Slashdot Mirror


High-Tech Attack Alert For 2016 Super Bowl (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes with news about a Homeland Security memo concerning potential technological attacks during the Super Bowl. The forthcoming Super Bowl event on 7th February could be at risk of a high-tech attack against fans both inside and outside the San Francisco 49ers Stadium. A security memo issued by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security has warned that the annual game could be a target not just at the stadium, but at other commemorative events taking place in San Francisco and in the Silicon Valley. One of the chief concerns is the various sabotages committed against fibre cables in the area. As the fibre optic cable networks function as back up communication systems in emergency situations, these are a possible target for the attackers. By destroying these cables, response times could be slowed down.

60 comments

  1. Anonymous Reader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, just an 'anonymous reader'...

    1. Re:Anonymous Reader? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      The biggest "crime" they will work the hardest to stop and prosecute will be copyright infringement.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Oh noes! by khasim · · Score: 1

    Someone has "high tech" cut the fibre! Where will my pr0n go?

    And why wait for the Super Bowl to do this?

    And why is this a "threat"?

    1. Re:Oh noes! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as my team of choice is out of the running, it's no concern of mine any more.

      The threat of an attack at the stadium is always real, albeit probably fairly small. The awareness has been heightened because of the recent events in California and France, of course, but that doesn't really mean it's more likely. Any significant damage done would be purely psychological. In Tom Clancy's thriller about a nuclear blast on American soil, the terrorists chose the Superbowl as ground zero. It's a uniquely American icon, popular here the way soccer (the other "football") is in the rest of the world.

      The cable cutting "threat" is really more one of revenue than anything else (aside from the irritation of fans not being able to see the game), as the Superbowl is the largest sports event in the world, at least in terms of dollars per hour - or so I've heard. I suppose there also might be an issue of loss of face at a single person or small group being able to piss off millions of Americans and fans of football around the world.

      Here's the telling bit to me: "The organisers of the event say that they are on “maximum alert”, a level that has been in place since the attacks on 11th September 2001."

      In other words, it's business as usual.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Oh noes! by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      Someone has "high tech" cut the fibre! Where will my pr0n go?

      Best to start laying in a good supply ahead of time.

      And why wait for the Super Bowl to do this?

      And why is this a "threat"?

      Think about it. Interfering with Superbowl commercials will be devastating to the US economy. If the game itself cannot be seen, there will be parties all over the world where there is nothing to celebrate.

      And I guarantee you that at least one team will lose that day.

      These effects will cascade and the fabric of the universe could be rent.

    3. Re:Oh noes! by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Think of all the ads running during the event and the huge amount big corporations won't make if people don't see the ads.
      This is a real threat agains democracy. Think of the children!

    4. Re:Oh noes! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but all of that will be inserted from the network HQ in New York City, from a satellite feed from a dish on a truck outside the stadium. Probably more than one, for redundancy.

      No fiber will be used to get the television signal out of that place. It's all done via satellite.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re: Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 9/11 timeline says incompetence everywhere. IE 8:21am call from the flight attendant saying throats slashed and hijacked, then NORAD finally notified at 8:36

    6. Re:Oh noes! by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      all of that will be inserted from the network HQ in New York City, from a satellite feed from a dish on a truck outside the stadium. Probably more than one, for redundancy.

      No fiber will be used to get the television signal out of that place. It's all done via satellite

      Hmmm..., well, not naming any names but our asset inside the Kremlin referred to as "Cardinal" thinks that method might not work either.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  3. Super Bowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is bowling really that popular in America?
    And big whoop if someone cuts some cables, fix them after the bowling is over.

  4. Backup system could slow down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hyperbole much?

    This is another shining example of shit media. You're reporting on a possible "slow down" on back up services, without mentioning risk to "primary services?"

    That's like saying: the backup generator could potentially be acting up but the grid is operating perfectly and looks to be able to operate perfectly. ... And the real question is, what the fuck does this even mean? Nothing.

    Might as well masturbate and after just piss into the wind... It's certainly be more impactful on your life.

    1. Re:Backup system could slow down? by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      "Might as well masturbate and after just piss into the wind.."

      I do NOT wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Please do not tell me more...

  5. High Risk? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is more likely to be a riot after the Super Bowl than a terrorist attack. You are more likely to die from food poisoning while eating a hot dog in New York City then you are to die in a terrorist attack anywhere in the United States.

    1. Re: High Risk? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If there was a God he would blow the NFL off the map

  6. what else could they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets make up lots of other dumb ideas to be afraid of and post them as a story on a web site.

  7. Probably not terror at all. by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be willing to bet that all of those fiber cuts were caused by would-be copper thieves who didn't know how to tell the difference between the two. Copper wire theft is happening fairly frequently in the Bay Area, thanks in no small part to growing poverty rates.

