Slashdot Mirror


Kindle or Not, a Resurgence In Used Bookstores

The growing availability of books via internet (whether instant, in the form of downloads from Amazon's Kindle store or the Google Play store, or in physical form by post) puts pressure on conventional bookstores. The Washington Post reports, though, that some bookstores are thriving, and some new ones are getting started, in a particular niche: used books. The phenomenon springs in part from the disappearance of many large chain bookstores, leaving gaps that smaller and nimbler shops can fill; as the article points out, a used bookstore in many places is the only one around. Nonetheless, It is by no means an easy business. Many used-book retailers — with either bad management or bad locations (or both) — still struggle against the digital headwinds. For one, Amazon is still just a few clicks away. But some used-bookstore owners have made a shrewd move: widening their customer base by listing their inventories on Amazon’s third-party marketplace, an idea many new-book retailers despise. (The Washington Post is owned by Amazon founder Jeffrey P. Bezos.) My favorite bookstores have mixed stock (used and new), serve coffee, and specialize -- the process of discovery is still easier at a place like Ada's Technical Books in Seattle than it is browsing through Amazon recommendations.

133 comments

  1. Niche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brick-and-mortar used-books stores have never seemed like a niche to me here in the Netherlands.
    Well, not until the biggest with stores in many cities, went bankrupt recently. I wonder why that happened..

  2. I like charity bookshops, e.g. Oxfam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got a gem on the solar magnetosphere from the local one yesterday, based on a summer course at Imperial. If you know where people dump their collections, you know where to wait to pick them up :D. And of course you're paying £1 to £3 for something that might have cost £10-£40 new. There's also no profit motive, which winds up the capitalists to no end.

    Let's face it, the real problem is DRM. eBooks with DRM are evil. I have nothing against eBooks otherwise, ofc., though I prefer reading paper - I'll just find a torrent/equivalent of the PDF/ePub/whatever once I've bought the paper version.

    1. Re:I like charity bookshops, e.g. Oxfam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also no profit motive, which winds up the capitalists to no end.

      How interesting that some of these places struggle.

    2. Re:I like charity bookshops, e.g. Oxfam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oxfam doesn't struggle - it just ploughs its net income into charitable activity.

      All an economy requires is sustainability, not some selfish motive. The latter tends to be fairly short-termist when compared to the alternatives, since the requirements of one human are not the same as the requirements of humanity. This is why mixed economies work best.

  3. Paper by maop · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is 2015. Why are books still being printed on paper?

    1. Re:Paper by NMBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are DRM free. You can share them with whomever you want. You can beat up people that don't return them. Go watch The Princess Bride. Lot's of reasons they are still read, and therefore produced.

    2. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because printing them on tablets is expensive.

    3. Re:Paper by Junta · · Score: 1

      Note there are drm free ebooks too.

      I personally don't like dealing with books when I can get it electronically (I prefer an e-ink device, which is even lighter than a book, and looks as good as a book), but some people just prefer a book..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Paper by mango9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely. Plus we can reread them in 5yrs, 10yrs... And they are still there in the event of power failure and other tech failures.
      Not that we don't need ebooks. Both is better.

    5. Re:Paper by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is 2015. Why are books still being printed on paper?

      Because a lot of people like them that way.

      But here's a puzzler: This is 2015. Why are people still asking stupid questions?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    6. Re:Paper by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are DRM free. You can share them with whomever you want. You can beat up people that don't return them. Go watch The Princess Bride. Lot's of reasons they are still read, and therefore produced.

      And...

      They don't need a battery. Ever.
      They don't break when you drop them, even from heights that would turn a Kindle into a bag of shards.
      The feel good in your hands.
      The TSA won't make you take them out and "turn them on" when you fly with them.
      You can share them with your children and instill a love of reading in them.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Paper by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To expand on Junta's comment; drm free, no internet connection required, no subscription fees, no electricity required, easier to search, easy to use "hands off", can be a tactile experience, easier to read in daylight, and easy marginalia..

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:Paper by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or the stoarge format changes and renders e-books unreadable.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    9. Re:Paper by mikael · · Score: 1

      Because you don't have the whole world knowing what you are reading when you have a technical book on the shelf.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Paper by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did we even notice that this article is about old, secondhand books? Derp, derp, derp. It's just unsettling to see people so willing to discard the old way of doing things and completely fail to see the problem with the new way, up to the point of harshly criticizing those who decline to change. A short story called "The Right to Read" should hopefully make an impression, though I doubt it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Paper by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Because many of us like paper books, and we can tell the publishers to fuck off and go to hell when they try to tell us what the license for the book says we can and can't do.

      When I'm doing leisure reading, I don't want some damned screen ... I want to sit in a comfy chair, in an idea world near a pool with a mojito, and if a little water (or rum) gets on my paperback book, who cares? I sure don't want some fragile digital device which needs to be coddled and recharged.

      I tried e-Books for a while, and while they have a small amount of places where I like to use them, in general many many people still prefer the tactile feel of a book, and don't want to have our eyes constantly facing a screen. The most avid readers I know have eBooks, but still mostly read off paper.

      Used book stores are making a comeback because people are asking themselves "why a I reading this on a digital screen where I need to ask permission if I can turn the damned page?" You buy a physical book, and you own it ... you buy a digital book and some asshole lawyer will tell you the terms and conditions. And that lawyer can cram his terms and conditions up his ass.

      It may surprise you to know that not all of us wish our entire lives to be spent at the altar of technology, and when we disconnect and take downtime, the last thing we want is some stupid computer screen to have to interact with.

