Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Twitter Sued For Giving Voice To Islamic State (reuters.com)

Posted by Soulskill on from the speech-restrictions-are-hard dept.

An anonymous reader writes: An American woman named Tamara Fields has sued Twitter in U.S. federal court, saying the social network gave the Islamic State a voice to spread its propaganda. Fields's husband died on November 9, when the terrorist organization attacked a police training center in Amman, Jordan. The complaint alleges, "Without Twitter, the explosive growth of ISIS over the last few years into the most-feared terrorist group in the world would not have been possible." At the end of 2015, Twitter stepped up its efforts (or at least its official policies) to block such content from its site. But the company has been under fire for over a year from citizens and law enforcement officials over the activity of various terrorist groups on its platform. Fields's attorneys hope that her husband's death will give her proper standing to challenge Twitter in court.

6 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We should sue the courts for giving this lunatic a voice.

    1. Re:What's next? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1. "most-feared" is more about the news agencies reporting. Statistically you are in more danger from your own family/friends.

      Umm...That really, heavily, depends on where you live. In this case it was Jordan. Big difference than in the US.

      2. Al-Qaeda used to be "the most-feared" and they managed it without Twitter.

      Al Qaeda never managed to establish a caliphate.

      3. Finally, what evidence does she have that those specific terrorists actually used Twitter to recruit/plan/whatever? As opposed to, say, text messages.

      Considering that it's well known to be their primary recruitment platform (even by their own admission,) I'm sure you can find plenty.

  2. Let's not forget... by Onuma · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...to sue the air for carrying wireless messages, and the photons of light which transmit via fiber optic glass...and the glass too!

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  3. Re:Fueled by recent change to Twitters TOS by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thing about bans, they still need to be evenly enforced, and twitter seems to selectively enforcing their rules. Facebook is currently in a lawsuit over this for allowing "kill Israelis" pages and only banning "kill Arabs" pages. Companies are not evenly enforcing their policies and actually being very offensive towards some groups.

  4. Re: Fueled by recent change to Twitters TOS by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ISIS has most of the protections that SJWs have to attack, bully, etc.

    I saw what you did there.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  5. Re:The enemy of my enemy by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of these is true:

    1) Twitter employees read every one of the 500 million tweets per day that get posted and agree with the content of them all.

    2) You're making accusations despite having both a complete lack of evidence and a complete lack of understanding of the subject.

    BZZT. That's a 10 yard penalty for a False Dilemma fallacy. Try again.

    3) People have reported the offending content and Twitter left it up in the name of free speech -- while punishing people who disagree with fake feminist con artists like Zoe Quin or Brianna Wu, because "freeze peach" is so 1990s.