Slashdot Mirror


DoD Award To Recognize Drone Operators (securityweek.com)

wiredmikey writes: According to a Pentagon memo due out today, the US military will create a new way to recognize drone operators and other service members who contribute to America's fighting efforts from afar. The military is set to introduce a new "R" designation — known as a "device" — that can be attached to medals given to drone operators and other non-combat troops, such as cyber warriors who hack enemy networks. Former defense secretary Chuck Hagel nixed a proposed new combat medal for US troops who launch drone strikes or cyber attacks, after a torrent of criticism from veterans and lawmakers. Drone pilots have complained of low morale, long hours and of the psychological impacts stemming from killing people remotely.

144 comments

  1. Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For what?

    Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour? What's honourable about taking out an opponent from so far away that the risk to yourself is nonexistent?

    1. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

      YOU TRAITOR

    2. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the drones they mark the missions with little wedding cakes...

    3. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think a sniper does? There is nothing romantic about war. It's a barbaric consequence of diplomatic failures. Giving diplomats more elegant beating sticks was the most progressive thing humanity ever accomplished. Towards this purpose: free trade is a modern marvel.

    4. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I haven't suggested that I don't support military action where it's appropriate, I just don't think that doing what essentially amounts to hiding in a control room potentially many miles away from a target and letting what is basically a robot fight for you is doing anything that is particularly worthy of a medal.

    5. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Will SJWs cry a river of jaded tears if I refuse to make cakes for drones?

    6. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Snipers do, to an extent, put themselves in a line of fire... certainly they are close enough to be facing some personal risk, even if they are hidden. There is always a chance of discovery. Controlling a robot form afar to let it fight for you is not taking any kind of risk at all.

    7. Re:Recognize them??? by argumentsockpuppet · · Score: 2

      Thank you AC for saying what I didn't have the words to.

      Of course there is nuance. It's unavoidable to have to think about the problems genocidal dictators present for the world. Child soldiers, just general oppression and just generally terrible people in positions of power.

      War should never, ever be necessary, but sometimes it's less bad than the alternatives of inaction. Getting sane human beings to willingly kill other people is difficult and comes with consequences. Commenters here seem to be mostly uniform in the idea that trying to kill people without getting killed is cowardice, but it's just what war is about.

      War is about killing the other guy who also loves his country, has a family and is fighting for what he believes in. It is might makes right. And it sucks. It just sucks slightly less than the alternatives.

      Sometimes.

    8. Re:Recognize them??? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      For what?

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour? What's honourable about taking out an opponent from so far away that the risk to yourself is nonexistent?

      I guess politicians and presidential candidates can get medals too...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    9. Re:Recognize them??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour?

      I served in the military, and was awarded several medals. None of them were for bravery, heroism, or honour. Most of them were for being in the right place at the right time, such as the SASM and the NDSM. I also got a NAM, or "atta boy medal" for doing my job during a peacetime deployment.

      I don't see any reason drone operators shouldn't get a medal of their own. They are doing more to earn it than I did.

    10. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Obama's agenda to push the ideals of a new America on the world. Things like child murder, which used to be anathema, are now commonplace thanks to Planned Parenthood and officially sanctioned missiles lobbed at Pakistani schools, Yemeni weddings and such.
       
      Really, what else could it be?

    11. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ^This

      Not giving them medals is like not giving medals to missile or torpedo operators. They did their part in their way, working with everyone in the military for a common goal.

    12. Re: Recognize them??? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if maybe the risk of psychological harm is exceptionally high?

    13. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing it in spite of the psychological tolls it takes on you?

    14. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Effectiveness. It's not a hard concept for most people.

    15. Re:Recognize them??? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Some medals are just for service in an action whether they are cook or commando.

    16. Re:Recognize them??? by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, incorrect. While some awards (e.g. the Bronze Star, Medal of Honor) are given for unusual behavior (e.g. heroism), the military has the worlds' original badge system. There are badges for everything. For example, you can get the Silver Chevron if you've served in a war but stateside for at least six months (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...).

      So it's entirely reasonable to say "there's something distinctive about this group that merits its own device" -- most devices have nothing to do with heroism.

    17. Re:Recognize them??? by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't suggested that I don't support military action where it's appropriate, I just don't think that doing what essentially amounts to hiding in a control room potentially many miles away from a target and letting what is basically a robot fight for you is doing anything that is particularly worthy of a medal.

      Medals are for recognition - sure you might be hiding in a control room, but there are circumstances where what you did deserves recognition.

      Drones are often deployed in support roles - providing an eyes in the sky view for the ground team, for example. While out on patrol, the ground team gets pinned because of an unknown shooter. So while their lives are in danger, the drone operator flies around and then sports the shooter and relays their coordinates to the ground team so they know where to look and try to take it out.

      At the end of the mission, those guys on the ground are thankful for the drone operator to provide support - it could've ended very badly. Perhaps the guy in the air conditioned control room stateside should get a little recognition for that? Because I'm sure that team doesn't care about the drone operator's working conditions, but they're damn appreciative he was there.

    18. Re:Recognize them??? by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      Honorable? Fuck that. As a famous General once said (paraphrased), it's not about dying for your country, but making some other poor bastard die for his. However, it's not just pushing a button, is it? Unless you want to discount what's becoming a huge crisis in mental disorders from drone operation (as the article noted). Killing real, live people on a video screen, it turns out, has quite a bit of psychological baggage that we're beginning to understand. I'm actually relieved that we're finding this out because there's still a ton of people who want to turn people into 24/7 killing machines with no exceptions. It's a micromanaging Officer's wet dream: "Here's the target son, I'm pointing right at it, push the goddamned button or I'll have you court-martialled for insubordination, we don't have time to make a judgement call; Command is always right." At least many soldiers get to exercise some judgement, moral and ethical, whilst on the ground. "Sarge, there's a kid in the road" "Go Around him, give him some candy." vs "Captain, there's a kid in the road." "Fuck that kid, bombs away."

