Slashdot Mirror


Julian Assange May Surrender To British Police On Friday (twitter.com)

bestweasel writes: As reported by The Guardian and others, Julian Assange has announced via Wikileaks that: "Should the UN announce tomorrow that I have lost my case against the United Kingdom and Sweden, I shall exit the embassy at noon on Friday to accept arrest by British police as there is no meaningful prospect of further appeal. ... However, should I prevail and the state parties be found to have acted unlawfully, I expect the immediate return of my passport and the termination of further attempts to arrest me."

9 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Re:should be interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    The UN working group on human rights has no authority to do much of anything. Here is the current membership. After making a decision, they will work with the countries involved to help them "Do the Right Thing." They can't force England or Sweden to let him go.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Re:should be interesting by TheReaperD · · Score: 2, Informative

    They went to the police to locate him for a STD test, not for rape charges. Officials "convinced" one of the women to upgrade her charge. She's wanted it dropped ever since.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  3. Re:should be interesting by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the British judges conclusions - they consider the concept of "dual criminality", which is a requirement for extradition from the UK. Under UK law, the same charges are indeed classed as rape. So yes, it is exactly what it seems.

  4. Breaking - "UN panel 'rules in Assange's favour'" by seoras · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the BBC just now: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-35490910

    He probably had someone "leak" that result prior to his "I'll give myself up on Friday", offer.
    As if the UN can change anything...

  5. UN rules in Assange's favor by gavron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't expect the authorities to give him back his passport any time ever.

    http://www.reuters.com/article...

    E

  6. Re:should be interesting by peragrin · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do realize that no one in sweden is tried or even charged in absentia. You have to appear before a judge before charges can even be filed or dismissed.

    I really wish idiots like you would stop thinking swedish law is the same as English common law.

    Also Sweden doesn't have any laws to allow them to lend someone to another country. That goes against both Swedish law and EU law.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  7. Re:should be interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do realize that no one in sweden is tried or even charged in absentia.

    Even the Swedish prosecutor has admitted that it happens all the time, in accordance with EU law.

    Now, unless I have missed something, the UK hasn't left the EU yet, and neither has Sweden.

  8. Re: should be interesting by cold+fjord · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well then, "thank goodness" you're here to help set the record straight. How could progress occur without folk like you?

    The rush to smear Assange’s rape accuser

    OK, so maybe the charges really are for rape-rape, but still — the woman has CIA ties! I’ve read that on at least a dozen blogs! Keith Olbermann tweeted it and everything! That’s got to be coming from a highly credible source, right?

    Actually, as far as I can tell, the only source for that claim is an August Counterpunch article by Assange fanboys (seriously, they recast him as Neo of “The Matrix”) Israel Shamir and Paul Bennett. Here’s the most damning evidence Shamir and Bennett have compiled against Assange’s accuser:

    1) She’s published “anti-Castro diatribes” in a Swedish-language publication that, according to an Oslo professor, Michael Seltzer (who?), is “connected with Union Liberal Cubana led by Carlos Alberto Montaner,” who reportedly has CIA ties. Let me repeat that: She has been published in a journal that is connected with a group that is led by a guy with CIA ties. Says this one guy.

    2) “In Cuba she interacted with the feminist anti-Castro group Las damas de blanco (the Ladies in White). This group receives US government funds and the convicted anti-communist terrorist Luis Posada Carriles is a friend and supporter.” That link goes to an English translation of a Spanish article noting that at a march last spring, Posada “wander[ed] unleashed and un-vaccinated along Calle Ocho in Miami, marching alongside” — wait for it — “Gloria Estefan in support of the so-called Ladies in White.” Apparently, it’s “an established fact” that Posada and the Ladies also share a shady benefactor, which means he should clearly be called a “friend” of the organization, and this is totally relevant to the rape charges against Julian Assange, because the accuser once interacted with them in some manner.

    Are you kidding me? That’s what we’re basing the “CIA ties” meme on? An article that reads like a screenplay treatment by a college freshman who’s terrified of women? Actual quote: “[T]he Matrix plays dirty and lets loose a sex bomb upon our intrepid Neo. When you can’t contest the message, you smear the messenger. Sweden is tailor-made for sending a young man into a honey trap.”

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  9. Re:should be interesting by Parafilmus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The us military released the entire video unedited to discredit and show just how badly edited the file was.

    That's not correct.

    Wikileaks actually released both videos at the same time, with the edited "short version" clearly labeled as such.

    Here is a link to the videos: https://collateralmurder.wikil...