      You should try it some time. There's a whole world out there which isn't controlled by a touchscreen or a mouse.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Paper by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unreadable? My girlfriend had her kindle for a day before she found some software which could not only strip all the DRM for any formats, but freely convert between them all and plain text.

      At the moment this is as solved of a problem as DVD-CSS.

    13. Re:Paper by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Because, in addition to the myriad other reasons people have already given you, not everyone in the world has an e-reader. Or the internet. Or electrical power.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    14. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why paper? Because we stare at computer screens, tablets, phones, etc all day and want a break when we read!

    15. Re:Paper by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The TSA won't make you take them out and "turn them on" when you fly with them.

      Is that still a thing? The last 4ish times I've flown I wasn't even asked to turn off my very large tablet. They only asked people with laptops to switch them off.

    16. Re:Paper by NeoMorphy · · Score: 3, Informative

      To expand on Junta's comment; drm free, no internet connection required, no subscription fees, no electricity required, easier to search, easy to use "hands off", can be a tactile experience, easier to read in daylight, and easy marginalia..

      No DRM, but you can't legally copy any portion of a paper book without permission. You only need the internet connection to download the book, not to read it. You don't need a subscription fee for an ebook. You only need electricity to charge a kindle and then it's good for over a month depending on usage. It's just as easy to use hands off, maybe easier, I don't have to worry about it flipping close and finding my place again. Ebooks are much easier to search than a paper book. It doesn't even have to be in the index, I can digitally search for any word or words throughout the book, or even library. E-ink is just as easy to read in daylight as a regular paper book.

      Advantages of ebooks?

      I can carry a library of tech manuals with me in my pocket. If they get lost, destroyed or stolen I can replace my books for free(I might have to pay the price for the new kindle, but some of my books cost more than a kindle, plus I have multiple kindle devices and a smartphone.) They don't fill an entire room of bookshelves. They don't get moldy. I can buy a new book any day or night and have it in my hands in minutes and it will be cheaper than a new hardcopy version of the book.

      One advantage of the paperbooks is that you can get a used copy that is cheaper than the ebook copy. I have done this from Amazon, it's amazing what you can find and have sent to your house for cheap.

    17. Re:Paper by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Because a lot of people like them that way.

      But here's a puzzler: This is 2015. Why are people still asking stupid questions?

      Not a puzzler, people aren't taught to think anymore. They are only taught to answer pre-set questions.

    18. Re:Paper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      This is 2015. Why are pencils still made?

      See how stupid that sounds?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:Paper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      But here's a puzzler: This is 2015. Why are people still asking stupid questions?

      Still the same old obsolete v1.0 model, I guess ;-)

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    20. Re:Paper by ItsIllak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      * Have randomly sized text
      * Are impractical to carry in enough quantity for 1-2 weeks away from home
      * Require an external light source
      * Can't be easily searched
      * Annotation is messy and often frowned upon
      * You lose your place if you fall asleep while reading them
      * Can't read themselves to you
      * You have to visit a physical store to get a new one

      I don't disagree with your list, just think there's an equal (or in my view greater) list on the other side.

      DRM is the big problem, but honestly - screw what I've signed up for, I just treat them as if I'd bought the book, I hope governments will eventually forcibly equalise this difference.

    21. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the number of times throughout computer history that someone has declared that the problem of data conversion and preservation is a "solved problem"... a lesson for all geeks:

      1) Name the most famous supercomputer.
      2) Search online for a copy of the operating system.
      3) Read up on how the copy was obtained.

    22. Re:Paper by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Not a puzzler, people aren't taught to think anymore.

      Anymore? You are implying that there was once a golden age when people were taught to think. When was that? Then 1950s, when we lived with cookie cutter conformity? The 1960s, when we thought the Vietnam war was a good idea? The 1970s, when disco was popular? The 1980s, when we decided that "deficits don't matter"? The 1990s, when we invested in pets.com? The 00s, when GWB was elected twice?

    23. Re:Paper by westlake · · Score: 1

      This is 2015. Why are books still being printed on paper?

      Illustration.

      I have collected hundreds of large format books on art. history, architecture, nature, travel and geography that would be profoundly disappointing to read when reduced to the size and resolution of a Kindle. Many of these make superb use of tipped-in prints and photographs, rare inks, textured papers.

    24. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM isn't ebook, though. It's shit on top - which can be stripped if you can be bothered. Alternatively, buy non-DRM titles.

      You also missed sync across devices on the same title. Read on your phone, pickup at home on your kindle or table (ipad/droid with kindle app).

    25. Re:Paper by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      They are DRM free...Lot's of reasons they are still read, and therefore produced.

      That first one is a good reason, but I wonder how common it is.

      As for the remaining reasons, though.. Some people like to have books and some people like to read stories. People who like to read are really enjoying e-paper devices, in spite of the challenges of DRM.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    26. Re:Paper by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You have to visit a physical store to get a new one

      Ever hear of "mail order"? It's a thing, look it up on the google. You can actually get a book delivered right to your house. :)

      But I agree, e-books do have some advantages, no doubt about it. As someone else said, "the best choice is both". I occasionally read stuff on my ipad, but overall I prefer a real book in my hands. So I've no problem with people that want e-books, I think they're great, but they aren't the end-all, be-all. Like anything they have their pros and cons.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    27. Re:Paper by matbury · · Score: 2

      Yes, and...
       
      If a service desk makes you wait, pull out a real book and start reading it. See how long it takes them to realise how bad this makes them look and start serving you :)

    28. Re:Paper by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The TSA won't make you take them out and "turn them on" when you fly with them.

