Slashdot Mirror


Seagate Adopts Helium For a 10TB HDD (computerworld.com)

Lucas123 writes: Seagate has finally adopted helium as an inert gas in its data center drives and has used it to produce a 10TB HDD for cloud-based data centers. Seagate had relied on its shingled magnetic recording technology for high-capacity drives right up until its last 8TB HDD, even after WD has used helium in several iterations of its hermetically sealed, 3.5-in HDDs. The lighter-than-air helium reduces friction on platters and allows more to be used. In Seagate's new HDD, it crammed seven platters 14 heads, a 25% increase in disk density over its 8TB drive.

175 comments

  1. Oh yeah! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see the failure rate on this thing. How do they even get a hermetic seal?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      thinking the same.. if they are at a standstill with technology and require hermetically sealed drives they better really start looking at improving SSD technology even if that requires going back to 5 inch drives its still better than losing your data due to a gas leak.....

      However i don't believe they are using helium .. they are using midgets to assemble their drives and just don't want executives asking questions when someone calls the factory and it sounds like a cross between the wizard of oz and charley's chocolate factory >:o)

    2. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hermetic seals on HDD's are not new or difficult.

    3. Re:Oh yeah! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sealing helium in ANYTHING for a significant amount of time is pretty much impossible. Helium is a monatomic gas. These drives will leak.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Oh yeah! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Did they do away with the breather hole and paper filter?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Against helium? Really? Why do people always feel the need to make worthless, content-free drive-by comments on things they don't understand?

      https://www.hgst.com/sites/def...

      Still not new or difficult?

    6. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. The drives have to be sealed as tight as a helium tank.
      A side benefit is that you can submerse helium drives in an inert coolant.

    7. Re:Oh yeah! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How do they even get a hermetic seal?

      Draw a couple of snakes on a sealion?
      No, just bits of synthetic rubber and screw down on them really tight. If the pressure difference isn't huge between external and internal it's not very hard.

    8. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      broken link you dummy

    9. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      404 not found. I'm guessing that means it leaks.

    10. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course. The drives have to be sealed as tight as a helium tank.
      A side benefit is that you can submerse helium drives in an inert coolant.

      Actually, wouldn't doing so greatly reduce the leak rate?

      Sure helium is monatomic, but it would be surrounded by presumably some kind of mineral oil, or similar material. That could be used to keep the temperature pretty constant, so no great pressure delta would presumably be formed..

    11. Re:Oh yeah! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to see the failure rate on this thing. How do they even get a hermetic seal?

      Well we've been doing this with car tires for ~15 years now, nearly 20 on luxury model cars. Despite that both the rubber, the rubber-steel/aluminum bonding point, and the valve all leak. The solution was to over pressurize the tires in the early years, these days they simply slap some sealing compound on it. It's generally good for the lifetime of the tire as long as it's done properly. That's between 3-8 years.

      I'm guessing it'll be similar in this case, though they'll likely have an easier time of it since the mating surfaces don't actually move, unlike a tire for instance. There's minimal flex, twisting, or strong inertia forces that react heavily on it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:Oh yeah! by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 5, Informative

      > These drives will leak.

      While technically correct, the rate of static-pressure helium leakage through HGST HelioSeal appears to be measured in decades. They up-rated their enterprise SAS drives from 1.4 million hours MTBF to 2.5 million hours MTBF because hermetically-sealing drives and using helium improves various operating parameters, prolonging life in several ways.

      My results in production and the lab bear this out over the past two years: helium drives appear to have substantially lower failure rates than air-filled drives. While nobody has owned a commercial helium drive for a decade yet, the internal helium sensors on the disk farms that I've looked at show no degradation or leakage so far: SMART 22 shows 100.

      I'll be watching Seagate's results here with great interest and optimism that their results parallel those of HGST.

      Disclaimer: I'm an Oracle employee; my opinions do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle or its affiliates.

    13. Re:Oh yeah! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

      Mean time between failure is not representative of real life experience. Ever. Also, the below-atmosphere internal pressure compared to stp and lower density of the gas makes head crashes a bigger problem than before. That's why you don't run hard disks in a vacuum - they wouldn't work.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    14. Re:Oh yeah! by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Why would it require going back to 5" drives? SSDs have higher data density than HDDs, they just have lower data density per dollar.

    15. Re:Oh yeah! by fnj · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, just bits of synthetic rubber and screw down on them really tight. If the pressure difference isn't huge between external and internal it's not very hard.

      If you knew anything whatsoever about helium permeation, you would know what a preposterous statement you made.

      It's the difference in PARTIAL pressure that matters. There is almost certainly one atmosphere of helium on the inside vs zero on the outside. About the same as a rubber circus balloon. You know, the kind that lose all their lift in a day or two. Rubber is about the most laughably ineffective helium barrier there is.

    16. Re:Oh yeah! by cheater512 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wow why wouldn't the skilled engineers at Seagate and Western Digital think of stuff like that?

      They should employ you on the spot!

    17. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't understand why they need hermits to seal the drives.

    18. Re:Oh yeah! by Firethorn · · Score: 0

      SSDs have higher data density than HDDs, they just have lower data density per dollar.

      How are you measuring density? Chip, packaging, platters, what?

      Looking it up real quick, they have HD data density up past 1 Tbit per square inch. With a micro-sd card, you're looking at what, 256GB if you have 2 of them? I suppose you can stack them up more, but it seems pretty close to me.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:Oh yeah! by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Informative

      The amount of data you can fit in a normal drive would be a good measure. Some googling says the largest 3.5" HDD is 10TB; the largest 3.5" SSD is 16TB.

    20. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe you are thinking of Nitrogen...

    21. Re:Oh yeah! by rossdee · · Score: 1

      If we are talking about car tires rhen they don't need the lightest inert gas. Argon would do the job and its not as rare (on earth) as He

    22. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While technically correct. The time taken for this is decades past the expected life of the drive. You may as well say rust is a significant risk to drive failure.

    23. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with tires it isn't so much about being light and inert, it is about low moisture and consistent pressure under various temperature ranges.

    24. Re:Oh yeah! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      That link tells you absolutely nothing other than they have a patent on the seal. I wouldn't even think of buying one of these drives.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    25. Re: Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD Card? Seriously?

    26. Re: Oh yeah! by ememisya · · Score: 0

      Talk about getting a bang for the buck, make sure that HD doesn't heat up too much.

