Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot and SourceForge Sold, Now Under New Management (bizx.info)

kodiaktau writes with a link to today's announcement that DHI Group, Inc. (which you might know better as Dice, the company that bought Slashdot and sister site SourceForge in 2012) today announced that it completed the sale of its Slashdot and SourceForge businesses (together referred to as 'Slashdot Media') to BIZX, LLC in a transaction that closed on January 27, 2016. Financial terms were not disclosed. DHI first announced its plan to sell Slashdot Media in July 2015 as part of its strategy to focus on its core brands, as Slashdot Media no longer fits within the Company's core strategic initiatives. KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. served as the Company's exclusive financial advisor for the transaction. (FOSS Force has a short article with some more info BIZX and the sale.)

44 of 1,310 comments (clear)

  1. Meet the new boss by tpjunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    same as the old boss

    1. Re:Meet the new boss by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes please! Check out my sig, this has been a really annoying issue for quite some time. Also, please encode in UTF-8 if you can. UTF-16 is dangerous - namely because the vast majority of characters are only two bytes, but in rare cases they're four, so these cases usually slip past testing; often even libraries are broken in UTF-16, let alone individual programs, when it comes to 4-byte characters.

      Other things to keep in mind:

        * This is a site of nerds, so if someone posts a small chunk of code, it should display properly. Don't go all crazy on trying to "parse" and "prettify" posted text.

        * For your sake, don't make the site vulnerable to injection (aka, *never* just paste a string from a user into one used internally). This is, again, a site full of nerds; they'll notice. And the less scrupulous will take advantage of it. Don't write your own sanitization functions, use internal library functions - preferably parameter binding and the such. And don't forget that injection is not just about SQL, it can affect any user string inserted into another that subsequently goes through a parser - there's XML injection, HTML injection, BASH injection, and so forth.

      * If there's some coding project that you think would help the site but you don't have the resources to do it, turn to your readers. For example, if the site was being hit by spam bots in the comments or whatnot, I'm sure you could get more than a few volunteers who would contribute code if it means not having to read the spam.

      * People screw up, that's normal. If you accidentally post a duplicate, just take it off the front page. You don't have to delete the comments (you could even put it back on firehose), but just try to keep the front page duplicate free.

      * I'm not a big "oh, this site is inherently bad!" person, but a lot of people are, and they get angry when they see links to articles on certain sites (such as, for example, Forbes, due to their adblocker policy and malware history). Be aware of what sites are unpopular and try to avoid linking them, if you can. Most news is available from multiple outlets.

      If you do this sort of stuff, people here will be very happy :)

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    2. Re:Meet the new boss by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but on the other hand it took SN only a few months to completely degrade into Breitbart-level rightwing kookery.

      Ok, ok, that's hyperbolic, but it's a lot worse than Slashdot. Here at least there is a sizable contingent of people still willing to challenge the reactionary rhetoric.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  2. Take back Slashdot by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I really, really hope this is good news. I miss the actual "News for nerds" ethos that brought me here, and I've waded through a lot of sponsored "posts" and clickbait to sift out the kernels of actual news that remain.

    New /. overlords? Get this site back to "News for nerds" and news that matters, and you'll keep me here.

    1. Re:Take back Slashdot by ChrisKnight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please, please, please... No more Bennett Haselton monologs!

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    2. Re:Take back Slashdot by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't believe it. Is Slashdot going to stop those ridiculous paid links to forbes.com? What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world? What about constant news-today-gone-tomorrow political stories that are general news, at best? I don't see any of those going away under any kind of new management. Irritating as fuck content has been around since the Jon Katz stories wouldn't stop appearing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please fuck off. Slashdot is not Slashdot without the AC. There is no need for stupid reddit-ish "EDIT: Blahblahblah" bullshit. Say it right the first time your reply to your own post. Are you trolling?

    4. Re: Take back Slashdot by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please, cut back on the "everyone in your industry are chauvenists assholes and you owe us a place in your ranks" crap?

      We don't need shit and abuse in our leisure time, we get enough on the job.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:Take back Slashdot by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're going to do our best to keep/bring back that "news for nerds" ethos and hopefully keep you here.

