Slashdot Mirror


US Regulators Find Serious Deficiencies At Theranos Lab (wsj.com)

An anonymous reader writes: 2016 has not started well for blood-testing startup Theranos. Already facing allegations of data manipulation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have found problems with Theranos' laboratory in Newark, California, putting the company's relationship with the Medicare program in danger. WSJ reports: "It isn't clear exactly what regulators have faulted Theranos for in their latest inspection, which took several months. Adverse findings would be another regulatory setback for one of Silicon Valley's highest-profile startups, valued at about $9 billion in 2014. Theranos already has stopped collecting tiny samples of blood from patients' fingers for all but one of its tests while it waits for the Food and Drug Administration to review the company's applications for wider use of the proprietary vials called 'nanotainers.' In October, the FDA said it had determined that the nanotainers were an 'uncleared medical device.'"

4 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Awesome job, guys! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, going from a revolutionary plan to do tests with markedly less blood using your super-neat proprietary hardware to not even being able to operate off-the-shelf hardware from competitors well enough to satisfy Medicare?

    I guess we can't all be disrupters...

  2. it's not a story about blood by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real story here is not about some medical device or a failed test.

    The story, and reason we take pleasure in this downfall is because a charismatic, supposed prodigy, Stanford-privileged, everyone-wants-to-believe-in-successful-woman CEO, who was able to convince funders based on flashy visions and compelling talk, has been found out to have nothing behind the emperor's clothes. And that so many people who are purportedly expert at evaluating technology got collectively duped/brainwashed into believing a whole bunch of fluff based on no more than a TED talk-level technology pitch.

    While others who are working on real demonstrable technology, and do not get the benefit of celebrity status, Silicon Valley connections, get passed over for grants / VC money / recognition because they're not connected or privileged in the same way.

    Stop believing so much in the vision and hype. Ask for and act on real results more.

  3. Re:Regulation; is there no harm it cannot bring? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even worse, a recent article indicated they had effectively stopped using their own process for testing and had gone back to using the previous method.

    If anything screams scam, that should be a flashing red light.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  4. Re:Regulation; is there no harm it cannot bring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Theranos device has integrated testing capability and the capillary tube contains the sample while it is delivered to a desperate testing device, which in all likelihood is a medical device