Slashdot Mirror


There's a Wind Turbine On the Horizon With Blades the Size of Trump Tower

merbs writes: Imagine a stretch of open ocean, populated by a swath of wind turbines with skyscraper-sized blades, whipping into the gusts like enormous palm trees. The vision is partly terrifying, partly inspiring, and being taken entirely seriously by the federal government and one of our top research laboratories. [Sandia National Labs, in an effort led by the University of Virginia] has unveiled the preliminary design for a new offshore wind turbine with 650-foot turbine blades. That, as its announcement points out, is twice the size of an American football field. It's also roughly the size of Trump Tower in New York.

4 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mega installation which require mega capital which allow power companies to centralize production, control distribution, and charge consumers.

    It is more efficient and less prone to failure to have distributed production with small scale wind turbines, photovoltaic, etc. on peoples' homes. But then, well, where's the profit to the established interests?

  2. Remember the NASA Wind Turbines? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting

    NASA Wind Turbines approached this scale in the '80's. Unfortunately, this was a previously-unexplored area of aerodynamics for NASA, and they had mechanical stress and noise problems (including subsonics) and were all demolished. I think there was one near Vallejo, CA being taken down when I got to Pixar in '87, and one in Boone, NC, which famously rattled windows and doors.

    The art has since improved. I took a ride to the top of the turbine at Grouse Mountain, that was fun! That's the only one I have heard of where you can actually get to see it from the top.

    1. Re:Remember the NASA Wind Turbines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being an electrical engineer educated in Denmark, wind turbines was mandatory even though I specialized in digital electronics. This includes the history of wind turbines. During the oil crisis they became a hot topic worldwide and what I was told at the lectures about the US experimental wind turbines is that without prior knowledge, the engineers came up with the concept of borrowing knowledge from helicopter rotors. While it was planned to give them a head start compared to other countries, it showed the world that helicopters is a rotation to wind force converter and wind farms are wind force to rotation converter and they are two completely different topics with completely different issues. As I'm informed, they managed to completely rip a wind turbine apart in the first storm it encountered. That's not very promising for major investment.

      Danish wind turbine research started by a group of hippie professors (or something) who decided on green energy. They were viewed as loons at the time, but when the oil crisis hit, they had 10 years of experience, which gave Denmark the technological edge. In the 1990s, Denmark had 6 of the 10 biggest wind turbine companies (the country had 5.5 million people at the time) and while it isn't the supreme ruler in wind energy anymore, it is still the leading edge of the technology as well as home to the biggest manufacture. There is also wind turbines everywhere. There is a total of 13 existing offshore windfarms, but only 2 of those are in the North Sea despite the article mentioning "That's why there are so few offshore wind turbines in the oceans—they're mostly Denmark's, in the North Sea". The combined power output of wind turbines exceeds the demand, but since the wind isn't at peak capacity all the time, it "only" supplied 42% of the demand last year (42.1% but 42 is likely preferred here. Easier to remember... or something).

  3. Re:Pity the birds by dwywit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure that coming into contact with the tip of a wind turbine would kill or seriously damage you, but there's evidence that some animals aren't actually colliding with the blades. Some post-mortem studies (of bats IIRC) showed evidence of ruptured lungs (but no blunt-force trauma), implying that the animals were killed by entering the zone of low pressure behind the leading edge.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom