Slashdot Mirror


NSA Cheerleaders Discover Value of Privacy Only When Their Own Is Violated (theintercept.com)

Advocatus Diaboli sends this report from Glen Greenwald: The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that the NSA under President Obama targeted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his top aides for surveillance. In the process, the agency ended up eavesdropping on "the contents of some of their private conversations with U.S. lawmakers and American-Jewish groups" about how to sabotage the Iran Deal. All sorts of people who spent many years cheering for and defending the NSA and its programs of mass surveillance are suddenly indignant now that they know the eavesdropping included them and their American and Israeli friends rather than just ordinary people. The long-time GOP chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and unyielding NSA defender Pete Hoekstra last night was truly indignant to learn of this surveillance.

In January 2014, I [Greenwald] debated Rep. Hoekstra about NSA spying and he could not have been more mocking and dismissive of the privacy concerns I was invoking. "Spying is a matter of fact," he scoffed. As Andrew Krietz, the journalist who covered that debate, reported, Hoekstra "laughs at foreign governments who are shocked they've been spied on because they, too, gather information" — referring to anger from German and Brazilian leaders. As TechDirt noted, "Hoekstra attacked a bill called the RESTORE Act, that would have granted a tiny bit more oversight over situations where (you guessed it) the NSA was collecting information on Americans." But all that, of course, was before Hoekstra knew that he and his Israeli friends were swept up in the spying of which he was so fond.

40 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Aww, poor babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, they thought they were special? they thought they were part of the untouchable elite? Fucking rubes, anyone championing the NSA's actions deserve what's coming to them. Retards, the whole lot of them.

    1. Re:Aww, poor babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fucking rubes, anyone championing the NSA's actions, while working against US interests , deserve what's coming to them - FTFY

    2. Re: Aww, poor babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But its Israel. Aren't Israeli interests the same as American interests? That's what our government keeps saying, and that's why we're always defending them, right? All those reporters who call them out on their neo-Apartheid policies are just anti-semitic, biased, Jew-haters.

    3. Re:Aww, poor babies by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      Fucking rubes, anyone championing the NSA's actions, while working against US interests , deserve what's coming to them - FTFY

      That's still a pretty broad stroke. What are US "interests"? I'll bet I could find a problem with just about anything if I framed US interests in the right way.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    4. Re: Aww, poor babies by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Born-again Christians believe that The End of The World is going to happen really soon and they get to go to Heaven with Jebus v.20. But the catch is that in order for that to happen, Jews have to be in charge of Jerusalem. That's why crazy religious people are adamant that we've got to be unwavering in our support of Israel.

      You're not arguing against any kind of sane viewpoint w.r.t. politics, finances, etc. You're arguing against their religious beliefs.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  2. Screw Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nancy Pelosi, Mike Rogers, all of you who voted for safety over freedom - you deserve neither. - Ben Franklin

    Justin Amash - Thanks for standing for the constitution, specifically the 4th amendment.

    1. Re: Screw Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Am I the only one concerned that Israel and the Jewish community have such high reaching influence on our country?

      Maybe, just maybe, the influence they have and the power they weild is being used to convince us to fight wars that they benefit from but that cost us ruinously.

    2. Re: Screw Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      nope you're not the only one.

      but israel has a good propaganda system. owns a lot of polticians. and has a built in victim excuse for all of it.
      and you can't disagree or you're a nazi or antisemite.

      you can really see their online social media efforts on some of the larger sites.
      anything negative to israel gets blasted.
      anything positive gets the circlejerk of the same users every time.

      Personally tho. I'm tired of seeing MY TAX MONEY end up going to israel every year. (4 billion this year.)
      I don't care if we get most of it back when they buy our weapons.
      It's a giant wasteful corporate handout. And we're not gaining anything useful from the charade.

    3. Re: Screw Em by Coren22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      FYI, Israel is 17% muslims. They have no issue with muslims, they have issues with people who want to destroy their country.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re: Screw Em by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Personally tho. I'm tired of seeing MY TAX MONEY end up going to israel every year. (4 billion this year.) I don't care if we get most of it back when they buy our weapons. It's a giant wasteful corporate handout. And we're not gaining anything useful from the charade.

      I agree. especially since "we" don't get it back. Defense contractors get it. So really it's just laundered money for corporate welfare.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    5. Re: Screw Em by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      With their current arsenal, Israel can handle a hundred years of the overgrown firecrackers Hamas fires.