    Ask yourself which is more likely—a few people trying to make a quick buck or a vast underground conspiracy of terrorists trying to find the optimal places to sever fiber lines to maximally disrupt communications and delay emergency response so that they can attack the Super Bowl in some way... and doing it by randomly cutting the lines to see what happens, rather than by stealing maps of where all the fiber goes....

    I mean yes, there's a chance it is terrorism-related. There's also a chance that someone stole Adolf Hitler's DNA and cloned him in a secret laboratory so that he could bring about the end of the world, and that these fiber cuts were caused by his clone army of mutant mice with laser beam eyes. I'd bet on the latter before the former....

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:Probably not terror at all. by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd be willing to bet that all of those fiber cuts were caused by would-be copper thieves who didn't know how to tell the difference between the two. Copper wire theft is happening fairly frequently in the Bay Area, thanks in no small part to growing poverty rates.

      Two years ago you'd be correct. But now? Copper is down 24% in the last year alone; it's currently only $2/pound.

      http://www.infomine.com/invest...

      When copper was $3+ (and especially at $4), yes, copper theft was an issue. However now that prices are down copper theft has dropped off significantly. Which is not to say that it has gone away entirely, but when copper is this cheap, stealing it and fencing it is an increasingly poor use of time at a whole $2 per pound. So I would be surprised if that was the issue; there are better ways to make money at these prices.

    2. Re:Probably not terror at all. by eth1 · · Score: 2

      I'd be willing to bet that all of those fiber cuts were caused by would-be copper thieves who didn't know how to tell the difference between the two. Copper wire theft is happening fairly frequently in the Bay Area, thanks in no small part to growing poverty rates.

      Our company has circuits all over the place, and by far, the most common notes from the carriers regarding cable cuts is "cable damaged by construction activity nearby. dispatching splice team." IOW, some dumbass with a backhoe.

    3. Re: Probably not terror at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like great depression era desperation economics. Price goes down? Do it more to stay afloat.

    4. Re:Probably not terror at all. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      This.

      I'll add, as well, that someone going through the trouble of planning such an attack will want as much attention for it as possible. That's the whole point of a terrorist attack: to get it in front of as many eyeballs as possible, in order to spread terror. Cutting communications cables is basically the exact opposite of what someone planning a terrorist attack would do.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re:Probably not terror at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been many instances of malicious fiber and infrastructure attacks in Silicon Valley over the past few years. One instance is when someone fired a hundred or so rounds into a power substation taking out power for that area. They have also been investigating several fiber optic cuts that were done purposely. Some are saying the Chinese could be probing our response times etc. So while the majority of times it's an accident Silicon Valley has a high number of incidents where things like this happen maliciously, hence the warning.

    6. Re:Probably not terror at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Your conjecture lacks any statistical facts. Here's one:

      Fact: Three weeks ago I walked into Burger King here in Santa Clara where I live. They said "Sorry, no soda from the fountain today." and served bottled water with burgers. When I inquired to the manager what happened, he said "Thieves broke into our pipes in the middle of the night outside the building, and stole the largest copper pipes. So our soda fountain system is out of commission until tomorrow at the soonest."

      So yeah, it still freaking happens, right here in Silicon Valley.

  8. So it seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there's a god in heaven, what in the hell is he waiting for?

    I mean, if he can't hear the children, then he must see the wars.

    It sure seems to me the he leads his lambs to the slaughterhouse, and not the promised land.

    Carolina. Denver. Denver wins it. Bings says so. So it costs a few a little brain damage. It could be worse. Still, all the "attack warning", "turn your neighbors in", is getting to be a bit too too much.

    1. Re:So it seems to me by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Still, all the "attack warning", "turn your neighbors in", is getting to be a bit too too much.

      Indeed, so much wolf-crying. Anyone with the intelligence to actually be able to do anything useful in the event of another major terrorist event has already figured out that all these reports are bullshit and stopped listening. Where does that leave us when the next credible threat comes along? In the hands of fools.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  9. Attackers would have to be determined by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    The cable cuts that have occurred in the Bay Area have been above-ground cables, but all the cables in the vicinity of the Levi's Stadium (where the Superbowl is being held) are buried. So potential attackers have first to dig up the road.

    There will be a big police presence so I doubt that someone digging up the road on Superbowl Sunday would go unnoticed.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Attackers would have to be determined by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You don't have to dig up the road. You just have to get into one of the lockers. They are under the sidewalk, IIRC, and you need some kind of fancy tool to open them, but it's not impossible. You don't need a backhoe.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Attackers would have to be determined by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to dig up the road. You just have to get into one of the lockers.