      Is that still a thing? The last 4ish times I've flown I wasn't even asked to turn off my very large tablet. They only asked people with laptops to switch them off.

      Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. But they've never asked me to turn my book on.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    29. Re: Paper by Threni · · Score: 1

      You think one day it'll be impossible for a device more advanced than today's to handle a format books were stored in?

    30. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me how to open a ebook to two pages at once with 11x17 foldouts... Like old service manuals.

    31. Re:Paper by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      They are DRM free.

      YES! I can buy a book with cash and ***NOT*** have to setup an account with password, submit my name, SSN, DOB, address, and sign the EULA.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    32. Re:Paper by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I love e-books, but the submitter of the article is right about one thing: most e-readers offer a terrible browsing experience, are piss-poor at providing meaningful recommendations, and suck at helping you organize your library. There is a lot of room for improvement there.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    33. Re: Paper by KenHansen · · Score: 2

      They don't need a battery. Ever. They don't break when you drop them, even from heights that would turn a Kindle into a bag of shards. The feel good in your hands. The TSA won't make you take them out and "turn them on" when you fly with them. You can share them with your children and instill a love of reading in them.

      And they have a tremendous carbon footprint (cutting down trees, moving logs to mill, mill to paper plant, paper plant to printer, printer to warehouse, warehouse to store, store to home)... They also look great on bookcase. There is a thriving business in selling used books by the linear board foot as a decorative item

    34. Re: Paper by KenHansen · · Score: 2

      Then 1950s, when we lived with cookie cutter conformity?

      The economy boomed in the 1950's, and people were genuinely happy by most accounts.

      The 1960s, when we thought the Vietnam war was a good idea?

      Pretty sure quite a few people opposed the Vietnam War.

      The 1970s, when disco was popular?

      I seem to recall a large backlash against Disco, culminating in a dramatic anti-disco record burning party.

      The 1980s, when we decided that "deficits don't matter"?

      I don't recall that being a wildly-popular position in the 80's, but then again, like most Americans I was busy working, paying taxes, etc.

      The 1990s, when we invested in pets.com?

      That was far from a universal position.

      The 00s, when GWB was elected twice?

      Bush won in 2000 because Gorecwas seen as an extension of the Clinton scandal-riddled administration, and the electorate RARELY lets one party control the whitehouse for three consecutive terms - Reagan/Reagan/Bush were last to do it on the Republican side, Rosevelt/Rosevelt/Rosevelt/Truman were the last to do it on the Democratic side. Re-elected? Pretty sure Bush beat Kerry despite Kerry supporters representing nearly, but not more than, half the voters in that campaign. More people voted against Kerry than voted against Bush, but you can't argue 'everyone' thought re-electing Bush was a good idea.

    35. Re:Paper by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But for how much longer? They have already developed the ink designed to make book text fade after the first reading.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    36. Re: Paper by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 0

      And they have a tremendous carbon footprint (cutting down trees, moving logs to mill, mill to paper plant, paper plant to printer, printer to warehouse, warehouse to store, store to home)...

      Why, you're totally right- manufacturing a Kindle or an iPad has no carbon footprint and the manufacturing process doesn't produce any toxic materials as byproducts! That just never happens!

      Plus, e-readers don't need to be shipped across oceans from the factory, they just magically appear in the store or in your mailbox. It's incredible how they do that!

      Also, unlike books, e-readers never break, everybody knows that. E-readers never need updating and they certainly never get thrown away, where they pile up in landfills letting toxic materials leach into the environment. They just don't! That's because everyone in the world dutifully recycles their e-reader gadgets so nothing ever goes to waste. You can't say that about a book printed on paper, now can you?

      Another really cool thing about e-readers is that sometimes you can get the author of your e-book to sign it, making it a personalized collectible. Isn't that awesome? No book could ever do that!

      And don't forget that e-readers are ideal for places where power is hard to come by, because unlike a book, e-readers never need to be plugged in. On all my trips to Cambodia and Laos and Vietnam we never had a problem finding a place to plug in, not even while camping in the jungle. That's because most trees have hidden outlets at the base, you just have to clear away the bark to find 'em. A lot of people don't know that, but it's totally true!

      Another cool thing is that the early e-books (like from the 1700 and 1800s) are super valuable and collectible. Take that, you lousy printed-on-paper books!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    37. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me. They're convenient, tough*, drm free, last practically forever with no built-in obscellescence, and can't be redacted at the whim of the publisher (c/f amazon).

      *I've (accidentally) dropped books off balconies, into pools (briefly, then dried in front of a heater), sat on them and bent them near in two, and they remained perfectly readable decades later. Good luck doing that with a kindle.

    38. Re: Paper by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      It would not be the first time that happened.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    39. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't legally copy any portion of a paper book without permission.

      The corps would love for you to believe this. I'm not aware of any country where it's an accurate statement of the law.

    40. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey folks, this is not an either/or situation! There are markets for both ebooks and dead tree books (new and used). I live in a small apartment, and don't have room for all of the paper (even paperback) books that I want to read (and sometimes reread). I like my Kindles (I have 2). Some people prefer the dead tree edition of a book, and these are not about to disappear. Like many others, I routinely strip DRM from ebooks so I can keep a plain text backup copy. Plain text is more likely to be readable in the future than some of the DRMed ebook formats. DRM needs to be outlawed, and the DMCA repealed! When someone buys an ebook, they OWN that copy of it, and can loan it, give it away (as long as they don't keep a copy) or destroy it at will, just like the dead tree version. Anything else is just stealing our rights to own what we bought and paid for!