    27. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I can't see this ending well.

      Helium might have some use in mechanical drives that are meant to log a lot of data in a short term storage cycle. Likewise Hybrid drives, the flash memory will be burned out pretty quick.

      But ultimately I think what we're going to see is SSD's lap mechanical drives in capacity and we'll just see mechanical drives used as cold storage, since the reliability of the high-end mechanical drives tends to be fairly good, and it's only the interfaces that tend to "rot" (I've killed about 5 external drive chassis, but only two of those drives ever incurred real mechanical failures. I'm sticking with WD MyBook's for now, so I have spare power supplies/chassis in case one dies.)

    28. Re:Oh yeah! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Sealing helium in ANYTHING for a significant amount of time is pretty much impossible. Helium is a monatomic gas. These drives will leak.

      Leak where? Yes the atoms diffuse through the metal but then what happens to the drive? They aren't pressurized, they are just filled with helium. In order for them to leak other particles need to diffuse into the drive to replace the missing atoms, it's not going to leak itself into a vacuum, just like helium balloons never completely and totally deflate, they just get to the point where the rubber is no longer exerting pressure on the gas.

    29. Re:Oh yeah! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, no, that means the leak was properly prevented. You'd know it leaked if the information was actually available outside the company. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    30. Re:Oh yeah! by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      SMART 22 shows 100.

      an arbitrary number mapped to a measured value you will never see. 100 != 100%

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    31. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order for them to leak other particles need to diffuse into the drive to replace the missing atoms

      Don't think it works like that. Hydrogen leaks out of steel tanks but you don't hear about oxygen & nitrogen leaking into them.

    32. Re:Oh yeah! by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "In order for them to leak other particles need to diffuse into the drive to replace the missing atoms, it's not going to leak itself into a vacuum,"

      Actually, you will draw a vacuum, provided that you wait long enough. In balloons, the process slows down not because the pressure difference decreases, but because the latex rubber layer gets thicker as the balloon shrinks.

    33. Re: Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're thinking Hydrogen
      Helium's the one that DOESN'T explode

    34. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, both Seagate and WD actually do run their disks in vacuum? Or am I missing your point?

    35. Re:Oh yeah! by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Built in Obsolescence. Exactly what they intended =p

    36. Re:Oh yeah! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Wow why wouldn't the skilled engineers at Seagate and Western Digital think of stuff like that?

      It's because the employees are clowns. I mean literally. They confused the disks with party balloons and started squiirting helium in so they'd float around the room at parties.

      Obviously they need a slashdotter to come along and set them right.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    37. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... the internal helium sensors on the disk farms that I've looked at show no degradation or leakage so far: SMART 22 shows 100. ...

      Hooray.

      Those sensors were manufactured by Volkswagen....

    38. Re:Oh yeah! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I'm an Oracle employee; my opinions do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle or its affiliates.

      And all credibility of your post was lost with this sentence. You might want to keep that secret, NO ONE thinks Oracle is impressive anymore, we discovered that you don't have to live in the seventies or pay for features that everyone else just does by default.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    39. Re:Oh yeah! by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Until the advent of helium hard drives no hard drive had *EVER* been hermetically sealed. There is always a small hole which allows air to be exchanged with the surroundings so the pressure in the drive equalizes with the outside. There is a small filter to make sure any air entering the drive is kept clean.

      I suggest you dismantle a hard drive and see for yourself.

    40. Re:Oh yeah! by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Mean time between failure is not representative of real life experience. Ever. Also, the below-atmosphere internal pressure compared to stp and lower density of the gas makes head crashes a bigger problem than before. That's why you don't run hard disks in a vacuum - they wouldn't work.

      It seems likely that running the head closer to the platter is one of the methods they are using to get the data density they want.

      Disks we use now would not work at all in a vacuum. The heads "fly" over the platter using some gas-fluid physics to do it properly.

      Those drives are going to fail a lot, helium is indeed hard as hell to keep contained. It leaks through a lot of materials that stop many other gasses.

    41. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And SSD datasheets tell you absolutely nothing other than they have a patent. I wouldn't even think of buying one of these drives.

    42. Re:Oh yeah! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      "In order for them to leak other particles need to diffuse into the drive to replace the missing atoms, it's not going to leak itself into a vacuum,"

      Actually, you will draw a vacuum, provided that you wait long enough. In balloons, the process slows down not because the pressure difference decreases, but because the latex rubber layer gets thicker as the balloon shrinks.

      Citation please. The only reference I've found including in physics textbooks is that helium can diffuse through metals. I haven't found anything that says you can hermetically seal helium in a metal container and then come after a while to find it has drawn a vacuum.

    43. Re:Oh yeah! by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      The people making spinning platter drives are just grasping at straws at this point. It won't be more than a decade before SDDs completely take over. You can already get a 1 TB SSD for about $350. A 1 TB HDD costs about $50. That's a ratio of 7:1. SSD prices have been falling a lot over the past year or two, while HDD prices have remained pretty much constant. There's very little reason for most average people to even be using HDDs at the moment apart from people who want to store giant media collections.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    44. Re:Oh yeah! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to disassemble the drive. The hole is marked on the top of the drive to make sure you don't block it. It's necessary for proper operation.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    45. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#q=dimensions%20of%20micro%20sd%20card&es_th=1

      You can fit a lot more than four Micro SD cards into one square inch of SSD.

    46. Re:Oh yeah! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      They already have non-consumer 10TB SSD's available in the 2.5 inch form factor. I don't even want to know what the price tag is on those things, but they're supposed to be out there.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    47. Re:Oh yeah! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      What does being a monatomic gas have to do with leakage? So are xenon and krypton, and I doubt they are hard to seal.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    48. Re:Oh yeah! by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      i realize this was probably intended as a joke but...

      "Hermetically sealed" is a reference to the hermetic heretics who, among other things, practiced what most people would call alchemy and one part of that involved sealing something air-tight. Long story short, if you wanted something to have an air-tight seal you wanted it hermetically sealed and the phrase outlasted the heretics by a long, long time.

      (As an aside, they didn't consider themselves to be heretics but felt that their beliefs were entirely consistent with Christianity. There were not the only heretics to believe so.)

    49. Re:Oh yeah! by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, it is because the pressure difference decreases. In addition to the balloon rubber being thicker. Two factors, that both happen to work together.