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    19. Re:Recognize them??? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Among other things, a sniper runs the risk of being taken out by a sniper fighting for the other side.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not in the business of relieving you of your sense of chivalry and fair combat. If I could kill terrorists with mind bullets or an Android tablet while sipping a mai tai on a beach I would happily do so.

      Drones help good guys kill bad guys in greater comfort. Greater comfort means more dead bad guys. If we make the good guys comfortable enough: eventually we will run out of bad guys and our politicians will have to make up new enemies to kill to keep the war economy going. This is the ultimate goal that we should all aspire to achieve.

      When we question if it is in good taste to take something that is given so freely: America's military is doing it's job well.

      What matters is this:
      Medals inspire young men to imitate success. To me, success is putting bad guys in a hole in the ground. If drone operators do that job well: I want every High School Senior to see them getting a medal so the next generation of drone operators will want to imitate that success.

      The ideal scenario for me is that killing bad guys is so low risk, it is seen as a conventional boring government job and the electorate loses its love affair with putting our men and women in uniform in harm's way.

      Voters say "Support Our Troops" like they wear their favorite athlete's jersey. They like the idea of a fair fight for the same reason they like watching NASCAR(because dog-fighting prison inmates is considered too vulgar and "uncivilized").

      My job will be complete when the words "war" and "murder" leave the same bad taste in your mouth and our killing machines are so good there's a big green button in the White House that instantly neutralizes all dissent from foreigners with no collateral damage to innocent civilians or structures. When we are so good at it: we never have to fight another war again then we can stop giving medals.

      Until then: I say make it shaped like an X-Box controller.

    21. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cheaper than paying overtime (ie. what they deserve).

    22. Re:Recognize them??? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For what?

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour? What's honourable about taking out an opponent from so far away that the risk to yourself is nonexistent?

      Which is exactly why their morale is so low - which in turn is what military medals are for...to raise the morale of someone doing a shit job well so that they keep doing it well.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    23. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Bronze Chicken would be appropriate for either longish or brave service and in case injured (like tennis elbow using joystick) Purple Chicken would be nice too :)

    24. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infinite war or else you're a traitor? WTF...

    25. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commenters here seem to be mostly uniform in the idea that trying to kill people without getting killed is cowardice, but it's just what war is about.

      Or...

      Cowardice is the opposite of bravery. It's the unwillingness to do what you have to do because of fear. I don't see that in these guys operating attack drones.

      I do see a certain emotional detachment and lack of empathy being a problem, because it takes you out of the mindset of "war" and turns it into a video game. Like Denzel Washington in Virtuosity where he shoots the sushi chef being held hostage to get the bad guy because "I knew he wasn't real."

      There was also an episode of M*A*S*H way back in the day, where they treated a bomber pilot who liked his job because he didn't have to put himself in close danger or see his victims. He just pressed a button and the bombs fell. Then they brought in some wounded children, maimed by bombs...

    26. Re:Recognize them??? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck should I support your troops? So we get to deal with even more refugees here?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Recognize them??? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It sure beats paying more. At least on the expenses level.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Recognize them??? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Maybe ISIS could give them medals, they're running a great recruitment campaign for them.

    29. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you 'earn' the right to be required to wear it, but you have to buy the ribbon/rank in most cases on your own, and when I got out they changed the 'all, some, or none,' reg to just 'all' so you can't just not wear the ones they don't actually give you now, you are required to go out and buy all the ribbons you have been awarded.

    30. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gay

    31. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And this is what we're reduced to.
      Now we have participation trophies in the military.
      Everyone's a winner.
      What's the point of these if everyone gets them?

    32. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I strongly suspect the comment was a tongue-in-cheek jibe at the overextension of "support our troops" being used as a thought-terminating cliché.

      Though, of course, they made the point in a much funnier way than I did.

    33. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does the use of drones mean if your a civilian contractor doing the 'routine' flying (as they say militiary personnel do the "shooting") you are now a ligitimate target or would you be classed an an illegal combatant due to lack of uniform?

    34. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of the world consider you the bad guys.

    35. Re:Recognize them??? by dave420 · · Score: 0

      He didn't put his own safety on the line to go help out his buddies, he just leant slightly on the joystick and told them what he saw. Fair enough if he leapt on a plane and flew over there, tracked down the shooter and beat him up, I'd agree with you entirely. A medal is supposed to be for actions performed, not for how warm and fuzzy you make others. Handing them out like tic tacs makes any medal worth less.

    36. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    37. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little confused. It's Obama's agenda? You're suggesting someone in Trump's party would be different in the matter?

    38. Re:Recognize them??? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      People get medals for service (e.g. good conduct), campaigns (but not necessarily in combat), being overseas and so on. I don't see why there shouldn't be a recognition of someone who contributes even from afar.

    39. Re:Recognize them??? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Depends where the guy is sitting. If its in some base in Afghanistan then yeah they're taking a risk even if it's a comparatively small one. But besides that, many medals don't involve personal risk as criteria.

    40. Re:Recognize them??? by Higaran · · Score: 1

      If you look at it, this is the natural evolution of military tech, I do not see this any difference to drone pilots and artillery. The main objective is to kill the enemy before he can even see you.

    41. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's the point of these if everyone gets them?

      The point is that it publicly shows what the person has done during their service. Not everyone gets the same medals because not everyone does the same things.

      But I get your point. Modern military medals are basically the same as achievements in video games.

    42. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when we stop defending before they are done attacking? Hmmm?

      WTF indeed.

    43. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You goddamned savage!

      Playstation controllers are obviously the better choice.

    44. Re:Recognize them??? by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

      Please, please tell me you're being a brat here. I'm a Veteran, an Infantryman and think that any 'medal' to a drone pilot is ridiculous; I was also a contractor with TASK FORCE ODIN-A and handing out medals for sitting on your ass in an ARST staring at a monitor for 12 hour shifts is insanely hilarious. Check, please!

    45. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, genius, we won't look for that part of the world to give our guys medals then.