    41. Re:Paper by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I've seen some documentaries and we've had a few forks and we've had a few major versions since we climbed down from the trees. Or, if you want, since before we climbed into 'em.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    42. Re:Paper by hey! · · Score: 1

      In general if you let the average marketer anywhere near the UX design process the user will never feel like he's in control of the browsing experience. I guess it's just that mediocrity is the norm in any field, but you'd think the goal would be to make the user feel like he's in control while subtly influencing his decisions. But subtle, marketing influence in user interface design is not. I always feel like I'm fighting with the Apple Store, that the store wants to steer me towards what everyone else is supposed to be buying. That's why I steer clear of the Apple store and get my music in MP3 format from Amazon -- a company I'm not particularly enamored of politically but which is smart enough not to make me fight against the tide to get what I want.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    43. Re:Paper by hey! · · Score: 2

      This is true, and it raises the importance of design and build quality in paper books -- which is often lacking. Find a volume from the late 1800s in a used bookstore; in many ways that era was the pinnacle of dead tree book UX, or at least the surviving books from that era are. Good enough but not elaborately precious typography, quality paper and binding, fine covers -- they're a pleasure to use in a way that a ten year-old paperback or even most 21st century hardbound volumes are not.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    44. Re:Paper by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      This is 2015. Why are books still being printed on paper?

      Because a lot of people like them that way.

      But here's a puzzler: This is 2015. Why are people still asking stupid questions?

      Precisely. I am not going to read Harper's on a Kindle (or iPad, etc.) in the bathtub or hot tub.

      Likewise, I am not going to leave my iPad on the beach while I go for a swim. A paper copy of something... Ha. No one will take it.

    45. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right of first sale.

      look it up.

      enough said.

    46. Re:Paper by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      * Have randomly sized text
      * Are impractical to carry in enough quantity for 1-2 weeks away from home
      * ...
      * Annotation is messy and often frowned upon
      * You lose your place if you fall asleep while reading them

      What? really?

      Page-layout in physical print is a highly refined art. In web pages and 'Kindle-versions' of books, the great effort of the typesetter for readability is thrown out of the window.

      If you read only 'fluff' books, then your second point does appy. I suggest that you read something pithy that requires you to think every few paragraphs. Thus, you will have less paper to carry, and as a reward, much more to ponder.

      Annotation is frowned upon? By whom? Your first-grade teacher? Write in the goddamned margins. All the greats did. If you think annotation destroys the value of your book, then you have argued explicitly against you last point of 'destroying value' of a book by annotating. Look up the word 'palimpsest', and also google the term 'famous margin writings'.

      RE: Your last point. If re-reading a paragraph, or even gasp, a whole page of a book or magazine that you have been reading flummoxes you, then you are either (a) reading page-turner garbage, (b) choosing authors who have nothing worth repeating, or (probably) (c) too dumb to get that re-reading anything worthwhile is a worthwhile investment of your time.

    47. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you can't legally copy any portion of a paper book without permission.

      bullshit. fair use. look it up. you have permission, implicitly. enough said.

    48. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that B&N changed their encryption keys and no one seems to know how the new ones are formed.

      So you may have decrypting capabilities, but without the key, they're useless. At last report, finding out the new key value requires a rather convoluted process and a suitable device/OS.

    49. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are DRM free.

      YES! I can buy a book with cash and ***NOT*** have to setup an account with password, submit my name, SSN, DOB, address, and sign the EULA.

      Well, yes, but I'm sure the Department of Homeland Security is working on that. Books are dangerous!

      The firemen will be arriving shortly, Mr. Bradbury.

    50. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't disagree with your list, just think there's an equal (or in my view greater) list on the other side.

      longer list sure, but not necessarily greater.

    51. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Plus we can reread them in 5yrs, 10yrs... And they are still there in the event of power failure and other tech failures.
      Not that we don't need ebooks. Both is better.

      Exactly. I have about a half a boxes full of books (mostly CompSci) that I still keep around in my attic. My main library is in my kindle, but every so often I need to revisit topics that aren't typically found in new electronic books (try finding a comprehensive guide on, say Tarjan algorithm or self-adjusting binary search trees that are *not* red-black. Most modern algo books only focus on a select crop of topics whereas older used books give you a much better coverage of such topics.)

      There are a lot of fiction books that are still only available on print (Niven's Man-Kzin wars are not fully digitized yet). Hell, consider works of fiction on other languages. Good luck trying to find those in e-form, Project Gutenberg notwithstanding.

      Then, there is the value that is beyond the practical: collecting. I've been collecting the books I used in college back in 92. Hard to find, but valuable from a personal point of view. My wife does the same with her Japanese books.

      We are still a long way for full digitalization. And I'm not sure if we really want to go all the way digital.

    52. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if printed on acid free paper with permanent ink and cared for appropriately, they are guaranteed to be able to be read 200 years from now. I doubt we can guaruntee that the ebook formats will still be readable in 200 years. Will all my music CD's be playable 200 years from now? I'm having trouble playing my VHS tapes these days and it hasn't been that long.

    53. Re:Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly between the 14th and 17th century. And of course during the times of the Greek philosophers and Roman literature.

    54. Re:Paper by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can also flip back and forth in the book more easily, and have different fingers marking different pages. It's not as intuitive to do that with an ePub.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:Paper by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      But with enhanced IQs, compared to maybe 80-90 years ago.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    56. Re:Paper by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. But only IQ, not actual intelligence or skills. IQ-test like questions have gotten pervasive enough that everybody has some experience with them, and that is known to boost scores.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    57. Re:Paper by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Why paper? Because we stare at computer screens, tablets, phones, etc all day and want a break when we read!

      Rate this one up!!

