Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

First Hidden Electric Motor In Cycling World Championship (cxmagazine.com)

Posted by timothy on from the thumb-on-the-scale dept.

An anonymous reader writes with the story that the world championship cyclocross competition this weekend in Zolder (Belgium) was scandalized by the first case of "mechanical doping." European champion Femke Van Den Driessche was caught with a bicycle with a hidden electric motor. From the article: The Union Cycliste Internationale said in a statement âoethat pursuant to the UCIâ(TM)s Regulations on technological fraud a bike has been detained for further investigation following checks at the Womenâ(TM)s Under 23 race of the 2016 UCI Cyclo-cross World Championships. This does not concern any of the riders on the podium. Further details will be shared in due course.â

The Belgian media outlet Sporza reported that the Belgian Cycling Federation had confirmed that the detained bike belonged to Van den Driessche. Ironically, Van den Driessche had abandoned the race due to a mechanical issue shortly before the bike was scrutinised. Van den Driesscheâ(TM)s name did not feature in the official results on the UCI website on Saturday evening. Cyclocross Magazine adds some details.

6 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. What's the deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does cycling attract so much cheating?

    Is it just more publicized than that in other sports? I mean, you don't hear about cheating nearly as much in other "sports" where they depend upon mechanical equipment... Nascar, F1, MotoGP, etc...

    You'd think that Bill Belichick were the coach...

    1. Re: What's the deal... by George_Ou · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A pro competitor at Tour de France averages 450 watts. Casual fit rider averages 220. That means having a mere half a horse power would let the casual rider win the Tour de France though you likely wouldn't be able to put in that much battery capacity for the entire ride unless you swapped the battery along the way. For competitive riders, just having a 100 watt motor that can turn on 10 minutes is enough to go from last place to first.

    2. Re:What's the deal... by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Motorized curling, perhaps.

      I'd actually get up at 3am to watch curling with jet fuel powered stones.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. More details... by bluescrn · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's some pics here showing how such a motor can be concealed surprisingly well:

    http://cyclingtips.com/2015/04...

  3. Re:News for nerds? by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ItÃ(TM)s a good story to demonstrate SlashdotÃ(TM)s lack of Unicode support. ThatÃ(TM)s a nerdy issue!

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  4. Re:How much would it help? by Shinobi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One system mentioned has an effect of about 110W, with either 60 or 90 minute battery, total package weight with 60 minute battery is 1,8kg, with battery and motor all hidden away, wireless activation button etc.And yes, it can be disengaged.

    Ironically, it's on the mountain stages it'd really help. 0.148hp for a total of 60 minutes during a stage can help you build a massive lead spread over a few climbs.

    Also, look at some suspected motorized cheating like Fabian Cancellara in Roubaix-Flaanderen for example.

    Links:
    http://cyclingtips.com/2015/04...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...