    46. Re:Recognize them??? by dwillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      His safety is not a criteria. He was there dong the job as needed. The pilot of the AC130 that could have been circling overhead instead of the drone would get an award for flying in circles while others aimed the guns and fired all at no more risk than any other flight. Further the AC130 pilot is just flying in circles over a spot, the Drone pilot is not only guiding the drone but targeting living human beings and blowing them up. Something that is psychologically damaging to do day in and day out, knowing it's not just a video game but real humans whose lives are being violently terminated.

      The actions performed that shape and affect the battlefield are what matter, no matter how they are performed. The intel analyst sitting on a secure base that connects the dots revealing the enemy plans in time for the combat troops to thwart them gets rewarded, so should the drone pilot. There are various levels of awards. Yes some do or at least should involve some personal risk. But there are instances for just about every award but the CHM where it is awarded without direct combat involvement.

      Napoleon was not wrong when he declared, "give me enough ribbon and I can conquer the world." Recognition is a key component in morale and promoting future efforts to excel. I agree that they should not be handed out like tic tacs, and they should never be rank based (sadly some units have determined combat medals based on ranks) but they do in fact need to be handed out for all aspects of the war fighting effort.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    47. Re:Recognize them??? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well what is honorable about war anyway? Every war I ever looked at turned out to be based on money and lies anyway. Its always been the people in power conning the poor into fighting for them.

      The reason they tell you war is honorable is just the marketing of it. It never was.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    48. Re:Recognize them??? by shawn2772 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And this is what we're reduced to. Now we have participation trophies in the military. Everyone's a winner. What's the point of these if everyone gets them?

      There are different medals for different things, and you'd better believe that members of the military look at, say, a Silver Star or a Distinguished Service Medal very differently from an achievement medal. Medals of lower value do still have value. The offer a chance for recognition in front of your peers, in a persistent way (since you wear ribbons or medals on some of your uniforms), they provide a persistent proof of competence and capability in your personnel file (helpful for determining promotions), and they document important and meaningful aspects of your career, such as that you were in an active combat theater with its concomitant risks, even if you didn't actually get injured or do anything heroic. To an experienced service member, a glance at another person's "fruit salad" tells you a lot about who they are and what they've done, not merely by the number of commendations but by their type.

    49. Re:Recognize them??? by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      It sure beats paying more. At least on the expenses level.

      Base pay is associated with rank, which is a separate thing. Earning important medals will definitely improve your chances of promotion which will get you more money but by design the two are separate, and not for fiscal reasons.

    50. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some of those matter quite a bit on what version of it. For instance, someone could earn a Bronze Star simply by serving in a combat zone despite never leaving the FOB, but you can only earn a Bronze Star with a "V" device for valor by doing something pretty exceptional. A regular Bronze Star is just a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) given for service in a combat zone.

    51. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't value my contribution, then we can stop doing it and let your ass hang out to dry.

    52. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm an RPA pilot, making about $160K and I'm not staying to 20. The Air Force doesn't value me or what I do, so fuck them.

    53. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess we should abandon naval ships that can shoot from miles away, artillery, cruise missiles, ICBMs and go back to fighting clad in plate mail on horseback? Eventually there will be no humans on the ground (on our side anyway). Just flying drones and walking drones.

    54. Re:Recognize them??? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why their morale is so low - which in turn is what military medals are for...to raise the morale of someone doing a shit job well so that they keep doing it well.

      Well, there's some fucked logic for you.

      Can't believe you or anyone else feels that morale is low because some Airman isn't wearing yet another pretty ribbon on a uniform they rarely even wear to work.

      PTSD isn't caused by medal deficiency. Or a lack of fucking awards and atta-boy ceremonies. Not sure when people are going to wake up to that fact, but I'm not surprised the Military has taken the cheapest route to "fix" morale.

    55. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snipers do, to an extent, put themselves in a line of fire...

      They certainly do, when the other side has snipers too. Or anti-sniper troops.

      War always works both ways. Drone operators put themselves at risk when:
      * the enemy is equally capable of sending drones into your home territory
      * the enemy has anti-drone forces - such as spies taking out operators or terrorists attacking control centers.
      At the moment, none of this happens. But someday, armed drones will be as ubiquitous as grenade launchers - any interested part will have them.

      Medals are for recognizing achievements. Putting yourself at risk for your country is one important kind of achievement for the military, but not the only kind. An operator doing much better than the other operators may also deserve recognition. Liberating prisoners by killing their guards is still useful, even if done by drone. And so on.

    56. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      He didn't put his own safety on the line to go help out his buddies, he just leant slightly on the joystick and told them what he saw.

      There is all manner of tit candy to be handed out, and it isn't all for the ground or forward troops.

      Your you have to be in imminent danger of death or GTFO outlook is a little insulting to the 80 percent of soldiers who aren't there, but for whom those on the front line wouldn't be able to do there job.

      Someone keeps those tanks and planes and ships running, and they take their jobs very seriously, and the people in those tanks and planes and ships are thankful they do.

      And just to piss ya off, here is some of that tit candy. Make certain you scroll through it so as to see it isn't all for combat.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    57. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right. Trump is a moderate. You'll have to elect Ted Cruz, or Huckabee to get real change from Obama.

    58. Re:Recognize them??? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Drones are often deployed in support roles

      Is that what bombing weddings is being called now? Support roles, like supporting paid informant's careeers of lies maybe.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    59. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Please, please tell me you're being a brat here. I'm a Veteran, an Infantryman and think that any 'medal' to a drone pilot is ridiculous;

      Go down through the list and tell us which awards and medals shouldn't be handed out:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Some will probably really get you pissed, like the efficiency awards or the good behavior awards, professional development medals.

      Some are just recognition medals, like the Coast Guard person of the year medal.

      Tit candy. It's part of the culture, and used as a morale and team booster. I'm surprised that someone who served is apparently against that.