      --
      I come here for the love
    50. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With welded metal to metal seals, like old transistors used to be, add glass to metal (kovar) seals for conductor feed thru's.
      Cast metals would need a good plating to cover porosity.
      Keep a slightly higher pressure than atmosphere to compensate for losses.
      Test assembly with a time-of-flight spectrum analyzer, commonly used helium leak detector.
      Thermal transfer in Helium is really good, also helping to remove heat from internals.

    51. Re:Oh yeah! by unrtst · · Score: 1

      You can already get a 1 TB SSD for about $350. A 1 TB HDD costs about $50. That's a ratio of 7:1.

      That's comparison favors the SSD, and it's still 7:1. Look at price per gb for various models/sizes. If you ignore performance, HDD's are still a very large way ahead.

      There's very little reason for most average people to even be using HDDs at the moment apart from people who want to store giant media collections.

      ... or anything that takes up much space. Backups, photos, video's, movies, music, virtual machines, etc etc - all the stuff people actually use desktops for.
      IMO, it would be more accurate to say that there is a very good reason for the majority of people to be using at least one SSD, as they do bring significant performance gains, and you are no longer forced to do anything too complicated to make them usable/feasible (on drives = 32gb, it's a huge PITA to maintain your system and keep things under that size if you use it for your OS, and you can forget about making vm's on it or storing very much there either).

      I do think/agree that SSD's will own the vast majority of the market in a decade, though there will still be legit uses for HDD's.

    52. Re:Oh yeah! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      MTBF means nothing, because of the realy stupid way it's calculated, ignoring the real world. Drive specs are based on accelerated life testing. A population of 1000 or so drives are run flat out at a high temperature for about 30 days. MTBF is calculated from that. It's a WAG more than anything else.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    53. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already get a 1 TB SSD for about $350. A 1 TB HDD costs about $50. That's a ratio of 7:1.

      That's comparison favors the SSD, and it's still 7:1. Look at price per gb for various models/sizes. If you ignore performance, HDD's are still a very large way ahead.

      If you assume that any SSD is better than any of the HDDs, it makes sense to do the comparison using the cheapest SSD and the average HDD (since that is what people buy). Whether this assumption is realistic is another question.

    54. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing the platter of a HDD to a microSD card is unfair, if you wan't to ignore packaging you should compare the actual dimensions of the NAND flash. A microSD contains the circuitry and connectors required to read and write to it, a single HDD platter does not, and is pretty vulnerable to literally any damage. However, lets compare HDDplatters to microSD cards, because we all know if you include the packaging the microSD easily wins, and I'm not sure where I'd find the required information about the NAND flash.

      If HDD data density is up past 1Tbit per square inch and the largest microSD card is 256GB (512GB is teased but not available), that means the best available microSD cards have a size of 0.25 square inches, so a density of 1TByte per square inch. 1TBit vs 1TByte, so a factor of 8, and that's when you are just comparing platter to card, and not the HDDpackaging itself.

      The only reason to use HDD's is that they are easier to recover data from, and they offer a better $1 per GB, although that gap is closing. On PC Part Picker the best HDDis $0.025 per GB, the best SSDis $0.250.

    55. Re:Oh yeah! by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let me start with an appeal to authority: I actually get paid to do calculations on gas diffusion and pumping of hydrogen.

      Depending on the materials of the walls of your helium-containing vessels, drawing a vacuum can take rather long. The point is that diffusive transport is driven by differences in partial pressures (or concentration if the gas is dissolved in a solid). The partial pressure of helium in the atmosphere is about 0.5 Pa; if you have a vessel with a porous wall with 100 kPa of helium (atmospheric pressure) on the inside, then helium will diffuse towards the volume with the lower partial pressure until both sides have the same partial pressure (i.e., 0.5 Pa). The same process will happen in the opposite direction for other gases (nitrogen, oxygen), but at a much slower speed. So at t=0, you have 100 kPa He (pure). After 1 year, you have (for example) 50 kPa He and 0.01 Pa nitrogen. After ten million years, you have 0.5 Pa He and close to 100 kPa nitrogen.

      Just imagine that you have a box with a small hole and lot of fruit flies on the inside. Place this box next to a stable where there are lots of big flies. The fruit flies will gradually disappear from the box, but not because they are pushing each other or because the fat flies (that don't fit through the hole) are pushing them out.

      Here are the basics of diffusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... .

      For helium, diffusion speed is proportional to the difference in partial pressures on either side of the wall. For hydrogen, it's more complicated because the hydrogen molecules first need to dissociate before they can permeate through metals; it turns out that the speed of diffusion is driven by the difference in square roots of the partial pressure of hydrogen on either side.

    56. Re:Oh yeah! by hankwang · · Score: 2

      In an inflated balloon, you have 1.05 bar of He on the inside and 0.000005 bar of He on the outside.

      When the balloon is almost deflated, you have 1.00 bar of He on the inside and 0.000005 bar on the outside. So that would make the diffusion speed decrease by a whopping 5 percent.

    57. Re:Oh yeah! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Wasn't aware of that, didn't see them when I checked really quick.

      Them being 'really out there' would be a valid reason.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    58. Re:Oh yeah! by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 1

      > MTBF means nothing, because of the realy stupid way it's calculated...

      I'm not disagreeing with you, but isn't MTBF -- when combined with warranty and AFR -- an overall expression of a hard drive manufacturer's engineering confidence in the product?

      Backblaze among others have noted that it's really difficult to estimate failure rates because the sample sizes are too small at present (see https://www.backblaze.com/blog... ). So it's fair to say the jury is still out as to whether the decrease in operating temperature, vibration, and carbon deposits as a result of using a helium-sealed drive represents a real-world improvement in reliability yet, or if it matches AFR rates.

      However, MTBF when combined with the AFR estimates -- which I agree are a better measure, and Seagate was an industry leader in implementing them -- the overall picture seems to be higher manufacturer confidence in the product.

      Disclaimer: I'm an Oracle employee. My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle or its affiliates.

    59. Re:Oh yeah! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      No, manufacturers "confidence" is pure marketing. And your mention of Seagate, who bought the Maxtor production lines and used them to produce "Seagate" drives with seriously fake MTBF numbers, makes this all the more funny.

