Slashdot Mirror
How an IRS Agent Stole $1M From Taxpayers (onthewire.io)
Trailrunner7 writes: Few, if any, companies or government agencies store more sensitive personal information than the IRS, and consumers have virtually no insight into how that data is used and secured. But, as the results of a recent Justice Department investigation show, when you start poking around in those dark corners, you sometimes find very ugly things.
Beginning in 2008, a small group of people–including an IRS employee who worked in the Taxpayer Advocate Service section–worked a simple and effective scam that involved fake tax returns, phony refunds, dozens of pre-loaded debit cards, and a web of lies. The scheme relied upon one key ingredient for its success: access to taxpayers' personal information. And it brought the alleged perpetrators more than $1 million.
What sets this case apart is that the accused IRS employee, Nakeisha Hall, was tasked specifically with helping people who had been affected by some kind of tax-related identity theft or fraud.
Beginning in 2008, a small group of people–including an IRS employee who worked in the Taxpayer Advocate Service section–worked a simple and effective scam that involved fake tax returns, phony refunds, dozens of pre-loaded debit cards, and a web of lies. The scheme relied upon one key ingredient for its success: access to taxpayers' personal information. And it brought the alleged perpetrators more than $1 million.
What sets this case apart is that the accused IRS employee, Nakeisha Hall, was tasked specifically with helping people who had been affected by some kind of tax-related identity theft or fraud.
They constantly put the poor in prison while refusing to ever audit the rich.
Uhh:
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2012/01/06/irs-steps-up-audits-of-millionaires/
The rate at which millionaires are audited has more than doubled under Obama. The audit rate for people making less than $200k per year is about 1%, and it is now at over 14% for people earning a million or more per year. For those of us that believe in the Constitution and equal protection, this is a problem. The SCOTUS ruled in in Bolling v. Sharpe in 1954 that equal protection requirements apply to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment.