Slashdot Mirror


Former Mozilla CEO Launches Security-Centric Browser Brave

rudy_wayne writes: Former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich has launched a new Chromium-based browser called Brave. "Brave blocks everything: initial signaling/analytics scripts that start the programmatic advertising 'dirty pipe', impression-tracking pixels, and ad-click confirmation signals," Eich wrote on the Brave site. Former Mozilla CTO Andreas Gal said in a blog post that "the web is broken," with current browser vendors unwilling to tackle the dilemma of blocking ads, while looking at alternative mechanisms for funding content. Gal said it was ironic Brave was a for-profit operation that can make money from reducing advertising.

5 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good thing he is not, nor ever was, intolerant.

    "There is not a scintilla of evidence that he has ever discriminated against a single gay person at Mozilla" - Dissents Of The Day. The Dish.

    The only bigotry here is the bigotry you and your ilk seem so willing to project on others.

  2. Re:And will insert its own ads... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, dude, seriously, read closer ... he's going to block the ads already there, and then put in his own ads:

    When Brave is ready, it'll replace the missing content with its own ads.

    The ad newtwork can't track you because it doesn't serve ads to you.

    And then he charges someone else to sell you ads.

    The now mysteriously missing engadget link is the source of that quote.

    Let's get a grip on reality here and at least read the site before jumping to conclusions.

    Oh, do lets.

    Because the business model is replacing existing ads with new ads under the guise of giving us less tracking and more security.

    This is about creating his own ad network, and telling us it's for our benefit.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Re:Good on Brendan by naris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really! you think replacing (NOT blocking) ads with other ads where the revenue goes to the browser maker instead of the site is a step in the right direction! How is this NOT about money?

  4. Re:No thanks by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Equally bigoted are the people who couldn't handle Adolf Hitler's views.

    Adolf Hitler had every right to his views, and every right to express them, to participate in the political process. He did not have the right to use force to impose those views on others when those avenues didn't work out.

    Eich was not the one that used force on others in his story. He participated in the political process to support views he had every right to hold, and every right to express. There's no evidence he ever discriminated against a gay person at Mozilla.

    "Tolerance" means to accept the right of people you disagree with to exist in society, and to not try to kill them or force them out. Eich was tolerant - not accepting, which is a higher bar, but tolerant. His opponents were intolerant, and forced him out.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  5. Re:No thanks by Alypius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pfft, what is this "democracy" of which you speak? We lost that when people decided that shaming and silencing was a splendid little strategy. These days, calling someone a bigot merely translates into, "'Shut up or I'll harass your boss until he fires you," and when someone says they "want a conversation," they really mean, "Shut up and agree with everything I say."