      In short: Israel is not the victim, and has not been the victim since the Six Day War.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  3. LOL by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government should NOT be spying on its own citizens, but spying on heads of state? That's kind of what they are for, right? I mean, if you're opposed to them spying on those guys, you're probably opposed to their existence in general.

    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Spying on active members of Congress is outside of the authority of the executive branch. Unless they had a warrant when they did this, they are doing exactly what Nixon was going to be impeached for.

    2. Re: LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a complicated issue. Indeed, in the best case scenario, NSA's existence should be to let us know when another country is getting ready to go to war. However, lately they've been an increasing threat to domestic civil liberties, judicial process, as well as checks and balances / balance of power between branches of government, tipping the power toward the executive.

      That being said, here we have many congress people who seem to care more about what Israel thinks than the people they are supposed to represent. Israel would have us continually going further into debt to gain it just a little more security. It's been tail wag the dog for too long, and our nation needs to get its act together financially, for the reserve system we've been relying on for so long will not last much longer.

    3. Re:LOL by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Informative

      These congresscritters only have themselves to blame since they laid the very foundation for this to happen with things like the Patriot Act. I'll shed crocodile tears for the lot of them.

    4. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that, technically, those congresscritters may have been violating the law themselves by engaging in direct diplomacy with foreign powers, which is a felony (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ).

      Of course, members of both parties have violated it in the past, and it largely goes unenforced as no one has actually been prosecuted for it since 1803.

    5. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      NSA is tasked with gathering signals intelligence from foreign sources. Communications originating and staying within the US is off limits (or used to be). Overseas phone calls to a foreign head of state to collude on how to sabotage a significant US bill in Congress are fair game. In fact, the FBI should be brought in to investigate those Congressional members for possible treason.

    6. Re:LOL by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 2

      It's not even close to what Nixon would have been impeached for.

    7. Re:LOL by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Spying on active members of Congress is outside of the authority of the executive branch. Unless they had a warrant when they did this, they are doing exactly what Nixon was going to be impeached for.

      If the target of the surveillance is a foreign head of state (Netanyahu), it's not the NSA's fault that US legislators happened to be calling that foreign head of state to get their marching orders.

      In fact, members of congress dealing directly with foreign heads of state directly violates the Logan Act, and it would absolutely be appropriate for the NSA to be looking into this. Maybe Pete Hoekstra (R-Tel Aviv) should be answering some questions.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      According to CBS, it was in Washington, DC (ie, on US soil). So this was NSA spying on US Congressmen engaging in political activities (opposing the President's political agenda) which is a direct part of their job.

      Communications that cross the US borde (as in calling a foreign head of state located in a foreign country), even if they originate in the US, are fair game for the NSA to eavesdrop on.

      Congress members colluding with a foreign power to undermine the Executive branch's Constitutional mandate to conduct foreign policy is against the law.

    9. Re: LOL by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      the reserve system we've been relying on for so long will not last much longer.

      With willing slaves, it can go on indefinitely.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:LOL by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. According to the Supreme Court, only the President is authorized to actually negotiate with foreign leaders. The Senate may advise him and ultimately must approve any proposed treaty, but they may only negotiate it through the President.

    11. Re:LOL by tinkerton · · Score: 2

      This article as well as many similar articles in previous years, says you're full of it, knowledgeable guy..

    12. Re:LOL by alphatel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that, technically, those congresscritters may have been violating the law themselves by engaging in direct diplomacy with foreign powers, which is a felony (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ).

      But did you know that Nixon did this while he was running for president (bargaining with South Vietnam), and Lyndon Johnson found out the night before the election, but couldn't reveal it because his source was the NSA, and therefore classified?

      Committing a felony, and protecting the felons - we're quite good at that!

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  4. The arrogance.. by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These people who routinely advocate for mass surveillance of the rest of us are outraged at being surveilled themselves? The arrogance and/or cognitive dissonance required must be astronomical.

    1. Re:The arrogance.. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      The arrogance and/or cognitive dissonance required must be astronomical.

      Remember - we are talking about politicians here. It's part of the job description.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:The arrogance.. by peragrin · · Score: 2

      lawyers are trained to be in a state of cognitive dissonance. it is the only way you can defend a rapist, or other piece of junk human being.

      corporate lawyers have to do the same thing. telling their clients how to avoid legal penalties while doing things that should be illegal by the spirit of the law. (how to hide and shuffle money around legally so you don't pay taxes on it)

      that is the sort of person politicians come from.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  5. Useful idiots by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They served their purpose.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  6. Word of the day. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dear Rep. Hoekstra,

    Here's your Word of the Day:

    Hypocrisy (noun) - The practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform.