      Car manufacturers will drive a test vehicle real distances, not "estimated", because if their products failed at the rate of hard drives, they'd be out of business. And offering a refurbished drive in place of a brand new DOA (Seagate's done this to me 4 times) is also crap. Imagine doing THAT with a new car that was a lemon.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    60. Re:Oh yeah! by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      If you really want to get into what is happening, you also need to consider that the balloon, when fully naturally deflated, is maybe half the diameter of a fully inflated balloon. It doesn't change by a factor of ten or twenty in thickness. Probably more like a factor of three or four.

      And why you compare the pressure of He inside, to the partial pressure of He outside is beyond me. It is a gas, under pressure, pushing against a membrane...with the gas gradually going through the membrane. You could inflate the balloon with air, for example, and it will still run down.

      --
      I come here for the love
    61. Re: Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the cheapest rubber balloon will easily stretch to less than 10% of its relaxed thickness before bursting.

    62. Re: Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MTBF is not an indication of actual lifetime. The drives could all fail after reachng 5 year warranty, but if you ran thousands of them in parallel from new, for 3 years or so, they would fail at a rate that would be close to the MTBF.

    63. Re: Oh yeah! by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Once again you are mistaking "new and tiny expands to full size" change with the much less dramatic "full size to droopy grapefruit size" that is what happens when it shrinks on its own.

      --
      I come here for the love
    64. Re:Oh yeah! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation. It actually clicked when you mentioned partial pressures. I was thinking in absolutes.

    65. Re:Oh yeah! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      While technically correct, the rate of static-pressure helium leakage through HGST HelioSeal appears to be measured in decades.

      Dimensional mismatch. XT^-1 != T

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    66. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. Once I started using SDD drives in my devices I'm never going back to spinning disk. Even my raid backup has 4 SSD drives.

    67. Re:Oh yeah! by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Well, he has more cred than you do, I mean, you're just some rude cunt on slashsdot.

    68. Re:Oh yeah! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      MTBF for drives is like the contrast ratios they like to put on LCD panels. It's a 100% pure bullshit made up marketing number. This has been proven by studies done by companies like Google who statistically significant numbers of drives, and their real world MTBF is nowhere close to the manufacturer's numbers.

    69. Re:Oh yeah! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      There are specialized epoxy resins which can produce a metal, glass, or ceramic seal which is hermetic.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    70. Re:Oh yeah! by hankwang · · Score: 2

      And why you compare the pressure of He inside, to the partial pressure of He outside is beyond me.

      Because the pressure of He inside is equal to the partial pressure of He inside.

      Unless the pores in the balloon have diameters that are much larger than the mean free path length (about 50 nm at atmospheric pressure), the absolute pressure doesn't matter for the leak rate, only the partial pressure. I doubt that balloon rubber has pores that large, but it could be. Even in the likely case that the pores are small (<100 nm), the pore size may shrink as the balloon deflates, which will depress the leak rate more than what can be explained from the change in membrane thickness.

      Disclosure: I am a vacuum engineer. If you don't believe it, then I suggest that you read up on the concepts of Knudsen number, Fick's law, and permeation.

    71. Re:Oh yeah! by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Comparing relative He pressures as you have done is fine...for figuring out the driving force causing He to escape. However, that balloon will also deflate if you fill it with regular air.

      If you look back to my original comment, that is what I am referencing -- that the balloon will deflate for two reasons, one of which is that the contents are under pressure.

      --
      I come here for the love
    72. Re:Oh yeah! by allo · · Score: 1

      The result was, some are way better.

  2. Hydrogen next? by Trachman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We need to assume that hydrogen will be the next element used for cooling? Or is it the end of spinning disc era?

    Hydrogen is used, believe it or not, for generator cooling at power plants. Here is the quick link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Hydrogen next? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Hydrogen is not an inert element..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Hydrogen next? by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nor is it smaller than He. Hydrogen gas likes to link up as H2 molecules which are pretty big compared to the inert, "I'll bond to nothing" Helium. You want the smallest thing you can find to fly those disk heads on.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Hydrogen next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but so long as you keep the 02 out that shouldn't be an issue.

      I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

    4. Re:Hydrogen next? by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Informative

      In hard drives, the fill gas is used to lift the heads, not for cooling. The idea is that the thin film between the head and platter forms at a shorter distance in helium, so everything can be made smaller and closer together. As another poster pointed out, at room temperature/pressure, helium is monatomic while hydrogen forms H2 molecules, which are larger than the helium atoms.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    5. Re:Hydrogen next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to assume that hydrogen will be the next element used for cooling?

      And when the disk explodes, do we get a "Oh, the humanity!" playback from the embedded recording of Herbert Morrison's report as the last (dying) gasp of the firmware?

    6. Re:Hydrogen next? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      The spinning disk era is coming to a close, and I welcome it! The issue is that while storage capacity has, for decades, increased almost exponentially, the actual performance of the HDD has remained virtually flat. A typical HDD spinning at about 7200 RPM can store 4 TB of data or more, but can only serve about 150 seek operations per second. Physics, she is a bitch, you know? So while you might be able to store 500 million files, it takes a month to copy them.

      Everywhere I look, Enterprise or "performant" storage has moved to SSDs. We moved our DB servers 4 (5?) years ago to SSDs and saw at least a 95% reduction in query times involving disk operations. (EG: not cached) For us, spinning rust is the new tape; SSDs (or RAM) anywhere performance matters, and spinning rust for archival use. For our session cache, we use a RAM drive.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    7. Re:Hydrogen next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      SSD's have strange problems related to caching however.

      Try this on a linux machine, find a 8GB file and try to copy it from the SSD to the mechanical drive or vice-versa. The Linux machine will literately exhaust it's disk cache and kill itself trying to do so.

    8. Re:Hydrogen next? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Everywhere I look, Enterprise or "performant" storage has moved to SSDs.

      You may want to define performant. Yes SSDs are used a lot in high activity enterprise scenarios. But they currently have close to zero marketshare in the SAN / NAS department where space and density is more important than speed of access due to being orders of magnitude more expensive.

      I'll welcome the demise of the classical harddisk when SSDs are comparable in price, and not a moment sooner.

    9. Re:Hydrogen next? by hankwang · · Score: 5, Informative

      The idea is that the thin film between the head and platter forms at a shorter distance in helium, so everything can be made smaller and closer together. As another poster pointed out, at room temperature/pressure, helium is monatomic while hydrogen forms H2 molecules, which are larger than the helium atoms.

