Slashdot Mirror


CBS, Others Sued For Copyright Infringement Over "Soft Kitty" In Big Bang Theory (arstechnica.com)

UnknowingFool writes: In the popular sitcom, The Big Bang Theory, Penny has sung "Soft Kitty" to the difficult Sheldon Cooper on numerous occasions as a lullaby and to comfort him. These scenes are such fan favorites that the song lyrics are sold on merchandise. The daughters of poet Edith Newlin are suing CBS, Warner Bros, and others claiming copyright infringement for her poem, "Warm Kitty".

The situation is not a simple copyright infringement case of Warner Brothers not obtaining any permission. The poem was created in the 1930s by Newlin, but she granted permission to Willis Music to be used as lyrics in their songbook Songs for the Nursery School. Warner Brothers obtained permission from Willis Music in 2007 for the song to be used in the show. Willis Music is also named as a defendant.

9 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Oh give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For fuck's sake, it's 2016 and a fucking child poem from 1930 is still copyright protected?

    Has the world gone fully retarded?

    1. Re:Oh give me a break by portwojc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the copyright for that last 95 years. So 2025 is when the copyright expires. We'll find out before that if that will enter the public domain since a certain mouse is set to expire in 2023.
       

    2. Re:Oh give me a break by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Statute may define copyrights to such lengths, but make no mistake, copyrights in mid industrialized countries are now effectively infinite.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. Additional comments by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The editors removed my last paragraph but my opinion is that CBS is probably legally fine because they used the derivative work (the song) as the song. Merchandise that show the lyrics are another matter and they may have to license the lyrics from Newlin's family.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  3. Re:A slashdot favorite! by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hardly. The show is about 4 fictional people. Those kind of people exist in real life, all very different. I've seen the equivalents of each of them throughout my years. It is only insulting if you identify with one. I'm going to guess you are like Sheldon?

    Or I suppose we should run sitcoms about a bunch of people sitting at the computer tapping on a keyboard. That will be far better. Does family guy insult your family? Does American dad?

  4. Fucking copyright vultures by sootman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm all for copyright, but set it back to 14 years, and no extensions. As far as I can tell, the current system allows for just two things:
    1) People can take from the public domain but never contribute
    2) People can profit off their dead ancestors' work.
    Neither is particularly good for the public at large.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  5. Re:A slashdot favorite! by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a TV show like that offends you, you're the one with a problem.

    You're taking offense because of your own personal issues, not because the show is 'insulting' you in some way.

    Considering a couple of the actors have actual geek cred and all you have is a slashdot account, I'm really not sure why you're getting pissed off instead of being thankful.

    Its not about the 'best' of a culture any more than Fresh Prince of Bel Air, Honeymooners, The Simpsons, Family Guy or any other TV show.

    ITS A FUCKING FICTIONAL COMEDY OF COURSE IT PICKS ON STEREO TYPES AND YOU JUST CONFIRMED ITS RIGHT TO DO SO, Sheldon.

    Seriously, you just gave the show even more cred by making these this stupid post.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  6. Re:GOOD! by Aaden42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A copyright statement in a 1930's vintage book may have become inaccurate in the intervening 86 years. If Wilis subsequently acquired full ownership, existing copies wouldn't be retroactively updated. Don't believe everything you read.

    All parties will have to show up in court with the text of whatever agreements they may have, and the sum total of those (as sussed out by 12 idiots) will determine who owns what and who owes whom.

    Either that or they settle out of court...

  7. Re:A slashdot favorite! by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It does actually. There's nerd chic now. People in the past who would never ever be called nerds are calling themselves that. The definitions of "nerd" in the past practically required them to be outcasts. I'd say a lot of the new nerds are really recovering nerds, able to fit in with mainstream culture better.