      This is the reason for many of us here, and for many others, now that computer equipment is everywhere.
      I want to rest, but I am -really- tired of watching TV. (And it is raining outside...) 8-)

    58. Re:Paper by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      IQ tests do their best to test intelligence, so it's reasonable to expect some improvement of general intelligence with rising IQs. I don't know what you really mean by "IQ-test-like questions", since the last IQ test I had was one-on-one without very many questions. (It showed that my problems at the time were depression rather than failling cognitive functions.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Love used books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I buy from Libraries whne they change out books, I have shopped in many locations over the years:
    "Green Apple Books" in SF: nice restaurants near by and great selection of Scientific works
    "On the Square Books" in Oxford, MS. Actually like 7 buildings / store fronts. each with a theme. Collector both signed and not, Children's books store also with high end/special toys, an old movie theatre filled with boxes of books still needing to be sorted.
    "Half Price Books" in Lexington, KY. Small but college based, with used records, movies and gaming items.

    There is nothing better than spending a rain day browsing looking for that missing item.

    CON: many many books to move...

  5. problem with used book stores by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    Everyone's got a shit ton of them, every thrift store is 1/3 used books, and other than thrift stores you cant give the damn things away. Now you think if you fill a building full of stuff no one wants, you will be able to sustain anything?

    no, no one cares about buying used paperback romance novels, so you better have a specialty, like antique rare books. Are most used book stores mismanages, your damn right, they opened a used book store!

    1. Re:problem with used book stores by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Yes, that means they get a free or cheap supply of inventory. The advantage they have over say a garage sale is that similar books (hopefully) are categorized together in one spot, saving the consumer from multiple store/source visits.

  6. Two things come to mind. by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    Gift giving. When giving gifts for birthdays, holidays, whatever, tangible things seem right.

    Status/virtue signaling. I think people like to flash the book cover of whatever they are reading to everyone around them.

    1. Re:Two things come to mind. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Hey, if someone thinks me flashing the book cover of my old copies of Tom Clancy or an Isaac Asimov means I'm signalling either virtue or status ... then that person is a fucking moron.

      I'm sorry, but I have never heard of this bullshit, and I don't give a fuck about what anybody else thinks about what I'm reading. While I'm sure society will always have some proportion of shallow, vain idiots whose life is dependent on being seen doing stuff .. I still think the vast majority of people reading actual books aren't doing it to signal status.

      That guy in the corner with the cover folder around a beat up paperback? He doesn't give a crap what you think of what he's reading.

      Pretentious college students? Maybe. Real grown ups reading books for pleasure? No bloody way.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Two things come to mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just did it here. You didn't have to mention what you read, but you did.

      Don't tell us that you don't give a fuck.

  7. The real killer app in this space by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Will be when someone figures out they can attached digital books (and other media) to a block chain. Allowing new copies to be charged as the rightsholder wants, and used digital copies distributed at fair market prices.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  8. Used books by Catmeat · · Score: 1

    From a conversations with a used bookseller I know. for the last 7 or 8 years at least, many used booksellers in the UK have been kept afloat by ABEBooks, to the extent that many have shut their retail shops and gone to 100% online sales, moving their stock in a cheap-to-rent storage unit.

  9. Selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in a town with a couple used bookstores and they really are great, if overpriced compared to used bookstores in bigger cities (but they'll buy the books back for half price when you're done if they're still in good shape). The problem is selection - if you're looking for something specific, going to one of those stores is a total crapshoot, unless you're looking for a recent release, in which case it is of course utterly hopeless. I end up buying from Amazon more often than not because there's nowhere else to go anymore. (We actually have one very good local bookstore left that sells new books, but the old lady there gives me the stink eye and then interception/subtexted "excuse me, can I help you?" every time I [a man] wander through the children's section. Fuck you, lady, my nephew will learn to love opening Amazon boxen!)

  10. Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "...but some used-bookstore owners have made a shrewd move: widening their customer base by listing their inventories on Amazon’s third-party marketplace, an idea many new-book retailers despise."

    New-book retailers: "But won't someone think of muh profits?!"

    That's one reason they hate the idea of "real" books- there's no DRM, so they can be resold, traded, or loaned without interference.

    And I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Amazon eventually either forbids the resale of used books in their marketplace, or else makes it so unprofitable that people just won't do it.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Amazon care? They get a cut from the sale whether the books are new or used. And there are a lot of books that are simply out of print.

    2. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Amazon eventually either forbids the resale of used books in their marketplace, or else makes it so unprofitable that people just won't do it.

      I don't think they care, they get their cut either way.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Amazon eventually either forbids the resale of used books in their marketplace, or else makes it so unprofitable that people just won't do it.

      I don't think they care, they get their cut either way.

      Oh, I think they care. They care about their bottom line, and if they could increase it another 0.1% by stifling sales of used books or real paper books they'd do it in the blink of an eye. They'd do it so fast you'd need one of those million-frame per second cameras to see it.

      Like any corporation, it's all about the money. Oh yah, social causes blah blah blah, doing stuff for the good of mankind blah blah blah...don't believe a word of it. Profit is the name of the game. It's a corporation, that's what corporations do.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one reason they hate the idea of "real" books- there's no DRM, so they can be resold, traded, or loaned without interference.

      Yeah, wear your tinfoil hat before "they" send their evil mind control rays into your brain!

    5. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      New-book retailers: "But won't someone think of muh profits?!" ... if Amazon eventually

      Your ideological blinders are showing. Of course, retailers and Amazon maximize profit, but they are doing a good job at getting out books cheaply.