      What matters for the hydrodynamics (drag forces, lift forces on the head) is not directly the size of the molecule, but the molecular mass (related to densitiy of the gas) and the dynamic viscosity (related to both molecular mass and molecular size). The size of the molecule or atom is in any case vanishingly small compared to the distance between the head and the platter. The dynamic viscosities of a few gases at room temperature are: helium is 19 micro-Pa s, air 18 uPa s, and hydrogen 9 uPa s. The molecular masses (proportional to density) are 4, 29, and 2, respectively; this is where helium wins, but hydrogen is better both in molecular mass and viscosity.

      The real reason for not using hydrogen gas is that hydrogen (H2) is reactive; at surfaces, it tends to split up into hydrogen atoms (H), which can then diffuse through metals and polymer seals. In the best case, it will leak out within months/years. In the worst case, it will change the crystal lattice and cause material failure. In particular, rare-earth magnents tend to crumble if exposed to hydrogen gas; that's something you really don't want inside a hard disk casing.

    10. Re:Hydrogen next? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Buy hydrogen also likes to dissolve in many metals. At that point it becomes worse for containment than the larger helium. Still though, these things are well established and there's ways of keeping hydrogen contained too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re:Hydrogen next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you remove all those extra apostrophes it will reduce the file size? it's means it is.

  3. Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Last time I bought a helium hard drive, it floated away and I never saw it again.

    1. Re:Careful by bobbied · · Score: 4, Funny

      You think you have it bad.... I purchased 100 of them, tied them to my lawn chair in a RAID 5x5x4 Array configuration and now I'm freezing at 15,000 feet with no way to get down and a cell phone battery that's running out. HELP!!!!

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quick! Store something really important on that array and all the drives will start having head-crashes and hopefully that will cause the helium to start to leak out...

    3. Re:Careful by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Store something on an array of Seagate drives? What? Are you CRAZY? That's it, the battery is dead, if you don't hear from me again......

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Careful by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what you are telling us is that you are storing your data in the cloud?

    5. Re:Careful by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      And all your audio files on it were high pitched and squeaky...

    6. Re:Careful by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess you could try spinning it up and yanking the power repeatedly until the emergency parking shears off the heads on the park ramp. Then repeatedly seek the drive to the outermost track and hope that the remains of the head manage to puncture the outside of the enclosure. Full disclosure: you'll probably have to seek the drive by manually applying voltage to the stepper motor, because the drive probably won't even show up on the SATA bus if it can't read track 0.

      Worth a try, anyway. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why these drives are so good for cloud ...

    8. Re:Careful by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      So what you are telling us is that you are storing your data in the cloud?

      Not only that but it does actually rain in his DC

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    9. Re:Careful by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Just set all the bits to 1. Ones are heavier than zeroes. It should be enough to counteract the helium.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fill up the RAID with data, that should weigh it enough to come back down, even better if you compress it and maybe even encrypt it too.

  4. Why not a vacuum? by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

    I know the idea sucks, perhaps the heads wouldn't fly as they need an "air" cushion?

    1. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      vacuum is impossible to maintain, tremendous pressures at seals

      helium at atmospheric pressure exerts no pressure on seals

    2. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a kid seeing a harddrive and how it was sealed, I thought they had a vacuum environment. As it stands, if I was to guess why they don't use a vacuum, it would be that helium allows for heat dissipation.

      Honestly, I'd like to see larger physical sized (and thus cheaper or higher capacity) SDD available. I don't care to keep getting adapters for 2.5 drives for a desk top.

    3. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vacuum is even harder to maintain than monatomic gas. At least if the helium is pressurized to one atmosphere so it is at equilibrium, there are no internal or external forces trying to escape/enter the drive.

      In fact, it might be better for them to try to pressurize the the drives slightly to account for leakage over the lifetime of the drive. Pressure container is still easier to maintain than a vacuum chamber.

    4. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How so? Many vacuum tubes from the 30s still work today (I repair old radios as a hobby), and they have to deal with stresses (heat) far in excess of what you'll find in a hard-drive.

      Let's see: mount the platters/heads/motors in a vacuum and the electronics outside. You'd need maybe a dozen wires between them, plus a vacuum chamber big enough to hold it. That's about a 4", maybe 5" diameter squashed sphere shaped bulb. Which is basically trivial - remember old CRT tubes were orders of magnitude larger, had more pins, dealt with bigger heat stresses, and worked just fine for decades.

      In fact it would probably be easier than old valve technology. They required hard vacuum to work, so had things like getters/flashing to react out any trace of gas remaining. I would hazard a guess that even with a soft vacuum a hard-drive would work pretty well.

      The only big issue would be the lack of an air cushion for the heads to fly on. Not sure how you get around that.

    5. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Vacuum is even harder to maintain than monatomic gas"

      Well, not in a vacuum tube. I have 50+ year old CRTs and tubes that still work, so must have a vacuum.

    6. Re: Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need a gas in there because the heads literally fly above the platter surface using the Bernoulli principle. In a vacuum, they would literally grind against the platter surface.

    7. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Larger physical drives aren't necessary. That's not the limiting factor for SSD's. The limiting factor is how the individual cells are stacked (eg SLC, MLC, TLC) and each bit stored in that stack results in a decimation of the cell life expectancy. This isn't a question about physical area, rather it's a question about data access speed.

      If I have SLC I can transfer 1 bit per operation, if I have TLC I can transfer 3 bits per operation. The tradeoff is that I can write to the MLC maybe a million times, but the TLC only 10,000 times. If I had 8 bits per cell, I'd likely only get a single write use out of it. It's more "cost effective" to stack the bits than to just stack the NAND cells themselves. So if I want 10TB of TLC It might cost 6000$ (20 x 500GB @ 300$), but if I want 10TB of SLC ( 40 x 256GB @ 2600$ (256GB Apacer APS25P6B256G-5C SAFD25P Industrial SATA SSD, SLC NAND Flash) it would cost 104,000$ or roughly 17X the cost. That durability life may never actually be needed since NAND persistence itself only lasts 3 months unpowered ( http://www.anandtech.com/show/9248/the-truth-about-ssd-data-retention )

      So you compromise where you want it. For the average consumer a TLC drive with a short life is "good enough" to last the life of the machine. For more hardcore users that routinely wipe their drive and reinstall software, or MMORPG players who play games that frequently require multi-GB updates, a MLC drive is probably a better choice.

