Slashdot Mirror


Google May Be Developing Consumer Virtual Reality Hardware (roadtovr.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Google's 'Cardboard' virtual reality initiative has put low-cost smartphone VR viewers in the hands of millions, but the experience provided by these simple phone holders doesn't compare with dedicated mobile VR hardware like Samsung's Gear VR. Now it seems that Google may be ready to move from Cardboard viewers to dedicated VR hardware. Four new full-time job listings at the company's Mountain View, CA headquarters seek candidates for the company's virtual reality group who are experienced with designing and manufacturing 'high-volume' consumer electronics devices. Road to VR suggests that Google could be creating a mobile VR headset under its flagship Nexus brand. The postings come just as the company's Clay Bavor dropped other responsibilities to fully dedicate his time as Google's VP of Virtual Reality.

27 comments

  1. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody needs it.

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what? You don't "need" 90% of the shit you own.

    2. Re:Yawn by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      People around here said that about cameras in cell phones, too.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could call it the Hololens... Oh wait?

    4. Re: Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's AR dipshit...

    5. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they didn't. You must be new here.

    6. Re:Yawn by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did. Complete with tales of how no one would use them because they'd just carry their point'n'shoots around,

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  2. Yawn by frnic · · Score: 1

    I maybe developing digital brain replacements running windows 12... could happen, maybe...

  3. Given google's history by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    It's more likely that they'll be developing a VR Operating system, with some "flagship" proof-of-concept hardware to create initial interest

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Given google's history by chispito · · Score: 1

      It's more likely that they'll be developing a VR Operating system, with some "flagship" proof-of-concept hardware to create initial interest

      Makes more sense to me that they would be developing the phone-in-goggles like the Samsung Gear.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  4. VPVR by turkeydance · · Score: 0

    must be an ancient Roman thing

  5. But then again, they might not. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If Betteridge had a second law, it would be this.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Where;s teh inn0vat1onzzzz?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they do is copy from everyone else. A bunch of frauds with their little army of faggot fanbitches.

    Go suck some more google cock, faggots.

    1. Re:Where;s teh inn0vat1onzzzz?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry your application to Google wasn't accepted, kid.

  7. Welcome by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Google One/VR. Over here you can listen to nothing. Over there is the circle of spam. But wait, there's more, one you have a time and or monetary investment we will shit can the project like reader.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  8. May be? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They already have Cardboard, which is VR hardware on the cheap - you can easily imagine the library that drives the display split on mobile phones could easily be updated to drive custom hardware also. Did everyone really think they would just stick with a Rube Goldberg cardboard and lens contraption?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. google strays from its core competences to fail by sittingnut · · Score: 1

    google( and other big techs ) seems to think throwing money(= people and resources) at all kinds of frontiers ( and even non frontiers) will result in success( that will keep the company relevant) . so far it has precious little to show in way of successes.
    this is predictable. there many many past cases through history where successful institutions who try do things they do not know about get into all sorts of troubles. its a mind and culture thing.

    google should do what it is doing well (and perhaps expand on edge of those things) . but not go after things it know nothing about as an institution .
    if individuals who make/made money from company want to do all that stuff, let them do that separately. through new startups.

    1. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about focusing on your core incompetency!

    2. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cardboard was a success because it made it easy to try virtual reality. Googles success with cardboard should not be a sign that there is a market for more vr gear. Maybe google should get more people into vr by sticking with cardboard and focus on providing vr content instead.

    3. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      google( and other big techs ) seems to think throwing money(= people and resources) at all kinds of frontiers ( and even non frontiers) will result in success( that will keep the company relevant) . so far it has precious little to show in way of successes.

      There was a time not too long ago when Google was merely a web-based search engine for the desktop. If Google stuck to its core competency, then there wouldn't be Android, GMail or the Chrome browser. Google would still be just a search engine.

    4. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real tragedy of this is that when they sink money into something like this they buy up all the talent, strip them of their ideas, very poorly implement it into a complete market failure, and then those people move onto better things. But meanwhile, google owns all the intellectual property and their ideas. So they just rob the world of ideas and products that would be awesome because they are incompetant greedy boobs.

    5. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by bouldin · · Score: 1

      Google developed android to protect against apple taking over the smartphone market and, while it seemed like a long shot, you see how successful that project has been.

      This sounds like a defensive play against oculus. Facebook/oculus should be intimidated; google executes much better than crapware companies like fb and ms.

    6. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by ultranova · · Score: 1

      google( and other big techs ) seems to think throwing money(= people and resources) at all kinds of frontiers ( and even non frontiers) will result in success( that will keep the company relevant) . so far it has precious little to show in way of successes.

      Very little except, you know, Google and the other big techs.

      google should do what it is doing well (and perhaps expand on edge of those things) . but not go after things it know nothing about as an institution .

      Going after new things is what being a tech company is all about. A large company can simply hire expertize in any desired area. What the company brings to the table is an institutionalized process of turning research into products which will fund further research, and the sheer size needed to absorb failures for the chance to invent the Next Big Thing.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by sittingnut · · Score: 1

      they are not doing great at "inventing the Next Big Thing" so far.
      only thing all the big techs do successfully is the one that made them big in the 1st place, all other things they (except for some that were added on the edge of their main competency. such as gmail which which was part of most of all the search engines before google as well) have been failures so far.
      there is some success at things they acquired fairly well developed from other startups that succeeded through community and other company(as smartphone ones) participation (eg android) .

    8. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by sittingnut · · Score: 1

      agree with your comment completely

    9. Re:google strays from its core competences to fail by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I agree. As far as I can see the only thing they did well (or well enough - I think timing plays into it) was search.

      Anything else has either been shit or bought in.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. Re: google strays from its core competences to fai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Wikipedia: "Co-founder Andy Rubin left (Danger) in 2003 to create the company Android, which was later acquired by Google." So what was that about no Google no Android? I guess it's just like people who believe Apple created Siri. It was purchased from SRI.