      That's true. I had not considered that. However, there is a lot of fibre in the area (for example, Savvis has a datacenter nearby) so, unless you knew which cable to cut, you would have to cut a lot of cables. You might set off an alarm by cutting the wrong cable.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  10. Sounds to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds to me they're just getting ready for the possibility of the Patriots returning to the Super Bowl. Given the headset shenanigans they've already been up to, you can't be too well prepared for dealing with whatever scheme they might have to "win" a second Super Bowl.

  11. EMP by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    It's all fun and games, until someone sets off a NNEMP device buried under the 50 yard line. ... I think that was part of the plot in a bad movie. I've noticed that a lot of credible threats are taken straight from movies and TV shows.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:EMP by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Kind of reminds me of this MIT prank:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  12. Primary comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As the fibre optic cable networks function as back up communication systems in emergency situations, these are a possible target for the attackers"

    And, what's the plan for the primary comms?

    1. Re:Primary comms? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      And, what's the plan for the primary comms?

      Crap! There's primary comms too?! All our careful planning has gone for naught!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Primary comms? by jmac_the_man · · Score: 2

      And, what's the plan for the primary comms?

      Belichick will be jamming those.

  13. Sounds made up, not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah this just sounds like more fake security BS spewed from the government to me.

    A. Why are fiber optic cables so important for response times when satellite phones are plentiful in government use.

    B. Response to what? It's the super bowl, they are already there. It's not like they are at the Police Station waiting without any idea where the next problem could be (hint, the superbowl is planned well in advance, in a known location).

    C. Why is cutting cables a "high tech attack"? Sounds like this is just a way to keep hammering that word into our heads as if something needs to be done about all these "high tech attacks".

    Wake up to propaganda people. It's alive and well.

    1. Re:Sounds made up, not a real issue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      A: because responding to the superbowl is not the only use for emergency services. Also, most public response radio frequency isn't direct radio to radio. It is often trunked at a packet forwarding location and piped to the relevant locations inside buildings. Packet relay radio allows for extended rangeas well as eliminating most dead spots and different agencies who rarely need to intercommunicate can do so with a relativel easy software change.

      B is subject to A but C is likely because it attacks the high tech aspect of emergency response communications. Not all cities are large enough to require complex setups but many are sufficient to require it. Take a dispatch office for instance, it may be in contact with 50 police radios, 30 or more fire and EMS radios and have 15 or more dispatchers on a light day. In a large city, there may be dozens of these. Then there is the 911 call center which may have 300 or more incoming lines and 100 operators or more who send dispatch requests to the appropriate agencies which then determine who and what responds.

      It would require so many antennas on buildings that they would resemble a pin cushion as well as multiple radios for each response unit.

    2. Re:Sounds made up, not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a "high tech attack" because the target (fiber cables) is high tech, even if the cutting of them is done with a stone hand axe.

      Now, if someone took out a sempaphore signalling system with drones and laser beams, that ought to be (by above criteria) a "low tech attack", but it'd be reported as a high tech attack too. It sounds cooler. Cool sells advertizing, which is what the news companies are all about.

  14. *** NATIONAL ALERT *** by easyTree · · Score: 2

    'Foot'ball threatened. Expected casualties are lethargy, beer sales, ad. revenue.

    DISPATCHING THE NATIONAL GUARD.

    -- End public service announcement --

  15. High-tech attacks by enriquevagu · · Score: 1

    Fibre cutting is not high-tech, it requires an axe or a saw, and is similar to cutting a rope. As some others have noticed, fibre cutting probably comes from failed attempts to steal copper wires, rather than an intentional sabotage to the telecommunication network.

  16. Enough scaremongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting tired of all these "ahhh this might happen!?!?!?" scenarios, either from here or other sites. Nothing bad ever happens, but when it does it's very much an isolated event, and well over 99.99% of people won't be affected.

  17. Who is the terrorist here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nowhere does it say that there is any evidence of someone planning an attack. No mention of any specific group like ISIS or Al-whomever. There is literally no intelligence behind this warning, spy type or IQ type. It's just frightened people who are paid to be paranoid screaming "Bogeyman!" Worse yet, they are giving ideas to the few bad guys out there who may not have thought of this. TFA even mentions the dreaded "lone terrorist" who can't be spotted/tracked because he talks to no one. That kind of person is an angry loner who may not even go over the tipping point if they hadn't put specific ideas in his head.
            Those claiming to protect us are going too far into paranoia and becoming a danger themselves, beyond destroying our privacy and individual rights. Yes, we need the services they are hired to perform, but I'm disgusted by how far they go in their righteous enthusiasm. This is irresponsibly frightening the public, just what the terrorists want. And exactly wrong for our well-being and economy.