      Certainly in Pop culture, there is the impression that there isn't much other than the Medal of Honor, Bronze Star and Purple Heart. There is so much more, and a drone pilot recognition medal isn't any less applicable than any of the others.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    60. Re:Recognize them??? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Most military people who work with drones don't do so by choice. They are assigned to a unit and they have very little, if any (generally none but sometimes they have some) say over what that unit does. If it's a ground unit in place in a combat zone, they get shot at. If it's a drone unit they don't. It doesn't make their work any less valuable to the military and any less worthy of recognition. Would you want to be overlooked for promotions because of an assignment you had no control over? Medals do have impact on your promotability in the military, especially as an officer.

      This answers a big problem within the military of how "combat" roles are defined for these kinds of things and will give a lot of people recognition for a job well done that they weren't receiving before because of internal politics and similar bullshit.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    61. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour?

      I served in the military, and was awarded several medals. None of them were for bravery, heroism, or honour.

      Exactly. What I find odd is the people who have claimed military service, yet seem to think that there are only 4 medals. Medals are part of the culture, and as such, a rather nice part of the culture.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Now we have participation trophies in the military.

      Everyone's a winner.

      What's the point of these if everyone gets them?

      Umm, you need to check out the medals that are given out. Your lament about participation trophies has been the case for a long long time. You are there, you do your job, you'll have some tit candy.

      Everyone's a winner, and you're a whiner.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    63. Re: Recognize them??? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You are aware that military pay is public right? Your claim is utter bullshit. As an O-4 (the highest rank someone is likely to be sitting in the seat as their primary duty) with >10 years in service, with BAH for Las Vegas (near one of the AF main drone bases) & BAS you're only going to be making ~ $106K.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    64. Re: Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I wonder if maybe the risk of psychological harm is exceptionally high?

      I suspect, fairly high. While the work takes on a video game aspect, the brain still knows at some level that you are killing people, and it gets stored away.

      Something similar might be how soldiers have been drilled in hand to hand combat with some very effective killing moves. It's been repeated with other soldiers (without that final kill move) so many times that it becomes muscle memory, and reflexive. So the thought that I've just killed someone gets buried, only to come out later.

      I've seen the public videos of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      People who wouldn't find that a little disturbing are probably pretty rare

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    65. Re:Recognize them??? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I bet the good conduct medal really pisses 'em off. Hell, if ya gotta couple of pizza boxes on your chest some of us know that you got 'em just for being able to shoot straight but we appreciate that. It's not like every medal is the Medal of Honor. (One pizza box is bigger than the other one.) Of course, those pizza boxes are really badges but I suspect that the person complaining doesn't actually know the difference.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    66. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I don't suggest that the military not practice such things, I just suggested that I don't believe that such things are worthy of being decorated. Why are so many people construing my words as suggesting that I don't support any military action at all?

    67. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then show us how civilized you are by boycotting our products.

      From where I'm sitting: it looks like our customers love "Fanta" and therefore(I assume): dead terrorists.

    68. Re:Recognize them??? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at how much an award can raise morale. Also, you'd probably bitch if they spent more money. In fact, I'm pretty sure I've seen you bitching about the military's budget in the past.

      (I too think we spend too much. We should just stop being the World Police or start charging other countries to do it for them.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    69. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False, you always have the choice. And sometimes you don't have the choice. For example National Guard who served in support of the 2002 winter Olympics received a ribbon for that service. If that ribbon was lost or becomes too dirty to wear there is no replacement.

    70. Re:Recognize them??? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      That depends a lot on whether you believe in following both international and US law. Committing what is in fact assassinations on foreign soil is not what I'd call worthy of a medal. These drone ops, and their commanding officers, should all be court-martialed.

      As for their counterparts over at CIA, they should be shipped to Daesh headquarters to be utilized as that bunch of crazies see fit.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    71. Re:Recognize them??? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      It depends on what kind of medals we're talking about. If it's recognition type stuff like a Navy Achievement Medal, then fine, no problem. If they're talking about a Silver Star, then no, not ok.

    72. Re:Recognize them??? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      Hey, dipshit:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I highly doubt you are a veteran if you weren't aware that medals are given out in the military just for not getting in trouble on base during peacetime.

    73. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      To me, success is putting bad guys in a hole in the ground

      In the case of combatting terrorism, putting bad guys in a hole in the ground who would otherwise kill hundreds or thousands of other innocent people is only the very bare *MINIMUM* standard of success... and while that is still a very positive goal, I do not think that it, by itself, should warrant being decorated. Being awarded a medal should, in my view, also involve doing something where the person has taken on at least some kind of personal risk, or at the very least having successfully completed a task or assignment that would push someone to the very limits of what might be ordinarily expected for somebody.

      Awarding a medal to somebody who has taken no great risks or who has not completed any grand challenges is treating adults like children, who get awarded a gold star for simply doing what has been expected of them, finishing all of their household chores, etc... I don't knock the approach for children, because it really can motivate them, I just don't think it's appropriate for adults, and I think it diminishes the significance of getting a medal in the first place.

      On a much lighter note...

      Until then: I say make it shaped like an X-Box controller.

      Thank you.... this made me laugh.

    74. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Sure, but why should just doing your job be deserving of a medal?

    75. Re:Recognize them??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at how much an award can raise morale.

      So we are going to treat our soldiers like children now? Oh, you did your job! Good for you, here's a gold star!

      At best it diminished the significance of being worthy of receiving a medal in the first place if they are going to give medals to people who don't do anything but the minimum that was expected of them.

    76. Re:Recognize them??? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      snipers; bombers; naval ship bombardment of shores.

      Medals are for a large number of things.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    77. Re:Recognize them??? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      Obama was president in 1973 when Roe V. Wade was decided??? Interesting! I was not aware.

      Please hang yourself.

    78. Re:Recognize them??? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      A lot of the world? Hmmm. No doubt some of the world. But, how do you define, a lot of the world and where do you get your statistic? Or are you just as full of BS as you are a coward?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    79. Re:Recognize them??? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour?

      No, some of them are for more mundane things like "good conduct" or "achievement" or "meritorious service". I'd expect a drone medal to be in the latter categories; it's not going to be equivalent to a Silver Star.

