

    Offer it at a discounted price, and the malware-free version at the usual price. As a bonus dox the malware provider. ;)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  4. Re: .EXE file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows has a perfectly fine package manager. When you want to install a package you simply double click setup.exe and hit enter until the window disappears. Uninstalls are easy to, you just reinstall Windows and install every package except for the one you don't want.

  5. Calm down, calm down by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's just a generic form-letter email that would have been sent to an auto-generated list of any number of systems integrators and anyone else that might possibly respond. That's how the bloatware that gets included in Windows PCs ends up on there, it could be describing SymantecNortonLenovoToshibaHuluNetflixCyberlinkDellSkype7ZipAccuweatherRealTek SuperEssentialClickOnMe.

    In any case there's already a malware-installer "EXE file that installs a desktop shortcut, that when clicked redirects users to a specific website" for the Raspberry Pi.

  6. Re: Okay... by NotInfinitumLabs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it? Newer Linux distros typically come with systemd, which many users consider to be malware because it's unwanted and can have a very negative impact. So it's not like Linux is any better in reality, I'm sad to say.

    Holy shit, why can't people shut up about systemd? You people seem to bring it up at EVERY single opportunity, even if it's REMOTELY related.

  7. Re: Okay... by Lost+Race · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since you brought it up....

    Complaints about systemd are like complaints about the TSA -- richly deserved, but kind of pointless, because that shit is just not going away (until it gets superceded by something even worse).