Slashdot Mirror


How OpenGL Graphics Card Performance Has Evolved Over 10 Years (phoronix.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A new report at Phoronix looks at the OpenGL performance of 27 graphics cards from the GeForce 8 through GeForce 900 series. Various Ubuntu OpenGL games were tested on these graphics cards dating back to 2006, focusing on raw performance and power efficiency. From oldest to newest, there was a 72x increase in performance-per-Watt, and a 100x increase in raw performance. The NVIDIA Linux results arrive after doing a similar AMD comparison from R600 graphics cards through the R9 Fury. However, that analysis found that for many of the older graphics cards, their open-source driver support regressed into an unworkable state. For the cards that did work, the performance gains were not nearly as significant over time.

3 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Phoronix = OSNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Comments like this is why I visit /. less often nowadays.

  2. Re:Phoronix = OSNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not really that interesting.

    Summary: Older video cards are slower than newer video cards, but linux still a piece of shit.

  3. unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article is not that interesting, primarily because they used high settings + 2560x1440 on old 256MB (!) cards, so most likely those cars are bottlenecked by gpu system ram texture swapping, showing lower performance and lower power reading than if more reasonable settings had been used. We're not seeing GPU power compared, but vram bottlenecks instead.