Slashdot Mirror
18 Million Targeted Voter Records Exposed By Database Error (csoonline.com)
itwbennett writes: Last week, a database containing 191 million voter records was exposed because of a misconfigured database that no on wants to claim ownership of. Around the same time, a second, smaller database containing fewer than 57 million records similar to those previously discovered was also found by researcher Chris Vickery. But the second database also includes 18 million records that hold targeted demographic information. And as was the case with the previous voter database, no one wants to claim ownership.
"Marx grasped this essence of capitalist democracy splendidly when, in analyzing the experience of the Commune, he said that the oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them in parliament!" -- V.I. Lenin, The State and Revolution, 1917
UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
She went with her own illegal / wide open e-mail server.
This sounds like it's right up her alley.
Not me. Though it does make me feel a little less badly about never registering to vote.
Better summary, from TFA:
>> the database appears to be from Nation Builder's 2014 update from February or March
Similarly Fiorina just accepts invitation to speak from different group, posts these invitations publicly in a google spreadsheet. Her SuperPAC uses this info to organize all the campaign work. Uncoordinated coordination!
This database could also be one of the deep pocketed presidential campaigns getting the info without paying for it, or provide the info without appearing to coordinate with them.
Just wish we would just scrap the elections and just sell the elections to the highest bidder at this point.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
These are voter registrations that are apparently available to any organization with the resources and connections to buy them or compile them... Aren't we better served if we just had the states make this information available for download? To my thinking it would be better to know what is known about us and what is being used to target us with political and commercial marketing rather than keep our information private. Although, certain law enforcement professionals have already expressed concern about having their addresses listed. So, at least that information should have been private.
define("DB_USER_NAME", "admin");
define("DB_PASSWORD", "passw0rd");
and of course the firewall definition allowing access on all ports from all IPs.
I think calling some things mis-configured is a real understatement
So are you starting to understand why the government wants to collect all or electronic data? Hint: the same reason all of the other tech companies want your data.
If the "wrong" candidate wins one can blame the weak databases and invalidate the votes? Genius.
What does it matter?
then it just come down to the supreme court picking the winner with a dead line to get the case done by X time.
I'm sorry to see/hear that you still push with this revisionist bit of history.
The best you could have hoped for in 2000 was Bush as Pres & Lieberman as VP.
Under no constitutional or lawful sequence of events was Al Gore going to become President.
Help Brendan pay off his student loans
Build a wall? Sure... But I'm still waiting on how you make Mexico pay for it.. The only ways I've come up with involve military force or some kind of new tax/tariff etc.. Just sending them a bill marked "over due, please pay now" is unlikely to be effective.
I beg you, ANY other republican contender over Trump... Please? I'll take him over the Hill, but he's my absolute last choice of the possible republican contenders.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror
Because knowledge is a good thing, even knowledge that challenges your most devout beliefs.
Why does there even need to be such a database ? It seems unnecessary. And even then, it registers way to much personal information. Especially the registration of party affiliation seems to come close to be a violation of the secrecy of the vote.
Here (Netherlands) we just use the lists from the civil register. If you are on it and eligible to vote, you can vote. No need for special registration or something. What is wrong with that ?
While not a fan of Trump, I recognize that as a business person he starts with a more out there proposal which he can then back off from during negotiations... which this sounds to be too.
You aren't thinking creatively enough.
If $23 billion is in fact being sent from the US to Mexico... just tack a 20% 'wall' tax and you pay for a $49 billion dollar wall in just 10 years.
Granted, such projections are based on more or less static accounting and discounts any changes in behavior.
Help Brendan pay off his student loans
The Government can't get huge companies to pay their own taxes (that shelter money offshore and funnel through international channels), but they're gonna tax the little people? Yeah, that does sound about right. Fuck the rich, and fuck the serial bankruptster Trump.
Like it or not, those methods are legal at present.
How well paid are the lobbyists for the 'little people'?
Help Brendan pay off his student loans
drop table * * (yes, I'm not a DBA), or cd / and sudo root, rm -rf (but I am a sys admin) and wait a few minutes. "no one owns it," so then, "No one will care or miss it, right?"
In particular, the draft registration is the only one that's in any way mandatory. No, SSN isn't mandatory, and making it mandatory wouldn't pass constitutional scrutiny, though your parents do it to you.
You aren't thinking creatively enough.
If $23 billion is in fact being sent from the US to Mexico... just tack a 20% 'wall' tax and you pay for a $49 billion dollar wall in just 10 years.
Oh... I can see Western Union lobbying AGAINST this tax.
You can't just avoid the tax by, you know, mailing cash.....
While not a fan of Trump, I recognize that as a business person he starts with a more out there proposal which he can then back off from during negotiations... which this sounds to be too.
You aren't thinking creatively enough.
If $23 billion is in fact being sent from the US to Mexico... just tack a 20% 'wall' tax and you pay for a $49 billion dollar wall in just 10 years.
Granted, such projections are based on more or less static accounting and discounts any changes in behavior.
Like I said, if you are not willing to recover the cost of the wall by force of arms, all you can do is add a tax or tariff on economic activity.
But as others have pointed out, putting a tax on money transfers to/from Mexico really doesn't solve the problem because then folks would change their behavior and just send cash directly...
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
Including the remedies in Florida law that the SCOTUS denied Fl the right to undertake? One of those was a full recount of all questionable counties (or something prettty damned close) and IIRC Gore would have won that count per the officially unofficial recount run by the journalists some years later.
Love the GOP - all for "state's rights" until those rights bite them on the butt, then trample those rights with the Federal Gummint! Yep!