      I do have one suggestion, since you appear to be participating... Please take care with the distinction between nerd stuff and fandom. The two have a lot of overlap, but at the moment fandom is seeing a popular resurgence that takes it far away from nerdy subjects. It can be fun, but part of the reason that Slashdot became successful in the first place was that it catered to a subculture rather than catering entirely to mainstream culture.

      There is a limit on the size that something can grow when it doesn't embrace mainstream culture, but entities that attempt to make that transition usually falter as they alienate their subculture userbase far faster than they attract mainstream participation. That may mean that Slashdot and other sites like it have an upper bound, but it's better than closing up shop.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re: Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've already commented more in this thread then the previous mods did in a year. Well done.

    7. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My suggestion is to look at the posting history of people who make suggestions while logged in, so you'll see when they're nutters who need to be ignored. QED.

      AC's dont want to make a reputation for themselves, so they can be judged on their own merits.

    8. Re:Take back Slashdot by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd disagree. The case for anonymous speech is well established and with Slashdot's default method of displaying comments, you won't see AC posts unless they've been moderated positively a few times. Also, there are plenty of people who don't want an account for whatever reason and the occasional inane troll (that is typically modded to -1 in a few minutes) isn't worth losing the random insightful AC post. You won't fix the problem either as the actual trolls will just create throwaway accounts.

      I can't say that allowing moderation and posting in the same article is a better idea either. There're enough articles that have become political and the people who have strong opinions on the positions they take shouldn't be allowed to mod in the same article. People get too emotionally involved and it will result in more bad moderation or abuse than potential good.

    9. Re:Take back Slashdot by schnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So here's some unsolicited advice (yay!):

      Websites that change owners frequently pretty much scream "potentially valuable asset that nobody has figured out how to make money on!" Because if they did actually make money, they wouldn't be getting sold. So Slashdot is a pretty obvious money sink, but it does have a desirable reading audience, many of whom are absurdly vocal about how they don't want to read ads, subscribe or otherwise do anything that would, you know, make the site profitable.

      My advice? Focus on content quality - Slashdot could easily post 3x the stories it does today, and have better QA - just by maybe hiring someone with some journalism credentials rather than making the people who write the back end server code pretend to be editors. Improve the quality and make it "must read" material that people are willing to pay for. And try encouraging some writers to create original content - not BS video interviews with talking heads from sponsors, but actual longform journalism. If Slashdot is actually a good enough read, you can monetize a subscription tier that echoes "Slate Plus," "ESPN Insider," etc.

      In Slashdot's "glory days," it didn't have a lot of competition. There was no Gawker/Gizmodo/iO9/whatever to read about the coolest Star Wars prequel rumors; people came to Slashdot for that. Even though there's a lot of competition now, Slashdot (barely) hangs on to a superior virtue: a better quality of commenters and a better moderation system than other "nerd" sites. Slashdot was never very well managed, even back in the "CmdrTaco/Hemos Glory Days." Inject some QA into the story vetting/writing process and you'll see a resurgence of readership.

      Let me continue to beat this dead horse: all that Slashdot really has going for it is a (minority) smart readership and a superior comment rating system. Explore and improve that. Gamify the f--k out of Karma. Do profiles on crazy frequent Slashdot contributors (not Bennett Hasleton) and let them have a real name and a voice. More badges, go back to numerical representations of karma, give higher upmods to really good contributors, whatever. Reward posters that get a lot of up- or down-mods because they're usually saying something interesting one way or another, even if they're being mod-bombed by ideologues. Reward longer posts. Finally introduce a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod. This mod system is your real asset - pay some attention to it, which hasn't been done in many many years.

