Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Pulls In $1 Billion At Record Speed (reuters.com)

New submitter henrydan798 writes to note that Star Wars: The Force Awakens has set a new record for ticket sales, becoming the fastest movie ever to earn a billion dollars at the till. As the L.A. Times reports, The latest installment in the "Star Wars" franchise grossed an estimated $153.5 million in the U.S. and Canada in its second weekend, beating the lower end of analyst expectations of $140 million. This drives the J.J. Abrams-directed picture to a to-date domestic gross of $544.5 million. "The Force Awakens," which cost an estimated $200 million to produce, debuted last weekend to record domestic ticket sales of $248 million. It also grossed $281 million overseas for a global total of $529 million, topping the previous worldwide debut benchmark set in June by "Jurassic World" ($525 million). This week, with an international estimated gross of $546 million to date, the film became the fastest to surpass $1 billion globally. Were any of those dollars yours? If so, do you think they were well spent?

19 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Not my money, yet by ffkom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congratulations on the successful marketing! And still, I'm in no rush to see this movie. I'll wait until I can rent a BluRay in my local video store, to watch it at home, where already for significant time the image and audio quality is more pleasant than in most public theaters, not to mention the comfort of having control over volume, play/pause etc., and the absent mob of other people.

    1. Re:Not my money, yet by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing. The action wasn't boring like a Bay film and I felt it was true to the best of the franchise.

      The only odd bits were a couple of lines that felt out of place because they used modern phrasing, and somehow I expected nothing to have changed in 30 years.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Not my money, yet by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, Han shot first a couple times :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Not my money, yet by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was well written and subtle, with good character development and pacing.

      Are you sure you saw a Star Wars movie?

    4. Re:Not my money, yet by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way I can find to explain how I felt after thinking about the film was that it has been "autotuned".

      It feels right and great (at least the first half) while you are in the theatre.

      But it doesn't feel right later when you start thinking about it.

      Some people will be satisfied with the feeling of the first half and not too bothered by the retread of a retread of a retread of a second half but unless the next film is better this is not going to be very rewatchable.

      You don't want to see it as I saw it- through less than new 3-d glasses which had a kind of haze around the edge near the frame that couldn't be cleaned with waiters walking back and forth in front of you-- stopping twice to tell us the bar was closing soon.

      I started to feel like "Get the "F" off of me and out of my view-line!"

      Bottom line is- I feel this movie is a designed corporate film where young people who lack experience and training beat people with years of experience and training ( Sounds like Star Trek already right?) and it tosses out 30 years of canon and 50% reboots the series.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  2. only for the nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new film was (a) far better than the train wreck of the prior three, (b) essentially identical to the first (1977) Star Wars plot, (c) decently acted, and (d) a mediocre movie, but one that felt better than it really was in comparison to the horrors of the prequels. It worked on a nostalgic level: it felt like the Star Wars universe again, and it didn't totally fuck it up. It didn't so well work on the level of being original or even fully making sense within its own universe.

    Mixed bag. Not as horrible as the naysayers claim, but not as awesomely great as the fanboys claim.

    1. Re: only for the nostalgia by loufoque · · Score: 3

      The prequels were good movies. The introduced a big and rich world, a large backstory, and they were very epic. Sure the actual story and acting were a bit weak, but the setting and art direction were very creative and interesting.

      This movie has nothing but fanservice for the die-hard fans of the 1977 movie. They even ruined their own evil character 30 minutes into the movie by revealing things way too early.

    2. Re:only for the nostalgia by jader3rd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It didn't so well work on the level of being original or even fully making sense within its own universe.

      Isn't funny how the Force Awakens is able to make us think of the good points of the prequels.

  3. The Force Awakens by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    But does the viewer?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  4. Squeezing the theaters probably helped by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Informative

    No doubt the film was popular. How to get all those people in and out a a record pace? Squeeze the theaters by requiring them to show the film on the largest screens for a long period of time, pushing out any other movies. The Hateful Eight was to be shown in a special 70mm roadshow presentation. The problem though was that it could only be shown on smaller secondary screens. Disney required their new movie to show on the largest ones, or else not show the movie at all, on any screen.

    So while their film is popular, it's not just the marketing hype that got it the numbers. A bit of strong arm tactics to push aside other movies seems to have contributed.

  5. Not shocking but mildly disappointing by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mild spoiler warning.

    Of course it made a billion dollars, it's a decent Star Wars movie. They could have made a great Star Wars movie if they didn't just remake A New Hope. Of course that would also risk a bomb that would kill ticket sales for the further installments.