    Sincerely,
    The rest of us.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. I was expecting a totally different type of story by Time_Ngler · · Score: 5, Funny

    For some reason, I read that as "NBA Cheerleaders Discover..."

  8. Everybody spies on everybody by AaronW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many times has Israel been caught spying on the US? All countries spy on each other. Senators conspiring with foreign heads of state though could be considered unamerican, however. It sounds like we were spying on Israel and some congress critters got caught up in it. In other words, the NSA was doing what it's supposed to be doing, monitoring and spying on foreign activity.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    1. Re:Everybody spies on everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "How many times has Israel been caught spying on the US?"

      "once"

      Pure nonsense. Most Jewish Americans aren't like this but there have been lots of Jews that acted like they were American "patriots" but were really working *only* for Israeli interests.

      What kills me is Republicans act like they are big patriots but a fair chunk of them are utter morons that unwittingly betray their own country to Israel over and over again. Far right Zionists, with not an iota interest in America, American values, Americans, Republicans, and certainly not Christianity..... tell Republican politicians to do x... and they trip over themselves to parrot whatever their far right Jewish masters tell them to do. And if you point out their behavior you are slandered as "antisemetic".

      Republican has inch-by-inch become a synonym for mystic nationalist chauvinistic racist idiot. Every single Republican Presidential nomination this year is certifiable. They aren't fit to run a circus much less be put in charge of nuclear weapons. Local version of the Taliban.

  9. Re:For Pete's Sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Movies play it when people fuck up, or get caoght in their own game.
    And they usually make a sad face when they realise this. Hence "sad" in the site name.
    That the people watching it find it humorous is beside the point of the trombone itself.

    I cant beleave i had to explain this shit to someone.

  10. What an objective title by rebelwarlock · · Score: 2

    Don't spill your bias so early, guys! At least trick me into reading the first paragraph before you pile on the politics.

  11. There is a song title that feels perfect for this by zuki · · Score: 2

    It's "The Hunter Gets Captured By The Game" by either Roxy Music, Grace Jones and whoever else recorded it.

  12. I don't understand... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When did the US media start allowing publication of any kind of news that might reflect unfavourably on Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud Party? Isn't that grounds for immediate classification as a terrorist and transfer to some dark, ugly hole in the back of a Third World prison?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  13. Hey! Why the surprised look? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Will it make a difference at election time? Probably not. The regular 95% reelection rate is going to continue for the foreseeable future, and people will come back here and complain like it's not their fault that it does. We've been through this before. It's just another day in paradise. Go back to your drinks, and forget about it.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. Re:There is a song title that feels perfect for th by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    It's "The Hunter Gets Captured By The Game" by either Roxy Music, Grace Jones and whoever else recorded it.

    Apparently, it's a Smokey Robinson song. I'm going to go ahead and declare the Massive Attack version to be the pinnacle, though. Clearly inspired by the Marvelettes version. I couldn't track down the Roxy Music cover, but I'm not a big fan to begin with.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. The same story in the UK last week by tinkerton · · Score: 2

    from the british newspaper The Independent

    The paper submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Home Office asking for Home Secretary Theresa May’s browsing history for the last week of October (excluding any information relating to security matters).

    Their argument being: if Theresa May wants extensive access to the general public’s browser history under the new legislation, can we also have access to hers?

    Unsurprisingly, the request was denied by the Home Office, which said that the Independent was being vexatious – which is one of the key reasons to deny an FoI and in legal terms means “an action that is brought without sufficient grounds for winning, purely to cause annoyance to the defendant”.

  16. My standard response by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My standard response to people cheering for new government powers (including NSA spying) is: Would you want these powers in the hands of someone on the opposite end of the political spectrum from you? If the person is a Democrat, imagine President Donald Trump with those powers. If the person is a Republican, imagine President Hillary Clinton with those powers. Rarely is the person fine with this situation, though they are perfectly willing for someone who shares their political philosophy to have those powers.

    This here is a real-life example of that response. These people are just fine with the NSA spying on people, but once that spying turns on them they find it a violation of their rights. Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. You can't declare that "all people like me are special and exempt from X." You either are for the NSA spying on everyone including you or you oppose the NSA spying.

    Here's hoping their outrage isn't short lived and instead turns into a swell of political opposition to NSA spying.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.