      Thank you for showing up to answer questions. Please continue to be engaged. Slashdot has always shown an astonishing lack of self-awareness! Why were there thousands of off-topic posts about how much Beta sucked and why? Because Slashdot's editors didn't even think through the idea that people have opinions of their product enough to introduce a way for people to have meta-discussions about Slashdot. When your readers/commenters are the "product" to your advertisers, how do you not give them a place to comment/vent/respond about Slashdot itself? In the 15+ years I have read this site, I don't remember a single post from "management" saying "how are we doing? comment here." That's just either willful disregard of feedback or idiocy. And seriously, the site itself gets sold, and the post about it is when somebody else submits a link? YOU DON'T THINK THAT'S SOMETHING YOU COULD HAVE ANNOUNCED YOURSELVES? I mean, WTF?

      Lastly, please just be open. What's working, what's not. I think people would be willing to turn off ad blockers or pay for Slashdot if someone in charge just said, "Hey, we lose money on this site. We need help. How are you willing to support us? Do you want to donate (a la Wikipedia) in exchange for having ads turned off? Would you be willing to subscribe? Can we do more ads if they follow a certain vetting process?"

      It's sad to admit this, but Slashdot has been my "home page" since at least 1999. I'd hate to see it go away, and I'd love to keep it alive and healthy, as long as it's worth keeping.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    10. Re:Take back Slashdot by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ACs also don't want to be mass down moderated just because someone had to be the adult in the room and state the obvious or wanted to play devil's advocate in order to explore different ends of a position.

      If that annoys you, I suggest you get over it else face a boring echo chamber.

    11. Re:Take back Slashdot by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No more "APK" posts, ban that spam-laden prick and put in a filter to stop him from polluting this site like he's done for the last several years.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    12. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say that also with the idea in mind that so many people prefer to live in their own echo chamber such that they are not often look for an educated discussion, rather just a way to be a part of their flavor of groupthink. (And /. has been guilty of that as well of course.)

      I was about to say... Part of the reason I'm not on /. so much anymore is that it has become an echo chamber and intolerant of those who don't follow the herd and think according to the groupthink.

      It's neither beta.slashdot nor Dice that killed Slashdot, it's that it failed to remain relevant and increasingly become hostile. As more and more places offered forums or mailing lists or even blog comments... people left Slashdot because "news for nerds" had become "cultism for nerds".

    13. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I exclusively post AC. I get modded everything from -1 Troll to +5 Insightful to +5 Interesting.

      AC posting encourages discourse and thoughtful expression unrestrained by social taboos. Elimination of AC's deprives the community of uncomfortable truths, criticism of dogma, and edgy satire.

      Socrates was forced to drink poison hemlock in retribution for "sophistry" and making people look foolish. I hold many unpopular opinions that would result in ostracism if vocalized publicly. Some of these opinions are unpopular because they are wrong, and some of them are unpopular because they aren't. Posting anonymously allows me to argue them on their merits and have my beliefs shaped by the persuasiveness of the responses I receive.

      Without this "sounding board" of anonymous speech the opinions which were both wrong and unpopular would have nowhere to go except to fester inside corrupting the integrity of my judgement. In many cases, I will deliberately take an extreme position that I don't believe just to play the devil's advocate and provoke a discussion I believe is worth having.

      Slashdot is where I come to measure the quality of my thoughts, and to learn to more effective persuasion. The readership is more intelligent than the average Reddit user, and as a consequence: the moderation system offers me a somewhat unique way to numerically gauge an argument on it's unbiased merits.

      For all these reasons: Slashdot comments section is a valuable institution providing freedom of speech on the internet and the marketplace of ideas as a whole.

    14. Re:Take back Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can agree on the Unicode support, but also see a problem with it since it opens up for spammers in Korean, Japanese and a kiloton of other languages as well as using unicode versions of lookalike characters that would make a word readable but hard to catch in spam filters.

      But it may be good to at least review which Unicode characters that may be let through so that we may get a few fresh ones.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    15. Re:Take back Slashdot by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gamify the f--k out of Karma.

      We've both been around long enough to remember numerical Karma, I think. I know I remember building up a fairly high number, and then "spending" it with some silly trolls just for grins and giggles. Have you thought through the whole idea of gamifying it?

      Anyway, I don't actively block ads on Slashdot--they're just collateral damage of script blocking. The script blocking is just there to avoid security and/or poor page performance issues. If the new owners can actually find a way to make me view ads without killing the site, they wouldn't just be fixing Slashdot--they'd be demonstrating a model that could fix the web in general.