    Better to shoot for mediocrity and guarantee billions than to shoot for greatness and risk the cash cow. Hopefully the next non-Abrams director will be willing to make a new movie.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  6. Not a movie by vikingpower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Star Wars is not a movie anymore. It is a heavily marketed brand. It can't even qualify for the label "science fiction", compared to the truly good SF movies around. Heck, Interstellar is a lot better than that, even with the hole(s) in the plot and the "Amurrica yeah!" spirit. I mean - I'm an adult. You'd literally have to drag me to a Star Wars movie, kicking and screaming.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Not a movie by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It was always like this. I remember being deluged Star Wars toys in the 80s too. Nothing has changed. The original movies also weren't much good. I liked them as a kid and watched them when the came on at Christmas but now I find them utterly unwatchable. This isn't the case for everything I watched as a kid. e.g. Back To The Future is still fun.

  7. Re:Still sucks by Noble713 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize that exercise isn't a priority for most geeks

    And having served as a Marine Corps Officer, I think I'm more familiar with physical exertion than most geeks. You emphasized the distance ran, I would emphasize getting shot, and from a noticeably high-powered weapon at that. If you shot me in the side with a Dragunov rifle (which fires the same 7.62x54mm rounds as the PKM light machine gun) and told me to run the Marine Corps obstacle course ( less than 100m), and THEN fight another Marine....I'd almost certainly lose, regardless of the melee skills of my opponent.

    But Ren didn't lose, he won. The entire argument of "Ep7 sucks because the Dark Jedi lost a saber fight with a Stormtrooper" is moot...because it's factually incorrect.

  8. Re:Rollercoaster by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your money is gone

    Speak for yourself.

    I am. I didn't have any expectations and I had a great time. You guys are all the same you know, when something new comes out you ignore it because it's unfamiliar and when you get what you ask for you complain because it is.

    You just can't sit back and enjoy it for what it is.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  9. It is very, very bad... by luismontbau · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not trying to sound like Jay Sherman, but if we keep going to bad movies, they will keep making them... I read all the reviews first, and went confident I was going to see an entertaining movie. I do not go to see a movie called 'Star Wars' hoping to it to be a philosophical experience, but man, it sucked big time... My main complaints: 1.) It is almost identical to the first movie. Desert planet? Check. Young, force-sensitive user that's unware of it? Check. Stranded, cute robot with a secret message to deliver? Check. Escape from said planet trying to deliver message? Check. Han Solo and Chewbacca conning the wrong guys? Check. 2.) The bad guys suck. In the first movie, Darth Vader intimidates. He is strong, powerful, and no one messes with him. Kylo Ren? A weak crybaby that is hit SEVERAL TIMES by a stormtrooper that never held a lightsaber before!!! And he is prone to tantrums. Even worse, when he removes his helmet, he looks like an idiot. I have the perfect Sith name for him: Darth Dumbo. You're welcome, Disney! 3.) The Emperor is replaced by Gollum. Enough said. 4.) Can someone explain to me why the zero-calories version of the Empire bother building a planet-sized weapon, and have thousands of armed soldiers, if they are going to leave the most vulnerable part of their humongous weapon completely unattended? Not a single guard? Han Solo & Co. just waltz in, plant bombs and there it goes! These guys are the galactic equivalent of the Dodo. I was 8 when I watched the first movie. I should have know better than to go to this kind of movie at my current age.

    1. Re:It is very, very bad... by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same here. The movie is chock full of unforgivable plot holes. From what i can remember right now...

      ...... SPOILERS AHEAD ......

      So, Luke is missing. For no apparent reason. But somehow there's a map to his location. Conveniently split in two halfs. Which everyone is aware of, again, for no apparent reason. And one is withheld by no other than R2D2?

      Finn, raised as a soldier his whole life, suddenly grows a conscience and quits after slaughtering a village. Doesn't stop him from killing a shitload of his old mates afterwards. Isn't he a bit too self aware?

      Poe Dameron pulls a resurrection that would make Jesus jealous. Zero explanations provided. ...same as the magical appearance of Chewy and Han Solo on the Millennium Falcon, which is now literally in the middle of nowhere. That one was cringe worthy. ...but not as much as Luke's lightsaber showing up in the exact saloon our heroes visit. Out of all the saloons in the galaxy.

      Kylo Ren: worst villain ever. One minute an incredible badass who can stop a blaster shot without even looking at it, the second he's been beaten up by a janitor with zero sword experience.

      An Rey. From scavenger extraordinary to master of the force in literally a little over 30 minutes. The "you will release me" scene was just too much.

      What exactly the Resistance was resisting to all these years?

      Why do Rey an Leia hug at the end? Did they even meet before that?

      Man, i could go on all day. The movie is a treat to the eyes and Harrison Ford just shines on it. The rest? You've seen it all on EP IV. With better writing, i might add.

  10. Wait, what? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought piracy was supposed to be killing the creative industries?

  11. Well, "yes". And "ish". by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it a movie to be seen on theaters? Absolutely.

    Now, is it a good movie? So... no. Not by a long stretch, i might add. Looks great, Harrison Ford is fantastic and it is loaded with iconic scenes... but man, the script is a poor rehash of EP IV, and ridden with glaring plot holes as well.