      The evil actors in the book publishing business are primarily publishers and secondarily agents and top-selling authors; they are trying to manipulate the market to their advantage, profit at the expense of small players, keep prices artificially high, and maintain monopolies. They are the ones who push for outrageous changes to copyright law, for government subsidies, and destroying the public domain.

    6. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The evil actors in the book publishing business are primarily publishers and secondarily agents and top-selling authors;

      News Flash: Pretty much everyone and everything is "evil", depending on what your values are or the lens you view life through.

      The fact is that very few of us are in it just for the love of the game, okay?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      The fact is that very few of us are in it just for the love of the game, okay?

      There is nothing wrong with being in it for profits; what is wrong is to try to derive your profits from coercion, via rent seeking and corruption.

      News Flash: Pretty much everyone and everything is "evil", depending on what your values are or the lens you view life through.

      Oh, I'm sorry, I wasn't clear about that: voluntary interactions between people are good, forcing people to do stuff against their will in order to profit is evil. Clear enough now?

    8. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      voluntary interactions between people are good, forcing people to do stuff against their will in order to profit is evil.

      And...what's your point?

      According to you, locking people out of a market and creating a near-monoply so you can make a few more dollars is fine, right? After all, you're not forcing them to do anything, so what's the problem?

      They just can't sell stuff and compete with you, but you're not forcing them to do anything, so this should be perfectly fine, correct?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      According to you, locking people out of a market and creating a near-monoply so you can make a few more dollars is fine, right? After all, you're not forcing them to do anything, so what's the problem?

      Your premise is wrong: proprietary standards do not "lock people out of a market". Just look at chargers: Apple has had proprietary chargers for a decade; does that mean that people can only get iPhones now? Of course not. In fact, the proprietary nature of their products has cost them market share.

      They just can't sell stuff and compete with you,

      Why "can't they just sell stuff and compete with you"? How does Apple's lightning connector keep you from selling Android phones with USB connectors?

    10. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N has a used book network too. Others could spring up as well, if Amazon ditched theirs.

    11. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to Amazon potentially blocking sellers of new or used books from using their platform, not Lightning connectors.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    12. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to Amazon potentially blocking sellers of new or used books from using their platform, not Lightning connectors.

      So? There are half a dozen competitors already, and they'd be happy to pick up this business if Amazon were stupid enough to do this. Even if there weren't, it would take a few days to set up a new platform. How is anybody "locked out of" anything?

    13. Re:Won't someone think of the profits? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      So? There are half a dozen competitors already, and they'd be happy to pick up this business if Amazon were stupid enough to do this. Even if there weren't, it would take a few days to set up a new platform. How is anybody "locked out of" anything?

      You're pretty skilled at missing the point, aren't you?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  11. Electronic media sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. You are stuck with the company you bought it from. You cannot move it to another device or program.

    2. Electronic media is stressful on the eyes. Tablets are bright and cause insomnia. eReaders with eInk or whatever it's called are slow and expensive.

    3. Electronic books have actually become MORE expensive than dead tree versions - and when you add in the cost the gadget to read the thing, it's a horrible deal. It's even stinks when the electronic version is just a couple of bucks cheaper.

    4.I purchased a bunch of ebooks that I read once, they sucked and pretty much that's it. I can't sell them. I can't give them away. It's the end of the road for those books. With a dead tree book, I can donate them to the library to sell or add to their collection.

    5. I can loan out paper books.

    1. Re:Electronic media sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do buy Kindle eBooks and strip the DRM with Calibre to make them device-independent for my own use. If that possibility goes away, I will stop being their customer.

    2. Re:Electronic media sucks by ItsIllak · · Score: 2

      1. Strip the DRM
      2. I don't find ePaper to be a problem, but I don't like reading a phone or tablet. On the other hand, every ebook I have has the spacing, margins, font and font size I want it to have - not that which fitted the format the publisher wanted or typesetter liked one day.
      3. The last three I bought (on Amazon) were 1/3rd cheaper than their paperback versions.
      4. Yes - biggest problem, gifting a used book is problematic, though Strip the DRM and it's not so hard to sideload them to most devices.
      5. Didn't you just say that? Strip the DRM and remember not to read them or loan them out to others while your recipient is reading them.

      Honestly, the industry is going to have to learn that restricting ownership rights to licensing for personal use is a dead end and a bad move that will increase piracy. Until then, I'll just buy eBooks and notionally treat them as paper books.

    3. Re:Electronic media sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the end of the road for those books.

      They never existed.

  12. This is a good thing by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    Once the zombie apocalypse happens, paper book stores will be the only way for us to get information on how to use baseball bats (cricket bats in the UK) along with chain saws and other weapons to kill the walking dead. That is until, or unless, we can get enough infrastructure back to be able to read ebooks again. Come to think of it, I hope some of those books will be on acid free paper. No telling how long a supernatural event featuring the undead will last once it gets started.

    1. Re:This is a good thing by swb · · Score: 1

      What you'd really want are farming and basic engineering references from the turn of the century. When this modern shithouse collapses, we'll be incredibly thankful just to try to live at 1900 standards and I'm guessing that 1800 will be about the average.

  13. Farenheit 451 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't stop until we burn all the books. Vote Trump.

  14. Let's Not Forget ... by gordguide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's Not Forget that a pre-requisite for owning a Used Book Store is the proprietor must be clearly insane. I don't mean that he or she would "have to be crazy" to be in the used book market in a "market" sense ... I mean that if they were not certifiable lunatics, they would not even consider possessing large quantities of used books sufficient to offer them for retail sale. Plus, the inventory multiplies like rabbits, since they sell one used book for every 20 used books they buy.