      What's honourable about taking out an opponent from so far away that the risk to yourself is nonexistent?

      Yeah, that argument has been going on since archers were introduced. But the point of a war is to win, not to be a fair fight.

    80. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick a "T" on their insignia. It works for Tech Sargent with three stripes

    81. Re:Recognize them??? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      They are children. We've always sent the kids off to war. You quite literally get a Good Conduct Medal for just keeping your shit squared away and not pissing anyone off. You get awards for being able to fire your weapon accurately - I have two. No, they don't all mean a fuck of a lot but they're much the same as insignia to those who know how to read them. You're, for your own reasons, placing far more stock in them than is needed. I've never counted but I suspect that there's a whole bunch that haven't a damned thing to do with heroics at all.

      At any rate, they are children. We're still sending our kids off to wars that we, the adults, cause. It's not the old that are out there on the front lines - until things get really bad. It's the young, the people who may even still be growing in height and kids who haven't even finished their brain development. It's far easier to condition a still developing brain than it is to work on one that's older. If you don't like that then go take a kid's place for them if you're still young enough to get in. Otherwise, you missed the chance to do what you can to help work on the problems you see.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    82. Re:Recognize them??? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      For what?

      Aren't military medals supposed to be for noble things like bravery, heroism, or honour? What's honourable about taking out an opponent from so far away that the risk to yourself is nonexistent?

      Which is exactly why their morale is so low - which in turn is what military medals are for...to raise the morale of someone doing a shit job well so that they keep doing it well.

      I would say you have a poor understanding of morale then. Morale is not simply how "good" or "happy" everybody feels. Morale is also about having everyone working towards the same goal. A group of people with excellent morale believe that they are the best XYZ in the world, that they do an excellent job, and that nobody can beat them at it. The trick is that when you start to believe that, you want to defend those beliefs by taking action to ensure that the group truly is what you believe it to be. So performance and morale are linked quite closely.

      The problem with the drone program is that the individuals operating the drones are really working against the best interests of the United States, and some of them know that. Every innocent person killed has a brother, father, son, uncle, cousin etc that now hates the USA and wants revenge. It's like running over dandelions with a lawnmower. Yes, the dandelion is gone, but the seeds get spewed everywhere. You can get rid of dandelions with a lawnmower. It is the wrong tool. A lot of drone operators seem to realize that they aren't helping the situation, and are only making it worse in many cases. That is what is causing their low morale. A medal isn't going to do anything to fix that. If anything, it will lower morale further.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    83. Re:Recognize them??? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Actually, incorrect. While some awards (e.g. the Bronze Star, Medal of Honor) are given for unusual behavior (e.g. heroism), the military has the worlds' original badge system. There are badges for everything.

      This is true as long as you're speaking about the US military. It seems like you guys get 9 medals before even completing basic. The same cannot be said for other countries. Most Commonwealth nations are much more stingy with medals - if you end up with 5 or 6 in your whole career, you've done well.

    84. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am absolutely not a fan of drone attacks, but that's a small portion of what the military uses them for.

    85. Re:Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but why should just doing your job be deserving of a medal?

      You are several hundred years too late asking this question. The tradition is well established.

      I'm not saying it isn't worth discussing, but it is a different discussion.

    86. Re:Recognize them??? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      He didn't put his own safety on the line to go help out his buddies, he just leant slightly on the joystick and told them what he saw.

      Some operators actually launch missiles at people whom they've been observing for a while - it's not all just recon work.

      A medal is supposed to be for actions performed, not for how warm and fuzzy you make others. Handing them out like tic tacs makes any medal worth less.

      It turns out that, (just as with first responders such as paramedics), PTSD is common among drone operators. I have no opinion on whether the operators deserve medals - I'm not a military kind of guy, and I think we should be working harder on ways to stop wars altogether. But I don't think it's either fair or practical to ignore or minimize the psychological trauma suffered by those members of the military who, in 'service to their country', spy on people from afar and then kill them with the press of a button. Those who participate directly in killing at the behest of their government deserve at least some recognition of the lifelong emotional damage they're often subjected to.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    87. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another problem with drones is that the US only counts the accidental kills of women and children in the 'wrong' count. So if the guy who's about to cure cancer is walking down a middle Eastern main Street and a drone strike kills him, that's OK because he could have been an enemy because he's male. That's not a policy, its a weak ass excuse, and the kind of approach that risks polarising and creating new enemy combatants.

    88. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would a show like m*a*s*h get made today? The US is so dangerously polarised by media these days I suspect it would face the equivalent of McCarthyistic anti American attacks. Unless it was on a paid cable service, where the filter of cost means probably more educated customers.

    89. Re:Recognize them??? by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read a word he said? Giving medals to everyone DILUTES the honour of getting one where you BRAVELY RISKED YOUR OWN LIFE. I consider your post an insult to real war veterans.

    90. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read a word he said? Giving medals to everyone DILUTES the honour of getting one where you BRAVELY RISKED YOUR OWN LIFE. I consider your post an insult to real war veterans.

      I read everything. I respect all our soldiers, not just the ones on the front line.

      And quite frankly - if you don't want anyone but front liners to get awards, take it up with the armed services, they agree with me, not you.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    91. Re:Recognize them??? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "What do you think a sniper does?"

      I think it would be more interesting to hear what you think a sniper does, because if you are equating the dangers faced by a drone operator and those faced by a sniper, you have no concept of the dangers involved (or not) in at least one of those categories.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    92. Re:Recognize them??? by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      It's really quite simple, the soldiers on the front line are brave. The ones at desks aren't. They may be just as useful, but they don't deserve the same recognition. A postman is as useful as a fireman, but guess which one should win medals?

    93. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's really quite simple, the soldiers on the front line are brave. The ones at desks aren't. They may be just as useful, but they don't deserve the same recognition. A postman is as useful as a fireman, but guess which one should win medals?

      As I said - take it up with the services. I agree with them, you don't. That makes it your problem, not mine.

