Slashdot Mirror


How an IRS Agent Stole $1M From Taxpayers (onthewire.io)

Trailrunner7 writes: Few, if any, companies or government agencies store more sensitive personal information than the IRS, and consumers have virtually no insight into how that data is used and secured. But, as the results of a recent Justice Department investigation show, when you start poking around in those dark corners, you sometimes find very ugly things.

Beginning in 2008, a small group of people–including an IRS employee who worked in the Taxpayer Advocate Service section–worked a simple and effective scam that involved fake tax returns, phony refunds, dozens of pre-loaded debit cards, and a web of lies. The scheme relied upon one key ingredient for its success: access to taxpayers' personal information. And it brought the alleged perpetrators more than $1 million.

What sets this case apart is that the accused IRS employee, Nakeisha Hall, was tasked specifically with helping people who had been affected by some kind of tax-related identity theft or fraud.

24 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Why I Am a Conservative by avandesande · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you could get us a Finland or Netherlands style government I might change my mind, but after half a life time of watching our jokers at work, no way!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Why I Am a Conservative by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To have a government like Finland or the Netherlands requires pretty left-wing policies and attitudes, including paying civil servants well, which requires a lot of tax money. If you keep insisting on low tax rates because we don't have a government type that doesn't arise unless one has somewhat higher tax rates, I'm not sure what to say.

    2. Re:Why I Am a Conservative by wyHunter · · Score: 2

      Since the marginal total tax rate in the US is somewhat about 50% when you factor in everything, from where do you expect to get...more money?

  2. Re:Classic! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Funny

    None needed. The Government is MUCH more trustworthy than private enterprise, you NEVER have to worry about it...

    Do I really need the /sarc?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  3. Happens more than people think by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole security by obscurity thing happens way more than people think. Why do you think e-file refund scams work in the first place? Because (most likely) when the core system was designed, it was assumed that an IRS employee was entering the paper returns received in the mail by hand into an IRS-controlled computer. Therefore, the system only does a cursory SSN-to-name match as a sanity check before issuing a refund for whatever amount the return shows (as long as the math checks out.) The IRS is processing millions of returns a year, so this is only noticed when a taxpayer tries to file their return and is told they've already done so; it happened to a relative of mine a couple years ago.

    Not knowing the architecture, e-file really feels like a security by obscurity mess. Perhaps the IRS gives "trusted e-file providers" encryption keys for an Internet-accessible gateway, and the tax software just pumps the raw data directly into the main filing system from the end user. Also, once it gets inside the IRS, the data is probably considered "trusted" and not encrypted as it's passed around from system to system. People love to hate the IRS, and I'm sure that's reflected in budget appropriations, so whatever system is in place is probably never upgraded beyond skeleton crew maintenance stuff and new regulations coding.

    This is going to be the interesting part of the Internet of Things push -- take existing systems and slap them onto the Internet, no matter what it takes. I'm seeing this a lot in the private sector as well -- cloud cloud cloud! Get our previously inaccessible, vulnerable product out on the Internet before the competition does! IoT!! We're Agile, we'll fix all the problems as we go! Social! Apps! Etc...

    In this case, it's interesting psychology. The article even states it - people assume that their data is safe once it makes it inside the IRS. Same way people assume their banking or health data are safe, then find out it's not as protected as they think.

    1. Re:Happens more than people think by Forgefather · · Score: 2

      You are right about their budgetary concerns, but the situation is worse than you think. As of 2014 they were still using a system of vinyl cartridges as hard drives to store their tax information. And their budget is getting worse. For the last decade lawmakers, primarily on the republican side have been slashing the IRS's budget by labeling it a mechanism of evil and whatnot.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    2. Re:Happens more than people think by Calydor · · Score: 2

      One million dollars, over the course of seven or eight years, spread over all the accounts she had access to? Sounds to me like no one's life was ruined, at least.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Happens more than people think by mark-t · · Score: 2

      If the tax money is being given to so-called criminals legally, what are they doing to be criminals in the first place?

  4. Meh. by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Run of the mill embezzlement by someone placed in just the right spot to get away with it. But you know what? It's nothing compared to the Lois Lerner mess. This thief took advantage of IRS access to steal some cash. Lerner et al took advantage of IRS control to influence public discourse and a looming election.

    The tax code is incomprehensibly complex and burdensome. That's trouble all by itself. But because it plays out in the sprawling, no-accountability federal big government landscape, it provides fertile ground for everything from thievery (a la the linked-to story) to partisan shenanigans (a la Lerner-related issues).

    The drive to make government always bigger, always more complex, and always more insulated from consequence - that costs each of us real, serious money that produces nothing. We do need a tax enforcement agency. But we don't need it to be responsible for such mind-bogglingly byzantine complexity that it can't even keep an eye on its own people's ongoing criminal enterprises and partisan betrayals of trust.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Meh. by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

      The IRS is a lot of things. Partisan isn't one of them.