Again, revisionist history that ignores reality, not to mention well established constitutional process and law.
Like I said, "Under no constitutional or lawful sequence of events was Al Gore going to become President."
A "Certificate of Ascertainment" had already been sent to congress and the Archivist of the United States, at that point the role of the state was over. Period.
The only remaining hope for the Gore campaign would be for the joint session of (the new) congress that is tasked with counting the votes challenge the result. If successful, each state delegation would cast a single vote for President. Given the breakdown of the 2000 House of Representatives election, it is almost certain that Bush would have won.
When it comes to VP, similar process in the senate, however due to the 50/50 split at the time, the President pro tempore of the Senate would cast the deciding vote. Who was that at the time? None other than the Vice President of the United States, Al Gore.
Help Brendan pay off his student loans
Including the remedies in Florida law that the SCOTUS denied Fl the right to undertake? One of those was a full recount of all questionable counties (or something prettty damned close)
Florida had already defined the electoral process and was following that process, as is the right of the state legislature to define. The federal government had no authority to overturn the state-defined process, nor did the Florida courts on a matter of process.
The recount was done. The result was certified. The only effect of forcing yet another recount was to delay the result from Florida until after the deadline for the Electoral College vote, effectively disenfranchising every Florida voter.
Love the GOP - all for "state's rights" until those rights bite them on the butt,
Florida has the right to determine its electoral process, and did so. It was Gore who was trying to change the process after the vote was counted.
And gotta love the Dems -- count every vote, until the votes are counted and the Republicans win, then take every vote to court to get it thrown out. Awful butterfly ballots -- that both parties agreed to prior to the election. Awful absentee process -- that both parties agreed to prior to the election. Got a problem with the process? Fix it before the ballots are cast, not after they go against you.
"I'm not responsible"
(this is where I rant and rave like a lunatic)
I wish Americans would grow up. They are a bunch of children who are irresponsible, spoiled, pandered to, expect everything handed to them, do not understand basic finance, lazy, and greedy. This is coming from an American who sees this everyday and is disgusted. Instead of fixing the problem you will see companies and lawyers standing around pointing fingers.
(end of rant)
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
This is the basic mechanism by which we have fair and open elections. I'll use California for example, but I think most states are the same or similar. I've been a poll worker, and a poll supervisor and inspector as well.
Anyone can go down to the local polling place and take a look at the voter rolls for that precinct, which has the name and address of each voter. Furthermore, when you step up to receive your ballot, you have to say your name and address aloud. People come up and show you ID (which is not required) and you have to ask them to say their name and address. That's so an observer (aka poll-watcher) can check off the names on their own copy of the list. If there's a question about who voted in an election (e.g. fewer or more votes cast than people went through the door), the pollwatcher can compare their list against the official list.
When the polls close for the evening, the pollworkers have to tally up the number of names that signed in to vote against the number of ballots cast. They also have to reconcile the number of ballots they started with, the number spoiled, etc. and make sure it all matches. In practice, you do this a maximum of two times. If you don't reconcile on the first count (not the actual vote counting, just the number of ballots) you do it once more, and if it fails, you all sign a form saying it didn't tally, you box everything up in the locked container and take it to the dispatch point where it gets schlepped to the county headquarters for counting. That's because it's all time critical: you don't want a precinct counting and recounting late into the night. There's another count and reconciliation at the HQ in any case.
All of this is observable by everyone at every step, from showing that the ballot box is empty in the morning before you lock it to the final sealing and handing over to the delivery people, etc. At no time is there only one person around.
So a massive subversion of the process is quite difficult: you'd need to suborn lots of poll workers at every polling place (or enough to make a difference), and the odds of that being kept secret are small.
The voter rolls must be public, for the same reason. You want anyone to be able to verify that John Doe actually lives at 1234 main street by physical observation. In theory, someone who puts a bogus date or address in will be caught by someone who actually knows the truth. It's a sort of "open source software debugging" approach of many eyes looking at the data.
There's a limited set of people who have access to this database.
Lets put them all on trial.
Really, this is simple. Get out of nafta, and put customs duties on products imported from Mexico. Put a tax on products exported to Mexico, and tax people going to Mexico. Mexico would pay for it, and we would collect it. Trump unfortunately does not have the guts to do it -- he's all talk and no action.
There's this other thing called the phone book. Granted it doesn't contain your DOB. But it does have most of your name, address, and phone#.
I fail to see the importance of this database that these folks found. Yes - your data is out there - companies collect it. It exists, are you surprised? Was a law broken in "leaking" this information (doesn't sound published - more like an accidental leak). In my state it is illegal to post public access into on the web - you have to come get it in person. But I don't know what restrictions exist after that.
The larger concern from my POV is using this kind of data to build a larger database (like Nexus). My name & address? - send me lots of junk mail. Phone number? Already get plenty of robo-calls. But start opening bank accounts in my name or making purchases - that will be a PITA. It's the criminal activity I worry most about.
VISA/Mastercard already have a huge pile of data on me. They know what I purchase and how much I spend. I know this because my employer used to buy "your" name & address & income & spending history for mass-marketing campaigns (targeted marketing -- give us 50,000 people who make $80k+/year and spend X dollars at stores like Apple and Williams/Sonoma).
The fastest way to deal with this is --- delete the database. Fight back, name your children...Little Bobby Tables - https://xkcd.com/327/
So, if no one owns the databases, what's the problem. If no one owns it, delete it. Problem solved. The govn't has too much data as it is.
Oh? Then why did Stalin kill so many of his own people?