Slashdot Mirror


An Ancient, Brutal Massacre May Be the Earliest Evidence of War

HughPickens.com writes: Violence has always been part of human behavior, but the origins of war are hotly debated. Some experts see it as deeply rooted in evolution, pointing to violent confrontations among groups of chimpanzees as clues to an ancestral predilection while others emphasize the influence of complex and hierarchical human societies, and agricultural surpluses to be raided. Now James Gorman writes in the NY Times that scientists have discovered a site in Africa dated about 10,000 years ago where a group of hunter-gatherers attacked and slaughtered another, leaving the dead with crushed skulls, embedded arrow or spear points, and other devastating wound. It's not clear that anyone was spared at the Nataruk massacre. Of the 27 individuals found, eight were male and eight female, with five adults of unknown gender. The site also contained the partial remains of six children. Twelve of the skeletons were in a relatively complete state, and ten of those showed very clear evidence that they had met a violent end. In the paper, the researchers describe "extreme blunt-force trauma to crania and cheekbones, broken hands, knees and ribs, arrow lesions to the neck, and stone projectile tips lodged in the skull and thorax of two men." Four of them, including a late-term pregnant woman, appear to have had their hands bound. "These human remains record the intentional killing of a small band of foragers with no deliberate burial, and provide unique evidence that warfare was part of the repertoire of inter-group relations among some prehistoric hunter-gatherers," says Dr Marta Mirazon.

The killers carried weapons they wouldn't have used for hunting and fishing, including clubs of various sizes and a combination of close-proximity weapons like knives and distance weapons, including the arrow projectiles she calls a hallmark of inter-group conflict. " This suggests premeditation and planning," says Mirazon Lahr. Other, isolated examples of period violence have previously been found in the area, and those featured projectiles crafted of obsidian, which is rare in the area but also seen in the Nataruk wounds. This suggests that the attackers may have been from another area, and that multiple attacks were likely a feature of life at the time. "This implies that the resources the people of Nataruk had at the time were valuable and worth fighting for, whether it was water, dried meat or fish, gathered nuts or indeed women and children. This shows that two of the conditions associated with warfare among settled societies—control of territory and resources—were probably the same for these hunter-gatherers, and that we have underestimated their role in prehistory."

6 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Not at all by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There were wars long before humans. Even termites and ants exhibit such behavior. We are not special snowflakes who invented the idea.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Not at all by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, and nor are we some enlightened animal so far removed from barbarism that it's unthinkable.

      What people fail to understand is this kind of stuff has always been with humanity, and 'civilization' is a relatively new and thin veneer over humanity.

      Why people think this was an invention which came much later is beyond me, we started as animals, and in all the important ways, we still are animals.

      But then people act all surprised and think war and violence was a modern invention ... our limbic system says we directly evolved from things with not much more advanced impulses than a lizard ... eat, survive, fuck.

      It's an intrinsic property, and when push comes to shove, we'll revert back to it pretty quickly. Having higher brain functions doesn't mean those other things have gone away.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything, I think we're _less_ violent in present times than in past history. The terrorist bombings we see, historically speaking, are a joke. Try living under the constant fear of your neighbour state sending in tens of thousands or more to kill/enslave/torture/rape/etc the population. Or on a smaller scale the superstitious religions burning people at the stake. People walking around with daggers and swords as a matter of common practice.

    3. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Utter bullshit. "We're told our ancestors are all vegan" - you say, linking to a Scientific American article that says, in short, "most human ancestors ate more vegetables than meat".

      And the idea that violence is bad actually underpins both Christianity and capitalism. They're both, by intent, designed as ways to reduce conflict. And to an extent, they've both been successful in that aim - at some levels, at some times, and within some scopes - but not without unintended side effects.

      If you've been hearing too many simplistic arguments, then maybe you need to stop hanging out with simpletons. Because it's rubbing off on you.

  2. Surprise! We're a young, violent race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ..and we haven't changed much at all in ten thousand years, either, now have we? The weapons and methods may have changed, but when it comes right down to it, the attitudes aren't all that different. We delude ourselves that this thin patina of 'civilization' means we've made it, we're not just 'intellgent' but sentient, and if E.T. came calling, we'd be ready to enter Galactic Civilization as full participating members -- but none of that is true.

    But look at the leaps and bounds we've made! What you're saying can't be true, look at the wonderful things X Y and Z have done and contributed to Humanity!

    An individual can act more evolved than the average, and entire populations of people can be just wonderful -- so long as everything is going well for them, there's no problems, and everyone has everything they want or need. But you put populations under stress? The animals that we are inside our skins comes out and you find out what we're really like.

    Nice try, Humanity. Come back in another 10000 years and we'll see if you've made any real progress.

    1. Re:Surprise! We're a young, violent race by almitydave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An individual can act more evolved than the average, and entire populations of people can be just wonderful -- so long as everything is going well for them, there's no problems, and everyone has everything they want or need. But you put populations under stress? The animals that we are inside our skins comes out and you find out what we're really like.

      Or to put it another way: "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it."

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're