      Except of course, we have evidence to the contrary. Lerner's past history indicates she wasn't going to carry water in the manner she did, for a conservative administration. And it's worth noting that the same MO in her earlier harassment attack as an FEC bureaucrat mirrored her attacks as an IRS bureaucrat and against the same sort of targets.

    2. Re:Meh. by erapert · · Score: 2

      Because it's not about reducing crime. It's not about anything other than preparing for a proper tyranny that doesn't have to hide behind the fig leaf of our current system.

    3. Re:Meh. by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      I didn't say the IRS was partisan. I said that the sprawling, un-supervisable, unaccountable nature of huge government bureaucracies like the one found at the IRS are unable to prevent people like Lois Lerner from bringing her highly partisan baggage to bear on her supposedly neutral role in her agency.

      That being said, the director of that agency IS a political appointee, and the current one has been in fact conducting himself in a highly partisan way in order to shield the agency's upper management from the fallout that comes from allowing the agency's power to interfere with elections. That agency provided a very partisan payload of personal tax data to the White House as opposition research was being done. Who got fired at either end of that process, for breaking the law in that way? Nobody at the White House, and nobody at the IRS.

      Your casual dismissal of that sort of thing says plenty about your own politics, especially since you consider calling that sort of corruption what it is to be simply being on a bandwagon. As you say, duly noted. We know where you stand.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Re:Classic! by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I honestly don't know how they would catch me in the first place.

    I'd bet the majority of criminals who get caught thought the very same thing before they got caught.

  6. sarcasm by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Do I really need the /sarc?

    Evidently yes

    1. Re:sarcasm by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You left out a bit, evidently yes because "the crew would take cards to ATMs and withdraw money, or use them in stores, the DoJ said. Hall, Goodman, and Coleman were arrested last month on a number of charges related to the scam, including mail fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud." It is called separation of powers and it exists because who watches over the government, other departments whose duty is to watch over the actions of government and when necessary investigate and prosecute those government employees who break the law. In private enterprise watching over itself, the response is STFU we are making money and the penalties will be far lower than the profits and that is 99% of responses made by the 1% in control of private industry.

      Perhaps snark might not be accurate as wilful blindness might be far more accurate, as it was the government that caught the government cheating and prosecuted it, so the point of sarcasm in this case being a complete lack of RTFA.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. Young fool with no ambition. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

    What really upsets me is the lack of ambition and drive in the younger generation. This IRS agent could have made millions, but stopped at just one million. This really sucks, even when they can steal, they get lazy and take time off to post selfies in the facebook profile. There is no hope. Now, get off my lawn.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. Re: There's a reason those Republicans... by njnnja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The IRS didn't audit a single millionaire last year.

    They didn't audit a single millionaire because they audited tens of thousands of millionaires. Unless of course you are referring to marital status. Unfortunately I can't find out whether they audited a single millionaire or if they were all married.

  9. Re:Classic! by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just about everyone is guilty of some crime, including some very odd felonies. You're mostly not in jail because even the cops and the balance of the legal system realize what sort of bullshit most of them are and don't enforce them.

    Nevertheless, with sufficient inducement, those laws can be used on you by those who are literally minded or corrupt enough. And because they are legitimate laws, your only recourse is either unconstitutionality or pure public backlash. The second being the reason that free speech and the right to protest and even to look threatening is a necessary check on governments who are quite capable of passing masses of laws that fail to reflect fairness or reality.

  10. Re:Classic! by bfpierce · · Score: 2

    Yeah I mean you never hear about private enterprise swindling their customers, that's just unheard of.

  11. Re:Classic! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Just the dumb ones?

    These IRS scammers were certainly dumb. They made $1M over 7 years, and split it at least 3 ways. So they are going to prison for less than $50k/year each. They could have made more money, and stayed out of prison, by just getting better jobs.

  12. Re: There's a reason those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They constantly put the poor in prison while refusing to ever audit the rich.

    Uhh:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2012/01/06/irs-steps-up-audits-of-millionaires/

    The rate at which millionaires are audited has more than doubled under Obama. The audit rate for people making less than $200k per year is about 1%, and it is now at over 14% for people earning a million or more per year. For those of us that believe in the Constitution and equal protection, this is a problem. The SCOTUS ruled in in Bolling v. Sharpe in 1954 that equal protection requirements apply to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment.

  13. Re:Infernal Revenue Service by Coren22 · · Score: 2

    However, if Capone hadn't been taken down by the tax evasion, they would have had proof of his illegal activities, it is a catch-22.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  14. Re:Classic! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    I lived with a con artist too, but I usually referred to her as "my wife".

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  15. Re:There's a reason those Republicans... by budgenator · · Score: 2

    They have destroyed so many cities in this country with their attacks on minority areas. Just look at Chicago and Detroit to see the results.

    Detroit's problems are all on a couple race riots and Colman Young and Kwame Kilpatrick. Your going to see the same thing in Ferguson and Baltimore over the next few decades.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds