Slashdot Mirror


Intel Says Chips To Become Slower But More Energy Efficient (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: William Holt, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Technology and Manufacturing Group, has said at a conference that chips will become slower after industry re-tools for new technologies such as spintronics and tunneling transistors. "The best pure technology improvements we can make will bring improvements in power consumption but will reduce speed." If true, it's not just the end of Moore's Law, but a rolling back of the progress it made over the last fifty years.

6 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Better transistors? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably not. Going beyond 5Ghz limit has been a problem for the last decade or so. This is why we have multicore processors. It's easier to add more cores than go to plaid.

  2. Re:Uh? by msauve · · Score: 5, Informative

    Moore's law says nothing about power or speed. It's strictly about the number of transistors on a chip.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  3. Re:Better transistors? by Frobnicator · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So the plan to make transistors tolerate higher clock speeds by using better materials is not going to happen?

    Yet another restating of Moore's Law? The thing gets revised to whatever the latest growth area is.

    The original 1965 article it was about "component counts", then it was revised in a later talk to be "circuit density", then revised in 1975 to be "semiconductor complexity", then revised in the later '70s to be "circuit and device cleverness", has been restated yet again when serial devices flatlined in favor of highly parallel chips.

    Assuming this goes through the chipset, it will likely be restated again in terms of whatever other factor on the chips continues to grow.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  4. Re:Intel's trolling us by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intel's so far ahead of AMD, they have to roll back the clocks in order to stay competitive.

    AMD isn't Intel's competition. Intel needs AMD to prevent Anti-Trust litigation. Intel's competition is ARM and all the OEM's who use ARM based chips. Especially if Microsoft ports full Windows 10 to the ARM. The big draw of ARM is performance/price per watt which is exactly what Intel is shooting for.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  5. Re:Intel's trolling us by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intel's been shooting itself in the foot with power vs performance for years. AMD was better, Intel reversed course and then beat AMD down. Now Intel's gunning for ARM because ARM is becoming a real threat to their core business. How many phones have Intel chips? How many tablets? Notebooks are moving towards ARM as well. Imagine an ARM based server farm. ARM is moving up the food chain into Intel's core business, and doing so with a class of processors Intel can't match.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  6. More and slower can do much by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can have strong AI in ~20W, because that's what our brain uses. Each neuron is really, really slow like 100Hz and below, but when you have absurdly many it works. The problem is understanding the programming model, because it's nothing like our one list of instructions.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings