Slashdot Mirror
Firefox 44 Deletes Fine-Grained Cookie Management (mozilla.org)
ewhac writes: Among its other desirable features, Firefox included a feature allowing very fine-grained cookie management. When enabled, every time a Web site asked to set a cookie, Firefox would raise a dialog containing information about the cookie requested, which you could then approve or deny. An "exception" list also allowed you to mark selected domains as "Always allow" or "Always deny", so that the dialog would not appear for frequently-visited sites. It was an excellent way to maintain close, custom control over which sites could set cookies, and which specific cookies they could set. It also helped easily identify poorly-coded sites that unnecessarily requested cookies for every single asset, or which would hit the browser with a "cookie storm" — hundreds of concurrent cookie requests.
Mozilla quietly deleted this feature from Firefox 44, with no functional equivalent put in its place. Further, users who had enabled the "Ask before accept" feature have had that preference silently changed to, "Accept normally." The proffered excuse for the removal was that the feature was unmaintained, and that its users were, "probably crashing multiple times a day as a result" (although no evidence was presented to support this assertion). Mozilla's apparent position is that users wishing fine-grained cookie control should be using a third-party add-on instead, and that an "Ask before accept" option was, "not really nice to use on today's Web."
Mozilla quietly deleted this feature from Firefox 44, with no functional equivalent put in its place. Further, users who had enabled the "Ask before accept" feature have had that preference silently changed to, "Accept normally." The proffered excuse for the removal was that the feature was unmaintained, and that its users were, "probably crashing multiple times a day as a result" (although no evidence was presented to support this assertion). Mozilla's apparent position is that users wishing fine-grained cookie control should be using a third-party add-on instead, and that an "Ask before accept" option was, "not really nice to use on today's Web."
Seems to be as fine grained as I need.
They seem to be really trying to shoot themselves in the foot lately.
Please identify WHICH add-on.
after another year or so of breaking them with nearly every damned release?
You guys just can't be satisfied. "This or that feature should be a plugin!" Mozilla removes features and suggests they are better handled by plugins "No! Not that feature!"
Their plugins sometimes break between releases because of the way plugins are structured, so they announce that they're replacing their plugin architecture with something guaranteed to have a more stable API. "No! You're destroying everything! NoScript will never work again!" "We're working with NoScript to ensure it continues to function in the manner users expect." "Liar! I hate you!"
Mozilla's users, at least on Slashdot, seem absolutely determined to jump the shark...
Required reading for internet skeptics
I built a new Windows image for our workstation PXE deployments, this time without Firefox.
If you're going to be just another trash browser you're no longer getting installed on the systems I'm responsible for.
In true Mozilla fashion, the discussion on the bug tracker has been censored, so people can't even effectively complain about it.
^^^ This
Self-Destructing Cookies was a genuine break-through in cookie privacy.
I wish the idea would be extended to other tracker-enabling downloads like fonts and HTML5 web storage.
No, its the "FUCK YOU! we know how to use our browser better than you" philosophy.
Everything we need to know about the sorry state of Firefox is shown by the new Brave web browser that Brendan Eich is creating.
Look at what Brave's FAQ page says:
For those who don't know, Brendan Eich worked at Netscape, created JavaScript, co-founded the Mozilla project, and was even the CEO of Mozilla as recently as 2014. He has a very long history with the technology behind Gecko and Firefox.
Yet despite having so much experience with Mozilla's technology, his team has gone with Chromium as the basis of their browser. Like their FAQ says, Chromium is better than Firefox "by every measure".
The problem for Mozilla is that while Firefox has become total shit, they have no better alternative to offer. The Servo project is sputtering, at least partially due to it using Rust, which itself is an immature programming language.
I don't know what Mozilla is going to do. The only option available now is to throw away Servo, throw away Rust, and try as hard as they can to get Firefox fixed up. But even that probably won't be enough. Things are looking extremely bleak for Firefox.
Yes, I "shouted". Obviously to OP has no clue.
Denying the creation of a cookie in the first place has nothing to do with deleting them when Firefox is closed (whoever closes ALL of their FF windows anyway?).
I hope Pale Moon keeps the feature, but, IMO, FF44 is now nearly useless.
Sure we can be satisfied. All they have to do is give control to the user instead of making inane changes because they know better for us.
If no one was maintaining this feature, the proper thing to do would be disable on new installs, check settings on upgrades, and put a job posting out for someone to volunteer to maintain it. While they are at it, notify the users of the problem and stop pretending their shit don't stink.
In fewer words, show the users some respect.