      Yes, that's a tall order and I'm skeptical. I don't know if it's the ad networks or the advertisers, or what; but the state of the art in ads is for them to be annoying as hell to end-users. You'd have to go back to regular old non-animated GIFs served from the same domain in order for me to view ads, and I think that's a tough sell to advertisers, or ad-networks, or anybody that's built a web site in the past 15 years.

      This is not quite the same as gamifying Karma, but I think if they borrowed the "gold" concept from reddit and kept their hands off the moderation and Karma systems they might have something. You know how that works? Users buy "gold" for other users. Getting gold unlocks some site features, the money goes to reddit. There is a thing that tells you how much server time the gold purchase has provided.

      I'm not sure how much of reddit is funded by gold, but it's probably a big chunk. I've gotten it once--it's way harder to get than a +5 comment, at least for me; but then I don't intentionally try to play to that crowd just for Internet points...

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    16. Re:Take back Slashdot by Hussman32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree more should be given, but at least let you keep the points when you do get them (right now you lose them in three days, which always feels like two days). If I'm in a rush I wouldn't use the mod points as well as if I had time to think about them.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    17. Re:Take back Slashdot by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Websites that change owners frequently pretty much scream "potentially valuable asset that nobody has figured out how to make money on!" Because if they did actually make money, they wouldn't be getting sold. So Slashdot is a pretty obvious money sink, but it does have a desirable reading audience, many of whom are absurdly vocal about how they don't want to read ads, subscribe or otherwise do anything that would, you know, make the site profitable.

      I think that's the vocal minority.

      First, - ads. There's a lot of ads (regular ads, not the sponsored articles) and most of them are quite irrelevant, motion and browser-slow crap. Find some tasteful self-hosted manually-screened ads appropriate to the audience, and only have one, or two tops on a page.

      Second - subscriptions. Offer subscriptions and promote the benefits. One of the biggest ones is subscribers get HTTPS access (!). Given the current environment, sell that - let people subscribe for HTTPS. Naturally get rid of the ads (you're buying privacy!) but hey, now you have a value-add that many people would find valuable. People don't care for early access to stories - they want real features. HTTPS is one of those.

      If you're an SEO company, you should know exactly your audience to optimize for them. If they did their research, they should know what the audience wants.

    18. Re:Take back Slashdot by rastos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If slashdot would not mangle characters such as pound, euro, quotes, copyright sign and few others, then it would be more than enough for me.

    19. Re:Take back Slashdot by goarilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, we need the liberty to post AC so "con-conformist"/contraversial ideas or uncomfortable issues can get attention.
      I sometimes post AC myself on a topic I want to know more about to incite knowledgeable people to inform me for example.
      Maybe we should only allow anonymous posts from real accounts, so the drive-by AC's and lazy trolls can't abuse it.
      Like an anonymous "idea box" in an office. It's sort of anonymous but only from the people who are employees.

    20. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always found it hilarious how he never took on board any of the comments. People would give him useful hints like "it's too long", "this is rambling drivel" or "you have no idea what you are talking about, you fucking idiot" and he'd just ignore them and post the same shit the next week. I assumed it was some kind of parody, or maybe he was going for a kind of "most hated man on the internet" clickbait.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Take back Slashdot by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a limit on the size that something can grow when it doesn't embrace mainstream culture, but entities that attempt to make that transition usually falter as they alienate their subculture userbase far faster than they attract mainstream participation. That may mean that Slashdot and other sites like it have an upper bound, but it's better than closing up shop.

      That's exactly right. It's the Unix philosophy: do one thing and do it right.

      I think it's useful to know that a lot of us around here have been here for literally decades at this point. It's hard to believe. I'm a mid-5-digit-uid guy and I've been here since 1998 or 1999. But the site has almost been around for 20 years now. We've grown up here. I was around 30 when I signed up, I'm almost 48 now.

      Slashdot is seeing the same trend as everywhere else where most younger kids are going somewhere else and this is a fairly consistent bunch of older guys. The point is that if you lose us there's unlikely to be anyone waiting in the wings to take our place.

