Slashdot Mirror


Sweden's Cash-Free Future Looms -- and Not Everyone Is Happy About It

HughPickens.com writes: Liz Alderman writes in the NYT that bills and coins now represent just 2 percent of Sweden's economy, compared with 7.7 percent in the United States and 10 percent in the euro area and this year only about 20 percent of all consumer payments in Sweden have been made in cash, compared with an average of 75 percent in the rest of the world. "Sweden has always been at the forefront of technology, so it's easy to embrace this," said Jacob de Geer, a founder of iZettle, which makes a mobile-powered card reader. In Sweden parishioners text tithes to their churches, homeless street vendors carry mobile credit-card readers, and even the Abba Museum, despite being a shrine to the 1970s pop group that wrote "Money, Money, Money," considers cash so last-century that it does not accept bills and coins. "We don't want to be behind the times by taking cash while cash is dying out," says Bjorn Ulvaeus, a former Abba member who has leveraged the band's legacy into a sprawling business empire, including the museum.

But not everyone is pleased with the process. Remember, Sweden is the place where, if you use too much cash, banks call the police because they think you might be a terrorist or a criminal. Swedish banks have started removing cash ATMs from rural areas, annoying old people and farmers. Credit Suisse says the rule of thumb in Scandinavia is: "If you have to pay in cash, something is wrong." Sweden's embrace of electronic payments has alarmed consumer organizations and critics who warn of a rising threat to privacy and increased vulnerability to sophisticated Internet crimes. Last year, the number of electronic fraud cases surged to 140,000, more than double the amount a decade ago, according to Sweden's Ministry of Justice. Older adults and refugees in Sweden who use cash may be marginalized, critics say, and young people who use apps to pay for everything or take out loans via their mobile phones risk falling into debt. "It might be trendy," says Bjorn Eriksson, a former director of the Swedish police force and former president of Interpol. "But there are all sorts of risks when a society starts to go cashless."

4 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. If you don't know why they're doing this... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't know why they're doing this, you haven't been paying attention.

    This is how the government manages to track and control every aspect of your life, and I do mean every.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:If you don't know why they're doing this... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you left out the best part.

      track and control and TAX every aspect. Just like the mafia, they want a piece of all the action

      Of course, that's just part of it.

      Seriously, control ALL transactions and you pretty much have a lock on everything.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:If you don't know why they're doing this... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Taxes are simply needed because some form of government is needed and governments need money.

      Believe it or not, I'm fine with paying taxes. I know the government (and therefore the country) doesn't run on magic pixie dust or unicorn farts.

      But if every transaction is trackable, say goodbye to any semblance of freedom or anonymity other than what they choose to give you.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. i don't want a fucking on-going relationship by cas2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i just want to buy stuff - anonymously, without the shop-keeper knowing my name and other personal details just because i bought a fucking coffee or a hamburger or something.

    lack of privacy and anonymity are the main reasons i dislike online shopping and use it only very rarely - delivery of the purchased goods requires that i give the vendor my personal details which they then immediately assume they are entitled to store in a database, use to spam me, and sell, trade, or give to third-parties.

    even when they have a checkbox option saying "don't spam me" or similar, some arsehole in their marketing department will take it upon themselves to decide that i didn't really mean that, or make some exception for their super-important spam (spammers always say "my spam isn't spam") or their database will frequently have that field "accidentally" cleared.