      But if you're logging data, and frequently "write cycling" the drive, you'd want a SLC drive with a smaller capacity over a TLC drive with a larger capacity. Like literately you'd want SLC SSD's in telemetry systems, earthquake logging, and so forth, because you don't need the long-term data, just the "last years worth" or so, and can overwrite the old data as needed since it would be moved to cold storage or discarded.

      A 2.5", 3.5" or 5.25" drive packed with NAND flash chips, isn't the point. Your average 2.5" drive only has two chips on it, and likely has only 1" of the PCB used, with the rest of the space being empty so it has a way to be mounted. This is why NVMe sockets are appearing on motherboards, they waste far less space than a SATA connected drive.

      We will probably start seeing "ultra compact" desktops that don't have any drive bays pretty soon. You still get your expansion card slots, but now there's no mechanical drives at all. See MacMini.

    8. Re:Why not a vacuum? by tsa · · Score: 1

      One bar is not a tremendous pressure.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:Why not a vacuum? by XNormal · · Score: 1

      Yes, the air cushion is an issue. I am sure it can be solved, though. Remember that the head assembly of the cheapest optical drive maintains micron accuracy for both tracking and focus distance while the disk wobbles with each rotation (it's never really centered or rotates in-plane). The head is mounted on voice coils and uses active feedback loops.

      If you use vacuum and passive magnetic levitation bearings the energy to keep the disk rotating drops to virtually zero. You can have cold storage that is ready to wake up and access in a 100 milliseconds.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    10. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is an NVME socket? Do you mean an M.2 socket (it's just a pcie 3.0 x4 connector)? I mean you sounded smart up to that point but that's a pretty damning mistake which makes me wonder about the veracity of the rest of your post.

    11. Re:Why not a vacuum? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Remember that the head assembly of the cheapest optical drive maintains micron accuracy

      With modern hard drive, according to Wikipedia, the flight height of the head is at 3 nanometers. I actually didn't believe it at first and had to check a few other sources to convince myself that there weren't a few zeroes missing. There is even research for subnanometer flight height.
      To get down to such ridiculously small values, the flight height is controlled using thermal expansion based techniques, using a small heating element inside the head.

    12. Re:Why not a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is an NVME socket? Do you mean an M.2 socket (it's just a pcie 3.0 x4 connector)? I mean you sounded smart up to that point but that's a pretty damning mistake which makes me wonder about the veracity of the rest of your post.

      lmgtfy:NVMe (Non Volatile Memory Express) SSDs are PCIe based and can be installed in a standard PCIe slot, M.2 socket, or via the brand new U.2 connector.

  5. Isn't Helium running out? by Velimir · · Score: 2

    I've heard Helium is a finite resource that we are rapidly depleting? I wonder how the use of it on such a large scale will impact the worldwide supply.

    1. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How many 10TB hard drives do think Seagate will ship?

      How many children will have at least one balloon at their birthday party this year?

    2. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's only partially correct & I thought the same thing but just google for 'helium shortage' and you'll quickly find out it is an artificial shortage created by none other than the US government...don't get me wrong they aren't doing it on purpose but like almost all things the Government engages in at any scale they'll find a way to screw it up.

    3. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MRI scanners and similar cryo systems are the 400-pound gorilla in helium consumption, using about a third of the total production. Production is less than consumption because the US Gubmint is selling off its helium reserve for less money than it can be extracted for (it comes from certain deposits of natural gas). Time is running out on this, and sooner or later there will have to be a buildout of extraction plants.

      As far as disk drives are concerned -- well, estimate the interior volume of a disk drive and divide that into the size of the Goodyear Blimp.

    4. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      actually alarmist nonsense that we're running out of helium. The truth is that most helium is just vented off the top of natural gas deposits even now. We have a helium wasting problem.

    5. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Centurix · · Score: 1

      Balloons count for 19% of Helium consumption each year. A standard tank of Helium fills about 50 balloons for a party. According to the PDF here a single tank fills 10,000 drives. Seems minimal.

      --
      Task Mangler
    6. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This brings up an interesting side topic: now that we're exploiting more natural gas than ever before, are we finding any more helium?

    7. Re: Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, with fusion only 20 years away (just like it has been for the last 50) we'll have a limitless supply of Helium!

    8. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are finding, but not capturing it. The helium comes from the decay of radioactive elements found in the earth, and is escaping all the time along with radon as well. There are no other sources, and it is a crime that we are simply venting the trapped helium into the atmosphere. The decay is a slow process from rare elements, and it took millions of years to accumulate what was there. If not captured from the wells, it will inevitably escape from the earth entirely.

    9. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a shortage yet, but how about after we have fracked (most) all of the gas and wasted all of that helium? There are no other sources where we can acquire it in significant volumes. That trapped helium that we are carelessly releasing is the result of millions of years of decay from rare radioactive elements in the earths crust.

    10. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Whibla · · Score: 1

      I heard the same thing a few years ago and briefly got all hot under the collar about party balloons ... then I realised that helium is being continuously replenished as a by-product of radioactive decay (alpha decay), plenty of which is going on within the earth's mantle and crust.

      Now I can sleep soundly again, and dream of partial pressure shells / helium shell airships sailing majestically through our skies.

    11. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Party balloons use 19% of the worlds helium, Hard Drives are estimated to use less then 1%, but hey, let's complain about the non-wasteful use.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    12. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That radioactive decay is a very slow process starting with already rare elements. If you don't mind waiting millions of years, then they will be replenished. It is foolish to piss away all of the reserves of helium that nature has collected for us. Future generations will not appreciate it, any more than our wasting the concentrated carbon resources while wrecking the environment.

      This goes for anything that nature has concentrated for us over great lengths of time, like coal. Its chemical energy content is actually less then a tenth of the nuclear energy content from trace radioactive isotopes, and it contains heavy metals and other things we should not spew all over our biosphere. There are better ways of to make use of those resources, without creating a gargantuan mess, or wasting the byproducts.

    13. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..so it is fine to waste it because the earth will provide. In its mantle. It's a renewable resource!

    14. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Finite? Depleting?