      So tell me how you make out - a simple problem like that, they'll take your advice, maybe even retroactively take medals away form the undeserving.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    94. Re:Recognize them??? by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't make it my problem, it makes it that you're wrong and so are they and I'm laughing at your stupidity right now. Your second sentence needs remedial work, go back to school.

    95. Re:Recognize them??? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't make it my problem, it makes it that you're wrong and so are they and I'm laughing at your stupidity right now. Your second sentence needs remedial work, go back to school.

      Blah blah blah, Sorry, pal. I'm just fine with the US military and their system. You are not. You lose, no matter wht you think. You see, all military units do this sort of thing, award medals and rewards. It isn't new, and it's universal.

      And my dear chachalaca - you don't get to make the rules. You just sit there with your weird and completely off ideas, and let the rest of us lead the way.

      Because when you are the only one right, and the rest of the entire world is wrong - it ain't the world - its you.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    96. Re:Recognize them??? by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, where we respect bravery. We look down on you children over there that left home and made a pretend country.

    97. Re:Recognize them??? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at how much an award can raise morale.

      So we are going to treat our soldiers like children now? Oh, you did your job! Good for you, here's a gold star!

      You're either not a parent or haven't served in our Military. I can speak to both with experience and confidence. They are children.

      At best it diminished the significance of being worthy of receiving a medal in the first place if they are going to give medals to people who don't do anything but the minimum that was expected of them.

      (looks over all the pathetic reasons we issue awards and ribbons today)

      Yup, bit too fucking late for that.

    98. Re: Recognize them??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Would a show like m*a*s*h get made today?

      M*A*S*H was made on the heels of the sixties, so even though it was set in the '50s, it had hippie dippy influence.

      Nowadays, in the wake of post-modernist feminist political correctness, they'd make Hawkeye and Blake women, Trapper John black and the nurses all male.

  2. The Yellowbelly Medal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are hiding in holes. Are not risking their lives. Do not deserve to be called soldiers.

    1. Re:The Yellowbelly Medal by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like, say, Generals?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. "psychological impacts" by firewrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the psychological impacts stemming from killing people remotely

    Also called conscience, but no worries... a little piece of decorative metal will make it so worth it!

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    1. Re:"psychological impacts" by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Yes the Drone papers give some insight into that aspect https://theintercept.com/drone...
      The conscience side is been worked on too. Expect a lot of new very well funded Hollywood movies, TV series, comics, books and other web 2.0 media to show a nice new friendly side to the contractor remote military industrial complex.
      With the Smith–Mundt Act been reworked to allow domestic propaganda Smith–Mundt Act a flood of domestic good news stories can be gov funded to win hearts and minds about the use of drones soon.
      "'Anti-Propaganda' Ban Repealed, Freeing State Dept. To Direct Its Broadcasting Arm At American Citizens" (2013/07/15)
      https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:"psychological impacts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that and the fact that there is one less barbarian that won't be around to sodomize 9 year old girls and 80 year old women, help chop the heads off of dozens of innocent people at a time, torture others to death with electric drills and blowtorches, burn others alive in cages, and train suicide bombers to go ride your bus. Or are you OK with that stuff?

    3. Re:"psychological impacts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is that so different from blowing up 9 year old girls and 80 year old women with razor sharp shrapnel from a killing robot ? oh wait, those were "accidental".
      dead is dead. at least the sodomized victims are alive.
      hypocrisy is NOT ok regardless of the side youre on.

    4. Re:"psychological impacts" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Was it our bomb or their bomb that killed them?"
      "Doesn't matter."
      "Of course it does!"
      "Not to them"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:"psychological impacts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least the sodomized victims are alive.

      Not necessarily. A warzone is perfect for the snuff/maiming fetishists.

  4. Congressional medals for vidya games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to win is not to play.

  5. Points! by fred911 · · Score: 1

    No metals, just points for targets and efficiency.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Points! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs points when medals are real world achievements? /raprapraprap Helloooo? Mcfly?

  6. a unique honor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hereby decree that drone operators shall be given honorary PTSD.

  7. No. by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just fucking NO!

    Many in my family have received medals, Gold, Bronze, Silver Stars to name those I remember clearly, there where others, over the courses of their military careers. In each case it was because they put there lives on the line for their country. On more than one occasion my father almost didn't come back from his combat postings. When I was a child he showed me each medal and told me the story of why it was given to him, and the names of the people who didn't come back from those missions. Giving a combat medal to someone who hasn't actually faced the real possibility of death in combat just feels like the DoD is spitting in the face of every service person who ever put they're lives on the line for their country.

    How the fuck does a joystick jocky sitting in a cozy air conditioned room and going home to a safe warm bed in the USA qualify for a combat medal??

    How about they start issuing medals to gamers who play Call of Duty while there at it? It as about the same risk level.

    I acknowledge that the drone pilots do face certain job related stress factors but if they want to just say "I can't take it" and walk away in the middle of a mission they can do it if the want to. You don't get that option in a real battle field.

    If the DoD wants to give the drone pilots and other non combat personnel recognition then print out some nice looking frame-able certificate, give them some time off and call it done, but do not call it a "combat medal"

    1. Re:No. by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because you have a history of some people in your family getting medals for doing some real combat doesn't change the fact that medals are given out for a wide variety of reasons, not all of them to do with combat, and in some cases given out without even being at war, or for just being deployed in the correct country not necessarily doing any combat.

    2. Re:No. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      How the fuck does a joystick jocky sitting in a cozy air conditioned room and going home to a safe warm bed in the USA qualify for a combat medal??

      I served in armed forces (not American) and honestly... Helping save lives of your fellow soldiers on the ground seems like a good reason to me.

      How about they start issuing medals to gamers who play Call of Duty while there at it?

      Done.

      I acknowledge that the drone pilots do face certain job related stress factors but if they want to just say "I can't take it" and walk away in the middle of a mission they can do it if the want to. You don't get that option in a real battle field.

