Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Teams With Automakers To Put Windows, Office In Cars (microsoft.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Today Microsoft announced partnerships with several companies to bring Windows 10, Office 365, and Azure to cars. Volvo is having their Call Universal App integrate with Windows 10 smartphones and Microsoft Band 2 watches to let drivers interact with their cars. Harman, a company that builds infotainment systems, will allow drivers to access Office 365 services (while parked or while the car is driving itself). IAV, a similar company, will let users stream Windows 10 Continuum from their smartphone directly to a vehicle's dashboard. Finally, Nissan's LEAF and Infiniti models in Europe will run their telematics system on Azure. "The common thread between these announcements is that Microsoft is pitching Azure as an enabling platform, tossing in analytics and focusing on its core productivity strengths. Aside from the Microsoft Band 2 partnership with Volvo, Microsoft is taking an enterprise behind-the-scenes approach to the auto industry."

13 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Nobody fucking wants this by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off, the entire idea of having a screen like that in any seat the driver can see is fucking idiotic and will cause crashes. But even ignoring that- I don't need my car to have a bunch of software that's always out of date and doesn't do what I want. If you're going to implement this, just let my phone screencast to it and take touch input from it.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Nobody fucking wants this by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry, when the centre console fails it'll only cost you $1k or more to get it replaced. And seeing as how every car company out there also makes the entire thing responsible for important things like the heater controls and signal chimes, this is gonna be a real fucking mess.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Nobody fucking wants this by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First off, the entire idea of having a screen like that in any seat the driver can see is fucking idiotic and will cause crashes.

      Automakers have really jumped the shark. Control surfaces used to be basically entirely tactile once one learned the basic layout, one could operate all of the usual features without looking at them. One could change the HVAC settings, the radio station, next/back on the CD, control the heated seats, set the cruise control, operate all of the accessories without looking at them once once was familiar enough with them. Now, with touchscreens, there are no longer unique-feeling buttons to become accustomed to. One has to take one's eyes off of the road in order to change music or to set the HVAC controls.

      This is completely insane. We wouldn't need so much lane-monitoring or collision-avoidance technology if people weren't forced to multitask on a computer in order to drive a car. Visual user interfaces beyond the passive feedback of speed, RPM, and characteristics of mechanical performance should be secondary, not primary. Primary should involve touch or speech to provide input and should use audio playback as the primary means of prompt or acknowledgement for all non-driving tasks that the car is capable of doing.

      My car plays a tone if I've left the keys in with the engine off or if I've left the lights on with the engine off when I open my door. My car plays a tone when the turn signal or the hazard lights operate. This particular car plays a tone if I've driven more than a quarter-mile with my turn signal operating. Some cars play tones if the speed exceeds a certain amount without seatbelts on, or if the gauges read too far out of tolerance, or if it activates an idiot-light, or if one tries to drive with a door not fully closed. I've even seen a few like a buddy's older Grand Cherokee that alerts the driver if it detects that an exterior lamp's bulb is not working. These indicators don't take a whole lot of the driver's attention while they're driving compared to having screens to read.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  2. Will it come with Clippy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It looks like you're trying to cause a 30-car pileup on the interstate. Would you like me to help?

  3. It'll be out of date by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I keep my cars a lot longer than my computers.

    My car was built in 2003, the year the Pentium 4 (single core, 4GB max addressable memory) was released and WinXP was mainstream, but only 2 years old, maybe my car would have had Win98 or WinME.

    What are the chances that these "smart cars" will be getting software updates and have upgradable hardware. (and even if they do have hardware upgrades, will it be affordable? I replaced my old factory stereo with a new USB+MP3+Bluetooth+speakerphone player for $150 - the OEM AM/FM/CD-only replacement costs $500)

    Manufacturers of "smart cars" should be required to publish full programming and interface specs so third party manufacturers can release alternative hardware.

    1. Re:It'll be out of date by sims+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hmm an 06 corvette needs a map disc that's juuuuust 179.99 + 3.95 S&H and they dropped support and now the last map update came out in 2013... Good luck finding those roads from 2014 & 2015....

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  4. Que the jokes by thoughtlover · · Score: 3, Funny

    I still get a chuckle about the time when Windows crashed and took down a battleship. If cars crashed like peoples' desktops, it'd look like a crash-up derby on the city streets...

    The joke used to be, "The day Microsoft starts making a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners."

    To be fair, Macintosh used to be an acronym for Most Applications Crash If Not The Operating System Hangs.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  5. Old Joke had to be repeated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Microsoft were GM

    Microsoft should make cars, GM should make software:
              At a recent computer expo, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated: "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon."
              In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating the following: "If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would be driving cars with the following characteristics:

    For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

    Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

    Occasionally, your car would die on the freeway for no reason, and you would accept this, restart, and drive on.

    Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart; in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

    Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT.' Then you would have to buy more seats.

    Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.

    The oil, water, temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car fault' warning light.

    New seats would force everyone to have the same back-end size.

    The airbag system would say 'Are you sure?' before going off.

    Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

    GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need them nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more.

    Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

    You'd press the 'Start' button to shut off the engine.

    1. Re:Old Joke had to be repeated by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      and if a car were designed like Linux?

      - The mechanic would tell you to "RTFM and fix it yourself!"

      - The brake pedal would be on the right and accelerator on the left.

      - You'd have dashboard buttons with names like "bt", "nrf", and "xs2".

      - You push "xs2" to see what happens, and the car accelerates forward without warning.

      - Only 15% of all seat covers would fit and you'd have to drive to New Mexico to find tires that fit.

      - Sometimes the brakes don't work, and TFM tells you to enter "stop -pd -V" in the command line as an alternative.

      - You accidentally type a lower case "-v" in the above command set, and the car goes faster instead of stopping.

      - You then smash into a brick wall at 70mph, and oddly the engine can still run.

      - You'd get beat up by Linux Car fans if you dare criticized it (or modded to hell, like I'm about to be).

      - The fans above usually take the body and dashboard off, and drive by pulling and splicing wires.

      - They actually drive better that way.

  6. that's gonna end well by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "What was the cause of the accident?"

    "Um, I was looking for the 'What-If Analysis' feature in the Excel ribbon, officer."

    "Data tab, sir."

    "Oh! Thank you!"

    "You're welcome, sir. Step out of the car, please."

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  7. Re: oh no. not that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's gonna get interesting when talking about installing drivers.

  8. nooooooooo...the Volt, only worse? by dAzED1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My wife has a Volt, and it's actually a pretty good car - great features, etc. Only major complaint is the microsoft part of it - stupid dash crashes frequently, does odd things, can't be made to not automatically play music from your phone when all you're bloody trying to do is plug it in to charge, etc. Seriously, can be listening to the radio already, plug in your phone, BOOM - randomly picks something from your phone and autoplays it. Because autoplay of removable media has worked out so well for Microsoft operating systems for so many years, I guess...

  9. OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE, IT'S A CAR! by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has got to be the most rediculous thing I've heard recently. As if people aren't stupid enough about playing with their phones while driving and getting distracted by that, now they want to put a full Windows OS in your car, too? Oh and by the way, the full-on dystopian 1984 future will then be here: you'll be spied on in your home, on your phone, at work, and in your car, all by Windows 10.

    FUCK THAT SHIT!

    Listen carefully, people: It's a car, not a lifestyle! It's transportation. You do not need Windows 10 in your gods-be-damned car; you need to forget all that, and put away your gods-be-damned phone, too, and PAY ATTENTION TO THE ROAD!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!