      The Dice years - as they'll be known historically - sucked. We don't care about SJW stories. I mean, seriously, a bunch of 50 year old guys just don't give a fuck about that shit. Excuse my French.

      Let's have news for nerds. We've done it before. We saved Hotmail, we spammed Alan Ralsky in real life, we had fun.

      Let's get back there.

    22. Re:Take back Slashdot by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would like to see a difference in anonymous because of not logging in and anonymous who has otherwise an excelent karma, but doe not want to reveal himself because of reasons (e.g. to give info they are not allowed to give).

      They should get a +1 by default and any +1 does not reflect on their karma, but any -1 would. That way you have the ability of posting anonymous, still not be at the bottom and no sillpostings just saying 'n*gg*rs' or 'frist post' as that would harm their karma.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. Serious question by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The announcement implies there are 30 (thirty) people working at SlashDot. Given the poorly edited article summaries and near-daily front page dups, what do these thirty people actually DO?

  4. Better financial models? by shanen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, my main reaction is "What? Again?" Been following slashdot off and on for some years, and mostly impressed by the LOST potential. Could do so much better, but obviously the financial models don't work that way.

    Say.... What if you could buy a $10 charity share to implement a new feature or support a server for the next year? If enough people chip in, then the feature gets funded or the server keeps running. If not, maybe you'll see something else you want to support--or they can rewrite the project until it is persuasive enough to get the donors. I think most people are basically nice folks, and if you make it easier to do nice things, then they will do so.

    Point to the opposite extreme. Microsoft has terrible service, but their financial model works great. Ditto a number of other highly offensive but profitable companies, usually distinguished by their mediocre software and services. Slashdot (and open source) could do better?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  5. Re:Open to Questions by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here is a question: are you planning on posting more Ghostkillah stories that link to TMZ? Because that is totally the Slashdot audience.

  6. Attention new management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can you please weed out the bullshiat "you are all cows" homophobic rant posts that have been defiling this once great site for far too long?

  7. Re:Open to Questions by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.

    That ... that goes beyond the pale, even for Slashdot trolling. You might as well be reading out load from the Necronomicon.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  8. That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy fuck. The last thing Slashdot needs is to become another censoring shithole like Reddit or HN. If those sites have taught us anything it's that it's preferable to have real, true, open discussion, even if that means putting up with a few so-called "troll" comments every now and then.

    If you want dumb, inane, watered-down discussion, then they the fuck don't you just go to Reddit and stay there?

    Slashdot has a great opportunity to reinvent itself as a tech/science/math-focused site with an emphasis on unhindered discussion. The censorship you propose doesn't help with achieving that goal. In fact, what you're proposing will destroy Slashdot faster than anyone could ever imagine.

    So-called "trolls" are a good thing. They're a sign of vibrant, vigorous discussion. That's why we see so few of them at Reddit or HN: those sites have the blandest circle-jerk discussion the world has ever seen!

    1. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Cylix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is a terrible trend of new age media to down vote dissenting views. Only group think supported here!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is a terrible trend of new age media to down vote dissenting views. Only group think supported here!

      I'd be happy if moderators learned the difference between sarcasm, humor, making valid point and actual troll / flamebait and didn't get their undies inappropriately bunched. [ Note: I'm not holding my breath. ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  9. Re:Open to Questions by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we save the cynicism for when they actually do something bad?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  10. Hire some new coders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seasoned C++ dev here and would love to work remote for you writing new code. Attend conferences, etc.

    Reader every single day of my life since 1999, always posting anon but I do have a 4-5 digit UID iirc.

    Surely you have heard of what the Soylent News guys are doing... I could never remember to keep going there but I did like what they were doing and I think you should offer to join forces with them. They had sane demands.

    Wish you got back to the hacker/code-monkey feel with extensive coverage of open source conferences and a more relaxed editorial tone. The sarcasm and non-pc tones especially shaped the feel that I enjoyed.