      It happens that people suddenly refuse to fight on a real battle field, despite the fact they're in a situation they'll get killed. If someone fails to perform their duty, they can get sent to a military prison and honestly; military prison is not desirable (you're forced to exercise constantly, non-stop). The idea people are walking out either means that they are incredibly stupid (you wouldn't want these people in the forces) or literally having some other psychological issues (which, may be detrimental anyway to the battlefield).

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:No. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      "a joystick jocky sitting in a cozy air conditioned room and going home to a safe warm bed in the USA "

      Back in 2009 I met a drone operator on leave from Iraq while travelling in Eastern Europe. He was on his third redeployment. He was stationed on-base in Iraq and was happy. At that time, weaponizing drones was a rumour. According to the media, they were surveillance devices. I would have *loved* to ask him all kinds of questions about his job, but that would be very, very, rude. I bought him a beer and we hung out meeting nice girls instead.

      What he did tell me was that he was thankful that although he was redeployed so many times, he shared a double room with another operator and admitted there were much harder jobs he was glad he wasn't doing.

      Does anyone *know* that these guys are operating from the U.S.? You would think that the expertise is slim and training scarce. It would be complex to train people on new equipment, innovations, details of maintenance, to collaborate with other teams, etc. without being on-site. In IT, we do teleconferencing because it's cheap, but I don't think the cost of flying drone operators to some safe base where the drones *are* is expensive... they're all earning the same pay and have the same obligations. There would be big advantages to being on-site.

      Any drone operators want to comment?

    4. Re:No. by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      Many in my family have received medals, Gold, Bronze, Silver Stars to name those I remember clearly, there where others, over the courses of their military careers. In each case it was because they put there lives on the line for their country.

      They also got other medals for other things. Ask them. Not all medals are about valor.

    5. Re:No. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Does anyone *know* that these guys are operating from the U.S.?

      Just based on available communication channels and lag times, I would assume that any real-time combat drones would need to be closer to the action. Automated drones that just have a camera feed and self-navigate via GPS could probably have operators stationed stateside but they aren't really being piloting at that point. To actually pilot a drone, not crash into obstacles, and hit moving targets is going to require lag times similar to what video games require and satellite and/or transcontinental cables are not going to be up to par.

    6. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving a combat medal to someone who hasn't actually faced the real possibility of death in combat just feels like the DoD is spitting in the face of every service person who ever put they're lives on the line for their country.

      I guess that is why they'll have the 'R' for remote on their medals. So those who know military medals will know; He took part in something important - but at no risk to himself. Clearly, a medal not tainted by the R will be seen as something different indeed.

       

      How the fuck does a joystick jocky sitting in a cozy air conditioned room and going home to a safe warm bed in the USA qualify for a combat medal??

      How can a general get a medal for sitting in an office, making plans on paper maps? How can airmen get medals for dropping stuff on low-tech enemies that can't hit planes at all?

      Drones make a difference for land war too. Consider advancing along a road through enemy territory - where drone operators has mapped the various ambushes waiting for you - and also help out by attacking them before you get there.

      How about they start issuing medals to gamers who play Call of Duty while there at it? It as about the same risk level.
       

      Same risk level, but a different importance level. When you're out in the field and get drone support, it had better be good & useful support. If the operators can be motivated to do better work by receiving little pieces of metal - so be it. You don't want operators 'sleeping on the job' because success or failure doesn't matter to them. You want ace operators who puts the eyes in the sky to good use, and who hit important targets on the first try. Because that makes life easier (and perhaps longer) for those risking it.

      I acknowledge that the drone pilots do face certain job related stress factors but if they want to just say "I can't take it" and walk away in the middle of a mission they can do it if the want to. You don't get that option in a real battle field.

      Deserting from a (declared) war has the same punishment for all military personnel. A drone pilot can't walk away, although he can underperform/miss on purpose without worry.

    7. Re:No. by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      There are units in the US piloting drones overseas. Full combat missions. What you think you know about lag times (with respect to what they are and what is realistically achievable) is inaccurate.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    8. Re: No. by torstenvl · · Score: 2

      I think you misread the article. They are specifically NOT combat awards. They will have an R device, not a V device (for valor).

      By the way, I think your post was unnecessarily inflammatory. Drone operators are military members. They still deploy when and where they're told. They still show up on terrorist target lists for stateside attacks. Calling them "joystick jockeys" and comparing them to Call of Duty gamers is petulant. They've done more to risk their lives for the country than most.

    9. Re:No. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Those people you mention that got those medals? Look at the rest of them instead of the pretty ones. You literally get one for keeping yourself squared away and not doing stupid shit - it's called the Good Conduct Medal. If they have those others that you mention, chances are pretty good that they have at least that one and a number of badges.

      Maybe you should ask those family members for a little more history or look at more then the pretty medals and learn what they actually mean.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:No. by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Just a note, the first weaponized drone was tested and validated for deployment in late 2000. We had armed drones in wide use well before 2009.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  8. Slight edit. by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Just remembered the there was no "Gold Star" medal for the US Army. You get one of those if your in the family of a soldier who died in the line of duty. My dad told me about them and I had friends who wore them.

    1. Re:Slight edit. by dwillden · · Score: 1

      You don't wear the gold star. Some mothers will wear a decorative Pin, no other family member receives or wears a Gold star. It's a banner you hang. Just as the blue star banners are hung to show family members currently in the service.

      And otherwise you are wrong. There are many medals, and many ways to earn those medals. Not all require direct personal combat or extreme danger. Such makes getting such medals far easier, but such medals can also be earned for non-combat roles. For combat awards a V device (for Valor) will be added, but again you don't have to be down in the mud to earn the V device. Pilots earn it all the time, even when casually dropping bombs from well above the AA capabilities of the enemy.

      How does the Joystick jockey qualify for combat? By flying his/her drone into combat and killing fellow humans. Do it accurately and in a timely manner, saving the lives of troops on the ground and it becomes worthy of a V device. And every one of those grunts on the ground will be lining up to shake his hand in thanks if they could. These drone pilots save the lives of our troops all the time. They deserve the recognition a little ribbon and a piece of brass will give them.