    One of the big issues Used Book Stores have to deal with are commercial leases ... they are not necessarily ideal tenants because the weight of the product they sell is probably higher than just about any other product, and that includes New Books, since resellers of new books generally make an effort to have the inventory look good, versus stacked 10 rows high covered in dust with extremely narrow shelf pitches making browsing difficult except for the super skinny.

    What they have going for them as tenants is they are very reluctant to move. So shady landlords love them, since the leaseholder is putty in their hands. Want to raise the rent? Go ahead, and make it unreasonable while you're at it. 50/50 they will pay rather than move.

  15. Used books are gross by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    I'd never buy used books, they are just bacteria-colonies from somebody else's bathroom.
    And every sickness they have is transferred to the book, by licking the finger and turning the page.
    No thanks.
    If I wanted that, I'd read the magazines in the doctor's office, at least 250 sick people have licked those pages.

    1. Re:Used books are gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I suppose you don't like to meet people either. How's the weather in there, bubble boy?

    2. Re: Used books are gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, do you have some kind of problem with people who choose not to wash? You don't have the right to judge their lifestyles, and anyway washing requires water which harms the planet and also women, gays and brown people need more than you. We don't want germaphobes here, it's the SHARING economy man and that includes sharing your black and brown, brother's and sister's anal flora.

    3. Re:Used books are gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it's gross. To avoid contamination, I keep all my books in a separate area of the house. Far away from my used-panties collection room.

    4. Re:Used books are gross by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I love bookstores, used and otherwise. I think this is good news. The vast majority of my books, fiction and non-fiction (and some in-between) have never left my bedroom, and every once in a while, I'll take a load of those I don't want to keep for reference or rereading anymore down to a used bookstore in the next town over and trade them in. So anyone eventually buying them is getting a clean, well-cared for book.
      So not all are dirty, but I know what you mean, I sometimes wonder if the used book I just bought was held by someone while they were on the toilet, wiping their ass, and if they swapped hands at some point. You never know, but I think the chances are rather on the low side, actually. I think it also depends on the subject matter: "coffee table" or trivia style books are probably more likely to have taken up residence in someone's bathroom (to kill time) than something more focused or specific, and I tend not to buy the former kind used. And these days, more people are likely to use their smartphones or tablets than books while sitting on the porcelain throne.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    5. Re:Used books are gross by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are not cut out for any interaction whatsoever anywhere outside your basement.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Used books are gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you are a fucking pussy.

    7. Re:Used books are gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait till this guy finds out what's growing on his tablet or smartphone screen!

      http://www.livescience.com/22822-cell-phones-germs.html

    8. Re:Used books are gross by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I'd never buy used books, they are just bacteria-colonies from somebody else's bathroom. ...

      The Bathroom is not the dirtyest or most bacteria-laden room in your house. The Kitchen is. Look it up... 8-P

  16. Gotta mention Powells by PuddleBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Powell's City of Books in downtown Portland. A full city block, multiple floors, of new and used books (and maps and book-related kitsch). So big (and popular) that they had to expand their technical books to another storefront nearby.

    On many days, the place is backed with shoppers - and it's a huge store. They even have a map of the store, so that you don't get lost. The store is divided into general subject sections: Reference, Mystery, SciFi, Art, Languages, Magazines, etc.

    It's such a trip to browse, and find, practically any book you can think of. And, if it's not on the shelf, go to their website and see if they have it in their warehouse. (You can check their website from any of the many terminals set up throughout the store) If they do, you can buy it and have it appear in Will Call at the main store.

    You can sell them your old books at their buying counter. (I've sold a couple hundred there myself...)

    If you're into books (the kind that are made of paper), you should visit this place at least once.

    (I'm not associated with the place - just a customer for the last 20+ years)

    1. Re:Gotta mention Powells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the technical book store closed ~10 yrs ago. I would guess you are not that good of a customer if you did know that :)

    2. Re: Gotta mention Powells by steveha · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Powell's technical bookstore closed, but Powell's opened a replacement called Powell's 2. This was a smaller store with fewer books, but it was right across the street from the "City of Books" main store.

      However, Powell's 2 also closed. I guess the technical books are just in the main store now because they no longer list a special location for technical books.

      http://www.powells.com/locations

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:Gotta mention Powells by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      I was kind of disappointed when I visited Powell's after all the hype. I didn't realize how small a city block is in Portland.

    4. Re:Gotta mention Powells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant that he visited 20 years ago. Powells is garbage and close to going out of business.

  17. accumulate junk inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this generation of independent used bookstores learned the lesson of the ones which went out of business in the past. It's really easy to accumulate junk inventory. Books come in, but they don't go out. As your inventory fills up with junk no one wants, the buying public moves on. Hint: Never accept anything with the words "Neil Hancock" on the cover as trade-in!

  18. Used bookstores are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need my bookstore to be shiny new. I prefer a used bookstore to buy my new books because they have some experience with customers.

  19. people want to sell used stuff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine that, apple.. amazon.. steam.. ea.. microsoft..

    people should be able to sell their used digital goods they dont want anymore.

    1. Re:people want to sell used stuff.... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, from what I have read (that whole terms and conditions thing) you're not buying e-books. In most cases, you're licensing them and that license doesn't necessarily include the ability to transfer that license. This appears to be relatively common with non-tangible product licenses.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  20. Even better: book sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like ebooks, you can get used books for free. Many places have free bookshelves outdoors or in cafes where you can take and leave as many books as you want. (OK, mostly bestseller crap but I've found some gems.) There's also bookcrossing. Antique bookstores are nice for browsing, but I haven't visited one in years and I haven't bought anything there for more than a decade. To buy a specific book that's not available for free, bookfinder is much better than a brick and mortar store.