      The Sun creates 1.2 trillion tons of helium a second. There's plenty of it. The only hard part is getting it. Which is why we need a crash program to either deep-drill or strip-mine the Sun for the valuable helium it's hiding from us.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    15. Re:Isn't Helium running out? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Yes there is source we can extract in significant volume though currently at 1000 times the cost. The same atmosphere where we vented it.

  6. Seagate disks and systemd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things I'll never willingly use.

  7. SMR was a DOA idea by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Marginal increase in capacity for a major decrease in performance.

    1. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMR is for archival/backup, "Write Once, Read Never" applications.

    2. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by sshir · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Seagate is killing it with SMR - they can't make enough of them. Retailers had problems (and still have) with keeping them in stock. WD still has no (reasonably priced) answer to Seagate's 8tb drive.

    3. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of these 8TB SMR drives - write performance can be atrocious, but read has been fine. Consolidated all my downloaded data to it and removed all other spindles from my PC. The drive rarely spins up as an M2 SSD takes care of the OS & apps.

    4. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for inexpensive 8tb drives for nvr's what I have read is that the SMR drives can't handle the load of 24/7 video recording at 4MBps.

      Plus I don't think you could run a raid 6 or even a raid 1 array on seagate drives that large and be able to replace them faster than they failed.

      I certainly wouldn't want to trust a single drive with 8tb of data.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    5. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The major decrease in performance depends entirely on the workload. For archival purposes and long continuous unfragmented writes they perform pretty solidly compared to normal harddisks.

      For random reads and writes I question why you would want a classic harddisk anyway. SMR drives worked well for storage of large files and would work even better if the OS was aware of them and used them appropriately (think of them as the very first SSDs where the OS didn't align sectors or issue TRIM commands, there's unused performance still on the table due to software support).

    6. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for inexpensive 8tb drives for nvr's what I have read is that the SMR drives can't handle the load of 24/7 video recording at 4MBps.

      They can just fine as long as they're not fragmented. Continuous copying is a non issue. Now video editing on the other hand.... the nature of SMR is that it needs to rewrite adjacent tracks so random reads and random writes performance is poor.

      Plus I don't think you could run a raid 6 or even a raid 1 array on seagate drives that large and be able to replace them faster than they failed.

      Seagate is plagued with lemons. From what I can tell the 8TB archival drive isn't one. But I'll wait for more data to come in on that. I'm not actually certain about running these things in RAID1 or RAID6 anyway. SMR needs complicated controllers on the drive to work and they act more like an SSD. I've heard of concerns that the RAID controller may get upset as one drive's performance suddenly drops off to do cleanup activities.

      I certainly wouldn't want to trust a single drive with 8tb of data.

      That goes without saying, but they do make an excellent offsite backup drive. Especially considering they are one of the cheapest drives per TB on the market.

    7. Re:SMR was a DOA idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The performance loss may be acceptable for certain workloads, but the potential data loss is not. With SMR, it is possible for new writes to destroy unrelated data or even entire filesystems, as can happen to NAND flash based SSDs without power loss protection. Hard disks may have terrible performance, but the failure modes are far less insidious.

  8. Helium by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    And to think the best thing I've adopted helium for is to sound like Elmo.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  9. Cloud-based data centers? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Why only cloud-based data centers? Are they not reliable enough for actual data centers?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Cloud-based data centers? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      They're full of helium! Who can keep them on the ground?? Duh!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Cloud-based data centers? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The Helium helps the Cloud based data center float.

    3. Re:Cloud-based data centers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because Helium helps reaching the clouds ?

      (on my way out)

  10. Last Seagate 8TB drive was PMR not SMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, the last Seagate 8TB drive was the Enterprise Capacity 3.5 HDD v5, which is PMR, not SMR.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/9577/seagate-announces-a-trio-of-8tb-drives-for-enterprise-applications

  11. Why not use a vacuum? by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    It's notoriously hard to keep helium inside of anything, so the seal would have to be good -- and they would have to vacate the air out of the drive interior before filling it with helium anyway. So why not just leave the interior of the drive in a vacuum?

    1. Re:Why not use a vacuum? by sshir · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heads will crash. The same thing was happening with notebook hard drives on flights because of low atmospheric pressure.

    2. Re: Why not use a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify the sibling poster's point:

      In hard drives, the spinning platters create air movement that causes the read heads to float just above their platters.

      You can think of the read head as having a flashlight attached to the end. As such, the closer it is to the platter, the more narrow its beam (shine a light at a wall and move towards and away for comparison).

      Since Helium is a small molecule, it allows the read heads to float closer to the platters (narrowing their beams). Narrower beams allow for the "tracks" of data to be closer together, producing more data density.

      Source: A neat tour of a Seagate factory

    3. Re:Why not use a vacuum? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Vacating the air to replace with helium does not mean drawing a vacuum. You can achieve the same thing with a helium purge.

    4. Re:Why not use a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heads will crash. The same thing was happening with notebook hard drives on flights because of low atmospheric pressure.

      Correct. A gas actually acts as a cushion of sorts. In a vacuum, you will have effects similar to galling and cold welding.

  12. There's significant and there's long enough by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes it's another failure mode that is going to give a harder limit on drive life than the current ones of spindle lubricant breaking down and polished surfaces fusing together. Seal things well and maybe they will last ten years before total failure, maybe only five, but a life of a few years is enough to bring them to market.

  13. Helium!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I had thought of that. I've tried filling hard drives with various other elements... Lead, plutonium, vanadium. Drives failed miserably.

    1. Re:Helium!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had your periodic table upside down.

  14. The helium will leak out, and drives will fai(#)&a by viking80 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Worked for an measurement instrument company building instruments that had to work in helium atmosphere. We tried for a long time to seal the helium out. Even to the point of filling the entire inside with glass filled epoxy to prevent intrusions of helium. In the end we gave up, and did a redesign to work in helium. solid metal seals will work, but pretty much any other seal will not.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
  15. Correction on why Helium "leaks" by justthinkit · · Score: 2

    It diffuses through metal because it is small. But not as small, nor as diffusion-prone as Hydrogen (which is diatomic btw).

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Correction on why Helium "leaks" by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think He is smaller and more diffusion prone in many ways than hydrogen.

      I believe that the difference is hydrogen is soluable in many metals. So it dissolves in the metal as monatomic hydrogen then diffuses through. The reason for this is not because H2 is smaller than He, but because H is sort of a metal and is soluable in many metals.