    Keep politics out of here *except* all the privacy issues as well as NSA and government surveillance stuff which should be *increased* in volume. Examples....
            * John Kerry doing X/Y/Z -> NO
            * Senate passing a bill to backdoor encryption -> YES
            * Trump insults $MINORITY -> NO
            * Russian hackers infiltrate $COUNTRY's telcom and ISPs -> YES
            * Hillary takes a poop -> NO

    Help expose people to new things they've never heard of instead of just repeating the already-trending buzzwords. For instance when everyone else talks about a new Arduino board (could care less), perhaps you could mention something more obscure and hacker-ish such as ZigBee or whatever. If my non-tech-savy friend knows all the issues, please don't cover it here. Only new stuff without repeating it.

    Important, please assume the average reader is a daily one and not an every-other-day reader. That means *NOT REPEATING CONTENT*. I want to stress that I do my best to hit this site every day unless I'm literally ill, and then I'll use the [prev] buttons to catch up on my own. I think most people I've ever met who also use slashdot are the same. It seems the site now thinks we are 2 to 3 day consumers and it just regurgitates news for a few days as if I wasn't here to spot that same stuff yesterday or the day before.

    If anything, let me tell you that your presence in the comments section is a good thing. We all seem to revolt quite obviously when something is bad. The previous owners seemed "distant" and blind and deaf to all the complaining. I understand ignoring some small grassroots troll group but when literally 90% of the comments are supporting the same complaint, LISTEN.

    Another thing, we are more of a "get-off-my-lawn" type than most readers. Do not ever force anything upon me. You have no clue what us programmers do. I had coded some nice parsing scripts to layout slashdot in a console quite cleanly and wish there was a richer api to fetch the content as if I wasn't even on the website. Imagine offering up the whole site's backend API without requiring a registration id and throttle/rate limit instead? Boy, I'd code up so many cool embedded viewers inside all my favorite apps.... Provide the content and let me re-craft my own digestion of that similar to RSS readers but enhanced.

    That's enough for now. So far by just being here you seem to have a better chance than absent-dice. Cheers.

  11. Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fight by dbIII · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night "SJW" vs "MRA" clickbait fight where assertions are made that sitting typing in an office is "mens work", as if we are all 1920s lumberjacks or something.

  12. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bizx LLC is an advertising and marketing company. So... I don't really hold out much hope of improvement.

  13. Openness and Honesty by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd recommend some amount of openness and honesty. If in doubt, consider what happened when Dice tried to stifle the story on what they were doing to Sourceforge, and then tried to stifle that they'd stifled the story. While everyone here has been happy to hear from you, if they get the idea that you won't follow through with what you said or want something to quietly go away, they can get viscous. I think nerds place a much higher value on honest and efficient communication.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  14. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some details to consider:
    1. Promote the Firehose more ( http://slashdot.org/recent ) - it seems that too few people don't realize that they can vote for stories that they have.
    2. Improved spam filtering so that links to stories on questionable sites doesn't have to appear at all. Also comment spam like this APK spam that has started to appear lately should at least be slowed. (Moderation option "Spam" that can be used without mod point loss should be possible for comments that have some spam characteristics, and if a number of moderators tag it as Spam it probably is.)
    3. There's no guide to what the color coding means in the Firehose.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  15. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Shompol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second of all, there should be no concept of a downmod.

    Without downmod SlashDot will become a dumpster diving experience. I find the StackExchange system interesting, where each downmod costs you a little karma. I am not advocating it, as there is probably more trolls than modders on this site at any given time. On the other hand, the downmodding of unpopular opinions is vicious.

  16. Classic works great for mobile by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't like the "mobile" site introduced by Dice either.

    As you may know, down at the bottom of the page is a link to use the "classic" interface. That's always worked great on all my mobile devices, even old tiny ones, and it works great on a desktop too.

    I check Slashdot a couple times per day, mostly on my phone. The good old-fashioned simple html of Classic works fine imho.

  17. Re:The WHO! by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They also announced the focus will move from technology to Japanese Girl Bands.

    3B Junior Rocks!

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  18. Re:no more trolls? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not linking to click-bait isn't anti-free speech. The article *still* exists.

    I just don't want to see /. cluttered up with spam.