Slashdot Mirror


Google Testing Project Loon: Concerns Are Without Factual Basis (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: In a filing submitted to the FCC, Google has stated that while concerns for health and environmental risks posed by Project Loon testing were 'genuinely held,' 'there is no factual basis for them.' Google's filing attempts to address a wide range of complaints, from environmental concerns related to increased exposure to RF and microwave radiation, to concerns for loss of control and crashes of the balloons themselves. First, it states that its proposed testing poses no health or environmental risks, and is all well within the standards of experimentation that the FCC regularly approves. It also pledges to avoid interference with any other users of the proposed bandwidth, by collocating transmitters on shared platforms and sharing information kept current daily by an FCC-approved third party database manager.

4 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. A summary would be nice by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have no idea what Project Loon is. One line to explain it in the summary would have been nice.

    --
    John
    1. Re:A summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is sign crappy Journalism when the reader is left wondering what the hell you are talking about.

  2. The tinfoil hat crowd is out in force by timholman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you browse through the FCC database and read the objections to date, what you'll find is mainly a bunch of "OMG! Electromagnetic radiation will poison us! Stop Project Loon!" It's the tinfoil hat crowd, the ones who think that WiFi and cell phones are giving us brain cancer. Some of their letters are good for a laugh, but they're not a serious threat to Loon.

    The serious objections will come later, from telcos who find their wireless rate models undercut by Google, or by petty despots who absolutely, positively do not want Google giving cheap Internet access to their subjects.

  3. THz != GHz by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's great but Google are using gigahertz frequencies, not terahertz frequencies. There is a three order of magnitude difference. This roughly the same as the difference between visible light and extreme UV/X-rays and there is clearly a huge difference in how these two types of radiation interact with the body.