    1. Re:Who is the terrorist here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti govt talk like that gets you put on the list.

    2. Re:Who is the terrorist here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely why I posted AC.

  18. Move along, nothing to see here. by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    The article quotes the FBI memo as saying, "the FBI and DHS have no information to indicate any specific, credible threats to or associated with Super Bowl 50 or related events". Which means that the people paid to be professionally paranoid and anticipate potential attacks have... Done their fscking jobs and anticipated potential attacks! ZOMG, the sky is falling! Personally, I think it's going to go down like this.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  19. 7th February by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you even English bro?

  20. #SMOD2016 by ScooterComputer · · Score: 1

    I await reading the FBI/DHS memo detailing the alert on the threat of the Sweet Meteor of Death hitting the 2016 Super Bowl. I mean, come on, the odds are about the same as for this.

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
  21. How to Truly Terrorize America by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    "One of the chief concerns is the various sabotages committed against fibre cables in the area. As the fibre optic cable networks function as back up communication systems in emergency situations, these are a possible target for the attackers. By destroying these cables, response times could be slowed down."

    The fucked up thing is that this might actually have more of an impact on many Americans than actual civilian deaths 'elsewhere' do.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  22. "San Francisco stadium"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "San Francisco" stadium which is two counties away and must be reached with a combination of heavy rail (Caltrain) and light rail (VTA).
    That place could get kaboomed by hostile actors and SF would barely notice.

  23. I hear they will take over the jumbotron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll say: "Zimmerman Flew, Tyler Knew. TURK 182!"

  24. My question is by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    If you are a terrorist organization and are planning a sophisticated attack, why in the world would you "tip your hand" this far in advance?

    Why not cut the cables a couple of hours in advance?

    Not saying it isn't a valid concern, but something doesn't seem right. I think the more obvious explanation is that there are disgruntled (that is probably one of the funniest words in the English language, btw) people in the area who want to shit on everyone else.

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:My question is by Agripa · · Score: 1

      You might test considerably in advance of the actual event to see what kind of results can be expected and to gauge any law enforcement response.

    2. Re:My question is by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      disgruntled (that is probably one of the funniest words in the English language, btw)

      "I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." (PG Wodehouse)

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  25. Drones will be the real threat at a large event by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    You can buy a drone like this (http://ebay.to/1lzsmj8) that can lift 15 pounds of weight for under $10k. Imagine someone with a van and 3 or more of these loaded with plastic explosives. Many can even be set to fly a preset GPS pattern. A moderately capable individual could launch a series of these miles from the event and have them drop their payload into the Superbowl or some other large event. They wouldn't likely directly kill thousands, but I bet hundreds would be killed just from the stampede of people trying to get out. Especially if multiple attacks were happening. And this action would have a decade plus multi-billion dollar impact of causing people to fear going to large events like this. It could be the end of attending professional sports as we know it.

    And you may say they could just put domes on arenas to protect people. I suspect 15lbs of high explosive could punch a hole in most domed structures.

    1. Re:Drones will be the real threat at a large event by swb · · Score: 2

      I would think that if something like that were to happen, it would have happened already.

      Like attacking a major shopping mall on the day after Thanksgiving when there are enormous crowds and the usual "Look at how many people are shopping!!!111" stand-up TV spots there to feed the fear directly to the people at home.

      Now you've not only made huge news, you've managed to scare people out of shopping malls and gut the American retail economy of profit for the year.

      That this *hasn't* happened in spite of how obviously vulnerable these places are to even the typical American mass shooter, let alone some group with any kind of advanced planning and better weapons leads me to believe it ain't gonna happen, either. Like maybe the threat isn't nearly as real as the media makes it out to be, or maybe it's actually harder than you think to pull it off.

    2. Re:Drones will be the real threat at a large event by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I would think that if something like that were to happen, it would have happened already.

      That is a great argument up until the first time that it happens and there has to be a first time.

      That this *hasn't* happened in spite of how obviously vulnerable these places are to even the typical American mass shooter, let alone some group with any kind of advanced planning and better weapons leads me to believe it ain't gonna happen, either. Like maybe the threat isn't nearly as real as the media makes it out to be, or maybe it's actually harder than you think to pull it off.

      The threat just is not that real but eventually someone is going to use or try to use a UAV in a terrorist act.

    3. Re:Drones will be the real threat at a large event by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "I would think that if something like that were to happen, it would have happened already."

      That statement was valid on 9/10/2001 concerning the theory that 19 men could take over a set of airliners and use them as guided missiles to take out iconic representations of capitalism.

  26. there are alternates, don't worry. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    Frisco has earthquakes for that. just ask Major League Baseball.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?