      For non metals, I think that doesn't apply. I might be wrong though.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Correction on why Helium "leaks" by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      Hydrogen has a higher diffusivity than helium. Seems to be about 25% higher.[PDF]

      I believe that the difference is hydrogen is soluable in many metals.

      Since I've never heard of such a thing, please provide a link.

      Note: given that hydrogen, even when diatomic, is smaller than Helium, it doesn't need to be "soluble" in metal to diffuse better.

      --
      I come here for the love
    3. Re:Correction on why Helium "leaks" by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Hydrogen has a higher diffusivity than helium. Seems to be about 25% higher.[PDF]

      That seems to be about diffusion of gaseous things within H2, not diffusion of H2 through solids.

      Since I've never heard of such a thing, please provide a link.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      http://energy.gov/sites/prod/f...
      http://www.google.co.uk/search...

      Note: given that hydrogen, even when diatomic, is smaller than Helium,

      Really? The atomic radius of Helium is 31pm http://periodictable.com/Prope... whereas the bond length for H2 is 74 pm http://www.wiredchemist.com/ch...

      Helium, it doesn't need to be "soluble" in metal to diffuse better.

      I like hopw you've never heard of it, can't be arsed to google, then use disparaging scare quotes because you want to be a consescending. Turns out you should have googled. It's a real thing.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  16. Spishak Mach 10TB drives by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't like the idea of cramming platters to increase density because it throws a wrench in useful scaling relationship between density and I/O rate. I don't want a disk requiring days to sync up or otherwise doubles time needed to read out a given percentage of the disk. This is what archival media is for.

    Would much rather see R&D efforts focused on increasing density and therefore I/O performance of individual platters otherwise for my purposes better off simply buying more and scaling out disks.

    If helium increases reliability over long term use then great.. if it lasts only as long as the warrantee period I'm not interested.

    Hoping against hope something not resembling vaporware will come out of RRAM efforts like crossbar in the next year or two.

    1. Re:Spishak Mach 10TB drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R&D efforts are focused on that: HAMR. Although research is still a few years out from results.

    2. Re:Spishak Mach 10TB drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the other way around. Bandwidth is proportional to the number of heads and the speed of each head. Adding a platter means adding two heads that will read in parallel to the others, so that increases bandwidth. Increasing density doesn't necessarily improve bandwidth. It can improve it by making bits closer and easier to reach, it might degrade it by making them smaller and harder to read.

    3. Re:Spishak Mach 10TB drives by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The heads on a hard drive cannot be read in parallel without separate actuators because more than one cannot be in alignment. Track density has been so high for more than a decade that various mechanical errors like wobbling of the disk stack, run-out, and the temperature coefficient of expansion create displacement errors greater than the track to track spacing.

  17. Umm... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    ...can you even hermetically seal helium? It will leak over time, slowly, no matter what.

    1. Re:Umm... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the word "can" be in italics in your sentence, instead of the word "even"?

    2. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knife edge seals on Copper, Aluminum, or Tin seals Helium and everything else, in or out,. This is something that I have a _lot_ of experience with, and each seal was Helium Leak-Checked. Some of the Chambers that I worked on had hundreds of these seals. (Conflat is Varian's trade name.)
      Tin actually works really well, and is very easy to work with, but it can't be baked without a lot of care because of the low melting temperature. Teflon also works well, and can provide electrical isolation.
      A Cyclotron that I once worked at, had double knife edge Copper seals on the vacuum chamber upper and lower faces, for redundancy; they never wanted to have to take it apart again. Within a few weeks, the seals started to leak; ramping up the Main Field caused the the knife edges to "work" the Copper. Some clever person rigged up a Grease Gun full of Dow Corning Vacuum Grease, fed into a hole drilled between the two seals. Every week, the Grease Gun would get a squeeze. After 35 years, it was still on the original load.

    3. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you even read any of the 98 comments before you to find out the answer?

    4. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. Re:The helium will leak out, and drives will fai(# by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    What pressure were you working with? Helium will happily diffuse through metals but it is not going to draw a vacuum on itself. Yes the drives will leak gently, but it's not like a pressure vessel where which is literally constantly releasing a small stream of helium through the shell. HGST hermetically seal their drives after filling them with helium and claim the helium won't leak out within the expected lifetime of the drive (~10 years).

  19. Planned Obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sealing helium in ANYTHING for a significant amount of time is pretty much impossible. Helium is a monatomic gas. These drives will leak.

    Planned Obsolescence.

  20. How do they handle pressure changes? by hankwang · · Score: 2

    If you have had hands-on experience with these things: do you have any idea how they handle pressure differences? Hard disk casings typically have flat sides, which are not ideal for handling pressure. In a pressurized airplane, you can have 0.3 bar pressire drop, which will exert about 30 kg of force on the walls. It's worse if they are shipped as unpressurozed cargo. So, the walls must be thicker than with a conventiomal HD, which conflicts with the goal of increasing the number of platters.

    1. Re:How do they handle pressure changes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet they have an under pressure in the drive, leading to a harder seal the higher the atmospheric pressure. Air plane pressure deviations should be easy to handle, particularly since the drives are likely more vulnerable only while running which is done in the pressurized section of a plane due to cooling considerations for the other components anyway.

  21. SEVEN platters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With helium, 14 heads? Seagate?

    That's just making me nervous even looking at it. They must have halved the MTTF for this piece of kit.

  22. the more you say "cloud" the stupider it sounds by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    "Cloud-based" datacenters? So, what, these drives wouldn't be any good for the datacenter in the basement with no internet connection?

  23. Well, then by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    thank goodness we're not running out of Helium!

  24. Waiting for Lemmium-filled drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Lemmium is likely to be a noble gas, lets fill the drives with it. Sure, they'll be heavier, and some of your data might come out a little distorted, but it will last for 70 years in the most messed up, toxic environment imaginable.

  25. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So...it's a fancier, shinier disk I still won't buy. Seagate....ugh.

  26. the real problem.. "high" bit set by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and the data comes out funny.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  27. MOAR PLATES! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see the failure rate of these things, be it with helium or magical farts from unicorns fed nothing but shavings off philosopher's stones.

  28. Diffusion over distance by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Redo your work with a more realistic model and you will get it. The thickness of the objects to be diffused through are non-zero.