  21. well that's simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use Amazon recommendations and actually look for the categories you want.

  22. I'd love to have a used book store by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    or say a coffee shop/small casual diner with 1000s of book available to read and for sale. I'd probably make it two levels, the bottom floor where everything is served/bought and with seats for people to eat/talk and upstairs where people can browse books and read them all day long while they drink coffee/beverages/food.

    Reason i say two levels as it''ll probably be cheaper to for rent 1000sqf bottom with a large mezzanine then say 1500sqf on one floor.

    Now I'm not a book reader and haven't read book for years but still for me there is something strange and calming when I visit second hand store with a large book selection.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      so you want a store that sells coffee and cookies to 4-5 people who dont have a job otherwise they wouldn't linger at a bookstore for 2/3rds a day

      sounds brilliant

    2. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Well just because you can't find time in your life doesn't mean others cant. Besides now one says you have to get rich from your business, its all about working for your self and having control over your life.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    3. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Meh, depends on where the store location is. You could probably count on a certain amount of retirees in the winter (snowbirds if you're in a warm enough climate) and a healthy market among high-school and college students in the summer. The concept is not too dissimilar from tabletop gaming stores who provide playspace as an incentive to get their client base in the door.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    4. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      high-school and college students generally dont have money, there are bills to pay in a 2 story building in a good area

    5. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      while you can have control over your life in a successful business, a failing one will consume your soul, your family and everything you own

      be careful, whims and dreams dont pay bills, which you will have

    6. Re:I'd love to have a used book store by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Although sometimes its out of ones control when a business starts to fail you'll never know if it will unless you try it. Having a solid business and exit plan is essential (Min you my current business has none and its doing good) but even then no guarantees if there's some social or technological change that will make it fail.

      If your plan is to suck out every penny out of the business for your self and not reinvest into it, it will fail on the first market slow down.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  23. Speaking as an independent author... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Independent bookstores have been gold to me. They know their clientele and more importantly their clientele trusts the proprietors with their entertainment dollar - if they recommend a book, that recommendation carries some weight. They give me great shelf space, arrange signing events, serve cookies! I support them with flexibility of stock and sell books to them at below wholesale. National bookstore chains (and sure as hell Amazon) don't do squat for me. Independent bookstores, at least those close to me, survive on those relationships. Incidentally, the local hardware store is surviving despite a Lowes and Home Depot within 10 minutes, also with personal relationships.

  24. I miss used book stores by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    They can be a huge time pit because browsing through one can find all kinds of interesting publications that never knew existed. And many times I've bought publications which typically takes up space at my home.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  25. The only real problem with eBooks is the price by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

    When shopping online, eBooks typically cost just as much as the hardcover version. That is why there is not wider adoption.

    eBooks would sell like crazy if priced $5 and under.

    Just glancing at my bookshelf:

    Stephen King - Cell (2006) New hardcover is $6. Kindle is $9.
    Michael Crichton - State of Fear (2009) New hardcover is $6. Kindle is $5.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  26. selling all the old books by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    This is people selling all the old paper books they don't need anymore (obviously, there are still people buying them at some low price). I think it's no more than a temporary resurgence.

  27. Is alcohol really legal again? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Note there are drm free ebooks too.

    True. But sticking to them will likely give you the false impression that the world hasn't changed since December 31, 1922, when the last clearly public domain book was published.

    1. Re:Is alcohol really legal again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some DRM-free ebooks are more DRM-free than others, too.

      Barnes & Noble hides ALL Nook-purchased book files on Android devices, DRM or not. Even when the book itself carries an explicit publisher's disclaimer that the book MUST be sold without Digital Rights Management.

      It doesn't matter if the book is stored unencrypted if you have to root the device to obtain a legal copy of it.

    2. Re:Is alcohol really legal again? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If you can get hold of an older version of the Nook program for Windows, the one that runs on Windows 7, you get distinct ebook files. I doubt that the version for Windows 8 or later would be so accommodating.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  28. I love used books... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I not only love used books, but this last five years has been an absolute bonanza on IRL rare books that have a low consumer demand. That is, for me, technical books on conference proceedings where an idea was first germinated, or even figured out over beers.

    Yes, I do use a rig w/an iPhone and GeniusScan+ to quickly PDF and OCR them, under Fair Use Rights. That is only to make them term-searchable, which is better than any index. I keep the physical copies.

    Some seminal scientific breakthroughs were first reported in conferences forty years ago, when transcriptionists recorded every question-and-answer sessions of colloquia. Libraries are throwing these things out left and right, to the detriment of human knowledge. It's like a slow-burn in Alexandria.

  29. It's what makes these sites fun! by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Books and libraries, also newspapers & periodicals, are quickly becoming obsolete. With the internet, cellphones, Kindles, Tablets, Blackberries and a few other things... info has become easier and more plentifully obtainable (and more fun) than what a boring environmentally burdensome library or newspaper can provide! Say goodbye to books, especially phonebooks! This is the best example: We're all online reading news websites every day. We don't buy newspapers. This is more fun and more updated and more colourful and less messy and less burden AND it's interactive. We save money and the environment. These days, "libraries" are just about little more than free "internet cafes". People go there when their home PCs are on the fritz or they don't own one. This is the age of technology!

  30. Looks by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Hey, you realize that used book stores -always- look like they are closing... right? 8-)

  31. Used bookstore? by larriet · · Score: 1

    Whadya get for a used bookstore these days?

    --
    I am currently beneath your threshold