Slashdot Mirror


At How Much Risk Is the US's Critical Infrastructure? (csoonline.com)

itwbennett writes: There is growing evidence that intrusions into the power grid and other critical infrastructure by hostile foreign nation states are real and happening. But there's "much less agreement over how much of a threat hackers are," writes Taylor Armerding. "On one side are those – some of them top government officials – who have warned that a cyber attack on the nation's critical infrastructure could be catastrophic,"writes Armerding. Others are crying FUD, including C. Thomas, a strategist at Tenable Network Security, who got some attention when he argued in an op-ed that the biggest threat to the U.S. power grid not a skilled hacker, but squirrels, are crying FUD. Who has it right? Agreement seems to coalesce around two points: 1) the cyber security of industrial control systems remains notoriously weak and 2) hostile hackers will improve their skills over time. So, while we haven't reached "catastrophe" yet, a properly motivated terrorist group could become a cyber threat.

2 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Re:OMG!!! by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As some one whose worked in industrial automation (PLCs and their ancillary products) the infrastructure is most definitely at risk. The only thing keeping terrorism at bay is the technical knowledge necessary to mess with it. Engineers at power stations are old farts, and they like things a certain way, the old way. PLCs communicate to other machines in the field using ancient serial protocols, proprietary back planes, and discreet data points. As Rockwell and Siemens and etc decide they need to wake up to the real world however they are putting more of their data over ethernet, but security is an afterthought, and there's your problem. They are designing security into newer protocols, I actually worked on something called DNP-3, and that specification does have an encryption layer in it. I come on to add AES-256 to an existing implementation. Again, afterthought. The effect out in the field of course is that new impl. will cause disruption, consuming devices will need to be upgraded, and etc. That costs money. And so on. Its rarely the case that one simply needs to add a password to an existing infrastructure. Even if that is all that's needed, it usually will still have a cascading effect.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  2. Re:From neglect or from hackers? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Informative

    QFT. Flint, MI says hi. Public works and infrastructure require a lot of maintenance

    It wasn't lack of maintenance that caused the environmental disaster and poisoning of 100k people in Flint. It was an attempt to run government on "free market" principles. An emergency manager appointed by Gov Rick Snyder (R-Atlas Shrugged) decided to change the water source to a polluted river to save money, punish Democratic voters and kill poor people.

    It was a Republican governor sending small pox infected blankets to the people of Flint.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.