      SFC (Ret)

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  9. Yes!! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    Drone pilots have complained of low morale, long hours and of the psychological impacts stemming from killing people remotely.

    Yes, they should be required to be up close and personal before qualifying for medal. I'd say 72hrs straight hours in the field without sleep and personally watching the life fade out of their opponents eyes as they plunge their dagger deep into them should be the minimum for any medal to be earned.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Yes!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, how about only rewarding medals for service within our borders. Defending yourself in your home is honorable, going somewhere else and cause trouble isn't.

    2. Re:Yes!! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Nope. If you don't experience the life draining out of your enemy's body there is no honor. Killing from a distance is cowardice.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  10. can't celibrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... low morale, long hours and of the psychological impacts stemming from killing people remotely.

    If one can't celebrate risk-free mass murder, in the name of patriotism and duty, with a couple of medals, then the job isn't worthwhile. It makes the medals handed out for disobeying orders and mass murdering unarmed men and women, seem cheap and hypocritical.

  11. A more appropriate form of recognition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You have to make the reward fit the audience you're dealing with. They have to understand and value what they get.

    20 years ago I would have said what you need is a high score board. But today, well, probably giving them some purple uniform pieces with over-the-top shoulder parts would be more fitting.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Ultimate REMF by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

    These people are the ultimate REMF.
    They are obviously *waay* to the rear and - I suppose owing to faulty or outdated intelligence - quite a few of their targets turned out to be families. Some will have been families of terrorists, others not even that. From what I read, drone attacks have a similar effect in radicalising people in the surrounding areas as suicide bombers do. That includes the 911 crew.

    Do REMFs normally get medals above and beyond those for "I was involved in that campaign"?

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  13. Military Medals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most civilians have no idea what military medals are for. The military has many different kinds of medals:

    From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Today military decorations include:
            Orders of Chivalry;
            Bravery awards, in the form of a cross, star or medal on a ribbon;
            Distinguished service awards, in the form of a cross, star or medal on a ribbon;
            Campaign medals worn on a ribbon;
            Service medals worn on a ribbon;
            Awards for entire units, in the form of Battle honours, Campaign streamers, Fourragères, or unit citations.

    I have been awarded many medals for distinguished service (Meritorious Service Medal, Commendation Medal, Humanitarian Service Medal, etc) that are not combat related. Spending weeks helping clean up after a natural disaster such as a hurricane or flood is not the same as fighting in combat, but the Humanitarian Service Medal is awarded to those that help in areas that need additional manpower to get people back to livable conditions.

    If you RTFA you would see that DoD *rejected* the idea of a new medal and instead proposed adding two new devices (pins worn on a medal) that would denote either C for combat or R for remote. If a soldier was awarded any of the existing medals, they could add the C-device or the R-device onto it to show how the medal was earned. No new medals, just a new device to show Remote participation.

  14. How about plastic medals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they deserve the Plastic Star for heroically steering a drone past (into?) enemy fire?

    There are awards for serving in a war, albeit in a non-combat role - they can have those (as someone else said - even the cooks and motor pool guys get those medals).

    1. Re:How about plastic medals? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It's funny that you say that. I ended up transferring to be a chaser/escort but my MOS 3531 and that was the only time I saw combat. (You might want to search to find out what that MOS is.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  15. Maybe.. by wbr1 · · Score: 1
    We should do steam style achievements.

    Achievement unlocked, "Bloody Mess: Destroy a house of worship with at least a 2:1 combatant:civilian ratio"

    Oh and hats, we should have hats....

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  16. Yet the real issue here....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the classic DoD response. Have a problem w/ morale, working our guys relentlessly. "Well cheer up Sgt. Jones add this new 'R' to that medal on your chest, instantly you will have more self esteem, & be all the rage w/ the ladies, or maybe even the guys (wink)." How many engineers in here recognize the 'receive plastic thingy if you are successful, hundreds to thousands die if you screw up," paradigm?????

    1. Re:Yet the real issue here....... by dwillden · · Score: 1

      It's as old as military service. Soldiers will do amazing things with just a little recognition. It long predates the DOD. Napoleon supposedly said "Give me enough ribbon and I can conquer the world!"

      Leaders can't just give more pay or benefits, but they can give awards as recognition and those awards do help towards promotions and thus more pay.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  17. I hope they give medals to the cafeteria staff. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    That cup of coffee kept that marine alert long enough to dodge that IED!

  18. Bonus by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Entitles the bearer to a half-off discount on La-Z-Boy purchases for the rest of their lives.

  19. Go digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could outsource it to Microsoft and tie it in to their XBox accounts!

  20. try reading the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love Slashdot, did any of you read the article?

    A device, they are not making a medal, they are making a device to put on medals.

    Background: US Marine with 10 years of service, all of my medals were for just doing my job.

  21. Just a PR campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This obviously has nothing to do with recent (Nov. 20) DemocracyNow story about four whistle blowers army drone operators and their open letter to Obama...

  22. exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is what we're reduced to.
    Now we have participation trophies in the military.
    Everyone's a winner.
    What's the point of these if everyone gets them?

    There are different medals for different things, and you'd better believe that members of the military look at, say, a Silver Star or a Distinguished Service Medal very differently from an achievement medal. Medals of lower value do still have value. The offer a chance for recognition in front of your peers, in a persistent way (since you wear ribbons or medals on some of your uniforms), they provide a persistent proof of competence and capability in your personnel file (helpful for determining promotions), and they document important and meaningful aspects of your career, such as that you were in an active combat theater with its concomitant risks, even if you didn't actually get injured or do anything heroic. To an experienced service member, a glance at another person's "fruit salad" tells you a lot about who they are and what they've done, not merely by the number of commendations but by their type.

    Exactly, even mediocre medals have worth, and they are in the military, and operating a drone is skilled work, so give them their mediocre medals.

  23. android by RozenGupta · · Score: 1

    Just great apk apps

  24. Ready Player One by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Drone operators don't kill for awards. They kill for high score credits.